Continental AG
Continental AG CTTAF Peers
See (CTTAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTTAF | $87.83 | -2.30% | 17.6B | 13.27 | $6.62 | +2.86% |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.1B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +0.57% |
| DNZOF | $14.39 | -10.88% | 40.5B | 14.25 | $1.01 | +3.02% |
| DNZOY | $13.36 | -0.16% | 37.6B | 13.23 | $1.01 | +0.93% |
| BRDCY | $21.39 | -1.11% | 29B | 15.28 | $1.40 | +2.05% |
| BRDCF | $42.40 | N/A | 28.7B | 15.25 | $2.78 | +3.11% |
| MGDDY | $19.10 | +0.21% | 27B | 8.55 | $2.23 | +3.98% |
| MGDDF | $37.78 | N/A | 26.7B | 3.38 | $11.17 | +4.12% |
| CTTAY | $8.70 | +0.93% | 17.4B | 13.18 | $0.66 | +2.91% |
| KNRRY | $25.53 | +0.47% | 16.5B | 34.04 | $0.75 | +1.72% |
Stock Comparison
CTTAF vs FYGGY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs DNZOF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while DNZOF trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs DNZOY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while DNZOY trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs BRDCY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while BRDCY trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs BRDCF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while BRDCF trades at $42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs MGDDY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while MGDDY trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs MGDDF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while MGDDF trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs CTTAY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while CTTAY trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs KNRRY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while KNRRY trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs SMTOY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while SMTOY trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs KNBHF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while KNBHF trades at $95.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs PTAIY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while PTAIY trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs PTAIF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs HLLGY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs HLKHF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs ASEKY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while ASEKY trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs ASEKF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NGKSY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NGKSY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs PLLIF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while PLLIF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NGKSF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs SFFLY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while SFFLY trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs YORUF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs FESTF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs YORUY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while YORUY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs BRBOY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs KOTMY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while KOTMY trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs SCFLF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs KOTMF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while KOTMF trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs MNTHY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while MNTHY trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 9.80. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs BRBOF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while BRBOF trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs STAEY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs SMTUF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs LIMAF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while LIMAF trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs STAEF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while STAEF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs VLEEY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while VLEEY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs TDBOF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NHKGF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs VLEEF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while VLEEF trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs VTSCF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs MNTHF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NPSKF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NPSKY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NPSKY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs TGOSY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs ARBFF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs JELCF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while JELCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs JEHLY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs MBUMY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while MBUMY trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs MBUMF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs GMPUF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs UNIEF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NTXVF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs GUDDY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs FURCF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while FURCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs PASTF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NIFCY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NKRKY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NKRKY trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -25.73. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NKRKF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -23.98. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs TIANF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs GUDHF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 867.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs SFHLF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 848M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while SFHLF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs ATNNF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs ABDDF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs FAURY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 689.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs FCVFF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NMAKF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 475.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NMAKF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is -16.27. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs MRETF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 430.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while MRETF trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.39. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs TCISF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 420M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs SAEOF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs VTSCY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs PWRHF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs ELLRY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while ELLRY trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs EGKLF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NPSGF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NPSGY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 266.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs IOCJY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while IOCJY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs XNGIF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs AKBIF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 192.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while AKBIF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs EXCOF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 186.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while EXCOF trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs AMGRF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs HWAFF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs WLMTF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs KGAUF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs SCTH Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while SCTH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs CAOHF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs LEAT Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while LEAT trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -174.80. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs STSGF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NWFAF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs VOAXF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs CREVF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs CCEGF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs CMMCF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs ATHHF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while ATHHF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs UFMG Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UFMG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs AFFL Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs OPTI Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs AMTY Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs NFGRF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs SPKTF Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.
CTTAF vs CDTI Comparison
CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 17.6B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $87.83, while CDTI trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 13.27, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.