Catenae Innovation Plc
Catenae Innovation Plc CTEA.L Peers
See (CTEA.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTEA.L | $0.50 | -9.07% | 407280.00 | -0.25 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| 0YP5.L | $1,657.00 | +0.50% | 46.75B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KSPI.IL | $122.85 | +1.87% | 23.61B | 15.83 | $7.76 | N/A |
| KSPI.L | $43.35 | -1.46% | 15.61B | 4.48 | $9.67 | N/A |
| DARK.L | $576.80 | +0.07% | 3.69B | 44.37 | $0.13 | N/A |
| 0RUL.L | $27.95 | +1.35% | 2.07B | 22.78 | $1.23 | N/A |
| MCRO.L | $532.00 | +0.11% | 1.80B | -0.01 | -$640.20 | N/A |
| BYIT.L | $551.00 | +0.18% | 1.33B | 26.24 | $0.21 | +2.14% |
| KAPE.L | $285.00 | +0.71% | 1.22B | 19.00 | $0.15 | N/A |
| SPT.L | $189.80 | +0.96% | 1.09B | 94.90 | $0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CTEA.L vs 0YP5.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, 0YP5.L has a market cap of 46.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while 0YP5.L trades at $1,657.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas 0YP5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to 0YP5.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to 0YP5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs KSPI.IL Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, KSPI.IL has a market cap of 23.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while KSPI.IL trades at $122.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas KSPI.IL's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to KSPI.IL's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to KSPI.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs KSPI.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, KSPI.L has a market cap of 15.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while KSPI.L trades at $43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas KSPI.L's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to KSPI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to KSPI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs DARK.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, DARK.L has a market cap of 3.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while DARK.L trades at $576.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas DARK.L's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to DARK.L's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to DARK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs 0RUL.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, 0RUL.L has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while 0RUL.L trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas 0RUL.L's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to 0RUL.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to 0RUL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs MCRO.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, MCRO.L has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while MCRO.L trades at $532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas MCRO.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to MCRO.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to MCRO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs BYIT.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, BYIT.L has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while BYIT.L trades at $551.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas BYIT.L's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to BYIT.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to BYIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs KAPE.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, KAPE.L has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while KAPE.L trades at $285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas KAPE.L's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to KAPE.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to KAPE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs SPT.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, SPT.L has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while SPT.L trades at $189.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas SPT.L's P/E ratio is 94.90. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to SPT.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to SPT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs BOKU.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, BOKU.L has a market cap of 492.30M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while BOKU.L trades at $166.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas BOKU.L's P/E ratio is 166.00. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to BOKU.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to BOKU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs PAY.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, PAY.L has a market cap of 484.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while PAY.L trades at $688.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas PAY.L's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to PAY.L's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to PAY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs WPS.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, WPS.L has a market cap of 412.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while WPS.L trades at $59.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas WPS.L's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to WPS.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to WPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs FNX.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, FNX.L has a market cap of 231.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while FNX.L trades at $233.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas FNX.L's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to FNX.L's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to FNX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs WNWD.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, WNWD.L has a market cap of 186.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while WNWD.L trades at $210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas WNWD.L's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to WNWD.L's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to WNWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs BLTG.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, BLTG.L has a market cap of 174.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while BLTG.L trades at $225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas BLTG.L's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to BLTG.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CTEA.L has daily volatility of 18.00 and BLTG.L has daily volatility of N/A.
CTEA.L vs BKS.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, BKS.L has a market cap of 150.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while BKS.L trades at $224.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas BKS.L's P/E ratio is 74.67. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to BKS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to BKS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs SEE.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, SEE.L has a market cap of 123.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while SEE.L trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas SEE.L's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to SEE.L's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to SEE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs CNS.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, CNS.L has a market cap of 91.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while CNS.L trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas CNS.L's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to CNS.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to CNS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs BGO.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, BGO.L has a market cap of 68.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while BGO.L trades at $89.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas BGO.L's P/E ratio is -9.94. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to BGO.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to BGO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs INSG.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, INSG.L has a market cap of 47.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while INSG.L trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas INSG.L's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to INSG.L's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to INSG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs PCIP.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, PCIP.L has a market cap of 35.13M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while PCIP.L trades at $48.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas PCIP.L's P/E ratio is -24.25. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to PCIP.L's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to PCIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs IOM.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, IOM.L has a market cap of 28.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while IOM.L trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas IOM.L's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to IOM.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to IOM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs FIN.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, FIN.L has a market cap of 20.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while FIN.L trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas FIN.L's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to FIN.L's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to FIN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs SYS.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, SYS.L has a market cap of 18.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while SYS.L trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas SYS.L's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to SYS.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to SYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs GLAN.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, GLAN.L has a market cap of 16.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while GLAN.L trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas GLAN.L's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to GLAN.L's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to GLAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs CYK.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, CYK.L has a market cap of 11.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while CYK.L trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas CYK.L's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to CYK.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to CYK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs SWG.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, SWG.L has a market cap of 8.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while SWG.L trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas SWG.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to SWG.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to SWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs BRSD.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, BRSD.L has a market cap of 7.82M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while BRSD.L trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas BRSD.L's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to BRSD.L's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CTEA.L has daily volatility of 18.00 and BRSD.L has daily volatility of N/A.
CTEA.L vs ECSC.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, ECSC.L has a market cap of 5.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while ECSC.L trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas ECSC.L's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to ECSC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to ECSC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs OSI.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, OSI.L has a market cap of 2.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while OSI.L trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas OSI.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to OSI.L's ROE of +23.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to OSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs CCS.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, CCS.L has a market cap of 1.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while CCS.L trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas CCS.L's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to CCS.L's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to CCS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs CLCO.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, CLCO.L has a market cap of 1.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while CLCO.L trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas CLCO.L's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to CLCO.L's ROE of +5.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to CLCO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs CTAI.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, CTAI.L has a market cap of 1.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while CTAI.L trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas CTAI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to CTAI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is less volatile compared to CTAI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs RCGH.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, RCGH.L has a market cap of 1.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while RCGH.L trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas RCGH.L's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to RCGH.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to RCGH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs MODE.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, MODE.L has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while MODE.L trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas MODE.L's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to MODE.L's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CTEA.L is more volatile compared to MODE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTEA.L.
CTEA.L vs FCS.L Comparison
CTEA.L plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTEA.L stands at 407280.00. In comparison, FCS.L has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CTEA.L is priced at $0.50, while FCS.L trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTEA.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.25, whereas FCS.L's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CTEA.L's ROE is -3.41%, compared to FCS.L's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CTEA.L has daily volatility of 18.00 and FCS.L has daily volatility of N/A.