SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF
SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF CWB Peers
See (CWB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | $79.61 | -0.11% | 3.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.92% |
| VOO | $532.40 | -0.68% | 1.3T | 25.26 | $21.07 | +1.31% |
| VFINX | $536.41 | -0.66% | 1.3T | 25.26 | $21.24 | +1.31% |
| VITSX | $138.74 | -0.63% | 1.2T | 24.54 | $5.65 | +1.32% |
| VTSAX | $138.71 | -0.63% | 1.2T | 24.54 | $5.65 | +0.02% |
| FXAIX | $201.83 | -0.66% | 594B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTI | $285.04 | -0.59% | 591.1B | 24.56 | $11.61 | +1.32% |
| IVV | $582.00 | -0.64% | 572.6B | 25.24 | $23.06 | +1.33% |
| SPY | $579.11 | -0.68% | 531.5B | 25.23 | $22.95 | +1.24% |
| VXUS | $66.75 | +0.33% | 470.4B | 15.99 | $4.17 | +2.92% |
Stock Comparison
CWB vs VOO Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VOO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VOO trades at $532.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOO's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VOO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to VOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VFINX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VFINX has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VFINX trades at $536.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFINX's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VFINX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VFINX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VITSX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VITSX has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VITSX trades at $138.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITSX's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VITSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VITSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VTSAX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VTSAX has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VTSAX trades at $138.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSAX's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTSAX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VTSAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs FXAIX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FXAIX has a market cap of 594B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while FXAIX trades at $201.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to FXAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to FXAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VTI Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VTI has a market cap of 591.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VTI trades at $285.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTI's P/E ratio is 24.56. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to VTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs IVV Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, IVV has a market cap of 572.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while IVV trades at $582.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVV's P/E ratio is 25.24. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to IVV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to IVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs SPY Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SPY has a market cap of 531.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while SPY trades at $579.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPY's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to SPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to SPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VXUS Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VXUS has a market cap of 470.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VXUS trades at $66.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VXUS's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VXUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to VXUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VTSNX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VTSNX has a market cap of 469.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VTSNX trades at $143.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTSNX's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTSNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VTSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VMCPX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VMCPX has a market cap of 334.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VMCPX trades at $359.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMCPX's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VMCPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VIMAX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VIMAX has a market cap of 307.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VIMAX trades at $330.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIMAX's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VIMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VIMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VIIIX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VIIIX has a market cap of 290.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VIIIX trades at $472.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIIIX's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VIIIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VIIIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VINIX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VINIX has a market cap of 290.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VINIX trades at $472.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VINIX's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VINIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VINIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RGAGX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RGAGX has a market cap of 267.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RGAGX trades at $75.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGAGX's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RGAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RGAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs GAFFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GAFFX has a market cap of 267.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while GAFFX trades at $75.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAFFX's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to GAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to GAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AGTHX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AGTHX has a market cap of 266.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AGTHX trades at $75.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGTHX's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AGTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AGTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs GFAFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GFAFX has a market cap of 264.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while GFAFX trades at $74.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFAFX's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to GFAFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to GFAFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RGABX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RGABX has a market cap of 237.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RGABX trades at $67.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGABX's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RGABX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RGABX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RGAAX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RGAAX has a market cap of 233.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RGAAX trades at $65.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGAAX's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RGAAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RGAAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs ABALX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ABALX has a market cap of 232.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while ABALX trades at $34.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABALX's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to ABALX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to ABALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AMBFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AMBFX has a market cap of 232.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AMBFX trades at $34.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBFX's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AMBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs BALFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BALFX has a market cap of 232.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while BALFX trades at $34.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALFX's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to BALFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to BALFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RLBGX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RLBGX has a market cap of 232.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RLBGX trades at $34.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLBGX's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RLBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RLBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AFMBX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AFMBX has a market cap of 232.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AFMBX trades at $34.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFMBX's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AFMBX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AFMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs GFACX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GFACX has a market cap of 227.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while GFACX trades at $64.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFACX's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to GFACX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to GFACX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VEA Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VEA has a market cap of 214.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VEA trades at $55.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEA's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to VEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VTMNX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VTMNX has a market cap of 214.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VTMNX trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTMNX's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTMNX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VTMNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VDIPX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VDIPX has a market cap of 214.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VDIPX trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDIPX's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VDIPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VDIPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs QQQ Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, QQQ has a market cap of 200.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while QQQ trades at $509.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQQ's P/E ratio is 31.93. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to QQQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to QQQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VB Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VB has a market cap of 199.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VB trades at $225.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VB's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to VB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VTV Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VTV has a market cap of 183.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VTV trades at $169.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTV's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to VTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VO Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VO has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VO trades at $266.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VO's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to VO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs BX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BX has a market cap of 160.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while BX trades at $136.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BX's P/E ratio is 41.37. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to BX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to BX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs BLK Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BLK has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while BLK trades at $963.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLK's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to BLK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to BLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs FCTDX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FCTDX has a market cap of 147.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while FCTDX trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCTDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to FCTDX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to FCTDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AICFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AICFX has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AICFX trades at $58.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AICFX's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AICFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AICFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AIVSX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AIVSX has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AIVSX trades at $58.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIVSX's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AIVSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AIVSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RICBX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RICBX has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RICBX trades at $58.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICBX's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RICBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RICBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AICCX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AICCX has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AICCX trades at $57.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AICCX's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AICCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AICCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RICAX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RICAX has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RICAX trades at $58.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RICAX's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RICAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RICAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs FCNKX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FCNKX has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while FCNKX trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNKX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to FCNKX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to FCNKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs FCNTX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FCNTX has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while FCNTX trades at $21.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to FCNTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to FCNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AWSHX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AWSHX has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AWSHX trades at $62.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWSHX's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AWSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AWSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs FWMIX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FWMIX has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while FWMIX trades at $62.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWMIX's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to FWMIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to FWMIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RWMFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RWMFX has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RWMFX trades at $62.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWMFX's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RWMFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RWMFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs CWMAX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CWMAX has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while CWMAX trades at $62.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWMAX's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to CWMAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to CWMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs WSHFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, WSHFX has a market cap of 140.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while WSHFX trades at $62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSHFX's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to WSHFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to WSHFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs NPFFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NPFFX has a market cap of 140B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while NPFFX trades at $65.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPFFX's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to NPFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to NPFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs ANWPX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ANWPX has a market cap of 140B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while ANWPX trades at $65.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANWPX's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to ANWPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to ANWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs FNPFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FNPFX has a market cap of 140B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while FNPFX trades at $65.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNPFX's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to FNPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to FNPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RNPGX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RNPGX has a market cap of 140B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RNPGX trades at $65.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNPGX's P/E ratio is 26.49. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RNPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RNPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs WSHCX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, WSHCX has a market cap of 138.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while WSHCX trades at $61.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSHCX's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to WSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to WSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RWMBX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RWMBX has a market cap of 137.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RWMBX trades at $61.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWMBX's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RWMBX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RWMBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs C-PN Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, C-PN has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while C-PN trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to C-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to C-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs ANCFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ANCFX has a market cap of 134.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while ANCFX trades at $82.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANCFX's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to ANCFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to ANCFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs CFNAX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CFNAX has a market cap of 134.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while CFNAX trades at $82.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFNAX's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to CFNAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to CFNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AFIFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AFIFX has a market cap of 134.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AFIFX trades at $82.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFIFX's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AFIFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AFIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs IEFA Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, IEFA has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while IEFA trades at $81.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEFA's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to IEFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to IEFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AEPGX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AEPGX has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AEPGX trades at $59.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPGX's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AEPGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AEPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RERGX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RERGX has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RERGX trades at $59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERGX's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RERGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RERGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AEGFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AEGFX has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AEGFX trades at $59.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEGFX's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AEGFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AEGFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AEPFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AEPFX has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AEPFX trades at $59.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEPFX's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AEPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AEPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RERHX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RERHX has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RERHX trades at $59.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RERHX's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RERHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RERHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AGG Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AGG has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AGG trades at $97.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGG's P/E ratio is 124.03. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AGG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs IWF Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, IWF has a market cap of 110.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while IWF trades at $390.