CyberAgent, Inc.
CyberAgent, Inc. CYAGF Peers
See (CYAGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYAGF | $8.08 | N/A | 4.1B | 27.86 | $0.29 | +1.39% |
| PUBGY | $27.12 | +0.30% | 27.2B | 14.43 | $1.88 | +2.99% |
| PGPEF | $107.00 | N/A | 26.8B | 14.27 | $7.50 | N/A |
| CYPXF | $0.76 | N/A | 15.2B | -75.80 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| WPPGF | $7.80 | -2.01% | 8.4B | 11.82 | $0.66 | +6.46% |
| DNTUF | $21.85 | N/A | 5.7B | -4.30 | -$5.08 | +2.00% |
| DNTUY | $21.19 | -0.40% | 5.5B | -4.17 | -$5.08 | +3.05% |
| HKUOY | $14.66 | -2.40% | 5.4B | 36.65 | $0.40 | N/A |
| CYGIY | $4.81 | N/A | 4.9B | 32.07 | $0.15 | N/A |
| JCDXY | $8.87 | +11.85% | 3.8B | 12.86 | $0.69 | +3.41% |
Stock Comparison
CYAGF vs PUBGY Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PUBGY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while PUBGY trades at $27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas PUBGY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUBGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to PUBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs PGPEF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PGPEF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while PGPEF trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas PGPEF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGPEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to PGPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs CYPXF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CYPXF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while CYPXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas CYPXF's P/E ratio is -75.80. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYPXF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to CYPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs WPPGF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WPPGF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while WPPGF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas WPPGF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPPGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to WPPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs DNTUF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DNTUF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while DNTUF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas DNTUF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNTUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to DNTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs DNTUY Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DNTUY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while DNTUY trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas DNTUY's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DNTUY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to DNTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs HKUOY Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HKUOY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while HKUOY trades at $14.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas HKUOY's P/E ratio is 36.65. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKUOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to HKUOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs CYGIY Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CYGIY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while CYGIY trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas CYGIY's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to CYGIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs JCDXY Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JCDXY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while JCDXY trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas JCDXY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JCDXY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to JCDXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs JCDXF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, JCDXF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while JCDXF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas JCDXF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JCDXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to JCDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs HKUOF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HKUOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while HKUOF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas HKUOF's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HKUOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to HKUOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs SOTDF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SOTDF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while SOTDF trades at $49.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas SOTDF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOTDF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to SOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs AIAPF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AIAPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while AIAPF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas AIAPF's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIAPF's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to AIAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs FRRFF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FRRFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while FRRFF trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas FRRFF's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRRFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to FRRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs YUGVF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, YUGVF has a market cap of 487.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while YUGVF trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas YUGVF's P/E ratio is 416.00. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YUGVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to YUGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs SPIDY Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPIDY has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while SPIDY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas SPIDY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPIDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to SPIDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs NXFNF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NXFNF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while NXFNF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas NXFNF's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NXFNF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to NXFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs MCCLF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MCCLF has a market cap of 322.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while MCCLF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas MCCLF's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCCLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to MCCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs TTTPF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TTTPF has a market cap of 282.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while TTTPF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas TTTPF's P/E ratio is 45.22. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTTPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to TTTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs PTMEY Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PTMEY has a market cap of 276.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while PTMEY trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas PTMEY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTMEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to PTMEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs PROM Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PROM has a market cap of 225M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while PROM trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas PROM's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PROM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to PROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs SCPPF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SCPPF has a market cap of 199.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while SCPPF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas SCPPF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCPPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to SCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs KLTI Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KLTI has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while KLTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas KLTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KLTI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to KLTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs VCCLF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VCCLF has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while VCCLF trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas VCCLF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VCCLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to VCCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs PCOFF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PCOFF has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while PCOFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas PCOFF's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCOFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to PCOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs OPESF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OPESF has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while OPESF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas OPESF's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPESF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to OPESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs GTNLF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTNLF has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while GTNLF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas GTNLF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTNLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to GTNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs CAUUF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CAUUF has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while CAUUF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas CAUUF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAUUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to CAUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs GMGZ Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GMGZ has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while GMGZ trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas GMGZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GMGZ's ROE of -30.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to GMGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs NHLPF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NHLPF has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while NHLPF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas NHLPF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NHLPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to NHLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs EZOO Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EZOO has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while EZOO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas EZOO's P/E ratio is -24.70. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EZOO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to EZOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs IFUS Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IFUS has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while IFUS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas IFUS's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IFUS's ROE of +2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to IFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs ACHN Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ACHN has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while ACHN trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas ACHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACHN's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to ACHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs CNFN Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CNFN has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while CNFN trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas CNFN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNFN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to CNFN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs SNIPF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SNIPF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while SNIPF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas SNIPF's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNIPF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to SNIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs TGNT Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TGNT has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while TGNT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas TGNT's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGNT's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to TGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs SPTY Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPTY has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while SPTY trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas SPTY's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPTY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to SPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs INEOF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INEOF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while INEOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas INEOF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INEOF's ROE of +2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to INEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs AATV Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AATV has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while AATV trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas AATV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AATV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to AATV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs UCPA Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UCPA has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while UCPA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas UCPA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UCPA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to UCPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs VYBE Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VYBE has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while VYBE trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas VYBE's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VYBE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to VYBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs DBMM Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DBMM has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while DBMM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas DBMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBMM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to DBMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs BYOC Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BYOC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while BYOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas BYOC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BYOC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to BYOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs CMGR Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CMGR has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while CMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas CMGR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMGR's ROE of +241.