Converge Technology Solutions Corp.
Converge Technology Solutions Corp. (CTSDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTSDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTSDF | $4.32 | -0.01% | 814.1M | -6.64 | -$0.65 | +0.50% |
| FJTSY | $24.66 | +2.84% | 44.4B | 31.99 | $0.77 | +0.43% |
| FJTSF | $25.00 | +3.58% | 44.1B | 32.26 | $0.77 | +0.77% |
| NIPNF | $31.52 | +8.69% | 42B | 35.42 | $0.89 | +0.61% |
| NTDTY | $26.71 | +3.45% | 37.4B | 38.70 | $0.69 | N/A |
| NTTDF | $24.00 | +0.00% | 33.7B | 34.78 | $0.69 | +0.71% |
| CAPMF | $151.80 | +0.94% | 25.8B | 14.70 | $10.33 | +2.54% |
| CGEMY | $29.57 | +2.18% | 25.1B | 14.29 | $2.07 | +2.52% |
| NURAF | $41.75 | +1.46% | 24.8B | 38.96 | $1.11 | +1.00% |
| NRILY | $41.32 | +0.98% | 23.9B | 37.27 | $1.11 | +0.63% |
Stock Comparison
CTSDF vs FJTSY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FJTSY trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 31.99. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check FJTSY's competition here
CTSDF vs FJTSF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FJTSF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check FJTSF's competition here
CTSDF vs NIPNF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NIPNF trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 35.42. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NIPNF's competition here
CTSDF vs NTDTY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NTDTY trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 38.70. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NTDTY's competition here
CTSDF vs NTTDF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NTTDF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 34.78. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NTTDF's competition here
CTSDF vs CAPMF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CAPMF trades at $151.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CAPMF's competition here
CTSDF vs CGEMY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CGEMY trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CGEMY's competition here
CTSDF vs NURAF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NURAF trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NURAF's competition here
CTSDF vs NRILY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NRILY trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NRILY's competition here
CTSDF vs WIZEY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WIZEY trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check WIZEY's competition here
CTSDF vs WPLCF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WPLCF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check WPLCF's competition here
CTSDF vs TISNF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TISNF trades at $31.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check TISNF's competition here
CTSDF vs ISMAF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ISMAF trades at $41.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check ISMAF's competition here
CTSDF vs BECTY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BECTY trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check BECTY's competition here
CTSDF vs RPYTF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check RPYTF's competition here
CTSDF vs DUSXF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check DUSXF's competition here
CTSDF vs BHTLF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BHTLF trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check BHTLF's competition here
CTSDF vs AEXAY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while AEXAY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check AEXAY's competition here
CTSDF vs CTLPP Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CTLPP trades at $60.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 2028.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CTLPP's competition here
CTSDF vs TSYHY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TSYHY trades at $14.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check TSYHY's competition here
CTSDF vs SPSAF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SPSAF trades at $221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SPSAF's competition here
CTSDF vs TSYHF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TSYHF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check TSYHF's competition here
CTSDF vs ISMAY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ISMAY trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check ISMAY's competition here
CTSDF vs NWITY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NWITY's competition here
CTSDF vs NWKLF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NWKLF's competition here
CTSDF vs NSSXF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NSSXF's competition here
CTSDF vs SLNTY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SLNTY's competition here
CTSDF vs NTCYF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NTCYF's competition here
CTSDF vs HLTEF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while HLTEF trades at $85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check HLTEF's competition here
CTSDF vs SESPF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SESPF trades at $121.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SESPF's competition here
CTSDF vs CFTLF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CFTLF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CFTLF's competition here
CTSDF vs NCRRP Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NCRRP trades at $1,075.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 919.59. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NCRRP's competition here
CTSDF vs ATEAY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ATEAY trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check ATEAY's competition here
CTSDF vs DLGEF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DLGEF trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is -29.43. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check DLGEF's competition here
CTSDF vs ATAZF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check ATAZF's competition here
CTSDF vs NDTAF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NDTAF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NDTAF's competition here
CTSDF vs CRAYF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CRAYF trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 49.46. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CRAYF's competition here
CTSDF vs DTSOF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 978M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DTSOF trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check DTSOF's competition here
CTSDF vs KSUEF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check KSUEF's competition here
CTSDF vs KAHTY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check KAHTY's competition here
CTSDF vs CCCMF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 888.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CCCMF trades at $28.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 40.87. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CCCMF's competition here
CTSDF vs ADSGF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 832.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check ADSGF's competition here
CTSDF vs NGRRF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 831.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NGRRF trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NGRRF's competition here
CTSDF vs FDRVF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 770.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FDRVF trades at $33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -25.90. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check FDRVF's competition here
CTSDF vs TRCLF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check TRCLF's competition here
CTSDF vs AEXAF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 726.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while AEXAF trades at $38.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check AEXAF's competition here
CTSDF vs DTATF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DTATF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 33.75. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check DTATF's competition here
CTSDF vs DCHIF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 521.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DCHIF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check DCHIF's competition here
CTSDF vs GBDMF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check GBDMF's competition here
