Dewmar International BMC, Inc.
Dewmar International BMC, Inc. DEWM Peers
See (DEWM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEWM | $0.00 | +0.00% | 354.5K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NSRGY | $99.84 | +1.77% | 257B | 19.06 | $5.23 | +3.41% |
| UVRBY | $14.18 | +0.00% | 249.8B | 14.47 | $0.98 | +0.09% |
| NSRGF | $97.99 | +1.32% | 247.8B | 18.74 | $5.23 | +3.74% |
| GPDNF | $79.60 | +1.05% | 51.4B | 21.81 | $3.65 | +3.06% |
| DANOY | $15.85 | +0.51% | 51.2B | 21.71 | $0.73 | +2.97% |
| JBSAY | $13.81 | +3.06% | 30.6B | 6.94 | $1.99 | +14.81% |
| AJINF | $27.00 | +0.00% | 26.8B | 112.50 | $0.24 | +1.01% |
| ASBFY | $31.23 | +3.09% | 22.1B | 13.00 | $2.38 | +3.78% |
| ASBFF | $27.88 | +0.00% | 19.9B | 11.71 | $2.38 | +4.14% |
Stock Comparison
DEWM vs NSRGY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 257B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NSRGY trades at $99.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs UVRBY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 249.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while UVRBY trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to UVRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NSRGF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 247.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NSRGF trades at $97.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GPDNF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GPDNF trades at $79.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and GPDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs DANOY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while DANOY trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs JBSAY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while JBSAY trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs AJINF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while AJINF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 112.50. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and AJINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs ASBFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ASBFY trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ASBFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ASBFF trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ASBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs KRYAY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while KRYAY trades at $105.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs KRYAF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while KRYAF trades at $105.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and KRYAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs WHGRF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while WHGRF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs AJINY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while AJINY trades at $26.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 111.25. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs JDEPF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while JDEPF trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and JDEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs WHGLY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while WHGLY trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GRBMF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GRBMF trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and GRBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs BMBOY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while BMBOY trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and BMBOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs ORKLY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ORKLY trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ORKLF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ORKLF trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ORKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs BRZL Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, BRZL has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while BRZL trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRZL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRZL's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to BRZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs CIADF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CIADF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and CIADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs TTAZF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and TTAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs SAPIF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SAPIF trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -70.57. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and SAPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs CIADY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CIADY trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 554.90. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to CIADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs KIKOY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while KIKOY trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to KIKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TYCMY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TYCMY trades at $30.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and TYCMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs PIFFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PIFFY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs KIKOF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while KIKOF trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to KIKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TCYMF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TCYMF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TCYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs WWNTF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while WWNTF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to WWNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TATYY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TATYY trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 47.69. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TATYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs SDPNF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TSUKY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TSUKY trades at $67.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ARHUF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ARHUF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ARHUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GPAGF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GPAGF trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to GPAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs DLLFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and DLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs GCHOY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GCHOY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs MEJHY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while MEJHY trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and MEJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs TSUKF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TSUKF trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs LOTBY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, LOTBY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while LOTBY trades at $76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOTBY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOTBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to LOTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NFPDF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NFPDF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and NFPDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs MEJHF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs CFEIY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CFEIY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and CFEIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs EMLZF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while EMLZF trades at $1,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs CHFLF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CHFLF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and CHFLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs SMPFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and SMPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs IOIOF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and IOIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs PIFMY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PIFMY trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and PIFMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs NSLYF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NSLYF trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 47.24. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NSLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs PIFMF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PIFMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to PIFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GLAPY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GLAPY trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and GLAPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs GLAPF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GLAPF trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to GLAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ACOPF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ACOPF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and ACOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs YMZBY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while YMZBY trades at $180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NIPMY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NIPMY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NIPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs MRRTY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while MRRTY trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and MRRTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs UVRBF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while UVRBF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and UVRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs CRWKF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NSFMF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NSFMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs FPAFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FPAFY trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs FPAFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FPAFF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FPAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NHFOF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NHFOF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NHFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TATYF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TATYF trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 43.44. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TATYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs NCHEY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs PRBZF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PRBZF trades at $65.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and PRBZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs CBCFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CBCFF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to CBCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs LYSFF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while LYSFF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and LYSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs TBLMF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TBLMF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs EBRPY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and EBRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs MLFNF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while MLFNF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to MLFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs EBRPF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while EBRPF trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and EBRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs LYSFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while LYSFY trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to LYSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs SUEZF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SUEZF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and SUEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs ARZTY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ARZTY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs ARZTF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs SUEZY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SUEZY trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and SUEZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs PFODF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PFODF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs CLBEY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while CLBEY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to CLBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs SGLJF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs PRRFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while PRRFY trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and PRRFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs GRPBF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and GRPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs FTROF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FTROF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs HOFJF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while HOFJF trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to HOFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TBLMY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and TBLMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs FSRCY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FSRCY trades at $109.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs AVSFY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while AVSFY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to AVSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs YNNHF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while YNNHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to YNNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GNCGY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GNCGY trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to GNCGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs FNEVF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FNEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs HLFGY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TUFUF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TUFUF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs GNCGF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, GNCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GNCGF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNCGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GNCGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and GNCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs NISUY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while NISUY trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to NISUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs FNEVY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while FNEVY trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to FNEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs VTSYF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, VTSYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while VTSYF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSYF's P/E ratio is 39.67. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTSYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to VTSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs TUFBY Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while TUFBY trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and TUFBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs AKEJF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while AKEJF trades at $35.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM is less volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DEWM.
DEWM vs JWLLF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, JWLLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while JWLLF trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JWLLF's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWLLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and JWLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
DEWM vs GBFBF Comparison
DEWM plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DEWM stands at 354.5K. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DEWM is priced at $0.00, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DEWM currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, DEWM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DEWM and GBFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).