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to CMGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs FBOP Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FBOP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while FBOP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas FBOP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FBOP's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to FBOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs MMND Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MMND has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while MMND trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas MMND's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMND's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to MMND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs LIGA Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LIGA has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while LIGA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas LIGA's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to LIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs CEENF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CEENF has a market cap of 985.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while CEENF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas CEENF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEENF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to CEENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs PVSP Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PVSP has a market cap of 755.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while PVSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas PVSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PVSP's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to PVSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs DMSL Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DMSL has a market cap of 484.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while DMSL trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas DMSL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DMSL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to DMSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs CMGO Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CMGO has a market cap of 416.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while CMGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas CMGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMGO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to CMGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs MMDDF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MMDDF has a market cap of 413K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while MMDDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas MMDDF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMDDF's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to MMDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs GOOLF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GOOLF has a market cap of 343.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while GOOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas GOOLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOOLF's ROE of +3.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to GOOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs SNPW Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SNPW has a market cap of 327.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while SNPW trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas SNPW's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNPW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to SNPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs ATXMF Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ATXMF has a market cap of 276.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while ATXMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas ATXMF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATXMF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to ATXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs WWIO Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WWIO has a market cap of 139K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while WWIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas WWIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WWIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to WWIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs ACTL Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ACTL has a market cap of 76.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while ACTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas ACTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACTL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to ACTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs NXMR Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NXMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while NXMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas NXMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NXMR's ROE of -3.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to NXMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs TRBO Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TRBO has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while TRBO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas TRBO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRBO's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to TRBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs ITKH Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ITKH has a market cap of 23.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while ITKH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas ITKH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITKH's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to ITKH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs PRKI Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PRKI has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while PRKI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas PRKI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRKI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to PRKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs NBDR Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NBDR has a market cap of 21K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while NBDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas NBDR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBDR's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to NBDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs EPGC Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EPGC has a market cap of 18.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while EPGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas EPGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EPGC's ROE of +10.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to EPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs PSYC Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PSYC has a market cap of 17.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while PSYC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas PSYC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSYC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to PSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs RFII Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RFII has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while RFII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas RFII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RFII's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to RFII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs GBXI Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GBXI has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while GBXI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas GBXI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBXI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to GBXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs NWCN Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NWCN has a market cap of 12.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while NWCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas NWCN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to NWCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs CYGT Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CYGT has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while CYGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas CYGT's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CYGT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to CYGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs GTRL Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTRL has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while GTRL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas GTRL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTRL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to GTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs ISML Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ISML has a market cap of 4.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while ISML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas ISML's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISML's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to ISML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs WGEE Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WGEE has a market cap of 3.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while WGEE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas WGEE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WGEE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to WGEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs BXNG Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BXNG has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while BXNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas BXNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to BXNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs BWAV Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BWAV has a market cap of 585. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while BWAV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas BWAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWAV's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to BWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs ADST Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADST has a market cap of 204. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while ADST trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas ADST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADST's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to ADST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs LOGX Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LOGX has a market cap of 68. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while LOGX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas LOGX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to LOGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs VPSN Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VPSN has a market cap of 1. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while VPSN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas VPSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VPSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to VPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs ADTY Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while ADTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas ADTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to ADTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs ZULU Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ZULU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while ZULU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas ZULU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZULU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to ZULU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs MYRY Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MYRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while MYRY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas MYRY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYRY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is more volatile compared to MYRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.
CYAGF vs LTMP Comparison
CYAGF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CYAGF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, LTMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CYAGF is priced at $8.08, while LTMP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CYAGF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.86, whereas LTMP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CYAGF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LTMP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CYAGF is less volatile compared to LTMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CYAGF.