Cybeats Technologies Corp.
Cybeats Technologies Corp. CYBT.CN Peers
See (CYBT.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYBT.CN | $0.13 | -3.70% | 16.67M | -1.62 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| MSFT.NE | $32.70 | +0.15% | 4.82T | 33.71 | $0.97 | +1.01% |
| PANW.NE | $23.29 | +1.04% | 179.12B | 105.86 | $0.22 | N/A |
| NVEI.TO | $47.61 | N/A | 6.81B | 216.41 | $0.22 | +0.87% |
| BB.TO | $5.43 | -0.18% | 3.24B | -543.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| TIXT.TO | $3.96 | +0.25% | 1.09B | -5.91 | -$0.67 | N/A |
| CPLF.TO | $11.99 | +0.08% | 943.51M | -49.96 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| CVO.TO | $7.02 | +2.63% | 681.59M | -46.80 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| DND.TO | $8.58 | -4.13% | 576.58M | -3.49 | -$2.46 | +0.88% |
| TC.TO | $25.37 | +4.62% | 280.52M | -1.82 | -$13.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CYBT.CN vs MSFT.NE Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, MSFT.NE has a market cap of 4.82T. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while MSFT.NE trades at $32.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas MSFT.NE's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to MSFT.NE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to MSFT.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs PANW.NE Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, PANW.NE has a market cap of 179.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while PANW.NE trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PANW.NE's P/E ratio is 105.86. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to PANW.NE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to PANW.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs NVEI.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, NVEI.TO has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while NVEI.TO trades at $47.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas NVEI.TO's P/E ratio is 216.41. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to NVEI.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to NVEI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs BB.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, BB.TO has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while BB.TO trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BB.TO's P/E ratio is -543.00. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to BB.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to BB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs TIXT.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, TIXT.TO has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while TIXT.TO trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TIXT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to TIXT.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to TIXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs CPLF.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, CPLF.TO has a market cap of 943.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while CPLF.TO trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CPLF.TO's P/E ratio is -49.96. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to CPLF.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to CPLF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs CVO.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, CVO.TO has a market cap of 681.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while CVO.TO trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CVO.TO's P/E ratio is -46.80. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to CVO.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to CVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs DND.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 576.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while DND.TO trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs TC.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, TC.TO has a market cap of 280.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while TC.TO trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas TC.TO's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to TC.TO's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to TC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs STC.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, STC.TO has a market cap of 276.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while STC.TO trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas STC.TO's P/E ratio is -28.41. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to STC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to STC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs PAY.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, PAY.TO has a market cap of 193.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while PAY.TO trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PAY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to PAY.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to PAY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs GIVX.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, GIVX.TO has a market cap of 190.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while GIVX.TO trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GIVX.TO's P/E ratio is -74.50. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to GIVX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to GIVX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs HAI.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, HAI.TO has a market cap of 120.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while HAI.TO trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HAI.TO's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to HAI.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to HAI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs NC.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, NC.CN has a market cap of 55.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while NC.CN trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas NC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to NC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to NC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs RAIL.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, RAIL.CN has a market cap of 52.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while RAIL.CN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas RAIL.CN's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to RAIL.CN's ROE of -8.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN and RAIL.CN have similar daily volatility (3.92).
CYBT.CN vs MOGO.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, MOGO.TO has a market cap of 44.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while MOGO.TO trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas MOGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to MOGO.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to MOGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs SCPE.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, SCPE.CN has a market cap of 18.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while SCPE.CN trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SCPE.CN's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to SCPE.CN's ROE of -9.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to SCPE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs PACT.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, PACT.CN has a market cap of 18.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while PACT.CN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PACT.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to PACT.CN's ROE of -11.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to PACT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs HANK.V Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, HANK.V has a market cap of 15.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while HANK.V trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HANK.V's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to HANK.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to HANK.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs ICS.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, ICS.CN has a market cap of 14.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while ICS.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ICS.CN's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to ICS.CN's ROE of +9.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to ICS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs NFTX.NE Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, NFTX.NE has a market cap of 8.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while NFTX.NE trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas NFTX.NE's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to NFTX.NE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to NFTX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs IP.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, IP.CN has a market cap of 7.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while IP.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas IP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to IP.CN's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to IP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs OPT.TO Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, OPT.TO has a market cap of 6.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while OPT.TO trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas OPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to OPT.TO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to OPT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs EONX.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, EONX.CN has a market cap of 6.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while EONX.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas EONX.CN's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to EONX.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to EONX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs PKK.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, PKK.CN has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while PKK.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PKK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to PKK.CN's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to PKK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs PERK.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, PERK.CN has a market cap of 5.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while PERK.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PERK.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to PERK.CN's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to PERK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs SCYB.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, SCYB.CN has a market cap of 4.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while SCYB.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SCYB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to SCYB.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is less volatile compared to SCYB.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs MBLM.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, MBLM.CN has a market cap of 3.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while MBLM.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas MBLM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to MBLM.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to MBLM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs BVCI.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, BVCI.CN has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while BVCI.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BVCI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to BVCI.CN's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to BVCI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs DSAI.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, DSAI.CN has a market cap of 2.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while DSAI.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DSAI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to DSAI.CN's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to DSAI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs HRO.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, HRO.CN has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while HRO.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HRO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to HRO.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to HRO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs APP.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, APP.CN has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while APP.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas APP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to APP.CN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to APP.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs BYND.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, BYND.CN has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while BYND.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BYND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to BYND.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to BYND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs AMPD.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, AMPD.CN has a market cap of 601665.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while AMPD.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas AMPD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to AMPD.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to AMPD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.
CYBT.CN vs SQID.CN Comparison
CYBT.CN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBT.CN stands at 16.67M. In comparison, SQID.CN has a market cap of 72084.00. Regarding current trading prices, CYBT.CN is priced at $0.13, while SQID.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBT.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CYBT.CN's ROE is +2.31%, compared to SQID.CN's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBT.CN is more volatile compared to SQID.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBT.CN.