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWF's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to IWF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to IWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VWELX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VWELX has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VWELX trades at $43.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWELX's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VWELX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VWELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VWENX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VWENX has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VWENX trades at $74.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWENX's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VWENX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VWENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs KKR Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KKR has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while KKR trades at $117.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKR's P/E ratio is 50.51. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to KKR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to KKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VSCIX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VSCIX has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VSCIX trades at $108.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSCIX's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VSCIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VSCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs NAESX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NAESX has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while NAESX trades at $108.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAESX's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to NAESX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to NAESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VTTHX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VTTHX has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VTTHX trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTTHX's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTTHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VTTHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VIG Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VIG has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VIG trades at $194.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIG's P/E ratio is 23.93. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to VIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VDADX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VDADX has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VDADX trades at $52.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDADX's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VDADX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VDADX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs JLGRX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, JLGRX has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while JLGRX trades at $81.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLGRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to JLGRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to JLGRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs SEEGX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SEEGX has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while SEEGX trades at $78.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to SEEGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to SEEGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs JLGMX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, JLGMX has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while JLGMX trades at $82.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JLGMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to JLGMX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to JLGMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs FSKAX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FSKAX has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while FSKAX trades at $159.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSKAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to FSKAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to FSKAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VUG Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VUG has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VUG trades at $404.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUG's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to VUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VTHRX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VTHRX has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VTHRX trades at $39.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTHRX's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTHRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VTHRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs BN Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BN has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while BN trades at $57.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BN's P/E ratio is 196.86. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to BN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to BN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs TBCIX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TBCIX has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while TBCIX trades at $185.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCIX's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to TBCIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to TBCIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs TRBCX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TRBCX has a market cap of 92.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while TRBCX trades at $184.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRBCX's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to TRBCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to TRBCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VFORX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VFORX has a market cap of 92.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VFORX trades at $44.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFORX's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VFORX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VFORX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs BAM Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BAM has a market cap of 91.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while BAM trades at $56.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAM's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to BAM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to BAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs IJH Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, IJH has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while IJH trades at $59.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJH's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to IJH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to IJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VTIVX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VTIVX has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VTIVX trades at $30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIVX's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VTIVX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VTIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs DODGX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DODGX has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while DODGX trades at $259.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DODGX's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to DODGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to DODGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VGT Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VGT has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VGT trades at $595.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGT's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to VGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VITAX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VITAX has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VITAX trades at $304.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VITAX's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VITAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VITAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs PABGX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PABGX has a market cap of 89.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while PABGX trades at $177.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PABGX's P/E ratio is 35.18. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to PABGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to PABGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VEMAX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VEMAX has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VEMAX trades at $39.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEMAX's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VEMAX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VEMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs VIEIX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VIEIX has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while VIEIX trades at $137.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIEIX's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to VIEIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to VIEIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RRBGX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RRBGX has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RRBGX trades at $165.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRBGX's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RRBGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RRBGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AMPFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AMPFX has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AMPFX trades at $42.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPFX's P/E ratio is 32.07. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AMPFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AMPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs RAFFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RAFFX has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while RAFFX trades at $43.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAFFX's P/E ratio is 32.09. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to RAFFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to RAFFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs AMCPX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AMCPX has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while AMCPX trades at $42.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCPX's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to AMCPX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to AMCPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs EFA Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, EFA has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while EFA trades at $88.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFA's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to EFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is less volatile compared to EFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.
CWB vs PRUFX Comparison
CWB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWB stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PRUFX has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWB is priced at $79.61, while PRUFX trades at $102.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRUFX's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, CWB's ROE is N/A, compared to PRUFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CWB is more volatile compared to PRUFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWB.