CEZ, a. s.
CEZ, a. s. CZAVF Peers
See (CZAVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CZAVF | $37.15 | N/A | 19.94B | 20.52 | $1.81 | +5.98% |
| FOJCY | $3.15 | -0.94% | 70.66B | 12.12 | $0.26 | +6.35% |
| OEZVY | $15.07 | -6.54% | 25.45B | 12.35 | $1.22 | +2.90% |
| OEZVF | $67.84 | N/A | 23.57B | 11.10 | $6.11 | +5.21% |
| CEZYY | $18.00 | -0.28% | 19.33B | 15.65 | $1.15 | N/A |
| DNNGY | $12.83 | +2.15% | 16.18B | 91.64 | $0.14 | N/A |
| DOGEF | $37.07 | +2.54% | 15.58B | 90.41 | $0.41 | N/A |
| FOJCF | $16.52 | N/A | 14.82B | 12.52 | $1.32 | +11.73% |
| CLPXF | $0.76 | N/A | 13.76B | 7.60 | $0.10 | +4.12% |
| KAEPF | $11.85 | -3.27% | 13.20B | 3.41 | $3.47 | +3.44% |
Stock Comparison
CZAVF vs FOJCY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, FOJCY has a market cap of 70.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while FOJCY trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas FOJCY's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FOJCY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to FOJCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs OEZVY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, OEZVY has a market cap of 25.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while OEZVY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas OEZVY's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OEZVY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to OEZVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs OEZVF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, OEZVF has a market cap of 23.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while OEZVF trades at $67.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas OEZVF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OEZVF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to OEZVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CEZYY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CEZYY has a market cap of 19.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CEZYY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CEZYY's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEZYY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to CEZYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs DNNGY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, DNNGY has a market cap of 16.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while DNNGY trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas DNNGY's P/E ratio is 91.64. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DNNGY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to DNNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs DOGEF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, DOGEF has a market cap of 15.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while DOGEF trades at $37.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas DOGEF's P/E ratio is 90.41. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOGEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to DOGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs FOJCF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, FOJCF has a market cap of 14.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while FOJCF trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas FOJCF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FOJCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to FOJCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CLPXF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CLPXF has a market cap of 13.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CLPXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CLPXF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLPXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to CLPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs KAEPF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, KAEPF has a market cap of 13.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while KAEPF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas KAEPF's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAEPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to KAEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs KAEPY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, KAEPY has a market cap of 13.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while KAEPY trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas KAEPY's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAEPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to KAEPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs MDDNF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, MDDNF has a market cap of 10.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while MDDNF trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas MDDNF's P/E ratio is 39.60. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to MDDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs EDRVF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, EDRVF has a market cap of 10.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while EDRVF trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas EDRVF's P/E ratio is -15.76. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDRVF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to EDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs BRENF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, BRENF has a market cap of 8.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while BRENF trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas BRENF's P/E ratio is -42.41. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRENF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to BRENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs NOSPF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, NOSPF has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while NOSPF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas NOSPF's P/E ratio is 76.36. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOSPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to NOSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs IFUUF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, IFUUF has a market cap of 5.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while IFUUF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas IFUUF's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IFUUF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to IFUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs MGHTF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, MGHTF has a market cap of 5.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while MGHTF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas MGHTF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MGHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to MGHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs TEPCF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, TEPCF has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while TEPCF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TEPCF's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEPCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to TEPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs TKECY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, TKECY has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while TKECY trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TKECY's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKECY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to TKECY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs PUPOF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, PUPOF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while PUPOF trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas PUPOF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PUPOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to PUPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs AGQPF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, AGQPF has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while AGQPF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas AGQPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGQPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to AGQPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs COENF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, COENF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while COENF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas COENF's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COENF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to COENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs TKECF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, TKECF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while TKECF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TKECF's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TKECF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to TKECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs TEPCY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, TEPCY has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while TEPCY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TEPCY's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEPCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to TEPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs NPIFF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, NPIFF has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while NPIFF trades at $14.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas NPIFF's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to NPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs EDRWY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, EDRWY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while EDRWY trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas EDRWY's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EDRWY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to EDRWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CPOIF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CPOIF has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CPOIF trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CPOIF's P/E ratio is 459.09. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPOIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to CPOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs DRXGY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, DRXGY has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while DRXGY trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas DRXGY's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRXGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to DRXGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs EPWDF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, EPWDF has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while EPWDF trades at $15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas EPWDF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPWDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to EPWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs DRXGF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, DRXGF has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while DRXGF trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas DRXGF's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRXGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to DRXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs TREAY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, TREAY has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while TREAY trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TREAY's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TREAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to TREAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CLPXY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CLPXY has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CLPXY trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CLPXY's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLPXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to CLPXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs TRSWF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, TRSWF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while TRSWF trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TRSWF's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRSWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to TRSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CGKEF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CGKEF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CGKEF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CGKEF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to CGKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs BRLXF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, BRLXF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while BRLXF trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas BRLXF's P/E ratio is 89.60. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRLXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to BRLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CGKEY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CGKEY has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CGKEY trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CGKEY's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGKEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to CGKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs INGXF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, INGXF has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while INGXF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas INGXF's P/E ratio is 230.25. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INGXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to INGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ALRCF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ALRCF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ALRCF trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ALRCF's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALRCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to ALRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs TREAF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, TREAF has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while TREAF trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TREAF's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TREAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to TREAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs STECF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, STECF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while STECF trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas STECF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STECF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to STECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs FSGCY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, FSGCY has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while FSGCY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas FSGCY's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSGCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to FSGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ENGDF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ENGDF has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ENGDF trades at $36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ENGDF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENGDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to ENGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs SEYMF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, SEYMF has a market cap of 984.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while SEYMF trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas SEYMF's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEYMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to SEYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs VLTAF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, VLTAF has a market cap of 924.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while VLTAF trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas VLTAF's P/E ratio is -39.25. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLTAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to VLTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ERXCF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ERXCF has a market cap of 544.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ERXCF trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ERXCF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ERXCF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to ERXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CWPWF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CWPWF has a market cap of 395.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CWPWF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CWPWF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWPWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to CWPWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs OKEPF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, OKEPF has a market cap of 361.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while OKEPF trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas OKEPF's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OKEPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to OKEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs LGSXY Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, LGSXY has a market cap of 294.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while LGSXY trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas LGSXY's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGSXY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to LGSXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ENLTF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ENLTF has a market cap of 264.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ENLTF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ENLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to ENLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ATRWF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ATRWF has a market cap of 262.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ATRWF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ATRWF's P/E ratio is -425.00. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATRWF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to ATRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs SMTLD Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, SMTLD has a market cap of 198.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while SMTLD trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas SMTLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMTLD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to SMTLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs RAMPF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, RAMPF has a market cap of 178.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while RAMPF trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas RAMPF's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAMPF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to RAMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs SVMRF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, SVMRF has a market cap of 137.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while SVMRF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas SVMRF's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SVMRF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to SVMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs PHNGF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, PHNGF has a market cap of 131.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while PHNGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas PHNGF's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PHNGF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to PHNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs PVLTF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, PVLTF has a market cap of 81.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while PVLTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas PVLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PVLTF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to PVLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs SMTLF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, SMTLF has a market cap of 79.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while SMTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas SMTLF's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMTLF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to SMTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs IESVF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, IESVF has a market cap of 72.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while IESVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas IESVF's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IESVF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to IESVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs WEGYF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, WEGYF has a market cap of 58.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while WEGYF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas WEGYF's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEGYF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to WEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs AZREF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, AZREF has a market cap of 57.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while AZREF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas AZREF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZREF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to AZREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs SKPGF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, SKPGF has a market cap of 56.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while SKPGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas SKPGF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to SKPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs GIPIF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, GIPIF has a market cap of 41.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while GIPIF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas GIPIF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIPIF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to GIPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs SHUNF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, SHUNF has a market cap of 41.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while SHUNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas SHUNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHUNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to SHUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CLMOF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CLMOF has a market cap of 35.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CLMOF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CLMOF's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLMOF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to CLMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CLNV Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CLNV has a market cap of 22.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CLNV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CLNV's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLNV's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to CLNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs SMAYF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, SMAYF has a market cap of 21.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while SMAYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas SMAYF's P/E ratio is 0.60. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMAYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to SMAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs TDWRF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, TDWRF has a market cap of 20.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while TDWRF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TDWRF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDWRF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to TDWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs PHIXF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, PHIXF has a market cap of 15.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while PHIXF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas PHIXF's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PHIXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to PHIXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs WNDW Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, WNDW has a market cap of 15.