TClarke plc
TClarke plc CTO.L Peers
See (CTO.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTO.L | $159.03 | +0.02% | 88.40M | 11.36 | $0.14 | N/A |
| 0KSR.L | $343.22 | +0.96% | 50.86B | 104.51 | $3.28 | +0.11% |
| LTOD.L | $22.20 | +0.45% | 30.53B | 18.50 | $1.20 | +1.51% |
| 0DH7.L | $150.80 | -3.83% | 17.17B | 16.04 | $9.40 | +3.40% |
| 0OFP.IL | $183.55 | +0.27% | 16.18B | 13.28 | $13.82 | +3.28% |
| 0H9N.L | $109.17 | +1.22% | 14.44B | 75.29 | $1.45 | +0.88% |
| 0MKP.L | $79.90 | -0.37% | 9.22B | 14.00 | $5.71 | +2.74% |
| 0IQC.L | $38.60 | +0.50% | 6.36B | -16.09 | -$2.40 | N/A |
| BAB.L | $848.00 | +1.13% | 4.27B | 22.92 | $0.37 | +0.63% |
| BBY.L | $487.20 | -0.29% | 2.45B | 14.33 | $0.34 | +2.57% |
Stock Comparison
CTO.L vs 0KSR.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0KSR.L has a market cap of 50.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0KSR.L trades at $343.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0KSR.L's P/E ratio is 104.51. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0KSR.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to 0KSR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs LTOD.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, LTOD.L has a market cap of 30.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while LTOD.L trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas LTOD.L's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LTOD.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to LTOD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0DH7.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0DH7.L has a market cap of 17.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0DH7.L trades at $150.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0DH7.L's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0DH7.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to 0DH7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0OFP.IL Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0OFP.IL has a market cap of 16.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0OFP.IL trades at $183.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0OFP.IL's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0OFP.IL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to 0OFP.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0H9N.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0H9N.L has a market cap of 14.44B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0H9N.L trades at $109.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0H9N.L's P/E ratio is 75.29. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0H9N.L's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to 0H9N.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0MKP.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0MKP.L has a market cap of 9.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0MKP.L trades at $79.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0MKP.L's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0MKP.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to 0MKP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0IQC.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0IQC.L has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0IQC.L trades at $38.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0IQC.L's P/E ratio is -16.09. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0IQC.L's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to 0IQC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs BAB.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, BAB.L has a market cap of 4.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while BAB.L trades at $848.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas BAB.L's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAB.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to BAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs BBY.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, BBY.L has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while BBY.L trades at $487.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas BBY.L's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBY.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to BBY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs MGNS.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, MGNS.L has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while MGNS.L trades at $3,660.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas MGNS.L's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MGNS.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to MGNS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs HILS.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, HILS.L has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while HILS.L trades at $1,932.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas HILS.L's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HILS.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to HILS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0M6I.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0M6I.L has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0M6I.L trades at $50.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0M6I.L's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0M6I.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to 0M6I.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0R53.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0R53.L has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0R53.L trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0R53.L's P/E ratio is 538.75. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0R53.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to 0R53.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0QO2.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0QO2.L has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0QO2.L trades at $123.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0QO2.L's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QO2.L's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to 0QO2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0R8F.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0R8F.L has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0R8F.L trades at $47.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0R8F.L's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0R8F.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to 0R8F.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs KLR.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, KLR.L has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while KLR.L trades at $1,564.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas KLR.L's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLR.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to KLR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs KIE.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, KIE.L has a market cap of 686.75M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while KIE.L trades at $161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas KIE.L's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIE.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to KIE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs RNWH.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, RNWH.L has a market cap of 672.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while RNWH.L trades at $850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas RNWH.L's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RNWH.L's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to RNWH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0OA7.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0OA7.L has a market cap of 578.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0OA7.L trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0OA7.L's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0OA7.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to 0OA7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0QNT.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0QNT.L has a market cap of 436.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0QNT.L trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0QNT.L's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QNT.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to 0QNT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs GFRD.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, GFRD.L has a market cap of 398.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while GFRD.L trades at $407.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas GFRD.L's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GFRD.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to GFRD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs COST.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, COST.L has a market cap of 339.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while COST.L trades at $124.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas COST.L's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COST.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to COST.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs SUR.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, SUR.L has a market cap of 212.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while SUR.L trades at $124.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SUR.L's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUR.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to SUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs SFR.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, SFR.L has a market cap of 88.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while SFR.L trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SFR.L's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SFR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to SFR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0QIH.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0QIH.L has a market cap of 58.60M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0QIH.L trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0QIH.L's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0QIH.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to 0QIH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs 0F7F.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, 0F7F.L has a market cap of 58.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while 0F7F.L trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas 0F7F.L's P/E ratio is 1.23. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to 0F7F.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to 0F7F.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs KINO.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, KINO.L has a market cap of 51.55M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while KINO.L trades at $85.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas KINO.L's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KINO.L's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to KINO.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs BILN.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, BILN.L has a market cap of 48.12M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while BILN.L trades at $382.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas BILN.L's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BILN.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to BILN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs SMJ.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, SMJ.L has a market cap of 46.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while SMJ.L trades at $120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas SMJ.L's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMJ.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to SMJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs VANL.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, VANL.L has a market cap of 42.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while VANL.L trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas VANL.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VANL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to VANL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs HERC.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, HERC.L has a market cap of 39.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while HERC.L trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas HERC.L's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HERC.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to HERC.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs NEXS.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, NEXS.L has a market cap of 14.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while NEXS.L trades at $165.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas NEXS.L's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEXS.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is more volatile compared to NEXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs TGP.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, TGP.L has a market cap of 6.80M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while TGP.L trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas TGP.L's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGP.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to TGP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs AUK.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, AUK.L has a market cap of 5.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while AUK.L trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas AUK.L's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AUK.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to AUK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs RAI.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, RAI.L has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while RAI.L trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas RAI.L's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAI.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTO.L is less volatile compared to RAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTO.L.
CTO.L vs FCRM.L Comparison
CTO.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTO.L stands at 88.40M. In comparison, FCRM.L has a market cap of 718764.00. Regarding current trading prices, CTO.L is priced at $159.03, while FCRM.L trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 11.36, whereas FCRM.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTO.L's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCRM.L's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CTO.L has daily volatility of 1.87 and FCRM.L has daily volatility of N/A.