Century Lithium Corp.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 121.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BHPLF trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 105.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RTNTF trades at $76.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 101.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RTPPF trades at $59.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 96.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RIO trades at $59.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 61.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BHP trades at $48.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 42.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GMBXF trades at $5.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 40.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GLCNF trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -26.15. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 40.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GLNCY trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -25.77. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 39.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while VALE trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 33.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AAUKF trades at $27.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 33.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NGLOY trades at $13.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FSUGY trades at $20.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 31.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FSUMF trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 20.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CMCLF trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 17.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TECK trades at $34.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 694.40. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 13.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while IVPAF trades at $9.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 30.09. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BDNNY trades at $61.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while IPOAF trades at $20.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 111.33. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ABML trades at $9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 5.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SMMYY trades at $5.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while STMNF trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PUTKY trades at $27.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LYSDY trades at $5.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 171.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LYSCF trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 126.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NILSY trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MP trades at $23.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -41.81. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PILBF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -96.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PAEKY trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MALRY trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NGXXF trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.04. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MALRF trades at $9.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while IPGDF trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ERMAY trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 98.33. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SOUHY trades at $8.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -34.38. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MTRN trades at $75.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 157.46. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NICMF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SKE trades at $12.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while STR trades at $17.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while DETRF trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ILKAY trades at $14.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ILKAF trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TMC trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -12.16. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TMC's ROE of +7.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BQSSF trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -63.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FMCXF trades at $2.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -61.62. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 921.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SGML trades at $8.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -17.91. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while STTSY trades at $20.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 905.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while USAR trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 111.11. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USAR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 897.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LINRF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -36.98. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 880.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ADMLF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.42. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 865.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ATUSF trades at $18.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 863.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ADTLF trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.16. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 816.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AFMJF trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 754.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while VULNF trades at $3.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 744.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CMP trades at $17.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 688.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LAC trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -14.98. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 687.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NEXA trades at $5.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 651.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while VZLA trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -112.25. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 647.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GSM trades at $3.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 562.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NAK trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -20.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 538.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AMVMF trades at $16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -16.21. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 503.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ALMTF trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -44.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 503.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MJDLF trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LAAC trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 433.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while REEMF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 419.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while USARW trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USARW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 417.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while UAMY trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -177.75. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 410.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PLM trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 392.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LLLAF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LLLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 375.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while USAS trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 369.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FGOVF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -69.84. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 344.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ERLFF trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -33.19. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 341.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LAR trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -23.44. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 338.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 329.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MLYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 321.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MNXMF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -56.02. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 301.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.85. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 296.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 295.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 291.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CGMLF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 291.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SVMLF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 278.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LZM trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 274.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NMG trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 265.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PMETF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -56.33. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 265.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TMQ trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -32.30. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 257.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SLI trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while STQNF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 245.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FWEDF trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to LTHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 235.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EMOTF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -22.38. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CILLF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 231.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EMX trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -71.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 229.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ERDCF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -63.13. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 229.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TMCWW trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +7.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SRAFF has a market cap of 229.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SRAFF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SRAFF's P/E ratio is -11.19. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRAFF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SRAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 228.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WRN trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GSCCF has a market cap of 211.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GSCCF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GSCCF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GSCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, APHLF has a market cap of 207.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while APHLF trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas APHLF's P/E ratio is -27.61. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APHLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to APHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 205.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SYAAF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GLATF has a market cap of 198.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GLATF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GLATF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLATF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GLATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 197.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MMILF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 197.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PKREF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MRRDF has a market cap of 193.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MRRDF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MRRDF's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MRRDF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MRRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PNPNF has a market cap of 192.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PNPNF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PNPNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PNPNF's ROE of -4.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PNPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 192.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MGMNF trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, OMZNF has a market cap of 189.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while OMZNF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas OMZNF's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OMZNF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to OMZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CURUF has a market cap of 183.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CURUF trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CURUF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CURUF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CURUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 179.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NCKAF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, OMHLF has a market cap of 176.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while OMHLF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas OMHLF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OMHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to OMHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RGLSF has a market cap of 175.