creditshelf AG
creditshelf AG (CSQ.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSQ.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSQ.DE | €2.30 | +35.29% | 3.2M | -1.26 | -€1.83 | N/A |
| 3V64.DE | €259.95 | +0.76% | 506.6B | 28.22 | €9.21 | +0.83% |
| M4I.DE | €428.30 | +0.25% | 379.1B | 30.01 | €14.27 | +0.63% |
| AEC1.DE | €259.40 | -1.05% | 178.1B | 19.33 | €13.42 | +1.13% |
| 2PP.F | €39.16 | +1.10% | 36B | 8.38 | €4.67 | +0.62% |
| 2PP.DE | €39.05 | +1.56% | 35.9B | 8.36 | €4.67 | +0.62% |
| SFE.DE | €59.17 | +0.17% | 21.4B | 7.32 | €8.08 | +1.76% |
| KRTA.F | €0.75 | -0.67% | 1.9B | 9.31 | €0.08 | +4.70% |
| GLJ.DE | €12.56 | -2.18% | 554.9M | 9.74 | €1.29 | +3.18% |
| HYQ.DE | €75.70 | +4.56% | 506.8M | 19.56 | €3.87 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CSQ.DE vs 3V64.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, 3V64.DE has a market cap of 506.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while 3V64.DE trades at €259.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas 3V64.DE's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to 3V64.DE's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to 3V64.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check 3V64.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs M4I.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, M4I.DE has a market cap of 379.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while M4I.DE trades at €428.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas M4I.DE's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to M4I.DE's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to M4I.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check M4I.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs AEC1.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AEC1.DE has a market cap of 178.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while AEC1.DE trades at €259.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas AEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to AEC1.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to AEC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check AEC1.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs 2PP.F Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, 2PP.F has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while 2PP.F trades at €39.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas 2PP.F's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to 2PP.F's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to 2PP.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check 2PP.F's competition here
CSQ.DE vs 2PP.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, 2PP.DE has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while 2PP.DE trades at €39.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas 2PP.DE's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to 2PP.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to 2PP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check 2PP.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs SFE.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SFE.DE has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while SFE.DE trades at €59.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas SFE.DE's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to SFE.DE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to SFE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check SFE.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs KRTA.F Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, KRTA.F has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while KRTA.F trades at €0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas KRTA.F's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to KRTA.F's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE and KRTA.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRTA.F's competition here
CSQ.DE vs GLJ.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GLJ.DE has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while GLJ.DE trades at €12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas GLJ.DE's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to GLJ.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to GLJ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check GLJ.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs HYQ.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, HYQ.DE has a market cap of 506.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while HYQ.DE trades at €75.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas HYQ.DE's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to HYQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to HYQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check HYQ.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs FRU.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FRU.DE has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while FRU.DE trades at €6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas FRU.DE's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FRU.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to FRU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check FRU.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs ALG.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ALG.DE has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while ALG.DE trades at €2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas ALG.DE's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ALG.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to ALG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check ALG.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs EBE.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, EBE.DE has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while EBE.DE trades at €9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas EBE.DE's P/E ratio is 38.60. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to EBE.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to EBE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check EBE.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs FRS.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FRS.DE has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while FRS.DE trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas FRS.DE's P/E ratio is 66.00. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FRS.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE and FRS.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRS.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs TUF.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, TUF.DE has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while TUF.DE trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas TUF.DE's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TUF.DE's ROE of -6.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE and TUF.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUF.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs TUF.F Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, TUF.F has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while TUF.F trades at €0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas TUF.F's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to TUF.F's ROE of -6.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE and TUF.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUF.F's competition here
CSQ.DE vs EBEN.HM Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, EBEN.HM has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while EBEN.HM trades at €1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas EBEN.HM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to EBEN.HM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to EBEN.HM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check EBEN.HM's competition here
CSQ.DE vs FF24.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FF24.DE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while FF24.DE trades at €0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas FF24.DE's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FF24.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CSQ.DE has daily volatility of 0.00 and FF24.DE has daily volatility of N/A.Check FF24.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs FF24.F Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FF24.F has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while FF24.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas FF24.F's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to FF24.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to FF24.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check FF24.F's competition here
CSQ.DE vs ENGL.DE Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ENGL.DE has a market cap of 493.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while ENGL.DE trades at €0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas ENGL.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ENGL.DE's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE and ENGL.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGL.DE's competition here
CSQ.DE vs ENGL.F Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ENGL.F has a market cap of 219.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while ENGL.F trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas ENGL.F's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to ENGL.F's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE is less volatile compared to ENGL.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSQ.DE.Check ENGL.F's competition here
CSQ.DE vs CSQ.F Comparison April 2026
CSQ.DE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSQ.DE stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CSQ.F has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, CSQ.DE is priced at €2.30, while CSQ.F trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSQ.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -1.26, whereas CSQ.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSQ.DE's ROE is -0.46%, compared to CSQ.F's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CSQ.DE and CSQ.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSQ.F's competition here