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while WNDW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas WNDW's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WNDW's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to WNDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs RROYF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, RROYF has a market cap of 14.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while RROYF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas RROYF's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RROYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to RROYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs AZLOF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, AZLOF has a market cap of 13.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while AZLOF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas AZLOF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZLOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to AZLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CWGYF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CWGYF has a market cap of 12.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CWGYF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CWGYF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWGYF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to CWGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs AWSL Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, AWSL has a market cap of 12.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while AWSL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas AWSL's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AWSL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to AWSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs GEBRF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, GEBRF has a market cap of 11.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while GEBRF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas GEBRF's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEBRF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to GEBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs MOTNF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, MOTNF has a market cap of 6.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while MOTNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas MOTNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOTNF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to MOTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs FNEC Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, FNEC has a market cap of 6.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while FNEC trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas FNEC's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNEC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to FNEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs VXIT Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, VXIT has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while VXIT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas VXIT's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VXIT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to VXIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs PWCO Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, PWCO has a market cap of 3.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while PWCO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas PWCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PWCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to PWCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs VGREF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, VGREF has a market cap of 3.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while VGREF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas VGREF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VGREF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to VGREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs NKWFF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, NKWFF has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while NKWFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas NKWFF's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NKWFF's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to NKWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ASRE Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ASRE has a market cap of 2.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ASRE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ASRE's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASRE's ROE of -7.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to ASRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs PRHL Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, PRHL has a market cap of 2.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while PRHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas PRHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to PRHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ALKHF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ALKHF has a market cap of 952522.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ALKHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ALKHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALKHF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to ALKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs TNSTF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, TNSTF has a market cap of 889194.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while TNSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TNSTF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to TNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs NEVE Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, NEVE has a market cap of 746772.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while NEVE trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas NEVE's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEVE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to NEVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs IICN Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, IICN has a market cap of 719695.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while IICN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas IICN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IICN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to IICN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs GSFI Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, GSFI has a market cap of 654176.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while GSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas GSFI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSFI's ROE of +7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to GSFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ENCVF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ENCVF has a market cap of 630720.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ENCVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ENCVF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENCVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to ENCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs MMMW Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, MMMW has a market cap of 324656.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while MMMW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas MMMW's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMMW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to MMMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs VSPC Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, VSPC has a market cap of 141051.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while VSPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas VSPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSPC's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to VSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CPWR Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CPWR has a market cap of 92185.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CPWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CPWR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPWR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to CPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs PSPW Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, PSPW has a market cap of 82289.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while PSPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas PSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSPW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to PSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs GEECF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, GEECF has a market cap of 47193.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while GEECF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas GEECF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEECF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to GEECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs TPII Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, TPII has a market cap of 37240.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while TPII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TPII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPII's ROE of -22.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to TPII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ETRXF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ETRXF has a market cap of 33409.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ETRXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ETRXF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ETRXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to ETRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ARSC Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ARSC has a market cap of 22430.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ARSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ARSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARSC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to ARSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs QSPW Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, QSPW has a market cap of 15558.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while QSPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas QSPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QSPW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is less volatile compared to QSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs ZHYLF Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, ZHYLF has a market cap of 15328.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while ZHYLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ZHYLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZHYLF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to ZHYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs VENG Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, VENG has a market cap of 12629.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while VENG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas VENG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VENG's ROE of -8.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to VENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs VCII Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, VCII has a market cap of 11388.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while VCII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas VCII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VCII's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to VCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.
CZAVF vs CGEI Comparison
CZAVF plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CZAVF stands at 19.94B. In comparison, CGEI has a market cap of 9756.00. Regarding current trading prices, CZAVF is priced at $37.15, while CGEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CZAVF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CGEI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CZAVF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CZAVF is more volatile compared to CGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CZAVF.