Cuentas Inc.
Cuentas Inc. CUEN Peers
See (CUEN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUEN | $0.00 | +10.00% | 3K | -0.01 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $285.74 | -2.11% | 333.3B | 51.03 | $5.60 | +0.92% |
| CNSWF | $3,490.00 | -2.72% | 74B | 100.06 | $34.88 | +0.11% |
| INVUP | $26.00 | N/A | 48.3B | -1733.33 | -$0.02 | +12.50% |
| DASTF | $35.60 | -3.82% | 46.8B | 34.90 | $1.02 | +0.80% |
| DASTY | $35.43 | -1.23% | 46.5B | 34.40 | $1.03 | +0.72% |
| WIGBY | $72.00 | N/A | 23.9B | 120.00 | $0.60 | +0.18% |
| WTCHF | $70.45 | N/A | 23.4B | 115.49 | $0.61 | +0.15% |
| DIDIY | $4.76 | +0.42% | 22.2B | 59.50 | $0.08 | N/A |
| XROLF | $118.85 | -2.72% | 18.3B | 136.61 | $0.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CUEN vs SAPGF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 333.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while SAPGF trades at $285.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 51.03. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs CNSWF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while CNSWF trades at $3,490.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 100.06. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs INVUP Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while INVUP trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1733.33. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to INVUP's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and INVUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs DASTF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while DASTF trades at $35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and DASTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs DASTY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while DASTY trades at $35.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 34.40. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs WIGBY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while WIGBY trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 120.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs WTCHF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while WTCHF trades at $70.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 115.49. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs DIDIY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while DIDIY trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is 59.50. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs XROLF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while XROLF trades at $118.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 136.61. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and XROLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs NEMKY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while NEMKY trades at $29.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 84.44. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs SGGEF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while SGGEF trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and SGGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs SGPYY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while SGPYY trades at $67.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 35.45. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs OBIIF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while OBIIF trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 36.24. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs NEMTF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while NEMTF trades at $125.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 70.23. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs OCLCF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while OCLCF trades at $93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs NCSYF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while NCSYF trades at $171.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs KGDEY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while KGDEY trades at $178.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -325.38. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs ALMFF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs HOILF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, HOILF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while HOILF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOILF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to HOILF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to HOILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs TMSNY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while TMSNY trades at $73.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs FNOXF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs TMNSF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while TMNSF trades at $74.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs THNOF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while THNOF trades at $14.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 57.58. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and THNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs SMCYY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and SMCYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs KXSCF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while KXSCF trades at $144.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 426.44. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs SICRF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and SICRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs ASOZF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while ASOZF trades at $51.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs LIFX Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while LIFX trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 375.75. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and LIFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs ASOZY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while ASOZY trades at $42.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs SRBEF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while SRBEF trades at $140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -49.30. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs TMVWF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while TMVWF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs UBMRF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, UBMRF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while UBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UBMRF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to UBMRF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to UBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs KHOTF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs QTGPF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while QTGPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and QTGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs TMVWY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while TMVWY trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs ESKEF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and ESKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs TMOAY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while TMOAY trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -64.20. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and TMOAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs IPEU Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while IPEU trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs FREKF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while FREKF trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is -21.71. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to FREKF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs WEMXF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while WEMXF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs SWONF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while SWONF trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -931.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to SWONF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs MAGTF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and MAGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs KNNNF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while KNNNF trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs VOBIF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while VOBIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 49.50. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and VOBIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs ZEUCF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, ZEUCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while ZEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZEUCF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to ZEUCF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to ZEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs LTTHF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and LTTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs GBGPF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 955M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while GBGPF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 77.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs ESIGF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs EGHSF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 916.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while EGHSF trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs BTRCF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 843.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while BTRCF trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and BTRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs BHPA Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -3.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs SLVFF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs BVSFF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 672.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while BVSFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and BVSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs TTMZF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, TTMZF has a market cap of 661.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while TTMZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TTMZF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to TTMZF's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to TTMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs TMOAF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 639.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while TMOAF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -57.78. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs XMMRF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs BCTCF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 626.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while BCTCF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs NPACF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while NPACF trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs PXPHF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while PXPHF trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs NPACY Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 510.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while NPACY trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs RWWI Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 498.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while RWWI trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and RWWI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs NSWEF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and NSWEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs BRDLF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 456.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and BRDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs BLKLF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 449.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while BLKLF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -76.14. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs CMDXF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 439.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while CMDXF trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs TCYSF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 432.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while TCYSF trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 194.53. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs IQGLF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs CHNVF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 406.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while CHNVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs RPGHF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs PSSWF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs LCHTF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while LCHTF trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs RTME Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and RTME have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs PLDIF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while PLDIF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs ELMFF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and ELMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs JAPPF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while JAPPF trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs NXLLF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 314.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while NXLLF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 95.20. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs BAINF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while BAINF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs RLLMF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while RLLMF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is 206.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs DOTDF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 297.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while DOTDF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs IVUFF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs CIGMF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and CIGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs ABXXF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 293M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while ABXXF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -7.78. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs EXMXF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 273M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and EXMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs SMTEF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while SMTEF trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -11.08. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs LOQPF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 269.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while LOQPF trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs MCAP Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while MCAP trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and MCAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs CINGF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, CINGF has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while CINGF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CINGF's P/E ratio is -72.45. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to CINGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to CINGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs DAHLF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and DAHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs FXSRF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and FXSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs FBSFF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while FBSFF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs GBUX Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, GBUX has a market cap of 172.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while GBUX trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GBUX's P/E ratio is -36.40. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to GBUX's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to GBUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs WONDF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 166.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while WONDF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs NEOJF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while NEOJF trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs IARGF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while IARGF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and IARGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs EXSPF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while EXSPF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and EXSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs CBSZF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs TCIIF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while TCIIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 250.00. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and TCIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CUEN vs SYZLF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, SYZLF has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while SYZLF trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SYZLF's P/E ratio is -156.75. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to SYZLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN is less volatile compared to SYZLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUEN.
CUEN vs DFORF Comparison
CUEN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUEN stands at 3K. In comparison, DFORF has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUEN is priced at $0.00, while DFORF trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUEN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DFORF's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, CUEN's ROE is -7.11%, compared to DFORF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUEN and DFORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).