China Yongda Automobiles Services Holdings Limited
China Yongda Automobiles Services Holdings Limited CYYHF Peers
See (CYYHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYYHF | $0.27 | N/A | 508.21M | 6.79 | $0.04 | +6.26% |
| SIETY | $88.90 | +3.88% | 9.44B | 23.96 | $3.71 | +32.80% |
| SIEVF | $168.78 | N/A | 8.96B | 22.72 | $7.43 | +36.47% |
| ZHSHF | $2.56 | -0.20% | 6.05B | 7.10 | $0.36 | +4.33% |
| ATOGF | $21.71 | +0.00% | 4.74B | 217.10 | $0.10 | N/A |
| ZSHGY | $16.57 | N/A | 3.92B | 8.91 | $1.86 | +6.15% |
| USSJF | $8.17 | N/A | 3.90B | 19.00 | $0.43 | +1.78% |
| IHCPF | $9.16 | -0.03% | 3.54B | 10.53 | $0.87 | +5.38% |
| USSJY | $20.10 | +4.93% | 2.40B | 19.32 | $1.04 | +1.37% |
| KMUXF | $12.17 | N/A | 485.26M | 24.84 | $0.49 | +0.99% |
Stock Comparison
CYYHF vs SIETY Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, SIETY has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while SIETY trades at $88.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SIETY's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIETY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and SIETY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs SIEVF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 8.96B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while SIEVF trades at $168.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIEVF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to SIEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs ZHSHF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while ZHSHF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and ZHSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs ATOGF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while ATOGF trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 217.10. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to ATOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs ZSHGY Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while ZSHGY trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to ZSHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs USSJF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while USSJF trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and USSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs IHCPF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while IHCPF trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs USSJY Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while USSJY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs KMUXF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, KMUXF has a market cap of 485.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while KMUXF trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas KMUXF's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KMUXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and KMUXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs CMEIF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 432.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while CMEIF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMEIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and CMEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs PDGNF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, PDGNF has a market cap of 389.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while PDGNF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas PDGNF's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PDGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and PDGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs LKKRF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, LKKRF has a market cap of 308.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while LKKRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LKKRF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LKKRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and LKKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs AOCIF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 301.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while AOCIF trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AOCIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and AOCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs VTMTF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 281.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while VTMTF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to VTMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs MVXM Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while MVXM trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and MVXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs NWAU Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while NWAU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and NWAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs MTPTF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 151.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTPTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs CZASF Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, CZASF has a market cap of 33.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while CZASF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas CZASF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CZASF's ROE of -15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to CZASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs GBXXY Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GBXXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and GBXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs PREC Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 247505.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while PREC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to PREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs KXINW Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59137.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while KXINW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KXINW's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs RWGI Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 24797.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while RWGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RWGI's ROE of -3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and RWGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs SPMI Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12766.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while SPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPMI's ROE of +2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and SPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs MTAM Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 4995.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while MTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and MTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs LASLY Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3257.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while LASLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LASLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF and LASLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CYYHF vs SFTGQ Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1700.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.
CYYHF vs CALIQ Comparison
CYYHF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYYHF stands at 508.21M. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 484.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYYHF is priced at $0.27, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYYHF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.79, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYYHF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYYHF is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYYHF.