China XD Plastics Company Limited
China XD Plastics Company Limited CXDC Peers
See (CXDC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXDC | $0.00 | N/A | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AIQUF | $206.52 | -0.44% | 119.1B | 31.34 | $6.59 | +1.56% |
| AIQUY | $41.04 | -1.28% | 118.3B | 31.09 | $1.32 | +1.77% |
| PTCAY | $56.00 | N/A | 48.4B | -509.09 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| GVDBF | $5,008.62 | -5.05% | 46.2B | 35.07 | $142.82 | +1.58% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | N/A | 45.6B | -52.67 | -$0.01 | +0.07% |
| GVDNY | $97.61 | -2.41% | 45B | 34.01 | $2.87 | +1.57% |
| SKFOF | $260.27 | -2.30% | 41.8B | 27.57 | $9.44 | +0.79% |
| SXYAY | $25.83 | -1.86% | 41.4B | 27.19 | $0.95 | +1.45% |
| NVZMY | $72.69 | +0.02% | 34.1B | 63.76 | $1.14 | +1.44% |
Stock Comparison
CXDC vs AIQUF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 119.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while AIQUF trades at $206.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs AIQUY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 118.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while AIQUY trades at $41.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs PTCAY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is -509.09. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs GVDBF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while GVDBF trades at $5,008.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and GVDBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs PTPIF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs GVDNY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while GVDNY trades at $97.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs SKFOF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while SKFOF trades at $260.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs SXYAY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while SXYAY trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs NVZMY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while NVZMY trades at $72.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 63.76. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs NVZMF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while NVZMF trades at $72.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 64.01. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs AKZOY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while AKZOY trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs EMSHF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while EMSHF trades at $771.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 32.05. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs NPCPF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while NPCPF trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs SYIEF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while SYIEF trades at $120.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs SYIEY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while SYIEY trades at $27.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs COVTY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while COVTY trades at $34.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -28.95. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs NDEKF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while NDEKF trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and NDEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs CVVTF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while CVVTF trades at $62.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -25.95. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs AKZOF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while AKZOF trades at $65.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and AKZOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs CRTSF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs CHYHY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs BNTGF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while BNTGF trades at $71.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and BNTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs EVKIY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while EVKIY trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs EVKIF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while EVKIF trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and EVKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs BNTGY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while BNTGY trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs SCVUF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs IMDZF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while IMDZF trades at $127.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs FUPBY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while FUPBY trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs ASGLF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is -13.89. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and ASGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs FUPPF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and FUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs ASGLY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ASGLY trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs OCLDY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while OCLDY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 102.92. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and OCLDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs COIHF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while COIHF trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs SCVPY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs TKCBY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs COIHY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while COIHY trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs ARKAY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ARKAY trades at $68.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs ARKAF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ARKAF trades at $69.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs FUPEF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while FUPEF trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs NDEKY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while NDEKY trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs OCLDF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while OCLDF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs MITUF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while MITUF trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs KDSKF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs MITUY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while MITUY trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs JMPLF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while JMPLF trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs JMPLY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while JMPLY trades at $45.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and JMPLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs AZLGF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while AZLGF trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs CLZNF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs WKCMF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while WKCMF trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and WKCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs NOFCF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and NOFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs HXXPY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs CLZNY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while CLZNY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs ICPVF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs SASOF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while SASOF trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs HXPLF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while HXPLF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and HXPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs MBGCF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while MBGCF trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs KPTCY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while KPTCY trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs INCZY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs KSANF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs AWTRF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while AWTRF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs LNXSF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while LNXSF trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs TKKYY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 2.58. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs LNXSY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while LNXSY trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -15.49. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs DACHF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while DACHF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and DACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs IRLCF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and IRLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs ZEOOY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs OCINF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while OCINF trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs KPLIF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs ZEOOF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs BRRDF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and BRRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs KANKF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and KANKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs ALZCF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ALZCF trades at $148.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and ALZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs TKYMY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while TKYMY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs ELKEF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ELKEF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and ELKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs CSNVY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while CSNVY trades at $22.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and CSNVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs TKCBF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs CSNVF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while CSNVF trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and CSNVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs HUABF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs ALPKF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ALPKF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -28.38. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and ALPKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs CUYRF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs EMNSF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while EMNSF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs TKYMF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and TKYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs LNTEF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs ELMTY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while ELMTY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and ELMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs VTXPF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 998.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while VTXPF trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and VTXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs SKKAF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 984.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while SKKAF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs HUIHY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs AECLY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and AECLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs HASGF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs DALQF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs SYCHF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and SYCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs VBVBF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 720M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while VBVBF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -22.16. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs DLNDY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 688M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while DLNDY trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs TYOBY Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs FPLSF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 556.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while FPLSF trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and FPLSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs TNMAF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs FLRAF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while FLRAF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 27.20. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and FLRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CXDC vs NOPMF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 385.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while NOPMF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -24.89. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CXDC.
CXDC vs NCRBF Comparison
CXDC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CXDC stands at 0. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CXDC is priced at $0.00, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CXDC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CXDC's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CXDC and NCRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).