COSCO SHIPPING Ports Limited
COSCO SHIPPING Ports Limited CSPKF Peers
See (CSPKF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSPKF | $0.53 | N/A | 2B | 6.58 | $0.08 | +6.44% |
| CICOF | $1.67 | -6.18% | 32.4B | 3.88 | $0.43 | +1.79% |
| CICOY | $8.17 | -1.92% | 31.7B | 3.82 | $2.14 | +1.78% |
| HLAGF | $173.48 | N/A | 30.5B | 10.51 | $16.50 | +6.17% |
| AMKBF | $1,871.90 | N/A | 29.4B | 4.16 | $450.00 | +8.74% |
| HPGLY | $82.50 | N/A | 29B | 10.00 | $8.25 | +6.41% |
| AMKBY | $9.39 | +3.07% | 28.8B | 4.17 | $2.25 | +8.34% |
| AMKAF | $1,742.14 | N/A | 27.6B | 3.87 | $449.99 | +9.39% |
| ICTEF | $7.69 | +4.13% | 15.5B | 18.31 | $0.42 | +3.21% |
| NYUKF | $36.10 | N/A | 15.4B | 11.11 | $3.25 | +2.56% |
Stock Comparison
CSPKF vs CICOF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CICOF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CICOF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CICOF's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CICOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CICOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs CICOY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CICOY has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CICOY trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CICOY's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CICOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CICOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs HLAGF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, HLAGF has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while HLAGF trades at $173.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas HLAGF's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLAGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to HLAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs AMKBF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, AMKBF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while AMKBF trades at $1,871.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas AMKBF's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMKBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to AMKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs HPGLY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, HPGLY has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while HPGLY trades at $82.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas HPGLY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HPGLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HPGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs AMKBY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, AMKBY has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while AMKBY trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas AMKBY's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMKBY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to AMKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs AMKAF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, AMKAF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while AMKAF trades at $1,742.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas AMKAF's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMKAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to AMKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs ICTEF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, ICTEF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while ICTEF trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas ICTEF's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICTEF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to ICTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs NYUKF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, NYUKF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while NYUKF trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas NYUKF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NYUKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to NYUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs NPNYY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, NPNYY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while NPNYY trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas NPNYY's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPNYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to NPNYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs MSLOY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, MSLOY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while MSLOY trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas MSLOY's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSLOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to MSLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs OROVF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, OROVF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while OROVF trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas OROVF's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OROVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to OROVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs MSLOF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, MSLOF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while MSLOF trades at $32.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas MSLOF's P/E ratio is 3.99. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSLOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to MSLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs OROVY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, OROVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while OROVY trades at $81.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas OROVY's P/E ratio is 4.17. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OROVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to OROVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs KAIKY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, KAIKY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while KAIKY trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas KAIKY's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAIKY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to KAIKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs PTAUY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, PTAUY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while PTAUY trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas PTAUY's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTAUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to PTAUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs KAKKF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, KAKKF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while KAKKF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas KAKKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAKKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to KAKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs SITIY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, SITIY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while SITIY trades at $31.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas SITIY's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITIY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to SITIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs CMHHF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CMHHF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CMHHF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CMHHF's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CMHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs CMHHY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CMHHY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CMHHY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CMHHY's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMHHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CMHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs QNDPF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, QNDPF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while QNDPF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas QNDPF's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QNDPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to QNDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs SITIF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, SITIF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while SITIF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas SITIF's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITIF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to SITIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs MIHDF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, MIHDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while MIHDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas MIHDF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIHDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to MIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs CSDXF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CSDXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CSDXF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CSDXF's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSDXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CSDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs DLPTF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, DLPTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while DLPTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas DLPTF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLPTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to DLPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs HAFNF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, HAFNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while HAFNF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas HAFNF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAFNF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to HAFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs CITAF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CITAF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CITAF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CITAF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CITAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to CITAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs TDGMW Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, TDGMW has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while TDGMW trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas TDGMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDGMW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to TDGMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs PTAUF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, PTAUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while PTAUF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas PTAUF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTAUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to PTAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs HFIAF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, HFIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while HFIAF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas HFIAF's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HFIAF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HFIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs BWLLY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, BWLLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while BWLLY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas BWLLY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWLLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to BWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs BWLLF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, BWLLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while BWLLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas BWLLF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWLLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to BWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs HOEGF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, HOEGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while HOEGF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas HOEGF's P/E ratio is 2.69. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOEGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HOEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs CADLF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CADLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CADLF trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CADLF's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CADLF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CADLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs CKNHF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CKNHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CKNHF trades at $46.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CKNHF's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKNHF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to CKNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs HHULF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, HHULF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while HHULF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas HHULF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HHULF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HHULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs PCFBY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, PCFBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while PCFBY trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas PCFBY's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCFBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to PCFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs CITAY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CITAY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CITAY trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CITAY's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CITAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CITAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs SOIEF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, SOIEF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while SOIEF trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas SOIEF's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOIEF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to SOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs WTSHF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, WTSHF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while WTSHF trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas WTSHF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTSHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to WTSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs HCTPF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, HCTPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while HCTPF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas HCTPF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCTPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HCTPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs HHULY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, HHULY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while HHULY trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas HHULY's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HHULY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HHULY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs PCFBF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, PCFBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while PCFBF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas PCFBF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCFBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to PCFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs IRCUF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, IRCUF has a market cap of 995.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while IRCUF trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas IRCUF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRCUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to IRCUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs CHDGF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CHDGF has a market cap of 967.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CHDGF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CHDGF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHDGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CHDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs DPBSF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, DPBSF has a market cap of 910M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while DPBSF trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas DPBSF's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to DPBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs OKENF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, OKENF has a market cap of 876M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while OKENF trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas OKENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OKENF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to OKENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs MPZZF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, MPZZF has a market cap of 707.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while MPZZF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas MPZZF's P/E ratio is 2.85. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPZZF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to MPZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs LTKBF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, LTKBF has a market cap of 623M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while LTKBF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas LTKBF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTKBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to LTKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs TJIPF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, TJIPF has a market cap of 492.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while TJIPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas TJIPF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TJIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to TJIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs AGMJF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, AGMJF has a market cap of 474.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while AGMJF trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas AGMJF's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGMJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to AGMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs DMCOF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, DMCOF has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while DMCOF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas DMCOF's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DMCOF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to DMCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs SEMUF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, SEMUF has a market cap of 466.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while SEMUF trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas SEMUF's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to SEMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs TSMTF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, TSMTF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while TSMTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas TSMTF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to TSMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs PSGFF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, PSGFF has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while PSGFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas PSGFF's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSGFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to PSGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs TTBKF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, TTBKF has a market cap of 287M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while TTBKF trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas TTBKF's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTBKF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to TTBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs JMSFF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, JMSFF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while JMSFF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas JMSFF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JMSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to JMSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs SLOFF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, SLOFF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while SLOFF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas SLOFF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLOFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to SLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs MKOTF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, MKOTF has a market cap of 238.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while MKOTF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas MKOTF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MKOTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to MKOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs VKGLF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, VKGLF has a market cap of 210.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while VKGLF trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas VKGLF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VKGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to VKGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs CSPKY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, CSPKY has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while CSPKY trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas CSPKY's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSPKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CSPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs HSPPF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, HSPPF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while HSPPF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas HSPPF's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs BSEAF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, BSEAF has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while BSEAF trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas BSEAF's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSEAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to BSEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs HUPHY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, HUPHY has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while HUPHY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas HUPHY's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUPHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HUPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs JNSTF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, JNSTF has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while JNSTF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas JNSTF's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JNSTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to JNSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs WSSTF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, WSSTF has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while WSSTF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas WSSTF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WSSTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to WSSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs AWLNF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, AWLNF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while AWLNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas AWLNF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AWLNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to AWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs GEOUF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, GEOUF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while GEOUF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas GEOUF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEOUF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to GEOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs ADCUF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, ADCUF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while ADCUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas ADCUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADCUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to ADCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs ASCJF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, ASCJF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while ASCJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas ASCJF's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASCJF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to ASCJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs GTMAY Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, GTMAY has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while GTMAY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas GTMAY's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTMAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to GTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs SEAOF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, SEAOF has a market cap of 66.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while SEAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas SEAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to SEAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs BBLKF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, BBLKF has a market cap of 27K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while BBLKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas BBLKF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBLKF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to BBLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs ULTRF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, ULTRF has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while ULTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas ULTRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULTRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to ULTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs TEUFF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, TEUFF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while TEUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas TEUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to TEUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs WLOLQ Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, WLOLQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while WLOLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas WLOLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WLOLQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to WLOLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs PRGNF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, PRGNF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while PRGNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas PRGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRGNF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to PRGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs TEUCF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, TEUCF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while TEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas TEUCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEUCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to TEUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs SEPI Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, SEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while SEPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas SEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to SEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.
CSPKF vs ITKSF Comparison
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2B. In comparison, ITKSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.53, while ITKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 6.58, whereas ITKSF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITKSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to ITKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.