China Communications Services Corporation Limited
China Communications Services Corporation Limited (CUCSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CUCSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUCSF | $0.56 | +0.00% | 3.9B | 8.03 | $0.07 | +10.80% |
| DTEGF | $36.92 | -0.46% | 180.9B | 12.35 | $2.99 | +2.73% |
| DTEGY | $36.73 | -0.08% | 180.2B | 12.30 | $2.99 | +2.70% |
| SFTBF | $103.93 | +5.04% | 148.1B | 19.68 | $5.28 | +0.29% |
| SFTBY | $51.83 | +4.73% | 148B | 19.68 | $2.64 | +0.18% |
| NTTYY | $27.65 | +0.30% | 92.5B | 13.79 | $2.02 | +2.26% |
| NPPXF | $0.96 | -12.73% | 81.6B | 12.33 | $0.08 | +3.27% |
| SFBQF | $1.62 | -2.41% | 77.4B | 23.21 | $0.07 | +19.81% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KDDIY | $18.19 | +1.51% | 72.9B | 15.83 | $1.15 | +0.87% |
Stock Comparison
CUCSF vs DTEGF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while DTEGF trades at $36.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check DTEGF's competition here
CUCSF vs DTEGY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 180.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while DTEGY trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check DTEGY's competition here
CUCSF vs SFTBF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 148.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SFTBF trades at $103.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SFTBF's competition here
CUCSF vs SFTBY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 148B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SFTBY trades at $51.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SFTBY's competition here
CUCSF vs NTTYY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 92.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while NTTYY trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check NTTYY's competition here
CUCSF vs NPPXF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while NPPXF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check NPPXF's competition here
CUCSF vs SFBQF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SFBQF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SFBQF's competition here
CUCSF vs AMXVF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check AMXVF's competition here
CUCSF vs KDDIY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while KDDIY trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check KDDIY's competition here
CUCSF vs KDDIF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while KDDIF trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check KDDIF's competition here
CUCSF vs AMOVF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AMOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMOVF's competition here
CUCSF vs SGAPY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SGAPY trades at $32.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SGAPY's competition here
CUCSF vs SNGNF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SNGNF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and SNGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNGNF's competition here
CUCSF vs CLLNY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while CLLNY trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is 82.30. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check CLLNY's competition here
CUCSF vs FNCTF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while FNCTF trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 41.85. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and FNCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNCTF's competition here
CUCSF vs SWZCF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SWZCF trades at $740.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and SWZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWZCF's competition here
CUCSF vs SCMWY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SCMWY trades at $73.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SCMWY's competition here
CUCSF vs TLGPY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TLGPY trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TLGPY's competition here
CUCSF vs TTRAF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TTRAF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TTRAF's competition here
CUCSF vs TEFOF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TEFOF trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -35.22. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TEFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEFOF's competition here
CUCSF vs VODPF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while VODPF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and VODPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VODPF's competition here
CUCSF vs BTGOF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while BTGOF trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTGOF's competition here
CUCSF vs CHWRF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while CHWRF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and CHWRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHWRF's competition here
CUCSF vs AVIFY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while AVIFY trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AVIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVIFY's competition here
CUCSF vs TELNY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TELNY trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TELNY's competition here
CUCSF vs TELNF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TELNF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TELNF's competition here
CUCSF vs CTOWY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while CTOWY trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check CTOWY's competition here
CUCSF vs KKPNY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while KKPNY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check KKPNY's competition here
CUCSF vs RCIAF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while RCIAF trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and RCIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCIAF's competition here
CUCSF vs KKPNF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while KKPNF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check KKPNF's competition here
CUCSF vs AVIVF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check AVIVF's competition here
CUCSF vs ELMUY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while ELMUY trades at $27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check ELMUY's competition here
CUCSF vs AVIKF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while AVIKF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check AVIKF's competition here
CUCSF vs TLKMF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TLKMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TLKMF's competition here
CUCSF vs MTNOF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while MTNOF trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and MTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTNOF's competition here
CUCSF vs VDMCY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while VDMCY trades at $8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check VDMCY's competition here
CUCSF vs MTNOY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while MTNOY trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check MTNOY's competition here
CUCSF vs HLTOY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while HLTOY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check HLTOY's competition here
CUCSF vs TLSNY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TLSNY trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TLSNY's competition here
CUCSF vs SJRWF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and SJRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SJRWF's competition here
CUCSF vs TLSNF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TLSNF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLSNF's competition here
CUCSF vs TIAIY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TIAIY trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TIAIY's competition here
CUCSF vs BCEPF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while BCEPF trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check BCEPF's competition here
CUCSF vs BECEF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while BECEF trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check BECEF's competition here
CUCSF vs TIAJF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TIAJF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -11.72. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TIAJF's competition here
CUCSF vs TCPFF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TCPFF's competition here
CUCSF vs TLTZY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TLTZY trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TLTZY's competition here
CUCSF vs TLTZF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TLTZF trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TLTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLTZF's competition here
CUCSF vs HKTTF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while HKTTF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check HKTTF's competition here
CUCSF vs TIAOF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TIAOF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TIAOF's competition here
CUCSF vs VODAF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while VODAF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check VODAF's competition here
CUCSF vs AAFRF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while AAFRF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check AAFRF's competition here
CUCSF vs HKTTY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while HKTTY trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and HKTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTTY's competition here
CUCSF vs BCPPF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BCPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCPPF's competition here
CUCSF vs BCEXF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BCEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCEXF's competition here
CUCSF vs LBRDB Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while LBRDB trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check LBRDB's competition here
CUCSF vs DIGBF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and DIGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIGBF's competition here
CUCSF vs ELMUF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while ELMUF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check ELMUF's competition here
CUCSF vs TELDF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TELDF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TELDF's competition here
CUCSF vs SOBKY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SOBKY trades at $16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SOBKY's competition here
CUCSF vs SHNUF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SHNUF's competition here
CUCSF vs TELDY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TELDY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TELDY's competition here
CUCSF vs AARTY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AARTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check AARTY's competition here
CUCSF vs FRTAY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while FRTAY trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check FRTAY's competition here
CUCSF vs QBCRF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while QBCRF trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and QBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCRF's competition here
CUCSF vs MYTEF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while MYTEF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check MYTEF's competition here
CUCSF vs QBCAF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while QBCAF trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and QBCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCAF's competition here
CUCSF vs HLTOF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while HLTOF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check HLTOF's competition here
CUCSF vs MAXSF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and MAXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAXSF's competition here
CUCSF vs AXXTF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AXXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXXTF's competition here
CUCSF vs PCCWY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while PCCWY trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -134.80. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check PCCWY's competition here
CUCSF vs PCWLF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while PCWLF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -68.13. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check PCWLF's competition here
CUCSF vs BZQIF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while BZQIF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BZQIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZQIF's competition here
CUCSF vs BZQIY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while BZQIY trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check BZQIY's competition here
CUCSF vs PTITF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while PTITF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check PTITF's competition here
CUCSF vs TRKNY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TRKNY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TRKNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRKNY's competition here
CUCSF vs TKAGY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TKAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKAGY's competition here
CUCSF vs UDIRF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check UDIRF's competition here
CUCSF vs GTMEY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and GTMEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTMEY's competition here
CUCSF vs PHTCF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check PHTCF's competition here
CUCSF vs CUCSY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while CUCSY trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check CUCSY's competition here
CUCSF vs FRTAF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while FRTAF trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check FRTAF's competition here
CUCSF vs TCMFF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TCMFF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TCMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCMFF's competition here
CUCSF vs TFAOF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TFAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFAOF's competition here
CUCSF vs IIJIF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while IIJIF trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and IIJIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIF's competition here
CUCSF vs IIJIY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while IIJIY trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and IIJIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIY's competition here
CUCSF vs BGAOF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while BGAOF trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check BGAOF's competition here
CUCSF vs PTXKY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while PTXKY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and PTXKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTXKY's competition here
CUCSF vs MICCF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and MICCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MICCF's competition here
CUCSF vs TACYY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TACYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TACYY's competition here
CUCSF vs TRKNF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TRKNF's competition here
CUCSF vs BGAOY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while BGAOY trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BGAOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGAOY's competition here
CUCSF vs SPKKY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while SPKKY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SPKKY's competition here
CUCSF vs TLGHY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TLGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLGHY's competition here
CUCSF vs PTTWF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, PTTWF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while PTTWF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas PTTWF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTTWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to PTTWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check PTTWF's competition here
CUCSF vs GMOYF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while GMOYF trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check GMOYF's competition here
CUCSF vs NZTCF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while NZTCF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and NZTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZTCF's competition here
CUCSF vs CHRYY Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CHRYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while CHRYY trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas CHRYY's P/E ratio is -452.17. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to CHRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check CHRYY's competition here
CUCSF vs CHRUF Comparison August 2025
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 3.9B. In comparison, CHRUF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.56, while CHRUF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.03, whereas CHRUF's P/E ratio is -535.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to CHRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check CHRUF's competition here