Cyberlux Corporation
Cyberlux Corporation (CYBL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CYBL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYBL | $0.01 | -0.65% | 36.9M | 0.62 | $0.01 | N/A |
| ASMLF | $755.16 | +2.26% | 297B | 26.98 | $27.99 | +0.95% |
| SLEGF | $188.10 | +0.00% | 72.3B | 376.19 | $0.50 | N/A |
| TOELY | $69.36 | +0.57% | 63.8B | 17.36 | $3.99 | +1.74% |
| IFNNY | $43.04 | +2.55% | 56.8B | 38.82 | $1.11 | +0.89% |
| IFNNF | $43.05 | +3.93% | 55.9B | 38.78 | $1.11 | +0.85% |
| ATEYY | $75.21 | +1.79% | 55.5B | 50.95 | $1.48 | +0.24% |
| ADTTF | $75.72 | +11.48% | 55.4B | 51.51 | $1.47 | +0.35% |
| RNECY | $6.04 | +2.37% | 43.4B | -33.56 | -$0.18 | +0.93% |
| DISPF | $277.01 | +0.00% | 30B | 35.98 | $7.70 | +1.01% |
Stock Comparison
CYBL vs ASMLF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ASMLF has a market cap of 297B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ASMLF trades at $755.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ASMLF's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ASMLF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to ASMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ASMLF's competition here
CYBL vs SLEGF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SLEGF has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SLEGF trades at $188.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SLEGF's P/E ratio is 376.19. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SLEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SLEGF's competition here
CYBL vs TOELY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, TOELY has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while TOELY trades at $69.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas TOELY's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TOELY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to TOELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check TOELY's competition here
CYBL vs IFNNY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, IFNNY has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while IFNNY trades at $43.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas IFNNY's P/E ratio is 38.82. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to IFNNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to IFNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check IFNNY's competition here
CYBL vs IFNNF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, IFNNF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while IFNNF trades at $43.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas IFNNF's P/E ratio is 38.78. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to IFNNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to IFNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check IFNNF's competition here
CYBL vs ATEYY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ATEYY has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ATEYY trades at $75.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ATEYY's P/E ratio is 50.95. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ATEYY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to ATEYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ATEYY's competition here
CYBL vs ADTTF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ADTTF has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ADTTF trades at $75.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ADTTF's P/E ratio is 51.51. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ADTTF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to ADTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ADTTF's competition here
CYBL vs RNECY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, RNECY has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while RNECY trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas RNECY's P/E ratio is -33.56. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RNECY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to RNECY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check RNECY's competition here
CYBL vs DISPF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, DISPF has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while DISPF trades at $277.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas DISPF's P/E ratio is 35.98. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to DISPF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to DISPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check DISPF's competition here
CYBL vs DSCSY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, DSCSY has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while DSCSY trades at $26.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas DSCSY's P/E ratio is 34.68. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to DSCSY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to DSCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check DSCSY's competition here
CYBL vs STMEF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, STMEF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while STMEF trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas STMEF's P/E ratio is 39.36. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to STMEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to STMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check STMEF's competition here
CYBL vs ASMXF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ASMXF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ASMXF trades at $478.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ASMXF's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ASMXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to ASMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ASMXF's competition here
CYBL vs ASMIY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ASMIY has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ASMIY trades at $478.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ASMIY's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ASMIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to ASMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ASMIY's competition here
CYBL vs RNECF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, RNECF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while RNECF trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas RNECF's P/E ratio is -32.83. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RNECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to RNECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check RNECF's competition here
CYBL vs BESVF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, BESVF has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while BESVF trades at $138.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas BESVF's P/E ratio is 55.45. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BESVF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to BESVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check BESVF's competition here
CYBL vs BESIY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, BESIY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while BESIY trades at $136.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas BESIY's P/E ratio is 54.94. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BESIY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to BESIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check BESIY's competition here
CYBL vs LSRCY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, LSRCY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while LSRCY trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas LSRCY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LSRCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to LSRCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check LSRCY's competition here
CYBL vs LSRCF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, LSRCF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while LSRCF trades at $97.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas LSRCF's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to LSRCF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to LSRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check LSRCF's competition here
CYBL vs DINRF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, DINRF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while DINRF trades at $91.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas DINRF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to DINRF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to DINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check DINRF's competition here
CYBL vs HHUSF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, HHUSF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while HHUSF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas HHUSF's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to HHUSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to HHUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check HHUSF's competition here
CYBL vs ROHCY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ROHCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ROHCY trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ROHCY's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ROHCY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to ROHCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ROHCY's competition here
CYBL vs ROHCF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ROHCF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ROHCF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ROHCF's P/E ratio is -16.42. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ROHCF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to ROHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ROHCF's competition here
CYBL vs MLXSF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, MLXSF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while MLXSF trades at $77.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas MLXSF's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MLXSF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to MLXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check MLXSF's competition here
CYBL vs NDCVF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, NDCVF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while NDCVF trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas NDCVF's P/E ratio is 231.29. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NDCVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to NDCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check NDCVF's competition here
CYBL vs ASMVF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ASMVF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ASMVF trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ASMVF's P/E ratio is 93.00. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ASMVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to ASMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ASMVF's competition here
CYBL vs SUMCF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SUMCF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SUMCF trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SUMCF's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SUMCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to SUMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SUMCF's competition here
CYBL vs NRSDY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, NRSDY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while NRSDY trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas NRSDY's P/E ratio is 215.00. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NRSDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to NRSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check NRSDY's competition here
CYBL vs SUOPY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SUOPY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SUOPY trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SUOPY's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SUOPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SUOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SUOPY's competition here
CYBL vs AMSSY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, AMSSY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while AMSSY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas AMSSY's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to AMSSY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to AMSSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check AMSSY's competition here
CYBL vs SLOIY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SLOIY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SLOIY trades at $27.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SLOIY's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SLOIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to SLOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SLOIY's competition here
CYBL vs AWEVF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, AWEVF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while AWEVF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas AWEVF's P/E ratio is -39.58. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to AWEVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to AWEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check AWEVF's competition here
CYBL vs AIXXF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, AIXXF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while AIXXF trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas AIXXF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to AIXXF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to AIXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check AIXXF's competition here
CYBL vs AIIXY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, AIIXY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while AIIXY trades at $30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas AIIXY's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to AIIXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to AIIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check AIIXY's competition here
CYBL vs SLOIF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SLOIF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SLOIF trades at $42.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SLOIF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SLOIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to SLOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SLOIF's competition here
CYBL vs SSLLF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SSLLF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SSLLF trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SSLLF's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SSLLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SSLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SSLLF's competition here
CYBL vs OXINF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, OXINF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while OXINF trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas OXINF's P/E ratio is 42.58. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to OXINF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to OXINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check OXINF's competition here
CYBL vs AUKUF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, AUKUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while AUKUF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas AUKUF's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to AUKUF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to AUKUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check AUKUF's competition here
CYBL vs SFDMY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SFDMY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SFDMY trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SFDMY's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SFDMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SFDMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SFDMY's competition here
CYBL vs ASMVY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ASMVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ASMVY trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ASMVY's P/E ratio is 117.67. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ASMVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to ASMVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ASMVY's competition here
CYBL vs XFABF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, XFABF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while XFABF trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas XFABF's P/E ratio is 36.85. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to XFABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to XFABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check XFABF's competition here
CYBL vs FUJXF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, FUJXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while FUJXF trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas FUJXF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FUJXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to FUJXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check FUJXF's competition here
CYBL vs SANJF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SANJF has a market cap of 880.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SANJF trades at $41.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SANJF's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SANJF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SANJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SANJF's competition here
CYBL vs PVLYL Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, PVLYL has a market cap of 691.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while PVLYL trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas PVLYL's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PVLYL's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to PVLYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check PVLYL's competition here
CYBL vs SESMF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SESMF has a market cap of 615.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SESMF trades at $32.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SESMF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SESMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SESMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SESMF's competition here
CYBL vs SILXF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SILXF has a market cap of 613.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SILXF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SILXF's P/E ratio is -32.25. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SILXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SILXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SILXF's competition here
CYBL vs SILXY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SILXY has a market cap of 594.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SILXY trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SILXY's P/E ratio is -29.76. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SILXY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SILXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SILXY's competition here
CYBL vs MITNF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, MITNF has a market cap of 507.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while MITNF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas MITNF's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MITNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to MITNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check MITNF's competition here
CYBL vs THPTF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, THPTF has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while THPTF trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas THPTF's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to THPTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to THPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check THPTF's competition here
CYBL vs WBTNF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, WBTNF has a market cap of 359.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while WBTNF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas WBTNF's P/E ratio is -13.27. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to WBTNF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to WBTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check WBTNF's competition here
CYBL vs BRCHF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, BRCHF has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while BRCHF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas BRCHF's P/E ratio is -12.84. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BRCHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to BRCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check BRCHF's competition here
CYBL vs NLST Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, NLST has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while NLST trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas NLST's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NLST's ROE of +4.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to NLST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check NLST's competition here
CYBL vs MCRNF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, MCRNF has a market cap of 195.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while MCRNF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas MCRNF's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MCRNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to MCRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check MCRNF's competition here
CYBL vs QNCCF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, QNCCF has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while QNCCF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas QNCCF's P/E ratio is -25.10. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to QNCCF's ROE of -5.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to QNCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check QNCCF's competition here
CYBL vs IQEPY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, IQEPY has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while IQEPY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas IQEPY's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to IQEPY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to IQEPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check IQEPY's competition here
CYBL vs IQEPF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, IQEPF has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while IQEPF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas IQEPF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to IQEPF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to IQEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check IQEPF's competition here
CYBL vs FRDSF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, FRDSF has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while FRDSF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas FRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to FRDSF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to FRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check FRDSF's competition here
CYBL vs RNWEY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, RNWEY has a market cap of 104.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while RNWEY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas RNWEY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RNWEY's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to RNWEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check RNWEY's competition here
CYBL vs RNWEF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, RNWEF has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while RNWEF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas RNWEF's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RNWEF's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to RNWEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check RNWEF's competition here
CYBL vs PAGDF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, PAGDF has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while PAGDF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas PAGDF's P/E ratio is -56.40. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PAGDF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to PAGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check PAGDF's competition here
CYBL vs ARRXF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ARRXF has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ARRXF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ARRXF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ARRXF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to ARRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ARRXF's competition here
CYBL vs SODI Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SODI has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SODI trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SODI's P/E ratio is -338.00. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SODI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SODI's competition here
CYBL vs OBDCF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, OBDCF has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while OBDCF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas OBDCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to OBDCF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to OBDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check OBDCF's competition here
CYBL vs PRKR Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, PRKR has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while PRKR trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas PRKR's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PRKR's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to PRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check PRKR's competition here
CYBL vs MMTIF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, MMTIF has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while MMTIF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas MMTIF's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MMTIF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to MMTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check MMTIF's competition here
CYBL vs MYBUF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, MYBUF has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while MYBUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas MYBUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MYBUF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to MYBUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check MYBUF's competition here
CYBL vs NXTBF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, NXTBF has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while NXTBF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas NXTBF's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NXTBF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to NXTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check NXTBF's competition here
CYBL vs NNOCF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, NNOCF has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while NNOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas NNOCF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NNOCF's ROE of +4.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to NNOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check NNOCF's competition here
CYBL vs BUGLF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, BUGLF has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while BUGLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas BUGLF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BUGLF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to BUGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check BUGLF's competition here
CYBL vs SCIA Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SCIA has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SCIA trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SCIA's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SCIA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SCIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SCIA's competition here
CYBL vs WSKEF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, WSKEF has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while WSKEF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas WSKEF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to WSKEF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to WSKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check WSKEF's competition here
CYBL vs GUER Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, GUER has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while GUER trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas GUER's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to GUER's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to GUER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check GUER's competition here
CYBL vs RBCN Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, RBCN has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while RBCN trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas RBCN's P/E ratio is -18.83. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to RBCN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to RBCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check RBCN's competition here
CYBL vs BCHPY Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, BCHPY has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while BCHPY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas BCHPY's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to BCHPY's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to BCHPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check BCHPY's competition here
CYBL vs PSFT Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, PSFT has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while PSFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas PSFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to PSFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to PSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check PSFT's competition here
CYBL vs MANZF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, MANZF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while MANZF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas MANZF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MANZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to MANZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check MANZF's competition here
CYBL vs SPVNF Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SPVNF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SPVNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SPVNF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SPVNF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to SPVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SPVNF's competition here
CYBL vs NMGC Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, NMGC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while NMGC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas NMGC's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to NMGC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to NMGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check NMGC's competition here
CYBL vs STRI Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, STRI has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while STRI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas STRI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to STRI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to STRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check STRI's competition here
CYBL vs ITCJ Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ITCJ has a market cap of 335K. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ITCJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ITCJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ITCJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to ITCJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ITCJ's competition here
CYBL vs ODII Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, ODII has a market cap of 292K. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while ODII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas ODII's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to ODII's ROE of +1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to ODII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check ODII's competition here
CYBL vs CXCQ Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, CXCQ has a market cap of 255K. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while CXCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas CXCQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to CXCQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to CXCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check CXCQ's competition here
CYBL vs GSTX Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, GSTX has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while GSTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas GSTX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to GSTX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to GSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check GSTX's competition here
CYBL vs TXCCQ Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, TXCCQ has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while TXCCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas TXCCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to TXCCQ's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to TXCCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check TXCCQ's competition here
CYBL vs MTNX Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, MTNX has a market cap of 4.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while MTNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas MTNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to MTNX's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to MTNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check MTNX's competition here
CYBL vs STRB Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, STRB has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while STRB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas STRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to STRB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to STRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check STRB's competition here
CYBL vs SRII Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, SRII has a market cap of 350. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while SRII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas SRII's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to SRII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is more volatile compared to SRII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check SRII's competition here
CYBL vs HSCO Comparison August 2025
CYBL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYBL stands at 36.9M. In comparison, HSCO has a market cap of 200. Regarding current trading prices, CYBL is priced at $0.01, while HSCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYBL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.62, whereas HSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYBL's ROE is -0.62%, compared to HSCO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CYBL is less volatile compared to HSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYBL.Check HSCO's competition here