Currency Exchange International, Corp.
Currency Exchange International, Corp. CURN Peers
See (CURN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CURN | $14.89 | -0.73% | 93.32M | 40.24 | $0.37 | N/A |
| IBKKF | $0.04 | N/A | 112.10B | N/A | -$445.80 | N/A |
| HAITY | $8.00 | +60.00% | 104.51B | -19.51 | -$0.41 | +16.47% |
| MQBKY | $136.30 | -0.02% | 52.48B | 18.98 | $7.18 | +1.94% |
| CIIHY | $25.04 | -5.65% | 50.83B | 11.98 | $2.09 | +4.00% |
| MCQEF | $138.09 | +7.35% | 50.35B | 19.21 | $7.19 | +3.25% |
| CIIHF | $2.55 | N/A | 49.88B | 12.14 | $0.21 | +3.93% |
| GUOSF | $1.37 | N/A | 38.28B | 9.13 | $0.15 | +6.12% |
| HTNGF | $0.52 | N/A | 18.56B | -13.04 | -$0.04 | +27.28% |
| NRSCF | $6.00 | +12.15% | 17.74B | 7.89 | $0.76 | +0.05% |
Stock Comparison
CURN vs IBKKF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, IBKKF has a market cap of 112.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while IBKKF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas IBKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IBKKF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to IBKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs HAITY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, HAITY has a market cap of 104.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while HAITY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas HAITY's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAITY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to HAITY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs MQBKY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, MQBKY has a market cap of 52.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while MQBKY trades at $136.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas MQBKY's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MQBKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to MQBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CIIHY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CIIHY has a market cap of 50.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CIIHY trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CIIHY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIIHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CIIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs MCQEF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, MCQEF has a market cap of 50.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while MCQEF trades at $138.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas MCQEF's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCQEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to MCQEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CIIHF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CIIHF has a market cap of 49.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CIIHF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CIIHF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIIHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CIIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs GUOSF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, GUOSF has a market cap of 38.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while GUOSF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas GUOSF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GUOSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to GUOSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs HTNGF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, HTNGF has a market cap of 18.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while HTNGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas HTNGF's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HTNGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to HTNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs NRSCF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, NRSCF has a market cap of 17.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while NRSCF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas NRSCF's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NRSCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to NRSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CMSQF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CMSQF has a market cap of 15.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CMSQF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CMSQF's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMSQF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CMSQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs HUATF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, HUATF has a market cap of 15.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while HUATF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas HUATF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HUATF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to HUATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CMSQY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CMSQY has a market cap of 15.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CMSQY trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CMSQY's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMSQY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CMSQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CNICF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CNICF has a market cap of 11.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CNICF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CNICF's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNICF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CNICF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs DSEEY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, DSEEY has a market cap of 9.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while DSEEY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas DSEEY's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSEEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to DSEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs DSECF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, DSECF has a market cap of 8.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while DSECF trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas DSECF's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DSECF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to DSECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs WSOUF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, WSOUF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while WSOUF trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas WSOUF's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WSOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to WSOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs BRPHF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, BRPHF has a market cap of 7.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while BRPHF trades at $21.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas BRPHF's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRPHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to BRPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs IGGHY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, IGGHY has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while IGGHY trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas IGGHY's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IGGHY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to IGGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs IVTJF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while IVTJF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs IVTJY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while IVTJY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs IGGRF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, IGGRF has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while IGGRF trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas IGGRF's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IGGRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to IGGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CLPE Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CLPE has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CLPE trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CLPE's P/E ratio is 1380.00. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLPE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to CLPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CGXYY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CGXYY has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CGXYY trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CGXYY's P/E ratio is 193.64. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CGXYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CGXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs LTSAP Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, LTSAP has a market cap of 2.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while LTSAP trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas LTSAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LTSAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to LTSAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs PLSQF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, PLSQF has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while PLSQF trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas PLSQF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLSQF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to PLSQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs TCAPF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, TCAPF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while TCAPF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas TCAPF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCAPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to TCAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs LTSA Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, LTSA has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while LTSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas LTSA's P/E ratio is -183.73. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LTSA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to LTSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs FNNTF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, FNNTF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while FNNTF trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas FNNTF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FNNTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to FNNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs MAUSY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, MAUSY has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while MAUSY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas MAUSY's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAUSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to MAUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs NHMAF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, NHMAF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while NHMAF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas NHMAF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NHMAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to NHMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs MNXBF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, MNXBF has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while MNXBF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas MNXBF's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MNXBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to MNXBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs DEFTF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, DEFTF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while DEFTF trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas DEFTF's P/E ratio is -41.78. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DEFTF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to DEFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CFNCF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CFNCF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CFNCF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CFNCF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFNCF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CFNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs LKADF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, LKADF has a market cap of 759.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while LKADF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas LKADF's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LKADF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to LKADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CBGPY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CBGPY has a market cap of 759.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CBGPY trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CBGPY's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to CBGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CCORF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CCORF has a market cap of 700.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CCORF trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CCORF's P/E ratio is -26.29. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCORF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to CCORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CBGPF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CBGPF has a market cap of 664.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CBGPF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CBGPF's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBGPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs PHIGW Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, PHIGW has a market cap of 595.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while PHIGW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas PHIGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PHIGW's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to PHIGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs PHIG Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, PHIG has a market cap of 593.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while PHIG trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas PHIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PHIG's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to PHIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs NAGGF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, NAGGF has a market cap of 446.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while NAGGF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas NAGGF's P/E ratio is 275.67. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NAGGF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to NAGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CYFRF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CYFRF has a market cap of 430.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CYFRF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CYFRF's P/E ratio is 93.80. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CYFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CYFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CNSRF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CNSRF has a market cap of 430.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CNSRF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CNSRF's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNSRF's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CNSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CESTY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CESTY has a market cap of 333.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CESTY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CESTY's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CESTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CESTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs ABGSF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, ABGSF has a market cap of 310.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while ABGSF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas ABGSF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABGSF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to ABGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CESTF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CESTF has a market cap of 286.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CESTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CESTF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CESTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs APPCF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, APPCF has a market cap of 247.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while APPCF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas APPCF's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APPCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to APPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs OSHDF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, OSHDF has a market cap of 222.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while OSHDF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas OSHDF's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OSHDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to OSHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs ABIT Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, ABIT has a market cap of 215.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while ABIT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas ABIT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABIT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to ABIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CSCHF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CSCHF has a market cap of 205.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CSCHF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CSCHF's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CSCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs NPPTF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, NPPTF has a market cap of 171.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while NPPTF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas NPPTF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NPPTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to NPPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs PROP Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 154.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while PROP trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs OZFRY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, OZFRY has a market cap of 129.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while OZFRY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas OZFRY's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OZFRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to OZFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs PNPFF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, PNPFF has a market cap of 125.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while PNPFF trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas PNPFF's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PNPFF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to PNPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CAGPF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CAGPF has a market cap of 118.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CAGPF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CAGPF's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAGPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CAGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs STGC Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, STGC has a market cap of 109.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while STGC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas STGC's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STGC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to STGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs GEVI Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, GEVI has a market cap of 97.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while GEVI trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas GEVI's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GEVI's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to GEVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs DGTLF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, DGTLF has a market cap of 80.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while DGTLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas DGTLF's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DGTLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to DGTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs XAUMF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, XAUMF has a market cap of 76.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while XAUMF trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas XAUMF's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XAUMF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to XAUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs DYNA Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, DYNA has a market cap of 75.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while DYNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas DYNA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DYNA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to DYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs ARCNF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, ARCNF has a market cap of 59.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while ARCNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas ARCNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARCNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to ARCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs HAFG Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, HAFG has a market cap of 54.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while HAFG trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas HAFG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAFG's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to HAFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs UFFRF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, UFFRF has a market cap of 45.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while UFFRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas UFFRF's P/E ratio is 0.72. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UFFRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to UFFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs DMGGF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, DMGGF has a market cap of 45.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while DMGGF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas DMGGF's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DMGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to DMGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs BBKCF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, BBKCF has a market cap of 38.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while BBKCF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas BBKCF's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BBKCF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to BBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CBTTF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CBTTF has a market cap of 32.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CBTTF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CBTTF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBTTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CBTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CMZZF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CMZZF has a market cap of 30.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CMZZF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CMZZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMZZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to CMZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CRMZ Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CRMZ has a market cap of 26.