Dewmar International BMC, Inc.
Dewmar International BMC, Inc. DEWM Peers
See (DEWM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEWM | $0.00 | +99.00% | 354501.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NSRGY | $102.04 | -3.36% | 262.52B | 20.01 | $5.10 | +2.53% |
| NSRGF | $100.58 | -2.56% | 258.59B | 19.76 | $5.09 | +3.64% |
| DANOY | $16.20 | -2.82% | 52.18B | 22.82 | $0.71 | +2.28% |
| GPDNF | $81.00 | -2.65% | 52.18B | 23.55 | $3.44 | +3.00% |
| TUFBY | $11.53 | +35.65% | 49.06B | 16.47 | $0.70 | +3.39% |
| ELOAF | $0.01 | N/A | 22.49B | 0.80 | $0.01 | N/A |
| AJINY | $22.14 | -0.02% | 22.02B | 35.14 | $0.63 | +1.20% |
| ASBFF | $29.04 | N/A | 20.91B | 12.31 | $2.36 | +2.98% |
| AJINF | $20.72 | N/A | 20.60B | 32.89 | $0.63 | +1.32% |
Stock Comparison
DEWM vs NSRGY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 262.52B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NSRGY trades at $102.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NSRGF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 258.59B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NSRGF trades at $100.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs DANOY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 52.18B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while DANOY trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GPDNF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 52.18B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GPDNF trades at $81.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and GPDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs TUFBY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 49.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TUFBY trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TUFBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ELOAF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, ELOAF has a market cap of 22.49B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ELOAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELOAF's P/E ratio is 0.80. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELOAF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ELOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs AJINY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 22.02B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while AJINY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ASBFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 20.91B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ASBFF trades at $29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and ASBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs AJINF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 20.60B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while AJINF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to AJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ASBFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 20.08B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ASBFY trades at $27.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs KRYAY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 17.41B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while KRYAY trades at $105.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs KRYAF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 17.40B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while KRYAF trades at $105.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to KRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs JBSAY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 16.41B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while JBSAY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs BMBOY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 13.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while BMBOY trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and BMBOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs GRBMF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 12.64B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GRBMF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and GRBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs JDEPF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 12.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while JDEPF trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to JDEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ORKLF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 11.58B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ORKLF trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ORKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs WHGRF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 11.30B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while WHGRF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs WHGLY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 11.24B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while WHGLY trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ORKLY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 10.42B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ORKLY trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs KIKOY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 9.91B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while KIKOY trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to KIKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs CIADF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.72B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CIADF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and CIADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs TYCMY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 9.64B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TYCMY trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs KIKOF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 9.53B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while KIKOF trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to KIKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs CIADY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 9.34B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CIADY trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 596.75. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TCYMF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 9.07B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TCYMF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TCYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TTAZF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.77B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and TTAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs PIFFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PIFFY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs WWNTF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 8.03B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while WWNTF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to WWNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs SAPIF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 7.84B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SAPIF trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -69.81. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and SAPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs CFEIY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 7.34B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CFEIY trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and CFEIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs MEJHY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 7.17B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while MEJHY trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 21.01. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to MEJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GCHOY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GCHOY trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs SDPNF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.92B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ARHUF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ARHUF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ARHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GPAGF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 6.59B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GPAGF trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to GPAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs DLLFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.51B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and DLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs CHFLF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CHFLF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to CHFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TSUKY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TSUKY trades at $63.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TSUKF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TSUKF trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs LOTBY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, LOTBY has a market cap of 6.17B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while LOTBY trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOTBY's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOTBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to LOTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NFPDF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NFPDF trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NFPDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs MEJHF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs EMLZF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while EMLZF trades at $990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs SMPFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and SMPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs IOIOF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and IOIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs NSLYF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NSLYF trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 50.05. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NSLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs PIFMY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PIFMY trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to PIFMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs PIFMF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PIFMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to PIFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ACOPF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ACOPF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ACOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NIPMY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NIPMY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NIPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs CRWKF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TATYF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TATYF trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TATYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs UVRBY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while UVRBY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and UVRBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs TATYY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TATYY trades at $30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TATYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NSFMF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and NSFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs GLAPY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GLAPY trades at $63.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to GLAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs MRRTY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while MRRTY trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GLAPF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GLAPF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to GLAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NCHEY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs YMZBY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while YMZBY trades at $152.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs FPAFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FPAFF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FPAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs FPAFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FPAFY trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs CBCFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CBCFF trades at $22.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and CBCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs EBRPY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and EBRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs EBRPF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while EBRPF trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and EBRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs PRBZF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PRBZF trades at $59.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to PRBZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs SUEZF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SUEZF trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is 51.36. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to SUEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs SUEZY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SUEZY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is 52.92. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and SUEZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs LYSFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while LYSFF trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to LYSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs LYSFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while LYSFY trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to LYSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ARZTF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ARZTY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ARZTY trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs CLBEY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CLBEY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and CLBEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs NHFOF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NHFOF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and NHFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs MLFNF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while MLFNF trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and MLFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs FTROF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FTROF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs UVRBF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while UVRBF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to UVRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TBLMF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TBLMF trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs PRRFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PRRFY trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and PRRFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs SGLJF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs PFODF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PFODF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GRPBF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and GRPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs HOFJF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while HOFJF trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and HOFJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs TBLMY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and TBLMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs FSRCY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FSRCY trades at $109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs YNNHF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while YNNHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and YNNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs AVSFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while AVSFY trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to AVSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs FNEVF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and FNEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs HLFGY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs VTSYF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, VTSYF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while VTSYF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSYF's P/E ratio is 128.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to VTSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NISUY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NISUY trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NISUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TUFUF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TUFUF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs FNEVY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FNEVY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FNEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs AKEJF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while AKEJF trades at $35.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GNCGY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GNCGY trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to GNCGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GBFBF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and GBFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs HLTFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, HLTFF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while HLTFF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTFF's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLTFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and HLTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs JWLLF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354501.00. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while JWLLF trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and JWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).