Continental AG

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while DNZOY trades at $13.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to DNZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 34.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while DNZOF trades at $12.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 29.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while BRDCF trades at $42.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 28.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while BRDCY trades at $21.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 26.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MGDDF trades at $37.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 26.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MGDDY trades at $18.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 16.49B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while KNRRY trades at $25.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CTTAY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while KNBHF trades at $98.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 31.31. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 12.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SMTOY trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 12.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while APTV trades at $58.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 11.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MBLY trades at $14.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 11.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while PTAIY trades at $5.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while HLLGY trades at $47.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while LKQ trades at $39.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 9.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MGA trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ASEKY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ALSN trades at $97.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ALV trades at $93.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while BWA trades at $28.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 5.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while PLLIF trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SFFLY trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while GNTX trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NGKSY trades at $12.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MOD trades at $90.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while LEA trades at $86.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while KOTMF trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while YORUF trades at $25.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while YORUY trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while FESTF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while DORM trades at $122.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while KOTMY trades at $12.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SCFLF has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SCFLF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SCFLF's P/E ratio is 9.60. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCFLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to SCFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while GT trades at $10.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 45.67. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while BC-PA trades at $22.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while BRBOF trades at $9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while STAEY trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MNTHY trades at $47.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while STAEF trades at $16.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while VLEEY trades at $4.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while GTX trades at $11.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while HSAI trades at $17.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -156.91. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while LIMAF trades at $37.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while VC trades at $80.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while QS trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NPSKY trades at $8.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while DAN trades at $14.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -60.83. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while JELCF trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NKRKY trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -34.90. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while VLEEF trades at $7.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MBUMY trades at $6.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while PHIN trades at $41.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NTXVF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while FURCF trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while PASTF trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ADNT trades at $12.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -630.50. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -36.61. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while TIANF trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 924.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while XPEL trades at $33.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 868.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 840.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while FOXF trades at $20.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is 125.88. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FOXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 826.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SFHLF trades at $18.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 793.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while THRM trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 623.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while FAURY trades at $3.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 620.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SMP trades at $28.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 588.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while PLOW trades at $25.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 503.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while AEVA trades at $9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ALLG trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 493.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ECX trades at $1.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 489.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while AXL trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 481.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MLR trades at $42.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 446.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CPS trades at $25.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 419.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while TCISF trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 414.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MRETF trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRETF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 403.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NMAKF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 399.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MNRO trades at $13.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNRO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 347.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while XNGIF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 304.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ELLRY trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 297.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SES trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 271.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while HYLN trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 261.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 256.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 244.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while HLLY trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 224.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while IOCJY trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 181.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while AKBIF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 177.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MPAA trades at $9.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 174.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while EXCOF trades at $4.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 169.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while LAZR trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 164.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while WLMTF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while XL trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 150.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 146.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while STRT trades at $35.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SCTH trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 139.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while INVZ trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 128.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while INVZW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 122.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SRI trades at $4.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 120.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CAAS trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 95.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while KNDI trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 91.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while GGROW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 75.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SUP trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUP's ROE of -213.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 74.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while GGR trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 48.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MKDW trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 47.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while WPRT trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while STSGF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 35.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SYPR trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -19.37. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 34.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while LEAT trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 31.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CVGI trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CREVF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 21.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ECXWW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NCNC trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while AMV trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMV's ROE of +13.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 14.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while WKSP trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 13.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while INEO trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 12.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while LIDRW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 12.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while LIDR trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SAG trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 5.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CREV trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ATHHF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while UFMG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 3.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while AMTY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 3.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while AFFL trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while OPTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 2.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while UFAB trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CDTI trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SVTE has a market cap of 885287.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SVTE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SVTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVTE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to SVTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, GTLA has a market cap of 590600.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while GTLA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas GTLA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTLA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to GTLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575286.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MWWC has a market cap of 572891.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MWWC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MWWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MWWC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MWWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, AGRS has a market cap of 500000.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while AGRS trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas AGRS's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AGRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 448060.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while FRSX trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, OMTK has a market cap of 438962.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while OMTK trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas OMTK's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to OMTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 182834.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CREVW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, TRBD has a market cap of 100000.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while TRBD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas TRBD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRBD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to TRBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, EGTK has a market cap of 51353.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while EGTK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas EGTK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to EGTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15529.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CAGR has a market cap of 9438.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CAGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CAGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAGR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to CAGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, PFTI has a market cap of 6902.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while PFTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas PFTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PFTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ADEC has a market cap of 6680.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ADEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ADEC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ADEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, VYDR has a market cap of 6230.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while VYDR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas VYDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VYDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to VYDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, STCC has a market cap of 4728.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while STCC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas STCC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STCC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to STCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, UFABQ has a market cap of 3520.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while UFABQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas UFABQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UFABQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to UFABQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ODYC has a market cap of 3507.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ODYC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ODYC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ODYC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ODYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, DTRO has a market cap of 3364.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while DTRO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas DTRO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTRO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to DTRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, AZDDQ has a market cap of 1969.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while AZDDQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas AZDDQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AZDDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to AZDDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, SNSGF has a market cap of 1618.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while SNSGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas SNSGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNSGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to SNSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, PLNTQ has a market cap of 1578.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while PLNTQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas PLNTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLNTQ's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to PLNTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, TXIC has a market cap of 1453.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while TXIC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas TXIC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TXIC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to TXIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, CSHEF has a market cap of 902.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while CSHEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas CSHEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSHEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to CSHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, FLES has a market cap of 885.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while FLES trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas FLES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLES's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to FLES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, JBZY has a market cap of 834.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while JBZY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas JBZY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JBZY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to JBZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ATCV has a market cap of 711.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ATCV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ATCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATCV's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ATCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ESWW has a market cap of 68.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ESWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ESWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESWW's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to ESWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MOTUY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MOTUY trades at $6.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MOTUY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOTUY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MOTUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MKDWW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, MTOR comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while MTOR trades at $36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, RMO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while RMO trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, ENVS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while ENVS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas ENVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENVS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to ENVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, VNE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while VNE trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, USAM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while USAM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas USAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to USAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, HLRD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while HLRD trades at $417.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas HLRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLRD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is less volatile compared to HLRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.

CTTAF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CTTAF stands at 16.55B. In comparison, HZN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTTAF is priced at $82.73, while HZN trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CTTAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.53, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTTAF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTTAF is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTTAF.