City Bank
City Bank (CTBK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTBK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTBK | $0.00 | +0.00% | 1.6K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CAIXY | $3.15 | +1.61% | 202.2B | 10.14 | $0.31 | +5.30% |
| CIHKY | $31.89 | -1.33% | 155.6B | 8.14 | $3.92 | +3.71% |
| CIHHF | $6.50 | +0.00% | 154.9B | 8.33 | $0.78 | +4.29% |
| UNCFF | $73.32 | -2.28% | 115.1B | 10.39 | $7.11 | +3.59% |
| UNCRY | $36.13 | -1.66% | 112.5B | 10.35 | $3.49 | +2.39% |
| DBSDF | $38.46 | +6.83% | 108.8B | 12.57 | $3.06 | +4.46% |
| IITSF | $5.90 | -3.20% | 104.9B | 9.67 | $0.61 | +6.29% |
| DBSDY | $147.55 | +0.06% | 104.6B | 12.07 | $12.19 | +3.74% |
| BNPQF | $91.63 | +1.16% | 102.4B | 8.26 | $11.10 | +5.88% |
Stock Comparison
CTBK vs CAIXY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 202.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CAIXY trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CAIXY's competition here
CTBK vs CIHKY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CIHKY trades at $31.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CIHKY's competition here
CTBK vs CIHHF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 154.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CIHHF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and CIHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIHHF's competition here
CTBK vs UNCFF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while UNCFF trades at $73.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check UNCFF's competition here
CTBK vs UNCRY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while UNCRY trades at $36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check UNCRY's competition here
CTBK vs DBSDF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while DBSDF trades at $38.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check DBSDF's competition here
CTBK vs IITSF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 104.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while IITSF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and IITSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IITSF's competition here
CTBK vs DBSDY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while DBSDY trades at $147.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check DBSDY's competition here
CTBK vs BNPQF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 102.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BNPQF trades at $91.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BNPQF's competition here
CTBK vs BNPQY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BNPQY trades at $44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BNPQY's competition here
CTBK vs SBKFF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 91B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while SBKFF trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and SBKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBKFF's competition here
CTBK vs KBCSY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while KBCSY trades at $52.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check KBCSY's competition here
CTBK vs BREJY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BREJY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and BREJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BREJY's competition here
CTBK vs MZHOF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while MZHOF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check MZHOF's competition here
CTBK vs EBKDY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while EBKDY trades at $45.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check EBKDY's competition here
CTBK vs AKSJF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and AKSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKSJF's competition here
CTBK vs OVCHF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while OVCHF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and OVCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OVCHF's competition here
CTBK vs CIXPF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CIXPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CIXPF's competition here
CTBK vs CHBJF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CHBJF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CHBJF's competition here
CTBK vs PBCRY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while PBCRY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check PBCRY's competition here
CTBK vs LLOBF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while LLOBF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and LLOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLOBF's competition here
CTBK vs PSBKF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check PSBKF's competition here
CTBK vs CHCJY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CHCJY trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and CHCJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHCJY's competition here
CTBK vs LLDTF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while LLDTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and LLDTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLDTF's competition here
CTBK vs OVCHY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while OVCHY trades at $26.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check OVCHY's competition here
CTBK vs PBCRF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while PBCRF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and PBCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PBCRF's competition here
CTBK vs CRARY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CRARY trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CRARY's competition here
CTBK vs CRARF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CRARF trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CRARF's competition here
CTBK vs NBNKF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while NBNKF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and NBNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBNKF's competition here
CTBK vs NRDBY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while NRDBY trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check NRDBY's competition here
CTBK vs SCGLY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while SCGLY trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check SCGLY's competition here
CTBK vs BNKHF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BNKHF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and BNKHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNKHF's competition here
CTBK vs UOVEF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while UOVEF trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check UOVEF's competition here
CTBK vs BHKLY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BHKLY trades at $89.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BHKLY's competition here
CTBK vs UOVEY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while UOVEY trades at $56.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check UOVEY's competition here
CTBK vs STNDF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and STNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STNDF's competition here
CTBK vs JPSTF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while JPSTF trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check JPSTF's competition here
CTBK vs SCGLF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while SCGLF trades at $63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and SCGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCGLF's competition here
CTBK vs CRZBY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CRZBY trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CRZBY's competition here
CTBK vs KBCSF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while KBCSF trades at $105.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and KBCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBCSF's competition here
CTBK vs CWESF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CWESF's competition here
CTBK vs DNBBF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while DNBBF trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check DNBBF's competition here
CTBK vs CRZBF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CRZBF trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and CRZBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRZBF's competition here
CTBK vs DNBBY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while DNBBY trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check DNBBY's competition here
CTBK vs SVKEF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while SVKEF trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and SVKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVKEF's competition here
CTBK vs EBKOF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while EBKOF trades at $92.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check EBKOF's competition here
CTBK vs CEBCF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CEBCF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CEBCF's competition here
CTBK vs BKRKF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BKRKF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and BKRKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKRKF's competition here
CTBK vs BKRKY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BKRKY trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BKRKY's competition here
CTBK vs JPPTY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check JPPTY's competition here
CTBK vs DNKEY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while DNKEY trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check DNKEY's competition here
CTBK vs SWDBF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while SWDBF trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check SWDBF's competition here
CTBK vs CMAKY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CMAKY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and CMAKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMAKY's competition here
CTBK vs SWDBY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while SWDBY trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check SWDBY's competition here
CTBK vs MLYNF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check MLYNF's competition here
CTBK vs PSZKF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while PSZKF trades at $23.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and PSZKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSZKF's competition here
CTBK vs HSNGF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while HSNGF trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and HSNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSNGF's competition here
CTBK vs BLMIF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BLMIF trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BLMIF's competition here
CTBK vs PSZKY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while PSZKY trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check PSZKY's competition here
CTBK vs DNSKF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check DNSKF's competition here
CTBK vs JPPHY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while JPPHY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and JPPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPPHY's competition here
CTBK vs JPHLF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while JPHLF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check JPHLF's competition here
CTBK vs HSNGY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while HSNGY trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check HSNGY's competition here
CTBK vs FCNCB Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while FCNCB trades at $1,655.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check FCNCB's competition here
CTBK vs PPERF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while PPERF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check PPERF's competition here
CTBK vs PPERY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while PPERY trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check PPERY's competition here
CTBK vs MLYBY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while MLYBY trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and MLYBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLYBY's competition here
CTBK vs GBOOF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while GBOOF trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check GBOOF's competition here
CTBK vs BKHYY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BKHYY trades at $94.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BKHYY's competition here
CTBK vs BKHPF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BKHPF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BKHPF's competition here
CTBK vs GBOOY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while GBOOY trades at $43.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check GBOOY's competition here
CTBK vs SBGOF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while SBGOF trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and SBGOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SBGOF's competition here
CTBK vs CKHGY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CKHGY trades at $96.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 28.82. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and CKHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKHGY's competition here
CTBK vs CGMBF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CGMBF's competition here
CTBK vs SGBLY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while SGBLY trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check SGBLY's competition here
CTBK vs RSNHF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while RSNHF trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and RSNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RSNHF's competition here
CTBK vs CMTDF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CMTDF trades at $27.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CMTDF's competition here
CTBK vs CKHGF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check CKHGF's competition here
CTBK vs BDORY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BDORY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BDORY's competition here
CTBK vs SUTNY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while SUTNY trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check SUTNY's competition here
CTBK vs PBLOF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check PBLOF's competition here
CTBK vs MDIBY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while MDIBY trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check MDIBY's competition here
CTBK vs BDOUF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BDOUF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and BDOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BDOUF's competition here
CTBK vs MDIBF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while MDIBF trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and MDIBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDIBF's competition here
CTBK vs BNCZF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BNCZF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and BNCZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNCZF's competition here
CTBK vs ISNPY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while ISNPY trades at $34.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check ISNPY's competition here
CTBK vs AIBRF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while AIBRF trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check AIBRF's competition here
CTBK vs AIBGY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while AIBGY trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check AIBGY's competition here
CTBK vs GPFOF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while GPFOF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check GPFOF's competition here
CTBK vs GPFOY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and GPFOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPFOY's competition here
CTBK vs CIMDF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while CIMDF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and CIMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIMDF's competition here
CTBK vs BKPKF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BKPKF trades at $56.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BKPKF's competition here
CTBK vs TKGBY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while TKGBY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check TKGBY's competition here
CTBK vs SKCBY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check SKCBY's competition here
CTBK vs BPXXY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BPXXY trades at $19.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BPXXY's competition here
CTBK vs OTPBF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and OTPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTPBF's competition here
CTBK vs FCBBF Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, FCBBF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while FCBBF trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCBBF's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to FCBBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK and FCBBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCBBF's competition here
CTBK vs BKRIY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while BKRIY trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check BKRIY's competition here
CTBK vs EGFEY Comparison August 2025
CTBK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTBK stands at 1.6K. In comparison, EGFEY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CTBK is priced at $0.00, while EGFEY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTBK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGFEY's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, CTBK's ROE is -0.60%, compared to EGFEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CTBK is less volatile compared to EGFEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTBK.Check EGFEY's competition here