EQ Inc.
EQ Inc. CYPXF Peers
See (CYPXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYPXF | $0.76 | N/A | 15.2B | -75.80 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PUBGY | $27.12 | +0.30% | 27.2B | 14.43 | $1.88 | +2.99% |
| PGPEF | $107.00 | N/A | 26.8B | 14.27 | $7.50 | N/A |
| WPPGF | $7.80 | -2.01% | 8.4B | 11.82 | $0.66 | +6.46% |
| DNTUF | $21.85 | N/A | 5.7B | -4.30 | -$5.08 | +2.00% |
| DNTUY | $21.19 | -0.40% | 5.5B | -4.17 | -$5.08 | +3.05% |
| HKUOY | $14.66 | -2.40% | 5.4B | 36.65 | $0.40 | N/A |
| CYGIY | $4.81 | N/A | 4.9B | 32.07 | $0.15 | N/A |
| CYAGF | $8.08 | N/A | 4.1B | 27.86 | $0.29 | +1.39% |
| JCDXY | $8.87 | +11.85% | 3.8B | 12.86 | $0.69 | +3.41% |
Stock Comparison
CYPXF vs PUBGY Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while PUBGY trades at $27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs PGPEF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while PGPEF trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to PGPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs WPPGF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while WPPGF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to WPPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs DNTUF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while DNTUF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to DNTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs DNTUY Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while DNTUY trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs HKUOY Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while HKUOY trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs CYGIY Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while CYGIY trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs CYAGF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CYAGF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while CYAGF trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas CYAGF's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CYAGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to CYAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs JCDXY Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while JCDXY trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to JCDXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs JCDXF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while JCDXF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to JCDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs HKUOF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while HKUOF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to HKUOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs SOTDF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while SOTDF trades at $49.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs AIAPF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs FRRFF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while FRRFF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs YUGVF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 487.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while YUGVF trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 416.00. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs SPIDY Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to SPIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs NXFNF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while NXFNF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs MCCLF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to MCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs TTTPF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs PTMEY Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 276.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while PTMEY trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to PTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs PROM Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 225M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while PROM trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to PROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs SCPPF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while SCPPF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs KLTI Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to KLTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs VCCLF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs PCOFF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs OPESF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while OPESF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs GTNLF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to GTNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs CAUUF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while CAUUF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to CAUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs GMGZ Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while GMGZ trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to GMGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs NHLPF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while NHLPF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs EZOO Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs IFUS Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while IFUS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs ACHN Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs CNFN Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while CNFN trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to CNFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs SNIPF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SNIPF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while SNIPF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas SNIPF's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SNIPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to SNIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs TGNT Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while TGNT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs SPTY Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while SPTY trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to SPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs INEOF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while INEOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to INEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs AATV Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while AATV trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs UCPA Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs VYBE Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to VYBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs DBMM Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs BYOC Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while BYOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to BYOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs CMGR Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to CMGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs FBOP Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs MMND Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while MMND trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to MMND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs LIGA Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while LIGA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to LIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs CEENF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to CEENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs PVSP Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 755.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs DMSL Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs CMGO Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 416.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to CMGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs MMDDF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 413K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to MMDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs GOOLF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 343.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs SNPW Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 327.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while SNPW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to SNPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs ATXMF Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 276.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to ATXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs WWIO Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 139K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs ACTL Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs NXMR Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to NXMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs TRBO Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to TRBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs ITKH Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to ITKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs PRKI Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to PRKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs NBDR Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to NBDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs EPGC Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs PSYC Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 17.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to PSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs RFII Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs GBXI Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to GBXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs NWCN Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 12.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs CYGT Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to CYGT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to CYGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs GTRL Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while GTRL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to GTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs ISML Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ISML's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to ISML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs WGEE Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs BXNG Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while BXNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to BXNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs BWAV Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 585. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to BWAV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs ADST Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs LOGX Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to LOGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs VPSN Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to VPSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs MYRY Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, MYRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while MYRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to MYRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs LTMP Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, LTMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while LTMP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs ZULU Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ZULU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while ZULU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is less volatile compared to ZULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.
CYPXF vs ADTY Comparison
CYPXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYPXF stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ADTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CYPXF is priced at $0.76, while ADTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYPXF currently has a P/E ratio of -75.80, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYPXF's ROE is +0.63%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYPXF is more volatile compared to ADTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYPXF.