Cyren Ltd.
Cyren Ltd. CYRNQ Peers
See (CYRNQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYRNQ | $0.00 | +900.00% | 800 | -0.00 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $18.00 | -0.55% | 56.7B | 54.55 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,772.00 | N/A | 55.8B | 52.91 | $33.49 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $58.50 | N/A | 36.1B | 14.20 | $4.12 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +4.34% |
| TOITF | $126.00 | +1.12% | 10.5B | 93.33 | $1.35 | N/A |
| TMICY | $73.64 | N/A | 9.9B | 43.06 | $1.71 | +1.29% |
| TMICF | $70.00 | N/A | 9.2B | 40.23 | $1.74 | +1.66% |
| NEXXY | $6.00 | N/A | 7.4B | 37.50 | $0.16 | +4.14% |
| NEXPF | $6.09 | -0.08% | 7.4B | 38.03 | $0.16 | +4.10% |
Stock Comparison
CYRNQ vs ADYEY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ADYEY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 54.55. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs ADYYF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ADYYF trades at $1,772.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 52.91. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs BSQKZ Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while BSQKZ trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs KAKZF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to KAKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs TOITF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TOITF trades at $126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs TMICY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TMICY trades at $73.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 43.06. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs TMICF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TMICF trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs NEXXY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NEXXY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs NEXPF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs DRKTY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to DRKTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs GMYTF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SWDAF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs STWRY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to STWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs CIOXY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs EXNWF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to EXNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs OVHFF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while OVHFF trades at $15.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 168.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs WWLNF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while WWLNF trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs DRKTF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to DRKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs WRDLY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while WRDLY trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SPNUF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SPNUF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to SPNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SANP Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs MGPPF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while MGPPF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 233.33. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs EXOD Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, EXOD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while EXOD trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EXOD's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to EXOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to EXOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs PHPYF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to PHPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs CPLFF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to CPLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs PRTHU Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs FNCHF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 592.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FNCHF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs PYPTF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 557.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while PYPTF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs DYNDF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 495.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DYNDF trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs YHEKF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 448.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while YHEKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs TDCSF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs HISNF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 415.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while HISNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is less volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SPMYY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 359.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SPMYY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 111.33. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs NFONF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to NFONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs CORZQ Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs TYPMF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TYPMF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SEEMF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 276.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SEEMF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs FFPP Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FFPP trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs FMZNF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FMZNF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs OTPMF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to OTPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs ABANF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ABANF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SERKF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 220.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SERKF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -16.45. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs FSOYF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs GIVXF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to GIVXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to GIVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs CGAAY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to CGAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs PYFRF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to PYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs WHEN Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ and WHEN have similar daily volatility (66.67).
CYRNQ vs ERDLF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ERDLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -29.13. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to ERDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs FCLOF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to FCLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs BGOPF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while BGOPF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs HAIVF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while HAIVF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is 51.50. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to HAIVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs VRSSF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while VRSSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VRSSF's ROE of -3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs CORZR Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while CORZR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs CROTF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to CROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs DGGXF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DGGXF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SKKY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SKKY trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs QBITF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to QBITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs NTTCF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is less volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs NOWVF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NOWVF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NOWVF's ROE of -49.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs JGHG Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while JGHG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs APGT Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to APGT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs ISDCF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs CLOQ Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while CLOQ trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs TFLM Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TFLM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TFLM's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs POTTF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to POTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs CLPMF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while CLPMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs PLCKF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while PLCKF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs CYBNY Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to CYBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SDCH Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SDCH trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs QFEEF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to QFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs EPXGF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to EPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs DLTXF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to DLTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs DSAIF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs FOBIF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FOBIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs IPNFF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SFIIF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SFIIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs DVPNF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to DVPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs TGCB Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TGCB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs PKKFF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while PKKFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs VENZF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while VENZF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs NBVAF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while NBVAF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs OVTZ Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while OVTZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SCYRF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SCYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs PKLBF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is less volatile compared to PKLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs ATCHW Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while ATCHW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to ATCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs MODGF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to MODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs RIHT Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while RIHT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to RIHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs KCRD Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while KCRD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs RKNEF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while RKNEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs MBLMF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to MBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs DRKOF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while DRKOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs VISM Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs TONR Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs RCWDF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs INOTF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 771K. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs INAR Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while INAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to INAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs SLXXF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 760.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to SLXXF's ROE of -7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is less volatile compared to SLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs FSRDQ Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to FSRDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.
CYRNQ vs FUAPF Comparison
CYRNQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYRNQ stands at 800. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 624.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CYRNQ is priced at $0.00, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CYRNQ's ROE is N/A, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYRNQ is more volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYRNQ.