China Communications Services Corporation Limited
China Communications Services Corporation Limited (CUCSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CUCSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUCSF | $0.63 | +0.00% | 4.3B | 7.83 | $0.08 | +4.87% |
| DTEGF | $39.18 | -0.28% | 189.9B | 13.27 | $2.92 | +2.54% |
| DTEGY | $39.38 | +2.71% | 189.6B | 13.21 | $2.93 | +2.57% |
| SFTBY | $13.26 | -7.37% | 157.7B | 7.91 | $1.75 | +0.88% |
| SFTBF | $28.14 | -2.29% | 156.7B | 7.86 | $3.50 | +0.26% |
| NPPXF | $1.00 | -2.45% | 80.1B | 12.25 | $0.08 | +3.59% |
| NTTYY | $24.46 | -0.12% | 79.5B | 11.86 | $2.05 | +2.90% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AMXOF | $1.20 | +20.00% | 72.3B | 15.00 | $0.08 | +1.24% |
| SFBQF | $1.28 | -9.15% | 67.1B | 20.07 | $0.07 | +4.10% |
Stock Comparison
CUCSF vs DTEGF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 189.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while DTEGF trades at $39.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and DTEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTEGF's competition here
CUCSF vs DTEGY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 189.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while DTEGY trades at $39.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check DTEGY's competition here
CUCSF vs SFTBY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SFTBY trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SFTBY's competition here
CUCSF vs SFTBF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 156.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SFTBF trades at $28.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SFTBF's competition here
CUCSF vs NPPXF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while NPPXF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check NPPXF's competition here
CUCSF vs NTTYY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while NTTYY trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check NTTYY's competition here
CUCSF vs AMXVF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check AMXVF's competition here
CUCSF vs AMXOF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AMXOF has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while AMXOF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas AMXOF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMXOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AMXOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMXOF's competition here
CUCSF vs SFBQF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SFBQF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SFBQF's competition here
CUCSF vs AMOVF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AMOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMOVF's competition here
CUCSF vs KDDIY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while KDDIY trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check KDDIY's competition here
CUCSF vs SNGNF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SNGNF trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and SNGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNGNF's competition here
CUCSF vs SGAPY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SGAPY trades at $39.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SGAPY's competition here
CUCSF vs SOBKY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SOBKY trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and SOBKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOBKY's competition here
CUCSF vs KDDIF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while KDDIF trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and KDDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KDDIF's competition here
CUCSF vs ORANY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ORANY has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while ORANY trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas ORANY's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORANY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to ORANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check ORANY's competition here
CUCSF vs FNCTF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while FNCTF trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and FNCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNCTF's competition here
CUCSF vs CLLNY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while CLLNY trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -128.14. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check CLLNY's competition here
CUCSF vs SCMWY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SCMWY trades at $92.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SCMWY's competition here
CUCSF vs SWZCF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SWZCF trades at $897.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and SWZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWZCF's competition here
CUCSF vs TLGPY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TLGPY trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TLGPY's competition here
CUCSF vs TTRAF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TTRAF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TTRAF's competition here
CUCSF vs AVIFY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while AVIFY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AVIFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVIFY's competition here
CUCSF vs AVIKF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while AVIKF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AVIKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVIKF's competition here
CUCSF vs VODPF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while VODPF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -7.89. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check VODPF's competition here
CUCSF vs CTOWY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while CTOWY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and CTOWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTOWY's competition here
CUCSF vs BTGOF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while BTGOF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BTGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTGOF's competition here
CUCSF vs TELNF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TELNF trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TELNF's competition here
CUCSF vs TELNY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TELNY trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TELNY's competition here
CUCSF vs CHWRF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while CHWRF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and CHWRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHWRF's competition here
CUCSF vs TEFOF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TEFOF trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TEFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TEFOF's competition here
CUCSF vs MTNOY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while MTNOY trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is 47.46. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check MTNOY's competition here
CUCSF vs TLKMF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TLKMF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TLKMF's competition here
CUCSF vs RCIAF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while RCIAF trades at $39.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and RCIAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCIAF's competition here
CUCSF vs KKPNF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while KKPNF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check KKPNF's competition here
CUCSF vs KKPNY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while KKPNY trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check KKPNY's competition here
CUCSF vs VDMCY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while VDMCY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check VDMCY's competition here
CUCSF vs TLSNY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TLSNY trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TLSNY's competition here
CUCSF vs TLSNF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TLSNF trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TLSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLSNF's competition here
CUCSF vs MTNOF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while MTNOF trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is 42.56. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and MTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTNOF's competition here
CUCSF vs TIAIY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TIAIY trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -22.95. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TIAIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIAIY's competition here
CUCSF vs TIAJF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TIAJF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.30. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TIAJF's competition here
CUCSF vs AVIVF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AVIVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVIVF's competition here
CUCSF vs AAFRF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while AAFRF trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AAFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAFRF's competition here
CUCSF vs ELMUY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while ELMUY trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and ELMUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMUY's competition here
CUCSF vs TIAOF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TIAOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -19.23. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TIAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIAOF's competition here
CUCSF vs HLTOY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while HLTOY trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check HLTOY's competition here
CUCSF vs VODAF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while VODAF trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and VODAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VODAF's competition here
CUCSF vs TLTZY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TLTZY trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check TLTZY's competition here
CUCSF vs SJRWF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and SJRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SJRWF's competition here
CUCSF vs BCEPF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while BCEPF trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BCEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCEPF's competition here
CUCSF vs BECEF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while BECEF trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BECEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BECEF's competition here
CUCSF vs TLTZF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TLTZF trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TLTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLTZF's competition here
CUCSF vs TCPFF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TCPFF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TCPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCPFF's competition here
CUCSF vs BCPPF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check BCPPF's competition here
CUCSF vs HKTTY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while HKTTY trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and HKTTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTTY's competition here
CUCSF vs HKTTF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while HKTTF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and HKTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HKTTF's competition here
CUCSF vs BCEXF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BCEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCEXF's competition here
CUCSF vs QBCRF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while QBCRF trades at $39.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and QBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCRF's competition here
CUCSF vs DIGBF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and DIGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIGBF's competition here
CUCSF vs QBCAF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while QBCAF trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and QBCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBCAF's competition here
CUCSF vs FRTAY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while FRTAY trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and FRTAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRTAY's competition here
CUCSF vs LBRDB Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while LBRDB trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and LBRDB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBRDB's competition here
CUCSF vs SHNUF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SHNUF's competition here
CUCSF vs HLTOF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while HLTOF trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and HLTOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLTOF's competition here
CUCSF vs TELDY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TELDY trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TELDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TELDY's competition here
CUCSF vs AARTY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while AARTY trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AARTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AARTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AARTY's competition here
CUCSF vs BZQIY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while BZQIY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BZQIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZQIY's competition here
CUCSF vs BZQIF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while BZQIF trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BZQIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BZQIF's competition here
CUCSF vs ELMUF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while ELMUF trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and ELMUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMUF's competition here
CUCSF vs MYTEF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while MYTEF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and MYTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MYTEF's competition here
CUCSF vs TELDF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TELDF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TELDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TELDF's competition here
CUCSF vs PCWLF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while PCWLF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -76.18. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and PCWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCWLF's competition here
CUCSF vs PCCWY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while PCCWY trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -145.80. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and PCCWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCCWY's competition here
CUCSF vs MAXSF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and MAXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAXSF's competition here
CUCSF vs AXXTF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and AXXTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXXTF's competition here
CUCSF vs TKAGY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TKAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKAGY's competition here
CUCSF vs TRKNY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TRKNY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TRKNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRKNY's competition here
CUCSF vs UDIRF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is 33.34. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and UDIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UDIRF's competition here
CUCSF vs PHTCF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and PHTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHTCF's competition here
CUCSF vs PTITF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while PTITF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and PTITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTITF's competition here
CUCSF vs FRTAF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while FRTAF trades at $35.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and FRTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRTAF's competition here
CUCSF vs GTMEY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while GTMEY trades at $26.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and GTMEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTMEY's competition here
CUCSF vs TFAOF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TFAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFAOF's competition here
CUCSF vs CUCSY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while CUCSY trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check CUCSY's competition here
CUCSF vs PTXKY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while PTXKY trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is -10.88. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check PTXKY's competition here
CUCSF vs TCMFF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TCMFF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TCMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCMFF's competition here
CUCSF vs MICCF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and MICCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MICCF's competition here
CUCSF vs BGAOY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while BGAOY trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BGAOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGAOY's competition here
CUCSF vs IIJIF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while IIJIF trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and IIJIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIF's competition here
CUCSF vs TACYY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TACYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TACYY's competition here
CUCSF vs TRKNF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TRKNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRKNF's competition here
CUCSF vs HTWSF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, HTWSF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while HTWSF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas HTWSF's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HTWSF's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and HTWSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTWSF's competition here
CUCSF vs TLGHY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and TLGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLGHY's competition here
CUCSF vs BGAOF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while BGAOF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and BGAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGAOF's competition here
CUCSF vs NZTCF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while NZTCF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and NZTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NZTCF's competition here
CUCSF vs ZONNF Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, ZONNF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while ZONNF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas ZONNF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZONNF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and ZONNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZONNF's competition here
CUCSF vs IIJIY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while IIJIY trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF and IIJIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIJIY's competition here
CUCSF vs SPKKY Comparison February 2026
CUCSF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUCSF stands at 4.3B. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUCSF is priced at $0.63, while SPKKY trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUCSF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.83, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, CUCSF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUCSF is less volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUCSF.Check SPKKY's competition here