China Shuifa Singyes Energy Holdings Limited
China Shuifa Singyes Energy Holdings Limited CSSXF Peers
See (CSSXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Solar Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSSXF | $0.03 | +0.00% | 75.6M | -3.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| XISHY | $6.94 | +9.12% | 3.2B | 22.39 | $0.31 | +3.69% |
| XNYIF | $0.30 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 15.15 | $0.02 | +4.23% |
| GCPEF | $0.09 | +0.00% | 2.5B | -4.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SMTGY | $2.80 | -2.44% | 971.6M | -5.96 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| SMTGF | $26.85 | +7.40% | 931.7M | -5.77 | -$4.65 | +1.94% |
| PXPC | $2.16 | -13.60% | 718.6M | -36.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| GRMZF | $11.30 | +0.00% | 261.1M | 21.32 | $0.53 | +1.26% |
| HYSR | $0.04 | -1.66% | 206.4M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SPRQF | $0.57 | -3.23% | 66.3M | -14.17 | -$0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CSSXF vs XISHY Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, XISHY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while XISHY trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas XISHY's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XISHY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to XISHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs XNYIF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, XNYIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while XNYIF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas XNYIF's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XNYIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to XNYIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs GCPEF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, GCPEF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while GCPEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas GCPEF's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GCPEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to GCPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs SMTGY Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SMTGY has a market cap of 971.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SMTGY trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SMTGY's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMTGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to SMTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs SMTGF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SMTGF has a market cap of 931.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SMTGF trades at $26.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SMTGF's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMTGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and SMTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs PXPC Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, PXPC has a market cap of 718.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while PXPC trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas PXPC's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PXPC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to PXPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs GRMZF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, GRMZF has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while GRMZF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas GRMZF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRMZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to GRMZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs HYSR Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, HYSR has a market cap of 206.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while HYSR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas HYSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HYSR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to HYSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs SPRQF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SPRQF has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SPRQF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SPRQF's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SPRQF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to SPRQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs UGEIF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, UGEIF has a market cap of 49.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while UGEIF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas UGEIF's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UGEIF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and UGEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs NEWH Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, NEWH has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while NEWH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas NEWH's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NEWH's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to NEWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs FLDI Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, FLDI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while FLDI trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas FLDI's P/E ratio is -750.00. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FLDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to FLDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs CVUEF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, CVUEF has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while CVUEF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CVUEF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CVUEF's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to CVUEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs CBUTF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, CBUTF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while CBUTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CBUTF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CBUTF's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to CBUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs SAENF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SAENF has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SAENF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SAENF's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SAENF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to SAENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs SEHLF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SEHLF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SEHLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SEHLF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SEHLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and SEHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs NTCXF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, NTCXF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while NTCXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas NTCXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NTCXF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to NTCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs TSPG Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, TSPG has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while TSPG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas TSPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TSPG's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and TSPG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs AACTF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, AACTF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while AACTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas AACTF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AACTF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to AACTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs PTOS Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, PTOS has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while PTOS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas PTOS's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PTOS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to PTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs SIRC Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SIRC has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SIRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SIRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIRC's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and SIRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs QCLSF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, QCLSF has a market cap of 816.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while QCLSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas QCLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QCLSF's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to QCLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs ANTGF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, ANTGF has a market cap of 578K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while ANTGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ANTGF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ANTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and ANTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs PSWW Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, PSWW has a market cap of 317.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while PSWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas PSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSWW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to PSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs UNSS Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, UNSS has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while UNSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas UNSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UNSS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and UNSS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs SPSO Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SPSO has a market cap of 43.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SPSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SPSO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SPSO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and SPSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs ABCE Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, ABCE has a market cap of 26.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while ABCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ABCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABCE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and ABCE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs OPVS Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, OPVS has a market cap of 24K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while OPVS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas OPVS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OPVS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and OPVS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs SUNWQ Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SUNWQ has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SUNWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SUNWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUNWQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to SUNWQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs CHJI Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, CHJI has a market cap of 19.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while CHJI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas CHJI's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CHJI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to CHJI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs SOEN Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SOEN has a market cap of 18.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SOEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SOEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOEN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and SOEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs SRWRF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SRWRF has a market cap of 17.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SRWRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SRWRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SRWRF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to SRWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs SNRS Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, SNRS has a market cap of 16.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while SNRS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas SNRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and SNRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs NTAC Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, NTAC has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while NTAC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas NTAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NTAC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to NTAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs XDSL Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, XDSL has a market cap of 8.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while XDSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas XDSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XDSL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and XDSL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs MBCI Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, MBCI has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while MBCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas MBCI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MBCI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and MBCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs ISUNQ Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, ISUNQ has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while ISUNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas ISUNQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ISUNQ's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and ISUNQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs VSOLF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, VSOLF has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while VSOLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas VSOLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VSOLF's ROE of -2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to VSOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs APVNF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, APVNF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while APVNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas APVNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to APVNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to APVNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs PPRW Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, PPRW has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while PPRW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas PPRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PPRW's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and PPRW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs GRYG Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, GRYG has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while GRYG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas GRYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRYG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to GRYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs EDYYF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, EDYYF has a market cap of 750. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while EDYYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas EDYYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EDYYF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to EDYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs GSLO Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, GSLO has a market cap of 654. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while GSLO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas GSLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GSLO's ROE of +20.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to GSLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs EBODF Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, EBODF has a market cap of 244. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while EBODF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas EBODF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EBODF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to EBODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.
CSSXF vs IXEH Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, IXEH has a market cap of 72. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while IXEH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas IXEH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IXEH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF and IXEH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CSSXF vs KOVR Comparison
CSSXF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSSXF stands at 75.6M. In comparison, KOVR has a market cap of 44. Regarding current trading prices, CSSXF is priced at $0.03, while KOVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSSXF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.00, whereas KOVR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSSXF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KOVR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSSXF is less volatile compared to KOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSSXF.