China Shenhua Energy Company Limited
China Shenhua Energy Company Limited CSUAY Peers
See (CSUAY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Coal Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSUAY | $17.72 | -0.34% | 105.4B | 11.29 | $1.57 | +6.00% |
| CUAEF | $4.00 | +0.00% | 95.1B | 10.26 | $0.39 | +7.80% |
| CCOZF | $1.18 | +0.00% | 19.3B | 6.56 | $0.18 | +5.67% |
| YZCAY | $11.80 | -2.16% | 15.8B | 6.38 | $1.85 | +8.88% |
| YZCHF | $1.00 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 5.56 | $0.18 | +10.66% |
| YACAF | $4.12 | -3.06% | 5.5B | 7.00 | $0.60 | +7.82% |
| IMYCF | $1.80 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 3.75 | $0.48 | N/A |
| HIIDQ | $0.91 | +0.59% | 4.2B | 0.16 | $5.54 | N/A |
| ADOOY | $6.32 | +10.68% | 3.8B | 7.26 | $0.87 | +77.96% |
| WHITF | $4.52 | +1.57% | 3.8B | 32.29 | $0.14 | +3.09% |
Stock Comparison
CSUAY vs CUAEF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, CUAEF has a market cap of 95.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while CUAEF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CUAEF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CUAEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to CUAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs CCOZF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, CCOZF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while CCOZF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CCOZF's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CCOZF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to CCOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs YZCAY Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, YZCAY has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while YZCAY trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas YZCAY's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YZCAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to YZCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs YZCHF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, YZCHF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while YZCHF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas YZCHF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YZCHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to YZCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs YACAF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, YACAF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while YACAF trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas YACAF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YACAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to YACAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs IMYCF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, IMYCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while IMYCF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas IMYCF's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to IMYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs HIIDQ Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, HIIDQ has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while HIIDQ trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas HIIDQ's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HIIDQ's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to HIIDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs ADOOY Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, ADOOY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while ADOOY trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ADOOY's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADOOY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to ADOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs WHITF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, WHITF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while WHITF trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas WHITF's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WHITF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to WHITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs PADEF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, PADEF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while PADEF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PADEF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PADEF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to PADEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs EXXAF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, EXXAF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while EXXAF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas EXXAF's P/E ratio is 5.59. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXXAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to EXXAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs NHPEF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, NHPEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while NHPEF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas NHPEF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NHPEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to NHPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs PBMRY Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, PBMRY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while PBMRY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PBMRY's P/E ratio is 110.00. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBMRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to PBMRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs PBATF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, PBATF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while PBATF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PBATF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBATF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to PBATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs TBNGY Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, TBNGY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while TBNGY trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas TBNGY's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TBNGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to TBNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs FSHYF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, FSHYF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while FSHYF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas FSHYF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSHYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to FSHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs ITAYY Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, ITAYY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while ITAYY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ITAYY's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITAYY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to ITAYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs PTIZF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, PTIZF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while PTIZF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PTIZF's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTIZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to PTIZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs STMRF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, STMRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while STMRF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas STMRF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STMRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to STMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs MOGLF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, MOGLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while MOGLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas MOGLF's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOGLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to MOGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs CCOZY Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, CCOZY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while CCOZY trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CCOZY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CCOZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to CCOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs TNGRF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, TNGRF has a market cap of 754.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while TNGRF trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas TNGRF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TNGRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to TNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs BRNE Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, BRNE has a market cap of 734.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while BRNE trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas BRNE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRNE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to BRNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs GRYRF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, GRYRF has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while GRYRF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas GRYRF's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRYRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to GRYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs CCARF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, CCARF has a market cap of 214.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while CCARF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CCARF's P/E ratio is -59.00. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CCARF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to CCARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs CODQL Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, CODQL has a market cap of 185.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while CODQL trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CODQL's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CODQL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to CODQL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs SGQRF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, SGQRF has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while SGQRF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SGQRF's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGQRF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to SGQRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs BTURF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, BTURF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while BTURF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas BTURF's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTURF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to BTURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs PBMRF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, PBMRF has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while PBMRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PBMRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBMRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to PBMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs TERCF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, TERCF has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while TERCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas TERCF's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TERCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to TERCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs WRLC Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, WRLC has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while WRLC trades at $440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas WRLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WRLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to WRLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs BNPJY Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, BNPJY has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while BNPJY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas BNPJY's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNPJY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to BNPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs ARECW Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, ARECW has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while ARECW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ARECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARECW's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to ARECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs FSHRF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, FSHRF has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while FSHRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas FSHRF's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FSHRF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to FSHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs GCLMF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, GCLMF has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while GCLMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas GCLMF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GCLMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to GCLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs FBMCF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, FBMCF has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while FBMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas FBMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FBMCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to FBMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs CRSXF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, CRSXF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while CRSXF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CRSXF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRSXF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to CRSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs WECFF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, WECFF has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while WECFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas WECFF's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WECFF's ROE of +1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to WECFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs MOAEF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, MOAEF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while MOAEF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas MOAEF's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOAEF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to MOAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs APMCF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, APMCF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while APMCF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas APMCF's P/E ratio is -24.99. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APMCF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to APMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs CAFZF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, CAFZF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while CAFZF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CAFZF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CAFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to CAFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs ROYE Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, ROYE has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while ROYE trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ROYE's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROYE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to ROYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs ALGCF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, ALGCF has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while ALGCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas ALGCF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to ALGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs AJLGF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, AJLGF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while AJLGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas AJLGF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AJLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to AJLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs MOAEY Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, MOAEY has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while MOAEY trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas MOAEY's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MOAEY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to MOAEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs KALG Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, KALG has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while KALG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas KALG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KALG's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is less volatile compared to KALG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs PVMCF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, PVMCF has a market cap of 393.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while PVMCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas PVMCF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PVMCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to PVMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs FDGMF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, FDGMF has a market cap of 248K. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while FDGMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas FDGMF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FDGMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to FDGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs SHGP Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, SHGP has a market cap of 197.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while SHGP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas SHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHGP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to SHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs AEXE Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, AEXE has a market cap of 145.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while AEXE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas AEXE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AEXE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to AEXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs CERX Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, CERX has a market cap of 536. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while CERX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas CERX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CERX's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to CERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.
CSUAY vs BGNRF Comparison
CSUAY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSUAY stands at 105.4B. In comparison, BGNRF has a market cap of 86. Regarding current trading prices, CSUAY is priced at $17.72, while BGNRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSUAY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.29, whereas BGNRF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CSUAY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BGNRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSUAY is more volatile compared to BGNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSUAY.