China Shenhua Energy Company Limited
China Shenhua Energy Company Limited CUAEF Peers
See (CUAEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUAEF | $4.21 | N/A | 103.8B | 10.79 | $0.39 | +7.57% |
| CSUAY | $17.41 | +2.88% | 106.6B | 11.09 | $1.57 | +7.18% |
| CCOZF | $1.07 | N/A | 17.3B | 5.94 | $0.18 | +10.17% |
| YZCAY | $10.84 | -4.72% | 14.1B | 5.89 | $1.84 | +24.43% |
| YZCHF | $0.99 | N/A | 12.8B | 5.49 | $0.18 | +27.09% |
| YACAF | $3.42 | +1.65% | 4.5B | 5.80 | $0.59 | +14.69% |
| IMYCF | $1.80 | N/A | 4.4B | 3.75 | $0.48 | N/A |
| ADOOY | $7.24 | +12.25% | 4.3B | 8.42 | $0.86 | +72.27% |
| HIIDQ | $0.91 | +0.59% | 4.2B | 0.16 | $5.54 | N/A |
| PADEF | $0.11 | N/A | 3.3B | 5.57 | $0.02 | +5.95% |
Stock Comparison
CUAEF vs CSUAY Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, CSUAY has a market cap of 106.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while CSUAY trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas CSUAY's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSUAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to CSUAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs CCOZF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, CCOZF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while CCOZF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas CCOZF's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CCOZF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to CCOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs YZCAY Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, YZCAY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while YZCAY trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas YZCAY's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YZCAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to YZCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs YZCHF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, YZCHF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while YZCHF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas YZCHF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YZCHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to YZCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs YACAF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, YACAF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while YACAF trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas YACAF's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YACAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to YACAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs IMYCF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, IMYCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while IMYCF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas IMYCF's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to IMYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs ADOOY Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ADOOY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while ADOOY trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas ADOOY's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADOOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to ADOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs HIIDQ Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, HIIDQ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while HIIDQ trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas HIIDQ's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIIDQ's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to HIIDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs PADEF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, PADEF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while PADEF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas PADEF's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PADEF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to PADEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs WHITF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, WHITF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while WHITF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas WHITF's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHITF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to WHITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs PBMRF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, PBMRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while PBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas PBMRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBMRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to PBMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs NHPEF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, NHPEF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while NHPEF trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas NHPEF's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NHPEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to NHPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs PBATF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, PBATF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while PBATF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas PBATF's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBATF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to PBATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs PBMRY Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, PBMRY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while PBMRY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas PBMRY's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBMRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to PBMRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs EXXAF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, EXXAF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while EXXAF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas EXXAF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXXAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to EXXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs TBNGY Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, TBNGY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while TBNGY trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas TBNGY's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TBNGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to TBNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs PTIZF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, PTIZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while PTIZF trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas PTIZF's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTIZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to PTIZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs FSHYF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, FSHYF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while FSHYF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas FSHYF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSHYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to FSHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs ITAYY Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ITAYY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while ITAYY trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas ITAYY's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITAYY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to ITAYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs STMRF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, STMRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while STMRF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas STMRF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STMRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to STMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs CCOZY Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, CCOZY has a market cap of 890.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while CCOZY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas CCOZY's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CCOZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to CCOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs MOGLF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, MOGLF has a market cap of 816.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while MOGLF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas MOGLF's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOGLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to MOGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs TNGRF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, TNGRF has a market cap of 681.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while TNGRF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas TNGRF's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TNGRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to TNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs GRYRF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, GRYRF has a market cap of 406M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while GRYRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas GRYRF's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRYRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to GRYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs CCARF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, CCARF has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while CCARF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas CCARF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CCARF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to CCARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs CODQL Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, CODQL has a market cap of 185.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while CODQL trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas CODQL's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CODQL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to CODQL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs SGQRF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, SGQRF has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while SGQRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas SGQRF's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGQRF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to SGQRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs BTURF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, BTURF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while BTURF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas BTURF's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTURF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to BTURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs TERCF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, TERCF has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while TERCF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas TERCF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TERCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to TERCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs BNPJY Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, BNPJY has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while BNPJY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas BNPJY's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNPJY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to BNPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs WRLC Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, WRLC has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while WRLC trades at $421.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas WRLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to WRLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs ARECW Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ARECW has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while ARECW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas ARECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARECW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to ARECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs WECFF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, WECFF has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while WECFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas WECFF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WECFF's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to WECFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs FBMCF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, FBMCF has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while FBMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas FBMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBMCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to FBMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs CRSXF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, CRSXF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while CRSXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas CRSXF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRSXF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to CRSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs FSHRF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, FSHRF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while FSHRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas FSHRF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSHRF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to FSHRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs GCLMF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, GCLMF has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while GCLMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas GCLMF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GCLMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to GCLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs MOAEF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, MOAEF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while MOAEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas MOAEF's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOAEF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to MOAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs CAFZF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, CAFZF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while CAFZF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas CAFZF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to CAFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs APMCF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, APMCF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while APMCF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas APMCF's P/E ratio is -20.01. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APMCF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to APMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs ROYE Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ROYE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while ROYE trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas ROYE's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROYE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to ROYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs ALGCF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, ALGCF has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while ALGCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas ALGCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to ALGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs AJLGF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, AJLGF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while AJLGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas AJLGF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AJLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to AJLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs PVMCF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, PVMCF has a market cap of 393.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while PVMCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas PVMCF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PVMCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to PVMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs MOAEY Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, MOAEY has a market cap of 257.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while MOAEY trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas MOAEY's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOAEY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to MOAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs FDGMF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, FDGMF has a market cap of 248K. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while FDGMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas FDGMF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FDGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to FDGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs SHGP Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, SHGP has a market cap of 197.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while SHGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas SHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to SHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs AEXE Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, AEXE has a market cap of 145.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while AEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas AEXE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEXE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to AEXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs BRNE Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, BRNE has a market cap of 23.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while BRNE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas BRNE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRNE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to BRNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs KALG Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, KALG has a market cap of 18.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while KALG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas KALG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KALG's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is less volatile compared to KALG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs CERX Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, CERX has a market cap of 536. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while CERX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas CERX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CERX's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to CERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.
CUAEF vs BGNRF Comparison
CUAEF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CUAEF stands at 103.8B. In comparison, BGNRF has a market cap of 86. Regarding current trading prices, CUAEF is priced at $4.21, while BGNRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CUAEF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.79, whereas BGNRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CUAEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGNRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CUAEF is more volatile compared to BGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CUAEF.