Century Next Financial Corporation
Century Next Financial Corporation CTUY Peers
See (CTUY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTUY | $44.25 | +0.57% | 56.5M | 7.27 | $6.09 | +1.69% |
| UNCRY | $32.31 | +0.65% | 201.3B | 9.26 | $3.49 | +2.36% |
| CAIXY | $2.79 | -1.41% | 179.1B | 9.00 | $0.31 | +5.95% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.3B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.23% |
| CIHKY | $31.45 | -0.61% | 153.4B | 8.04 | $3.91 | +4.32% |
| CIHHF | $5.09 | -6.09% | 124.8B | 6.53 | $0.78 | +4.38% |
| BNPQF | $96.70 | +9.89% | 109.2B | 8.99 | $10.76 | +5.57% |
| UNCFF | $64.43 | -0.11% | 100.4B | 9.36 | $6.88 | +3.64% |
| DBSDF | $35.16 | -0.50% | 99.6B | 11.53 | $3.05 | +3.87% |
| DBSDY | $140.04 | +1.15% | 99.6B | 11.48 | $12.20 | +4.00% |
Stock Comparison
CTUY vs UNCRY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 201.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while UNCRY trades at $32.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CAIXY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CAIXY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BKAYY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CIHKY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 153.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CIHKY trades at $31.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CIHHF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 124.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CIHHF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BNPQF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BNPQF trades at $96.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs UNCFF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 100.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while UNCFF trades at $64.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs DBSDF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while DBSDF trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs DBSDY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while DBSDY trades at $140.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs IITSF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while IITSF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BNPQY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BNPQY trades at $43.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SBKFF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SBKFF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs KBCSY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while KBCSY trades at $48.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs MZHOF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while MZHOF trades at $29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs PBCRF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while PBCRF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs PBCRY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while PBCRY trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs AKSJF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs LLDTF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while LLDTF trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs LLOBF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while LLOBF trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs PSBKF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs EBKDY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while EBKDY trades at $39.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CIXPF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CIXPF trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs OVCHF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while OVCHF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs OVCHY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while OVCHY trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CHCJY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CHCJY trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CRARF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CRARF trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CRARY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CRARY trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CHBJF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CHBJF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs NBNKF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while NBNKF trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs NRDBY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while NRDBY trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs UOVEF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs UOVEY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 46.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while UOVEY trades at $55.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs STNDF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BHKLY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BHKLY trades at $85.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BNKHF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BNKHF trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SCGLY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SCGLY trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BKRKY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BKRKY trades at $13.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs DNBBF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while DNBBF trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BKRKF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BKRKF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs DNBBY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while DNBBY trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SCGLF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SCGLF trades at $55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs KBCSF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while KBCSF trades at $97.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CRZBF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CRZBF trades at $31.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SVKEF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SVKEF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CWESF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CRZBY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CRZBY trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs JPSTF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs JPPTY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs DNKEY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while DNKEY trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CEBCF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CEBCF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs EBKOF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while EBKOF trades at $79.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SWDBF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SWDBF trades at $27.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs PPERY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while PPERY trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SWDBY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SWDBY trades at $26.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs JPHLF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs MLYNF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs DNSKF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs MLYBY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while MLYBY trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs JPPHY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while JPPHY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs PSZKF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while PSZKF trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs PPERF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while PPERF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs PSZKY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while PSZKY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs HSNGY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while HSNGY trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs GBOOF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while GBOOF trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs GBOOY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while GBOOY trades at $45.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CMAKY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CMAKY trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BDORY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BDORY trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs HSNGF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while HSNGF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs FCNCB Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while FCNCB trades at $1,648.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BLMIF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BLMIF trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CGMBF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CKHGY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CKHGY trades at $97.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.32. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BKHYY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BKHYY trades at $84.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BPXXY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SBGOF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SBGOF trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SGBLY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SGBLY trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs MDIBY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while MDIBY trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs RSNHF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while RSNHF trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CKHGF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CMTDF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CMTDF trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SUTNY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SUTNY trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs CRDIY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs PBLOF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BKHPF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs GPFOF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while GPFOF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs ISNPY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while ISNPY trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs AIBRF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while AIBRF trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs AIBGY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while AIBGY trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BDOUF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BDOUF trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs GPFOY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SKCBY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs VLYPN Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while VLYPN trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BNCZF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs OTPBF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs SUGBY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is more volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BKRIF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BKRIF trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs MDIBF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BKPKF Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BKPKF trades at $44.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 6.69. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.
CTUY vs BKRIY Comparison
CTUY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTUY stands at 56.5M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CTUY is priced at $44.25, while BKRIY trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTUY currently has a P/E ratio of 7.27, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, CTUY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTUY is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTUY.