Converge Technology Solutions Corp.
Converge Technology Solutions Corp. CTSDF Peers
See (CTSDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
CTSDF vs IBM Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 236.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while IBM trades at $254.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ACN Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 193.14B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ACN trades at $308.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FISV Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 116.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FISV trades at $114.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 100.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FI trades at $181.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs INFY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 72.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while INFY trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NTTDF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NTTDF has a market cap of 46.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NTTDF trades at $33.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NTTDF's P/E ratio is 45.27. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NTTDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NTTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FJTSF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FJTSF has a market cap of 40.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FJTSF trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FJTSF's P/E ratio is 29.15. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FJTSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FJTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FJTSY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FJTSY has a market cap of 40.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FJTSY trades at $22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FJTSY's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FJTSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FJTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CTSH Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 39.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CTSH trades at $79.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NTDTY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NTDTY has a market cap of 38.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NTDTY trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NTDTY's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NTDTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NTDTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs IT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 33.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while IT trades at $437.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NIPNF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NIPNF has a market cap of 32.52B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NIPNF trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NIPNF's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NIPNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NIPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs WIT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 29.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WIT trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CGEMY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CGEMY has a market cap of 27.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CGEMY trades at $32.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CGEMY's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CGEMY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CGEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BR Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 27.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BR trades at $236.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CAPMF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CAPMF has a market cap of 26.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CAPMF trades at $158.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CAPMF's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CAPMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CAPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CDW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 23.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CDW trades at $180.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GIB Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 23.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GIB trades at $106.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NRILY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NRILY has a market cap of 22.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NRILY trades at $38.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NRILY's P/E ratio is 34.18. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NRILY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NRILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NURAF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NURAF has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NURAF trades at $38.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NURAF's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NURAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NURAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs LDOS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 19.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while LDOS trades at $154.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs WIZEY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, WIZEY has a market cap of 14.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WIZEY trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WIZEY's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WIZEY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to WIZEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs AUR Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 13.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while AUR trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -16.85. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs WPLCF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, WPLCF has a market cap of 13.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WPLCF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WPLCF's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WPLCF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to WPLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs JKHY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 13.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while JKHY trades at $179.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs AUROW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 13.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while AUROW trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CACI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 10.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CACI trades at $476.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs EPAM Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 10.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while EPAM trades at $179.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs KD Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 8.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KD trades at $36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 63.21. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs EXLS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while EXLS trades at $45.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs G Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 7.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while G trades at $42.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas G's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DLB Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DLB trades at $74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs WAY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 7.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WAY trades at $40.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 311.46. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TISNF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TISNF has a market cap of 6.85B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TISNF trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TISNF's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TISNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DTATF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DTATF has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DTATF trades at $43.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DTATF's P/E ratio is 362.92. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTATF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DTATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ISMAF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ISMAF has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ISMAF trades at $33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ISMAF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ISMAF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ISMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs RPYTF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, RPYTF has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while RPYTF trades at $155.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas RPYTF's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to RPYTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to RPYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SAIC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SAIC trades at $121.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GLOB Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GLOB trades at $130.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GDS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GDS trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is -46.40. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BECTY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BECTY has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BECTY trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BECTY's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BECTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BECTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BHTLF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BHTLF has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BHTLF trades at $37.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BHTLF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BHTLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs INGM Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while INGM trades at $19.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs PAY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 4.63B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while PAY trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 105.63. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TSYHF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TSYHF has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TSYHF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TSYHF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TSYHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TSYHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TSYHY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TSYHY has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TSYHY trades at $14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TSYHY's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TSYHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TSYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SPSAF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SPSAF has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SPSAF trades at $199.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SPSAF's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SPSAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SPSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NCR Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NCR's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CNXC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CNXC trades at $52.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNXC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CD Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 3.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CD trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CD's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ISMAY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ISMAY has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ISMAY trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ISMAY's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ISMAY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ISMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs AI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while AI trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CLVT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 2.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CLVT trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CTLPP Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CTLPP has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CTLPP trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CTLPP's P/E ratio is 1333.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTLPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CTLPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DXC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DXC trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is -56.68. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DXC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NWITY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NWITY has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NWITY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NWITY's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NWITY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NWITY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs PRFT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NWKLF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NWKLF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NWKLF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NWKLF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NWKLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to NWKLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NSSXF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NSSXF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NSSXF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NSSXF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NSSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NSSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs AEXAY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, AEXAY has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while AEXAY trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas AEXAY's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AEXAY's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to AEXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ASGN Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ASGN trades at $56.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs WNS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 2.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WNS trades at $55.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SLNTY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SLNTY has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SLNTY trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SLNTY's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SLNTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SLNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NTCYF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NTCYF has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NTCYF trades at $42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NTCYF's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NTCYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to NTCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CFTLF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CFTLF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CFTLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CFTLF's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CFTLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CFTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NDTAF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NDTAF has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NDTAF trades at $30.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NDTAF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NDTAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NDTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs LZMH Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while LZMH trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -1125.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LZMH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ATEAY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ATEAY has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ATEAY trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ATEAY's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ATEAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ATEAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NYAX Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NYAX trades at $41.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is -258.31. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NYAX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs HLTEF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, HLTEF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while HLTEF trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HLTEF's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HLTEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to HLTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TWKS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NABL Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NABL trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is 47.09. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NABL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs VYX Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while VYX trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VYX's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FORTY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FORTY trades at $91.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NCRRP Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NCRRP has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NCRRP trades at $1,100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NCRRP's P/E ratio is 941.02. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NCRRP's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NCRRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ATAZF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ATAZF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ATAZF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ATAZF's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ATAZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ATAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FLYW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FLYW trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 278.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DLGEF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DLGEF has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DLGEF trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DLGEF's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DLGEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DLGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs INOD Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while INOD trades at $41.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 46.19. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TASK Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TASK trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs APLD Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while APLD trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DUSXF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DUSXF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DUSXF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DUSXF's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DUSXF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DUSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GDYN Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GDYN trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 108.92. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CCCMF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CCCMF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CCCMF trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CCCMF's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CCCMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CCCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CRAYF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CRAYF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CRAYF trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CRAYF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CRAYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CRAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs PSFE-WT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 977.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NGRRF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NGRRF has a market cap of 960.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NGRRF trades at $72.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NGRRF's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NGRRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NGRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SESPF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SESPF has a market cap of 954.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SESPF trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SESPF's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SESPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SESPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BBAI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 946.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BBAI trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs KSUEF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, KSUEF has a market cap of 943.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KSUEF trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KSUEF's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KSUEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to KSUEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs KAHTY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, KAHTY has a market cap of 936.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KAHTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KAHTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KAHTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to KAHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs PSFE Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 912.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while PSFE trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is 42.72. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PSFE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BBAI-WT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 888.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DTSOF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DTSOF has a market cap of 875.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DTSOF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DTSOF's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTSOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DTSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ADSGF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ADSGF has a market cap of 835.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ADSGF trades at $130.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ADSGF's P/E ratio is 245.36. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ADSGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ADSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TRCLF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TRCLF has a market cap of 764.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TRCLF trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TRCLF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TRCLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to TRCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs AEXAF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, AEXAF has a market cap of 762.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while AEXAF trades at $40.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas AEXAF's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AEXAF's ROE of +5.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to AEXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CLVT-PA Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs MGIC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 707.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while MGIC trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs XRX Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, XRX has a market cap of 703.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while XRX trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas XRX's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to XRX's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to XRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs HCKT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 681.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while HCKT trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CTLP Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 604.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CTLP trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 45.94. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DCHIF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DCHIF has a market cap of 551.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DCHIF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DCHIF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DCHIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DCHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FDRVF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FDRVF has a market cap of 538.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FDRVF trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FDRVF's P/E ratio is -22.97. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FDRVF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to FDRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FDDMF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FDDMF has a market cap of 508.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FDDMF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FDDMF's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FDDMF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FDDMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CMTUF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CMTUF has a market cap of 470.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CMTUF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CMTUF's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CMTUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GBDMF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GBDMF has a market cap of 467.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GBDMF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GBDMF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GBDMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to GBDMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CNDT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 356.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CNDT trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is 0.99. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNDT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs UIS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 354.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while UIS trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to UIS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DTTLY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DTTLY has a market cap of 347.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DTTLY trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DTTLY's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTTLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to DTTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs IBEX Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 338.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while IBEX trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SLUNF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SLUNF has a market cap of 304.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SLUNF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SLUNF's P/E ratio is -12.35. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SLUNF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SLUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DMRC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 289.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DMRC trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SVPLF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SVPLF has a market cap of 279.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SVPLF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SVPLF's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SVPLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SVPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs VNET Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 268.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while VNET trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is 300.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VNET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CEJOF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CEJOF has a market cap of 264.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CEJOF trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CEJOF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CEJOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CEJOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CSYJF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CSYJF has a market cap of 261.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CSYJF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CSYJF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CSYJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CSYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BULLZ Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 255.71M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BULLZ trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SSCC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SSCC has a market cap of 244.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SSCC trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SSCC's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SSCC's ROE of -7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CSYJY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CSYJY has a market cap of 240.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CSYJY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CSYJY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CSYJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CSYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ITFRF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ITFRF has a market cap of 229.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ITFRF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ITFRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ITFRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ITFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs EMCHF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, EMCHF has a market cap of 226.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while EMCHF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EMCHF's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EMCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to EMCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs APMRF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, APMRF has a market cap of 224.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while APMRF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas APMRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APMRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to APMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FCCN Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FCCN has a market cap of 215.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FCCN trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FCCN's P/E ratio is -63.60. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FCCN's ROE of +20.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to FCCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs III Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, III has a market cap of 193.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while III trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas III's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to III's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TTEC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 191.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TTEC trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TSSI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 184.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TSSI trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TLS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 183.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TLS trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SRT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SRT trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs PHLT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 176.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while PHLT trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -17.31. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PHLT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CTG Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 168.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ALVNF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ALVNF has a market cap of 167.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ALVNF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ALVNF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALVNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ALVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs LHSW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 161.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while LHSW trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LHSW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CSPI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 160.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CSPI trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is 812.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CSPI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs APXYY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, APXYY has a market cap of 138.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while APXYY trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas APXYY's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APXYY's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to APXYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ULPRF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ULPRF has a market cap of 136.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ULPRF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ULPRF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ULPRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ULPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GSDT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GSDT has a market cap of 127.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GSDT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GSDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GSDT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to GSDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ALYAF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ALYAF has a market cap of 118.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ALYAF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ALYAF's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALYAF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ALYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs APPEF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, APPEF has a market cap of 114.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while APPEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas APPEF's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APPEF's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to APPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ALYA Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs QUISF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, QUISF has a market cap of 108.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while QUISF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas QUISF's P/E ratio is -19.51. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to QUISF's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to QUISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NOTE-WT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NOTE-WT has a market cap of 106.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NOTE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NOTE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NOTE-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NOTE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CNGFF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CNGFF has a market cap of 103.03M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CNGFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CNGFF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNGFF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CNGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NOTE Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NOTE has a market cap of 99.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NOTE trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NOTE's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NOTE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NOTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs QSCGF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, QSCGF has a market cap of 99.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while QSCGF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas QSCGF's P/E ratio is -15.92. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to QSCGF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to QSCGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DCHIY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DCHIY has a market cap of 88.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DCHIY trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DCHIY's P/E ratio is -12.36. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DCHIY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DCHIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SAIH Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 81.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SAIH trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CTM Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 78.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CTM trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs KDCXF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, KDCXF has a market cap of 64.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KDCXF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KDCXF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KDCXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to KDCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs VEEA Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 57.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while VEEA trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VEEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs EAXR Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, EAXR has a market cap of 56.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while EAXR trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EAXR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EAXR's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to EAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs HLEO Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, HLEO has a market cap of 56.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while HLEO trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HLEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HLEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to HLEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SDHIU Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 54.05M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SDHIU trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CXGEF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CXGEF has a market cap of 53.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CXGEF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CXGEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CXGEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CXGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DVLT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 49.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DVLT trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs WYY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 49.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WYY trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -23.90. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs USIO Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 41.26M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while USIO trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to USIO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GMM Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 41.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GMM trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GMM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SEBFF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SEBFF has a market cap of 38.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SEBFF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SEBFF's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SEBFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SEBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs MASK Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 37.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while MASK trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MASK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GLE Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 34.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GLE trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is 94.50. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SNELF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SNELF has a market cap of 28.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SNELF trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SNELF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SNELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SNELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BTCM Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 27.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BTCM trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BTCM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CLPS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CLPS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -19.08. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DTST Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 26.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DTST trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is 52.43. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BNXAF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BNXAF has a market cap of 24.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BNXAF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BNXAF's P/E ratio is -19.40. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BNXAF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to BNXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs MLBEF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, MLBEF has a market cap of 22.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while MLBEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MLBEF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MLBEF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to MLBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SPOFF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SPOFF has a market cap of 18.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SPOFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SPOFF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SPOFF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SPOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ARBB Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 18.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ARBB trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CYCU Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CYCU has a market cap of 13.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CYCU trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CYCU's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CYCU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CYCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs JDZG Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 13.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while JDZG trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JDZG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SGLB Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SGLB's ROE of +43.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs KTHGF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, KTHGF has a market cap of 11.25M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KTHGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KTHGF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KTHGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to KTHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs XTMIF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, XTMIF has a market cap of 8.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while XTMIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas XTMIF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to XTMIF's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to XTMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs POSAF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, POSAF has a market cap of 6.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while POSAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas POSAF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to POSAF's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to POSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BRQSF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BRQSF has a market cap of 6.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BRQSF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BRQSF's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BRQSF's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BRQSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs KNRLF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, KNRLF has a market cap of 6.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while KNRLF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas KNRLF's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KNRLF's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to KNRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DVRNF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DVRNF has a market cap of 6.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DVRNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DVRNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DVRNF's ROE of +2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DVRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FUUN Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FUUN has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FUUN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FUUN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FUUN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to FUUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DCSX Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DCSX has a market cap of 5.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DCSX trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DCSX's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DCSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to DCSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CPIHF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CPIHF has a market cap of 3.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CPIHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CPIHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CPIHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CPIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SASI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SASI has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SASI trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SASI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SASI's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SASI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DRGV Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DRGV has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DRGV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DRGV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DRGV's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to DRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NOSUF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NOSUF has a market cap of 3.04M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NOSUF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NOSUF's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NOSUF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NOSUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs VSSSF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, VSSSF has a market cap of 2.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while VSSSF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas VSSSF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VSSSF's ROE of +25.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to VSSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SEAV Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SEAV has a market cap of 2.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SEAV trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SEAV's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SEAV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SEAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs VEEAW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while VEEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SKTCF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SKTCF has a market cap of 2.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SKTCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SKTCF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SKTCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SKTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DTSTW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DTSTW has a market cap of 2.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DTSTW trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DTSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTSTW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DTSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SNOIF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SNOIF has a market cap of 2.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SNOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SNOIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SNOIF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SNOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs WAVD Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, WAVD has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WAVD trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WAVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WAVD's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to WAVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TDTH Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TDTH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TDTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SFWJ Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SFWJ has a market cap of 1.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SFWJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SFWJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SFWJ's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SFWJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs MOBIF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, MOBIF has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while MOBIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MOBIF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to MOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CRCW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CRCW has a market cap of 1.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CRCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CRCW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CRCW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CRCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GTCH Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GTCH has a market cap of 1.68M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GTCH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GTCH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GTCH's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to GTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs MOOIF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, MOOIF has a market cap of 1.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while MOOIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas MOOIF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MOOIF's ROE of +18.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to MOOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DTMXF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DTMXF has a market cap of 1.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DTMXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DTMXF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DTMXF's ROE of -5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to DTMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SUIC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SUIC has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SUIC trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SUIC's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SUIC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SUIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SSFT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SSFT has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SSFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SSFT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SSFT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SSFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CYCUW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CYCUW has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CYCUW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CYCUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CYCUW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CYCUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CATG Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CATG has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CATG trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CATG's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CATG's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CATG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs JFU Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 930091.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while JFU trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs VEII Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, VEII has a market cap of 783014.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while VEII trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas VEII's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VEII's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to VEII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ESYL Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ESYL has a market cap of 697406.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ESYL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ESYL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ESYL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ESYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NFTFF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NFTFF has a market cap of 685285.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NFTFF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NFTFF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NFTFF's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NFTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SDVI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SDVI has a market cap of 674664.