Creative Vistas, Inc.
Creative Vistas, Inc. CVAS Peers
See (CVAS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVAS | $0.00 | N/A | 7.5K | N/A | -$0.04 | N/A |
| ASAZY | $16.16 | -0.03% | 36.3B | 23.42 | $0.69 | +1.75% |
| ASAZF | $32.94 | +3.57% | 34.7B | 24.22 | $1.36 | +0.85% |
| SOMLF | $38.19 | N/A | 15.9B | 22.73 | $1.68 | +1.73% |
| SOMLY | $9.08 | -0.63% | 15.1B | 21.63 | $0.42 | +0.52% |
| SCTBY | $15.40 | N/A | 8.5B | 15.56 | $0.99 | +2.60% |
| SCTBF | $15.35 | N/A | 8.4B | 15.51 | $0.99 | +2.63% |
| LOIMF | $39.51 | N/A | 2.6B | 15.80 | $2.50 | +3.65% |
| SOHGF | $5.31 | -80.00% | 2.6B | 17.70 | $0.30 | N/A |
| MRLWF | $5.89 | +7.00% | 462.1M | -196.17 | -$0.03 | +26.34% |
Stock Comparison
CVAS vs ASAZY Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while ASAZY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs ASAZF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while ASAZF trades at $32.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs SOMLF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while SOMLF trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to SOMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs SOMLY Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while SOMLY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs SCTBY Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while SCTBY trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to SCTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs SCTBF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while SCTBF trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to SCTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs LOIMF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to LOIMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs SOHGF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs MRLWF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 462.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while MRLWF trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is -196.17. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to MRLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs CRFQF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs ICTSF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 142.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while ICTSF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is -34.55. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs RSKIA Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while RSKIA trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to RSKIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs WPNNF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs GKPRF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while GKPRF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to GKPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs SECUF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while SECUF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is -173.00. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to SECUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to SECUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs PRBCF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs ALXXF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while ALXXF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to ALXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs LDDFF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while LDDFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs CSTI Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while CSTI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs VOTDF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs DIGTF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while DIGTF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs DADTF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while DADTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to DADTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs PLRTF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs SSECF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while SSECF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to SSECF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs MACE Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while MACE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs IWAL Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 957.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while IWAL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to IWAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs VCON Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while VCON trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs DTII Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 546.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while DTII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to DTII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs ATWT Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 480.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while ATWT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to ATWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs PTEFF Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 409.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while PTEFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs BLPG Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 408.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while BLPG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs LGTT Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while LGTT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to LGTT's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to LGTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs WCCP Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 351.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while WCCP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs DRNG Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 261.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while DRNG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to DRNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs VSYS Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while VSYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS and VSYS have similar daily volatility (198.01).
CVAS vs PSGI Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while PSGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to PSGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs SCTY Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while SCTY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to SCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs MGNT Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while MGNT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS and MGNT have similar daily volatility (198.01).
CVAS vs GDSI Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while GDSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to GDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs HCGS Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while HCGS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs MIHL Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while MIHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to MIHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs SKVY Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while SKVY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to SKVY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is less volatile compared to SKVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs ABPR Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while ABPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to ABPR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to ABPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs WOAM Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while WOAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to WOAM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to WOAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs PERL Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while PERL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to PERL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to PERL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs EKCS Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while EKCS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs EBWK Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while EBWK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to EBWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs HWSY Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while HWSY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to HWSY's ROE of +2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to HWSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs ARGL Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 741. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while ARGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to ARGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs DIRV Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while DIRV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to DIRV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs HLCN Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, HLCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while HLCN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to HLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs VSYM Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, VSYM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while VSYM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to VSYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs GTKP Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, GTKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while GTKP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to GTKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.
CVAS vs PWLK Comparison
CVAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CVAS stands at 7.5K. In comparison, PWLK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CVAS is priced at $0.00, while PWLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CVAS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CVAS's ROE is -1.47%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CVAS is more volatile compared to PWLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CVAS.