CTSDF vs CMTUF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CMTUF's competition here
CTSDF vs CEJOF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 385.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CEJOF trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CEJOF's competition here
CTSDF vs CSYJF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 379.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CSYJF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CSYJF's competition here
CTSDF vs APMRF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while APMRF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APMRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check APMRF's competition here
CTSDF vs DTTLY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DTTLY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check DTTLY's competition here
CTSDF vs SLUNF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SLUNF's competition here
CTSDF vs GSDT Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 300.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GSDT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GSDT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check GSDT's competition here
CTSDF vs SVPLF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SVPLF's competition here
CTSDF vs EMCHF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while EMCHF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check EMCHF's competition here
CTSDF vs CSYJY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 239.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CSYJY's competition here
CTSDF vs SSCC Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 232.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SSCC trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -4.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SSCC's competition here
CTSDF vs ITFRF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 230.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check ITFRF's competition here
CTSDF vs APPEF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 197.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while APPEF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check APPEF's competition here
CTSDF vs FDDMF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FDDMF trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check FDDMF's competition here
CTSDF vs ALVNF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check ALVNF's competition here
CTSDF vs FCCN Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FCCN trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -34.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check FCCN's competition here
CTSDF vs ULPRF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check ULPRF's competition here
CTSDF vs WYLDF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, WYLDF has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WYLDF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WYLDF's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WYLDF's ROE of +8.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to WYLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check WYLDF's competition here
CTSDF vs ALYAF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ALYAF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check ALYAF's competition here
CTSDF vs APXYY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while APXYY trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check APXYY's competition here
CTSDF vs DCHIY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DCHIY trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check DCHIY's competition here
CTSDF vs QUISF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check QUISF's competition here
CTSDF vs QSCGF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -26.53. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check QSCGF's competition here
CTSDF vs NONEY Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, NONEY has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NONEY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NONEY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NONEY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to NONEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check NONEY's competition here
CTSDF vs KDCXF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check KDCXF's competition here
CTSDF vs EAXR Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while EAXR trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check EAXR's competition here
CTSDF vs CXGEF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CXGEF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CXGEF's competition here
CTSDF vs SEBFF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SEBFF's competition here
CTSDF vs BNXAF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BNXAF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check BNXAF's competition here
CTSDF vs CNGFF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CNGFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CNGFF's competition here
CTSDF vs SNELF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SNELF's competition here
CTSDF vs KTHGF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check KTHGF's competition here
CTSDF vs MLBEF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while MLBEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check MLBEF's competition here
CTSDF vs HLEO Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while HLEO trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HLEO's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check HLEO's competition here
CTSDF vs SPOFF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SPOFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SPOFF's competition here
CTSDF vs CPIHF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CPIHF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CPIHF's competition here
CTSDF vs CRCW Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check CRCW's competition here
CTSDF vs XTMIF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while XTMIF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check XTMIF's competition here
CTSDF vs DRGV Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check DRGV's competition here
CTSDF vs POSAF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while POSAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to POSAF's ROE of -3.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check POSAF's competition here
CTSDF vs DVRNF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check DVRNF's competition here
CTSDF vs KNRLF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.82. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check KNRLF's competition here
CTSDF vs VSSSF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while VSSSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of -4.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check VSSSF's competition here
CTSDF vs BRQSF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BRQSF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check BRQSF's competition here
CTSDF vs FUUN Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FUUN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check FUUN's competition here
CTSDF vs UTRX Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, UTRX has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while UTRX trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas UTRX's P/E ratio is -15.49. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to UTRX's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to UTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check UTRX's competition here
CTSDF vs SUIC Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SUIC has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SUIC trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SUIC's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SUIC's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SUIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SUIC's competition here
CTSDF vs SKTCF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SKTCF's competition here
CTSDF vs GTCH Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, GTCH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GTCH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GTCH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GTCH's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to GTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check GTCH's competition here
CTSDF vs SNOIF Comparison August 2025
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.1M. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.Check SNOIF's competition here