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SDVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SDVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SDVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SDVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs AGILQ Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, AGILQ has a market cap of 581689.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while AGILQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas AGILQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AGILQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to AGILQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TRIRW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TRIRW has a market cap of 397925.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TRIRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TRIRW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TRIRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TRIRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs UTRX Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, UTRX has a market cap of 332360.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while UTRX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas UTRX's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to UTRX's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to UTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs WYLDF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, WYLDF has a market cap of 313079.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WYLDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WYLDF's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WYLDF's ROE of +6.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to WYLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs HMNY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, HMNY has a market cap of 300139.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while HMNY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HMNY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HMNY's ROE of +11.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to HMNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SLLN Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SLLN has a market cap of 272904.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SLLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SLLN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SLLN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SLLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ROKK Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ROKK has a market cap of 272428.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ROKK trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ROKK's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ROKK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ROKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DYNE Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DYNE has a market cap of 232936.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DYNE trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DYNE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DYNE's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to DYNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SAIHW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SAIHW has a market cap of 174991.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SAIHW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SAIHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SAIHW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SAIHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DIGAF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DIGAF has a market cap of 168217.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DIGAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DIGAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DIGAF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DIGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CBRI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CBRI has a market cap of 163292.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CBRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CBRI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ZWBC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ZWBC has a market cap of 134886.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ZWBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ZWBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ZWBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ZWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs APQT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, APQT has a market cap of 108108.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while APQT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas APQT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to APQT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to APQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs HUBV Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, HUBV has a market cap of 101820.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while HUBV trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HUBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HUBV's ROE of -4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to HUBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CLTS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CLTS has a market cap of 99989.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CLTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CLTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CLTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CLTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ICLD Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ICLD has a market cap of 95702.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ICLD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ICLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ICLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ICLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ADGL Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ADGL has a market cap of 95638.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ADGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ADGL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ADGL's ROE of -4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ADGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs RCMH Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, RCMH has a market cap of 84453.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while RCMH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas RCMH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to RCMH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to RCMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ALYI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ALYI has a market cap of 81707.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ALYI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ALYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ALYI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ALYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs IPSI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, IPSI has a market cap of 70378.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while IPSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas IPSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IPSI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to IPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs WCIG Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, WCIG has a market cap of 49979.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while WCIG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas WCIG's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WCIG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to WCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs RGGI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, RGGI has a market cap of 45979.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while RGGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas RGGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to RGGI's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to RGGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs XALL Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, XALL has a market cap of 45912.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while XALL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas XALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to XALL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to XALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs INIX Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, INIX has a market cap of 40485.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while INIX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas INIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to INIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to INIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GSPH Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GSPH has a market cap of 37091.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GSPH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GSPH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GSPH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to GSPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs YIPI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, YIPI has a market cap of 29790.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while YIPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas YIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to YIPI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to YIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs HWNI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, HWNI has a market cap of 21097.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while HWNI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HWNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HWNI's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to HWNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs EXCC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, EXCC has a market cap of 10246.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while EXCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EXCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EXCC's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to EXCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs EMRH Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, EMRH has a market cap of 10100.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while EMRH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas EMRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EMRH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to EMRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CMPY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CMPY has a market cap of 6671.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CMPY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CMPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CMPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TPPPF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TPPPF has a market cap of 6094.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TPPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TPPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TPPPF's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TPPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FCTI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FCTI has a market cap of 5522.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FCTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FCTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FCTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to FCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ENHT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ENHT has a market cap of 5238.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ENHT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ENHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ENHT's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to ENHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs PGFY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, PGFY has a market cap of 5010.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while PGFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas PGFY's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PGFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to PGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs HZHI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, HZHI has a market cap of 4973.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while HZHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HZHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HZHI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to HZHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NDVNQ Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NDVNQ has a market cap of 4759.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NDVNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NDVNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NDVNQ's ROE of +5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to NDVNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DGIF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DGIF has a market cap of 4340.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DGIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DGIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DGIF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to DGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs THDS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, THDS has a market cap of 3713.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while THDS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas THDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to THDS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to THDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CCTR Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CCTR has a market cap of 2977.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CCTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CCTR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CCTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CCTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CKYS Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CKYS has a market cap of 2000.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CKYS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CKYS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CKYS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CKYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs OTFT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, OTFT has a market cap of 1737.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while OTFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas OTFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to OTFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to OTFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs PRZM Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, PRZM has a market cap of 1007.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while PRZM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas PRZM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PRZM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to PRZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs PRLO Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, PRLO has a market cap of 730.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while PRLO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas PRLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PRLO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to PRLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SCNTQ Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SCNTQ has a market cap of 661.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SCNTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SCNTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SCNTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SCNTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs RTNB Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, RTNB has a market cap of 610.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while RTNB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas RTNB's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to RTNB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to RTNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs VBTC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, VBTC has a market cap of 528.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while VBTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas VBTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to VBTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to VBTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs USDC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, USDC has a market cap of 371.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while USDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas USDC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to USDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to USDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BETSF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BETSF has a market cap of 312.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BETSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BETSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BETSF's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to BETSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BTSR Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BTSR has a market cap of 210.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BTSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BTSR's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BTSR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to BTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ITTOF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ITTOF has a market cap of 171.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ITTOF trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ITTOF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ITTOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ITTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ITTOY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ITTOY has a market cap of 150.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ITTOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ITTOY's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ITTOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ITTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs DPFD Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, DPFD has a market cap of 114.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while DPFD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas DPFD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DPFD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to DPFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs IMCI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, IMCI has a market cap of 104.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while IMCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas IMCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IMCI's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to IMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NONEY Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NONEY has a market cap of 100.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NONEY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NONEY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NONEY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to NONEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SEVM Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SEVM has a market cap of 90.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SEVM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SEVM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SEVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SEVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NONEF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NONEF has a market cap of 84.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NONEF trades at $27.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NONEF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NONEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to NONEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ATHC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ATHC has a market cap of 75.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ATHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ATHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ATHC's ROE of -6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ATHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs NNSCF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, NNSCF has a market cap of 46.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while NNSCF trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas NNSCF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NNSCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to NNSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs HYDN Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, HYDN has a market cap of 39.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while HYDN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas HYDN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HYDN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to HYDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SFBTF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SFBTF has a market cap of 35.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SFBTF trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SFBTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SFBTF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SFBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TSCC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TSCC has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TSCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TSCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TSCC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to TSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs PCPJ Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, PCPJ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while PCPJ trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas PCPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PCPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to PCPJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CSVI Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CSVI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CSVI trades at $57.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CSVI's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CSVI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CSVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs BLFDF Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, BLFDF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while BLFDF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas BLFDF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BLFDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to BLFDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs AVCT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, AVCT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while AVCT trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas AVCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AVCT's ROE of -4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to AVCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CTEK Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CTEK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CTEK trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CTEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CTEK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SWCH Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SWCH comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SWCH trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SWCH's P/E ratio is 796.51. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SWCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SWCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs ACZT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, ACZT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while ACZT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas ACZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ACZT's ROE of -70.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to ACZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs FCCND Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, FCCND comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while FCCND trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas FCCND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FCCND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to FCCND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CRGE Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CRGE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CRGE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CRGE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CRGE's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CRGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CNLK Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CNLK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CNLK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CNLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CNLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CNLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs GDYNW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, GDYNW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while GDYNW trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas GDYNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GDYNW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to GDYNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SYKE Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SYKE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SYKE trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SYKE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SYKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to SYKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs TRIT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, TRIT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while TRIT trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas TRIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TRIT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to TRIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs SREV Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, SREV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while SREV trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas SREV's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SREV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to SREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs REKRW Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, REKRW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while REKRW trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas REKRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to REKRW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to REKRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CYXT Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CYXT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CYXT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CYXT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CYXT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is more volatile compared to CYXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
CTSDF vs CCRC Comparison
CTSDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTSDF stands at 814.12M. In comparison, CCRC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CTSDF is priced at $4.32, while CCRC trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTSDF currently has a P/E ratio of -6.64, whereas CCRC's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, CTSDF's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CCRC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CTSDF is less volatile compared to CCRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTSDF.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | $254.21 | +0.33% | 236.26B | 43.45 | $5.85 | +2.62% |
| ACN | $308.52 | +0.79% | 193.14B | 25.46 | $12.12 | +1.85% |
| FISV | $114.23 | N/A | 116.20B | 29.67 | $3.85 | N/A |
| FI | $181.40 | -0.43% | 100.57B | 32.11 | $5.65 | N/A |
| INFY | $17.49 | -1.24% | 72.48B | 23.01 | $0.76 | +3.34% |
| NTTDF | $33.05 | +22.63% | 46.34B | 45.27 | $0.73 | +0.27% |
| FJTSF | $23.03 | +2.90% | 40.93B | 29.15 | $0.79 | +0.85% |
| FJTSY | $22.74 | +1.84% | 40.67B | 28.78 | $0.79 | N/A |
| CTSH | $79.21 | +1.64% | 39.05B | 16.68 | $4.75 | +1.52% |
| NTDTY | $27.33 | +0.66% | 38.32B | 37.44 | $0.73 | N/A |