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RGLSF trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RGLSF's P/E ratio is -70.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RGLSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RGLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ECRAF has a market cap of 173.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ECRAF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ECRAF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECRAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ECRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CHXMF has a market cap of 170.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CHXMF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CHXMF's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHXMF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CHXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SMTSF has a market cap of 169.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SMTSF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SMTSF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMTSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SMTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NOURF has a market cap of 167.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NOURF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NOURF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NOURF's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NOURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 164.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SRHYY trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, IRCWF has a market cap of 164.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while IRCWF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas IRCWF's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IRCWF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to IRCWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 160.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PLL trades at $7.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PLLTL has a market cap of 159.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PLLTL trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PLLTL's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLLTL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PLLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 155.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PRMNF trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, JUBPF has a market cap of 153.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while JUBPF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas JUBPF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JUBPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to JUBPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 152.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CRML trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SBWFF has a market cap of 150.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SBWFF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SBWFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SBWFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SBWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BKTRF has a market cap of 146.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BKTRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BKTRF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BKTRF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BKTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ADVZF has a market cap of 144.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ADVZF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ADVZF's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADVZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ADVZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SYAXF has a market cap of 141.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SYAXF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SYAXF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYAXF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SYAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 140.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CREQF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, IBATF has a market cap of 138.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while IBATF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas IBATF's P/E ratio is -25.49. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IBATF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to IBATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, OIIIF has a market cap of 136.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while OIIIF trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas OIIIF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OIIIF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to OIIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, KGLLF has a market cap of 135.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while KGLLF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas KGLLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KGLLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to KGLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RTGGF has a market cap of 134.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RTGGF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RTGGF's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RTGGF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RTGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 133.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NB trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NB's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ADBRF has a market cap of 132.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ADBRF trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ADBRF's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADBRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ADBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 131.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NTCPF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -16.93. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CNIKF has a market cap of 130.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CNIKF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CNIKF's P/E ratio is -67.55. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNIKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CNIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TLGRF has a market cap of 129.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TLGRF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TLGRF's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TLGRF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TLGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FRACF has a market cap of 128.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FRACF trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FRACF's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FRACF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to FRACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GDQMF has a market cap of 128.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GDQMF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GDQMF's P/E ratio is -41.95. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDQMF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GDQMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AZMCF has a market cap of 124.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AZMCF trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AZMCF's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AZMCF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AZMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CTTZF has a market cap of 123.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CTTZF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CTTZF's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CTTZF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CTTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ARAAF has a market cap of 120.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ARAAF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ARAAF's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARAAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ARAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LMRXF has a market cap of 120.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LMRXF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LMRXF's P/E ratio is -24.06. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LMRXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LMRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 119.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ABAT trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, HANNF has a market cap of 119.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while HANNF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas HANNF's P/E ratio is -95.42. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HANNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to HANNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 117.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while USGO trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -13.82. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GPPRF has a market cap of 115.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GPPRF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GPPRF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GPPRF's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GPPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AOTVF has a market cap of 112.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AOTVF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AOTVF's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AOTVF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AOTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NWNNF has a market cap of 111.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NWNNF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NWNNF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NWNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NWNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SAVNF has a market cap of 108.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SAVNF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SAVNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SAVNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SAVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MDSQF has a market cap of 107.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MDSQF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MDSQF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MDSQF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MDSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RBWRF has a market cap of 106.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RBWRF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RBWRF's P/E ratio is -16.55. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RBWRF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to RBWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, DBLVF has a market cap of 105.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while DBLVF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas DBLVF's P/E ratio is -50.65. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DBLVF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to DBLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GEODF has a market cap of 102.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GEODF trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GEODF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GEODF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to GEODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NOVRF has a market cap of 102.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NOVRF trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NOVRF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NOVRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NOVRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CVVUF has a market cap of 102.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CVVUF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CVVUF's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CVVUF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CVVUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AAGFF has a market cap of 101.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AAGFF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AAGFF's P/E ratio is -8.56. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AAGFF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AAGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PWRMF has a market cap of 100.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PWRMF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PWRMF's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PWRMF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PWRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AXREF has a market cap of 99.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AXREF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AXREF's P/E ratio is -44.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AXREF's ROE of -4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to AXREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AABB has a market cap of 98.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AABB trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AABB's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AABB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AABB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ARRNF has a market cap of 93.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ARRNF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ARRNF's P/E ratio is -18.40. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARRNF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ARRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LITOF has a market cap of 93.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LITOF trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LITOF's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LITOF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LITOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 91.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LGO trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LTMCF has a market cap of 90.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LTMCF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LTMCF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LTMCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LTMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, KLDCF has a market cap of 89.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while KLDCF trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas KLDCF's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KLDCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to KLDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PIONF has a market cap of 86.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PIONF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PIONF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PIONF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PIONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 86.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AMLI trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MKNGF has a market cap of 84.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MKNGF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MKNGF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MKNGF's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MKNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LTHCF has a market cap of 84.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LTHCF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LTHCF's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LTHCF's ROE of -63.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LTHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LTRBF has a market cap of 84.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LTRBF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LTRBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LTRBF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to LTRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CXOXF has a market cap of 83.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CXOXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CXOXF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CXOXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CXOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, POROF has a market cap of 81.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while POROF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas POROF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to POROF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to POROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 81.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GRO trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, UURAF has a market cap of 81.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while UURAF trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas UURAF's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UURAF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to UURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ALGEF has a market cap of 80.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ALGEF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ALGEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALGEF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ALGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GPHOF has a market cap of 80.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GPHOF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GPHOF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GPHOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GPHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 79.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TLOFF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RCKTF has a market cap of 78.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RCKTF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RCKTF's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RCKTF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to RCKTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CNCZF has a market cap of 78.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CNCZF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CNCZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNCZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NVAAF has a market cap of 77.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NVAAF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NVAAF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVAAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NVAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CNRSF has a market cap of 76.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CNRSF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CNRSF's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNRSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CNRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MDNGF has a market cap of 76.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MDNGF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MDNGF's P/E ratio is -43.70. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MDNGF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MDNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FOSYF has a market cap of 76.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FOSYF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FOSYF's P/E ratio is -36.33. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FOSYF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FOSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ECGFF has a market cap of 75.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ECGFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ECGFF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECGFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ECGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NKGFF has a market cap of 73.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NKGFF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NKGFF's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NKGFF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NKGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TITUF has a market cap of 72.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TITUF trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TITUF's P/E ratio is -18.52. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TITUF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FRHYF has a market cap of 72.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FRHYF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FRHYF's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FRHYF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to FRHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, HLOGF has a market cap of 72.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while HLOGF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas HLOGF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HLOGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to HLOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GRLRF has a market cap of 71.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GRLRF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GRLRF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRLRF's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GRLRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AFTTF has a market cap of 69.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AFTTF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AFTTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AFTTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AFTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PYCMF has a market cap of 69.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PYCMF trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PYCMF's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PYCMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PYCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LRAXF has a market cap of 69.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LRAXF trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LRAXF's P/E ratio is -141.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LRAXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LRAXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 68.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while IPX trades at $21.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ALLIF has a market cap of 68.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ALLIF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ALLIF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALLIF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ALLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PNRLF has a market cap of 66.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PNRLF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PNRLF's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PNRLF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PNRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GLNLF has a market cap of 65.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GLNLF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GLNLF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLNLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to GLNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ASMMF has a market cap of 65.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ASMMF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ASMMF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASMMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ASMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PGNRF has a market cap of 63.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PGNRF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PGNRF's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PGNRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ATVVF has a market cap of 62.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ATVVF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ATVVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATVVF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ATVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LIFFF has a market cap of 61.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LIFFF trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LIFFF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LIFFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to LIFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CRECF has a market cap of 59.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CRECF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CRECF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRECF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CRECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TIMCF has a market cap of 59.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TIMCF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TIMCF's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TIMCF's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TIMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CDBMF has a market cap of 59.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CDBMF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CDBMF's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDBMF's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CDBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ARRRF has a market cap of 58.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ARRRF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ARRRF's P/E ratio is -9.21. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARRRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ARRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GDLNF has a market cap of 57.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GDLNF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GDLNF's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDLNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GDLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 56.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FURY trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BENZF has a market cap of 56.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BENZF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BENZF's P/E ratio is -25.60. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BENZF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BENZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FPOCF has a market cap of 55.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FPOCF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FPOCF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FPOCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FPOCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, QUEXF has a market cap of 54.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while QUEXF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas QUEXF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QUEXF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to QUEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GLBXF has a market cap of 54.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GLBXF trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GLBXF's P/E ratio is 96.98. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLBXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GLBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, APCDF has a market cap of 54.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while APCDF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas APCDF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APCDF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to APCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RDRUY has a market cap of 53.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RDRUY trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RDRUY's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RDRUY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RDRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NBMFF has a market cap of 52.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NBMFF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NBMFF's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NBMFF's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NBMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 51.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GERFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GERFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ORRCF has a market cap of 50.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ORRCF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ORRCF's P/E ratio is -20.82. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORRCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ORRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TMRC has a market cap of 50.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TMRC trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TMRC's P/E ratio is -33.75. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TMRC's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 50.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while XPL trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ERPNF has a market cap of 47.