Dividend 15 Split Corp. II
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II DF.TO Peers
See (DF.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF.TO | $5.82 | -0.34% | 125.86M | 1.49 | $3.91 | +18.84% |
| BLK.NE | $25.21 | +0.56% | 200.93B | 22.92 | $1.10 | N/A |
| BN.TO | $82.75 | +0.80% | 136.33B | 192.44 | $0.43 | +0.77% |
| BAM.TO | $81.27 | +1.02% | 133.06B | 42.33 | $1.92 | +3.76% |
| VFV.TO | $145.50 | +0.29% | 21.44B | 25.32 | $5.75 | +1.05% |
| ZSP.TO | $89.70 | +0.28% | 17.29B | N/A | N/A | +0.94% |
| PHYS.TO | $34.52 | -0.09% | 16.08B | 5.85 | $5.90 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | $39.00 | +0.26% | 13.74B | 21.00 | $1.86 | +3.29% |
| XEF.TO | $41.81 | -0.29% | 11.44B | 16.38 | $2.55 | +2.49% |
| VUN.TO | $109.58 | +0.38% | 11.05B | 24.75 | $4.43 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
DF.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 200.93B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while BLK.NE trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs BN.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 136.33B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while BN.TO trades at $82.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 192.44. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 133.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while BAM.TO trades at $81.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 21.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VFV.TO trades at $145.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 17.29B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZSP.TO trades at $89.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16.08B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while PHYS.TO trades at $34.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 13.74B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XIU.TO trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 11.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XEF.TO trades at $41.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 11.05B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VUN.TO trades at $109.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while IGM.TO trades at $44.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 9.91B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZCN.TO trades at $34.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZEA.TO trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 8.98B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VCN.TO trades at $52.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 8.86B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XIC.TO trades at $40.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 8.84B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XUS.TO trades at $50.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 8.75B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XSP.TO trades at $60.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 8.31B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while PSLV.TO trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while CEF.TO trades at $40.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 21.12. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.47B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ONEX.TO trades at $107.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XEQT.TO trades at $34.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.76B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VEQT.TO trades at $46.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 6.74B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VGRO.TO trades at $37.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while CASH.TO trades at $50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while CSAV.TO trades at $50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VIU.TO trades at $37.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZEB.TO trades at $42.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while PSA.TO trades at $50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while CIX.TO trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -11.34. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.27B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VSP.TO trades at $94.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZMMK.TO trades at $49.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZLB.TO trades at $50.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while HXS.TO trades at $84.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while HXT.TO trades at $67.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZCS.TO trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VDY.TO trades at $50.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.47B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XUU.TO trades at $60.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZUE.TO trades at $80.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VBAL.TO trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while QUU.TO trades at $237.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XSEM.TO trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XQQ.TO trades at $52.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZWB.TO trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XGRO.TO trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while TTP.TO trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while TPU.TO trades at $46.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while BBUC.TO trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XAW.TO trades at $45.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while TPE.TO trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XBB.TO trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VEE.TO trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VXC.TO trades at $64.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while NSCE.TO trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while PFMN.TO trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VCE.TO trades at $56.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XDIV.TO trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZQQ.TO trades at $146.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XCB.TO trades at $20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XEC.TO trades at $30.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VGG.TO trades at $93.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XBAL.TO trades at $30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while HSAV.TO trades at $115.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs QCN.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, QCN.TO has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while QCN.TO trades at $156.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas QCN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to QCN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to QCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while CMR.TO trades at $50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while QQC.TO trades at $35.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XIN.TO trades at $38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XEI.TO trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZWU.TO trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZLU.TO trades at $54.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XDV.TO trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while MNY.TO trades at $100.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while CACB.TO trades at $20.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ISIF.TO trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XFN.TO trades at $61.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XFH.TO trades at $34.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while CYB.TO trades at $76.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZWC.TO trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while CBIL.TO trades at $50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XSH.TO trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while FIH-U.TO trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 55.83. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XGB.TO trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZPR.TO trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while UNC.TO trades at $128.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while EQL.TO trades at $37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZGB.TO trades at $45.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZEM.TO trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while HXCN.TO trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while HMAX.TO trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while RIIN.TO trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VSB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VSB.TO trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZUQ.TO trades at $85.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs MUB.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, MUB.TO has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while MUB.TO trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas MUB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to MUB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to MUB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XEG.TO trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while XWD.TO trades at $96.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while FCUV.TO trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs HHL.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, HHL.TO has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while HHL.TO trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas HHL.TO's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to HHL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is less volatile compared to HHL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs VUS.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, VUS.TO has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while VUS.TO trades at $102.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas VUS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to VUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to VUS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs BND.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while BND.TO trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while ZDV.TO trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.
DF.TO vs QDX.TO Comparison
DF.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DF.TO stands at 125.86M. In comparison, QDX.TO has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, DF.TO is priced at $5.82, while QDX.TO trades at $131.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 1.49, whereas QDX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, DF.TO's ROE is +0.64%, compared to QDX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DF.TO is more volatile compared to QDX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DF.TO.