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CRMZ trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CRMZ's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRMZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to CRMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CFLSF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CFLSF has a market cap of 26.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CFLSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CFLSF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFLSF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CFLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs EBML Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, EBML has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while EBML trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas EBML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EBML's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to EBML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs ARBKF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, ARBKF has a market cap of 23.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while ARBKF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas ARBKF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARBKF's ROE of +5.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to ARBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs SMURF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, SMURF has a market cap of 20.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while SMURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas SMURF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMURF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to SMURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs FDCT Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, FDCT has a market cap of 19.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while FDCT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas FDCT's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FDCT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to FDCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs FWAV Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, FWAV has a market cap of 15.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while FWAV trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas FWAV's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FWAV's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to FWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs BCNWF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, BCNWF has a market cap of 15.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while BCNWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas BCNWF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCNWF's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to BCNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs BULT Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, BULT has a market cap of 12.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while BULT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas BULT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BULT's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to BULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs MATEF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, MATEF has a market cap of 12.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while MATEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas MATEF's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MATEF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to MATEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs AVFCF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, AVFCF has a market cap of 12.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while AVFCF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas AVFCF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVFCF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to AVFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs DPXCF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, DPXCF has a market cap of 11.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while DPXCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas DPXCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DPXCF's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to DPXCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs ABSOF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, ABSOF has a market cap of 11.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while ABSOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas ABSOF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABSOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to ABSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs PHIL Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, PHIL has a market cap of 9.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while PHIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas PHIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PHIL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to PHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs IHLDF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, IHLDF has a market cap of 9.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while IHLDF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas IHLDF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IHLDF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to IHLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs FFTTF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, FFTTF has a market cap of 6.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while FFTTF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas FFTTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FFTTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to FFTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs ITEX Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, ITEX has a market cap of 6.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while ITEX trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas ITEX's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ITEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to ITEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs BTCWF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, BTCWF has a market cap of 6.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while BTCWF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas BTCWF's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTCWF's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to BTCWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs BLVDF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, BLVDF has a market cap of 6.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while BLVDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas BLVDF's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLVDF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to BLVDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs HIPH Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, HIPH has a market cap of 6.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while HIPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas HIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HIPH's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to HIPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs BIDCF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, BIDCF has a market cap of 5.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while BIDCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas BIDCF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIDCF's ROE of +28.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to BIDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CCPUF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CCPUF has a market cap of 5.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CCPUF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CCPUF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to CCPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CSTXF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CSTXF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CSTXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CSTXF's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSTXF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs TRAA Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, TRAA has a market cap of 5.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while TRAA trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas TRAA's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRAA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to TRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs AAMTF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, AAMTF has a market cap of 4.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while AAMTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas AAMTF's P/E ratio is -21.61. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AAMTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to AAMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs HYHDF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, HYHDF has a market cap of 4.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while HYHDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas HYHDF's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HYHDF's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to HYHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs DBKSF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, DBKSF has a market cap of 4.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while DBKSF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas DBKSF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DBKSF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to DBKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs BZRD Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, BZRD has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while BZRD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas BZRD's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BZRD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is more volatile compared to BZRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs CRKR Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, CRKR has a market cap of 3.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while CRKR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas CRKR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to CRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs BKBLF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, BKBLF has a market cap of 3.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while BKBLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas BKBLF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKBLF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to BKBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs GBCHF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, GBCHF has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while GBCHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas GBCHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GBCHF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to GBCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs BKLIF Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, BKLIF has a market cap of 2.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while BKLIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas BKLIF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BKLIF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to BKLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.
CURN vs IFXY Comparison
CURN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CURN stands at 93.32M. In comparison, IFXY has a market cap of 2.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CURN is priced at $14.89, while IFXY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CURN currently has a P/E ratio of 40.24, whereas IFXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CURN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IFXY's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CURN is less volatile compared to IFXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CURN.