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ERPNF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ERPNF's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ERPNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ERPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BTRYF has a market cap of 47.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BTRYF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BTRYF's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BTRYF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BTRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NWXPF has a market cap of 47.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NWXPF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NWXPF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NWXPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NWXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ZNWLF has a market cap of 47.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ZNWLF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ZNWLF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZNWLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ZNWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CHKMF has a market cap of 47.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CHKMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CHKMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHKMF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CHKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SYHBF has a market cap of 47.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SYHBF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SYHBF's P/E ratio is -23.06. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYHBF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SYHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, HUSIF has a market cap of 46.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while HUSIF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas HUSIF's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HUSIF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to HUSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BNCHF has a market cap of 46.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BNCHF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BNCHF's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BNCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BNCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, HPQFF has a market cap of 45.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while HPQFF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas HPQFF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HPQFF's ROE of +66.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to HPQFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TGSI has a market cap of 45.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TGSI trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TGSI's P/E ratio is -50.17. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TGSI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TGSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ANDMF has a market cap of 43.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ANDMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ANDMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANDMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ANDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RRSSF has a market cap of 43.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RRSSF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RRSSF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RRSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CRICF has a market cap of 42.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CRICF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CRICF's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRICF's ROE of -2.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CRICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LCGMF has a market cap of 42.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LCGMF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LCGMF's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LCGMF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LCGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, DRDNF has a market cap of 42.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while DRDNF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas DRDNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DRDNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to DRDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AZMTF has a market cap of 41.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AZMTF trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AZMTF's P/E ratio is 47.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AZMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to AZMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, OBGRF has a market cap of 40.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while OBGRF trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas OBGRF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OBGRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to OBGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EXMGF has a market cap of 40.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EXMGF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EXMGF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EXMGF's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to EXMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 40.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GRFX trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ANSNF has a market cap of 40.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ANSNF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ANSNF's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANSNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ANSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LQRCF has a market cap of 40.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LQRCF trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LQRCF's P/E ratio is -123.10. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LQRCF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LQRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SHERF has a market cap of 39.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SHERF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SHERF's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SHERF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SHERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WLBMF has a market cap of 39.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WLBMF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WLBMF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WLBMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WLBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FPRGF has a market cap of 39.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FPRGF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FPRGF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FPRGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to FPRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SRGMF has a market cap of 38.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SRGMF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SRGMF's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRGMF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SRGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 38.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RTLGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GRLVF has a market cap of 38.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GRLVF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GRLVF's P/E ratio is -17.17. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRLVF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GRLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, KMGLF has a market cap of 38.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while KMGLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas KMGLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KMGLF's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to KMGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BMOOF has a market cap of 38.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BMOOF trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BMOOF's P/E ratio is -22.30. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BMOOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BMOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GRFXF has a market cap of 37.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GRFXF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GRFXF's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRFXF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GRFXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, HSRMF has a market cap of 36.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while HSRMF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas HSRMF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HSRMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to HSRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 36.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WWR trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PSRHF has a market cap of 36.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PSRHF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PSRHF's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PSRHF's ROE of +4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PSRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PMYLF has a market cap of 36.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PMYLF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PMYLF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PMYLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PMYLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GRSLF has a market cap of 36.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GRSLF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GRSLF's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRSLF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GRSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, DLPRF has a market cap of 36.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while DLPRF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas DLPRF's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DLPRF's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to DLPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TSKFF has a market cap of 35.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TSKFF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TSKFF's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TSKFF's ROE of -4.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TSKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CDMNF has a market cap of 35.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CDMNF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CDMNF's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDMNF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CDMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AZLAF has a market cap of 35.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AZLAF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AZLAF's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AZLAF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to AZLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CPRRF has a market cap of 35.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CPRRF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CPRRF's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPRRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CPRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SLROF has a market cap of 35.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SLROF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SLROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLROF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SLROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CONXF has a market cap of 35.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CONXF trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CONXF's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CONXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CONXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LLKKF has a market cap of 35.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LLKKF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LLKKF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LLKKF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LLKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ESKYF has a market cap of 35.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ESKYF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ESKYF's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ESKYF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ESKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 34.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while VTMLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to VTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EEMMF has a market cap of 34.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EEMMF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EEMMF's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EEMMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to EEMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CUAUF has a market cap of 34.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CUAUF trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CUAUF's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CUAUF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CUAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AWMLF has a market cap of 34.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AWMLF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AWMLF's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AWMLF's ROE of -5.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AWMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BLSTF has a market cap of 33.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BLSTF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BLSTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BLSTF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to BLSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PGEZF has a market cap of 33.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PGEZF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PGEZF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PGEZF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PGEZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WSZWF has a market cap of 33.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WSZWF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WSZWF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WSZWF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WSZWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BBSRF has a market cap of 33.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BBSRF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BBSRF's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BBSRF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to BBSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ELMTF has a market cap of 33.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ELMTF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ELMTF's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELMTF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ELMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FXRVF has a market cap of 32.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FXRVF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FXRVF's P/E ratio is -19.19. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FXRVF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FXRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GENMF has a market cap of 32.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GENMF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GENMF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GENMF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GENMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GDTRF has a market cap of 31.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GDTRF trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GDTRF's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDTRF's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GDTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PNXLF has a market cap of 31.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PNXLF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PNXLF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PNXLF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PNXLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NILIF has a market cap of 31.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NILIF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NILIF's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NILIF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NILIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GTAGF has a market cap of 31.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GTAGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GTAGF's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTAGF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RRRDF has a market cap of 31.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RRRDF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RRRDF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RRRDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CMETF has a market cap of 30.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CMETF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CMETF's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMETF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SRRHF has a market cap of 30.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SRRHF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SRRHF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRRHF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SRRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PANRF has a market cap of 29.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PANRF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PANRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PANRF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PANRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NWCCF has a market cap of 29.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NWCCF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NWCCF's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NWCCF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NWCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LEMIF has a market cap of 29.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LEMIF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LEMIF's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LEMIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LEMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 29.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LITM trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NSRCF has a market cap of 29.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NSRCF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NSRCF's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NSRCF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NSRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NVLHF has a market cap of 29.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NVLHF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NVLHF's P/E ratio is -11.22. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NVLHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NVLHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BCEKF has a market cap of 29.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BCEKF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BCEKF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BCEKF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BCEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NCFFF has a market cap of 29.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NCFFF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NCFFF's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCFFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NCFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, KVGOF has a market cap of 28.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while KVGOF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas KVGOF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KVGOF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to KVGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MLMZF has a market cap of 28.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MLMZF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MLMZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MLMZF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MLMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, DFMTF has a market cap of 28.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while DFMTF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas DFMTF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DFMTF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to DFMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MMMKF has a market cap of 28.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MMMKF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MMMKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MMMKF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MMMKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NICLF has a market cap of 28.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NICLF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NICLF's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NICLF's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NICLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NZAUF has a market cap of 27.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NZAUF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NZAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NZAUF's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NZAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SRLZF has a market cap of 27.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SRLZF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SRLZF's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRLZF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SRLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RCZRF has a market cap of 27.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RCZRF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RCZRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RCZRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RCZRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EMHLF has a market cap of 27.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EMHLF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EMHLF's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMHLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to EMHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, REMRF has a market cap of 26.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while REMRF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas REMRF's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REMRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to REMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CNSUF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CNSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TCVNF has a market cap of 26.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TCVNF trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TCVNF's P/E ratio is -45.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TCVNF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TCVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EMHXY has a market cap of 25.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EMHXY trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EMHXY's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMHXY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to EMHXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FTMDF has a market cap of 25.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FTMDF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FTMDF's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FTMDF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FTMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, KMMIF has a market cap of 25.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while KMMIF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas KMMIF's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KMMIF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to KMMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AGXPF has a market cap of 24.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AGXPF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AGXPF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGXPF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AGXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NIOBF has a market cap of 24.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NIOBF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NIOBF's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NIOBF's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NIOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, REEEF has a market cap of 24.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while REEEF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas REEEF's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REEEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to REEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CNSMF has a market cap of 24.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CNSMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CNSMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNSMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CNSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BKIRF has a market cap of 24.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BKIRF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BKIRF's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BKIRF's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BKIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ARSMF has a market cap of 23.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ARSMF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ARSMF's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARSMF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ARSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, JNDAF has a market cap of 23.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while JNDAF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas JNDAF's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JNDAF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to JNDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WHYRF has a market cap of 23.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WHYRF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WHYRF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WHYRF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WHYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, JRVMF has a market cap of 23.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while JRVMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas JRVMF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JRVMF's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to JRVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, KWGBF has a market cap of 23.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while KWGBF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas KWGBF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KWGBF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to KWGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LUMIF has a market cap of 22.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LUMIF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LUMIF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LUMIF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LUMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, UREQF has a market cap of 21.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while UREQF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas UREQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UREQF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to UREQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SRGXF has a market cap of 21.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SRGXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SRGXF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRGXF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SRGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ANLBF has a market cap of 21.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ANLBF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ANLBF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANLBF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ANLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BOXS has a market cap of 21.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BOXS trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BOXS's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BOXS's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to BOXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MIDLF has a market cap of 21.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MIDLF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MIDLF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MIDLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MIDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MKVNF has a market cap of 21.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MKVNF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MKVNF's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MKVNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MKVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, DRRSF has a market cap of 20.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while DRRSF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas DRRSF's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DRRSF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to DRRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, KCCFF has a market cap of 20.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while KCCFF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas KCCFF's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KCCFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to KCCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, VTMXF has a market cap of 20.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while VTMXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas VTMXF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VTMXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to VTMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RTTGF has a market cap of 20.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RTTGF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RTTGF's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RTTGF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to RTTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SMCDF has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SMCDF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SMCDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMCDF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SMCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, STSBF has a market cap of 19.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while STSBF trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas STSBF's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STSBF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to STSBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ARYMF has a market cap of 19.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ARYMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ARYMF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARYMF's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ARYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WRSLF has a market cap of 19.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WRSLF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WRSLF's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WRSLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WRSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EMGDF has a market cap of 19.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EMGDF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EMGDF's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMGDF's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to EMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AFFCF has a market cap of 19.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AFFCF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AFFCF's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AFFCF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to AFFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ARDNF has a market cap of 19.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ARDNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ARDNF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARDNF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ARDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, HNCKF has a market cap of 19.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while HNCKF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas HNCKF's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HNCKF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to HNCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 19.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ELBM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CLMPF has a market cap of 18.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CLMPF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CLMPF's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLMPF's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CLMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, KNGRF has a market cap of 18.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while KNGRF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas KNGRF's P/E ratio is -26.11. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KNGRF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to KNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EVXXF has a market cap of 18.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EVXXF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EVXXF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EVXXF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to EVXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AGCCF has a market cap of 17.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AGCCF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AGCCF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGCCF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AGCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PUBC has a market cap of 17.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PUBC trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PUBC's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PUBC's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PUBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RTRFF has a market cap of 17.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RTRFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RTRFF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RTRFF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to RTRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LNDLF has a market cap of 17.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LNDLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LNDLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LNDLF's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LNDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ORMFF has a market cap of 17.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ORMFF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ORMFF's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORMFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ORMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CBBHF has a market cap of 17.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CBBHF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CBBHF's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBBHF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CBBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FKMCF has a market cap of 17.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FKMCF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FKMCF's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FKMCF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FKMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 17.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CRMLW trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PBMLF has a market cap of 16.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PBMLF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PBMLF's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PBMLF's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PBMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CATPF has a market cap of 16.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CATPF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CATPF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CATPF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CATPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BSHVF has a market cap of 16.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BSHVF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BSHVF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BSHVF's ROE of +3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BSHVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, STRPF has a market cap of 16.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while STRPF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas STRPF's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STRPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to STRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 15.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GTI trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, JAMGF has a market cap of 15.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while JAMGF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas JAMGF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JAMGF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to JAMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AZZTF has a market cap of 15.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AZZTF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AZZTF's P/E ratio is -12.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AZZTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AZZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WRMCF has a market cap of 15.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WRMCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WRMCF's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WRMCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to WRMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CTXDF has a market cap of 15.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CTXDF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CTXDF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CTXDF's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CTXDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MXTRF has a market cap of 15.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MXTRF trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MXTRF's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MXTRF's ROE of -32.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MXTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PJXRF has a market cap of 15.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PJXRF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PJXRF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PJXRF's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PJXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ARTTF has a market cap of 15.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ARTTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ARTTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARTTF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ARTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EGMMF has a market cap of 15.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EGMMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EGMMF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EGMMF's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to EGMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FEOVF has a market cap of 15.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FEOVF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FEOVF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FEOVF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FEOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ZNCXF has a market cap of 15.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ZNCXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ZNCXF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZNCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ZNCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SXOOF has a market cap of 15.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SXOOF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SXOOF's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SXOOF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SXOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RDMMF has a market cap of 14.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RDMMF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RDMMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RDMMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RDMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CLRSF has a market cap of 14.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CLRSF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CLRSF's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLRSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CLRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WMNNF has a market cap of 14.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WMNNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WMNNF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WMNNF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WMNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TTSRF has a market cap of 14.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TTSRF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TTSRF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GOMRF has a market cap of 14.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GOMRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GOMRF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GOMRF's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GOMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CPEFF has a market cap of 14.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CPEFF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CPEFF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPEFF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CPEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PXCLF has a market cap of 14.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PXCLF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PXCLF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PXCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TNREF has a market cap of 14.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TNREF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TNREF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TNREF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TNREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ASDRF has a market cap of 13.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ASDRF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ASDRF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ASDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MUNMF has a market cap of 13.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MUNMF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MUNMF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MUNMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MUNMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BCMRF has a market cap of 13.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BCMRF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BCMRF's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BCMRF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to BCMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ABRMF has a market cap of 13.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ABRMF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ABRMF's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ABRMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ABRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ATAO has a market cap of 13.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ATAO trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ATAO's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATAO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ATAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EFRMF has a market cap of 13.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EFRMF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EFRMF's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EFRMF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to EFRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FYIRF has a market cap of 13.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FYIRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FYIRF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FYIRF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to FYIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SMDZF has a market cap of 12.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SMDZF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SMDZF's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMDZF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SMDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, VDMRF has a market cap of 12.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while VDMRF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas VDMRF's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VDMRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to VDMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AVLNF has a market cap of 12.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AVLNF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AVLNF's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVLNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AVLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, THORF has a market cap of 12.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while THORF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas THORF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to THORF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to THORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EUMNF has a market cap of 12.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EUMNF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EUMNF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EUMNF's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to EUMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BLLYF has a market cap of 12.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BLLYF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BLLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BLLYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BLLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, USREF has a market cap of 12.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while USREF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas USREF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USREF's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to USREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TWRFF has a market cap of 12.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TWRFF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TWRFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TWRFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TWRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, JZRIF has a market cap of 12.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while JZRIF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas JZRIF's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JZRIF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to JZRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PXXXF has a market cap of 12.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PXXXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PXXXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PXXXF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PXXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FNCJF has a market cap of 12.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FNCJF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FNCJF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FNCJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FNCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ASHXF has a market cap of 11.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ASHXF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ASHXF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASHXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ASHXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EROSF has a market cap of 11.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EROSF trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EROSF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EROSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to EROSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PGXPF has a market cap of 11.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PGXPF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PGXPF's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PGXPF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PGXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PSGR has a market cap of 11.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PSGR trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PSGR's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PSGR's ROE of +3.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PSGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AMYZF has a market cap of 11.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AMYZF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AMYZF's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMYZF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AMYZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SCCFF has a market cap of 11.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SCCFF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SCCFF's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCCFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SCCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EGPLF has a market cap of 11.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EGPLF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EGPLF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EGPLF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to EGPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, IMPNF has a market cap of 11.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while IMPNF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas IMPNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IMPNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to IMPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MTLLF has a market cap of 11.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MTLLF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MTLLF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTLLF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to MTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, FDCFF has a market cap of 11.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while FDCFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas FDCFF's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FDCFF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to FDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RBMTF has a market cap of 11.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RBMTF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RBMTF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RBMTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RBMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AXXDF has a market cap of 11.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AXXDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AXXDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AXXDF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to AXXDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LPDNF has a market cap of 11.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LPDNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LPDNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LPDNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LPDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NKORF has a market cap of 10.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NKORF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NKORF's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NKORF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NKORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SMRSF has a market cap of 10.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SMRSF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SMRSF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMRSF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SMRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, EOXFF has a market cap of 10.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while EOXFF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas EOXFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EOXFF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to EOXFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LMMFF has a market cap of 10.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LMMFF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LMMFF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LMMFF's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LMMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TKRFF has a market cap of 10.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TKRFF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TKRFF's P/E ratio is -25.95. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TKRFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TKRFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CMRZF has a market cap of 10.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CMRZF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CMRZF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMRZF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CMRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ATLYF has a market cap of 10.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ATLYF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ATLYF's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATLYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ATLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, UWEFF has a market cap of 10.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while UWEFF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas UWEFF's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UWEFF's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to UWEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CLLXF has a market cap of 10.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CLLXF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CLLXF's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLLXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CLLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, DAUGF has a market cap of 10.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while DAUGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas DAUGF's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DAUGF's ROE of -9.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to DAUGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PXCLY has a market cap of 10.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PXCLY trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PXCLY's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PXCLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to PXCLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TASEF has a market cap of 10.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TASEF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TASEF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TASEF's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TASEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TVIPF has a market cap of 10.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TVIPF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TVIPF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TVIPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TVIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ELECF has a market cap of 10.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ELECF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ELECF's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELECF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ELECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NMREF has a market cap of 10.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NMREF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NMREF's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NMREF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NMREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NGPHF has a market cap of 9.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NGPHF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NGPHF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NGPHF's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LSLCF has a market cap of 9.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LSLCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LSLCF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LSLCF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LSLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ERVFF has a market cap of 9.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ERVFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ERVFF's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ERVFF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ERVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LMSQF has a market cap of 9.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LMSQF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LMSQF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LMSQF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to LMSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MTLFF has a market cap of 9.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MTLFF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MTLFF's P/E ratio is -13.12. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTLFF's ROE of +10.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MTLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GPMTF has a market cap of 9.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GPMTF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GPMTF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GPMTF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GPMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TMZRF has a market cap of 9.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TMZRF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TMZRF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TMZRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TMZRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LBRMF has a market cap of 9.74M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LBRMF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LBRMF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LBRMF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LBRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LBNKF has a market cap of 9.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LBNKF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LBNKF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LBNKF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LBNKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SLVDF has a market cap of 9.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SLVDF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SLVDF's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLVDF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TTLXF has a market cap of 9.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TTLXF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TTLXF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TTLXF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TTLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SAMMF has a market cap of 9.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SAMMF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SAMMF's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SAMMF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to SAMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ALBAF has a market cap of 9.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ALBAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ALBAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALBAF's ROE of -304.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ALBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TRRXF has a market cap of 9.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TRRXF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TRRXF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TRRXF's ROE of -3.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TRRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ATBHF has a market cap of 9.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ATBHF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ATBHF's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATBHF's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ATBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WTRNF has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WTRNF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WTRNF's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WTRNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WTRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MGPHF has a market cap of 8.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MGPHF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MGPHF's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGPHF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BYU trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, AMSLF has a market cap of 8.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while AMSLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas AMSLF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMSLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to AMSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, DSMTF has a market cap of 8.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while DSMTF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas DSMTF's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DSMTF's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to DSMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BRKCF has a market cap of 8.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BRKCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BRKCF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRKCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BRKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ATCMF has a market cap of 8.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ATCMF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ATCMF's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATCMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ATCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BHSIF has a market cap of 8.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BHSIF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BHSIF's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BHSIF's ROE of +35.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BHSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TIGCF has a market cap of 8.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TIGCF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TIGCF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TIGCF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TIGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TMRFF has a market cap of 8.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TMRFF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TMRFF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TMRFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to TMRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ABCAF has a market cap of 8.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ABCAF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ABCAF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ABCAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to ABCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WMLLF has a market cap of 8.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WMLLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WMLLF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WMLLF's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WMLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LISMF has a market cap of 8.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LISMF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LISMF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LISMF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LISMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PMMCF has a market cap of 8.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PMMCF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PMMCF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PMMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ELTLF has a market cap of 8.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ELTLF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ELTLF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELTLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ELTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, LILIF has a market cap of 8.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while LILIF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas LILIF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LILIF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to LILIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GTMLF has a market cap of 7.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GTMLF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTMLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to GTMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, BNTRF has a market cap of 7.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while BNTRF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas BNTRF's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BNTRF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to BNTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WLFFF has a market cap of 7.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WLFFF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WLFFF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WLFFF's ROE of -4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WLFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, JUGRF has a market cap of 7.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while JUGRF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas JUGRF's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JUGRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to JUGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NYRSY has a market cap of 7.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NYRSY trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NYRSY's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NYRSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to NYRSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NLPXF has a market cap of 7.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NLPXF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NLPXF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NLPXF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NLPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, ZUUZF has a market cap of 7.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while ZUUZF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas ZUUZF's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZUUZF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to ZUUZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, GGIFF has a market cap of 7.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while GGIFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas GGIFF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGIFF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to GGIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SRCGF has a market cap of 7.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SRCGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SRCGF's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRCGF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SRCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, SEHKF has a market cap of 7.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while SEHKF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas SEHKF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SEHKF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to SEHKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, NRVTF has a market cap of 7.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while NRVTF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas NRVTF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NRVTF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to NRVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RBMNF has a market cap of 7.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RBMNF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RBMNF's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RBMNF's ROE of -9.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to RBMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, RARMF has a market cap of 7.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while RARMF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas RARMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RARMF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to RARMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, WDGNF has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while WDGNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas WDGNF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WDGNF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to WDGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, MNXXF has a market cap of 7.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while MNXXF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas MNXXF's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNXXF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to MNXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CUIRF has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CUIRF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CUIRF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CUIRF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to CUIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, COPGF has a market cap of 7.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while COPGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas COPGF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COPGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to COPGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, PEIMF has a market cap of 6.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while PEIMF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas PEIMF's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PEIMF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to PEIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, VULMF has a market cap of 6.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while VULMF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas VULMF's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VULMF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is less volatile compared to VULMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CNOBF has a market cap of 6.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CNOBF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CNOBF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNOBF's ROE of -8.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CNOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, TNMLF has a market cap of 6.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while TNMLF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas TNMLF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TNMLF's ROE of +1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to TNMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, HXLTF has a market cap of 6.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while HXLTF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas HXLTF's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HXLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to HXLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.

CYDVF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CYDVF stands at 41.31M. In comparison, CCNCF has a market cap of 6.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CYDVF is priced at $0.28, while CCNCF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CYDVF currently has a P/E ratio of -27.63, whereas CCNCF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CYDVF's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CCNCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYDVF is more volatile compared to CCNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYDVF.