COSCO SHIPPING Ports Limited
COSCO SHIPPING Ports Limited (CSPKF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSPKF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSPKF | $0.73 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 9.14 | $0.08 | +7.14% |
| CICOF | $1.90 | +2.70% | 33.8B | 4.42 | $0.43 | +11.33% |
| AMKBF | $2,135.18 | -3.60% | 33.4B | 4.89 | $437.02 | +7.70% |
| AMKBY | $10.53 | +0.86% | 32.9B | 4.82 | $2.18 | +10.57% |
| AMKAF | $2,082.91 | +0.00% | 32.6B | 4.77 | $436.99 | +7.89% |
| CICOY | $9.53 | +3.03% | 30.3B | 4.43 | $2.15 | +11.01% |
| HPGLY | $70.73 | +0.00% | 24.9B | 8.99 | $7.87 | +6.56% |
| HLAGF | $139.00 | -2.11% | 24.4B | 8.88 | $15.65 | +6.90% |
| ICTEF | $8.55 | -5.42% | 17.3B | 19.43 | $0.44 | +2.89% |
| NPNYY | $7.24 | +0.05% | 15.9B | 4.99 | $1.45 | +4.02% |
Stock Comparison
CSPKF vs CICOF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CICOF has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CICOF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CICOF's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CICOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CICOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CICOF's competition here
CSPKF vs AMKBF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMKBF has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while AMKBF trades at $2,135.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas AMKBF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMKBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to AMKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check AMKBF's competition here
CSPKF vs AMKBY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMKBY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while AMKBY trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas AMKBY's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMKBY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to AMKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check AMKBY's competition here
CSPKF vs AMKAF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AMKAF has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while AMKAF trades at $2,082.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas AMKAF's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to AMKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check AMKAF's competition here
CSPKF vs CICOY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CICOY has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CICOY trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CICOY's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CICOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CICOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CICOY's competition here
CSPKF vs HPGLY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HPGLY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while HPGLY trades at $70.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas HPGLY's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HPGLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HPGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check HPGLY's competition here
CSPKF vs HLAGF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HLAGF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while HLAGF trades at $139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas HLAGF's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLAGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HLAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check HLAGF's competition here
CSPKF vs ICTEF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ICTEF has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while ICTEF trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas ICTEF's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICTEF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to ICTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check ICTEF's competition here
CSPKF vs NPNYY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NPNYY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while NPNYY trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas NPNYY's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPNYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to NPNYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check NPNYY's competition here
CSPKF vs NYUKF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NYUKF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while NYUKF trades at $35.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas NYUKF's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NYUKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to NYUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check NYUKF's competition here
CSPKF vs OROVY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OROVY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while OROVY trades at $93.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas OROVY's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OROVY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to OROVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check OROVY's competition here
CSPKF vs OROVF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OROVF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while OROVF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas OROVF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OROVF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to OROVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check OROVF's competition here
CSPKF vs MSLOY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MSLOY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while MSLOY trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas MSLOY's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSLOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to MSLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check MSLOY's competition here
CSPKF vs MSLOF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MSLOF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while MSLOF trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas MSLOF's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSLOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to MSLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check MSLOF's competition here
CSPKF vs SITIF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SITIF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while SITIF trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas SITIF's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITIF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to SITIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check SITIF's competition here
CSPKF vs SITIY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SITIY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while SITIY trades at $37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas SITIY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITIY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to SITIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check SITIY's competition here
CSPKF vs KAIKY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KAIKY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while KAIKY trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas KAIKY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAIKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to KAIKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check KAIKY's competition here
CSPKF vs KAKKF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KAKKF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while KAKKF trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas KAKKF's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAKKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to KAKKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check KAKKF's competition here
CSPKF vs CMHHY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CMHHY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CMHHY trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CMHHY's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMHHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to CMHHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CMHHY's competition here
CSPKF vs CMHHF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CMHHF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CMHHF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CMHHF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CMHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CMHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CMHHF's competition here
CSPKF vs QNDPF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QNDPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while QNDPF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas QNDPF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QNDPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to QNDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check QNDPF's competition here
CSPKF vs MIHDF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MIHDF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while MIHDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas MIHDF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIHDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to MIHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check MIHDF's competition here
CSPKF vs CSDXF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CSDXF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CSDXF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CSDXF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSDXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CSDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CSDXF's competition here
CSPKF vs CITAF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CITAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CITAF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CITAF's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CITAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CITAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CITAF's competition here
CSPKF vs HAFNF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HAFNF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while HAFNF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas HAFNF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAFNF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HAFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check HAFNF's competition here
CSPKF vs DLPTF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DLPTF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while DLPTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas DLPTF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLPTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to DLPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check DLPTF's competition here
CSPKF vs TDGMW Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TDGMW has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while TDGMW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas TDGMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDGMW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to TDGMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check TDGMW's competition here
CSPKF vs PTAUF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PTAUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while PTAUF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas PTAUF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTAUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to PTAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check PTAUF's competition here
CSPKF vs HFIAF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HFIAF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while HFIAF trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas HFIAF's P/E ratio is -26.16. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HFIAF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HFIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check HFIAF's competition here
CSPKF vs PTAUY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PTAUY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while PTAUY trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas PTAUY's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTAUY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to PTAUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check PTAUY's competition here
CSPKF vs HOEGF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HOEGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while HOEGF trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas HOEGF's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOEGF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HOEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check HOEGF's competition here
CSPKF vs BWLLY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BWLLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while BWLLY trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas BWLLY's P/E ratio is 4.26. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWLLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to BWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check BWLLY's competition here
CSPKF vs CADLF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CADLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CADLF trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CADLF's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CADLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to CADLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CADLF's competition here
CSPKF vs BWLLF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BWLLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while BWLLF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas BWLLF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BWLLF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to BWLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check BWLLF's competition here
CSPKF vs SOIEF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SOIEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while SOIEF trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas SOIEF's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOIEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to SOIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check SOIEF's competition here
CSPKF vs CKNHF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CKNHF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CKNHF trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CKNHF's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CKNHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CKNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CKNHF's competition here
CSPKF vs HCTPF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HCTPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while HCTPF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas HCTPF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCTPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to HCTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check HCTPF's competition here
CSPKF vs HHULY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HHULY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while HHULY trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas HHULY's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HHULY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HHULY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check HHULY's competition here
CSPKF vs CITAY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CITAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CITAY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CITAY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CITAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to CITAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CITAY's competition here
CSPKF vs PCFBF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PCFBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while PCFBF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas PCFBF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCFBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to PCFBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check PCFBF's competition here
CSPKF vs HHULF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HHULF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while HHULF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas HHULF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HHULF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HHULF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check HHULF's competition here
CSPKF vs PCFBY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PCFBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while PCFBY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas PCFBY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCFBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to PCFBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check PCFBY's competition here
CSPKF vs WTSHF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WTSHF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while WTSHF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas WTSHF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTSHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to WTSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check WTSHF's competition here
CSPKF vs CHDGF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CHDGF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CHDGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CHDGF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHDGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CHDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CHDGF's competition here
CSPKF vs IRCUF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IRCUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while IRCUF trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas IRCUF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRCUF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to IRCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check IRCUF's competition here
CSPKF vs DPBSF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DPBSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while DPBSF trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas DPBSF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPBSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to DPBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check DPBSF's competition here
CSPKF vs OKENF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OKENF has a market cap of 876M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while OKENF trades at $27.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas OKENF's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OKENF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to OKENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check OKENF's competition here
CSPKF vs MPZZF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MPZZF has a market cap of 849.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while MPZZF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas MPZZF's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPZZF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to MPZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check MPZZF's competition here
CSPKF vs TJIPF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TJIPF has a market cap of 739M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while TJIPF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas TJIPF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TJIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to TJIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check TJIPF's competition here
CSPKF vs LTKBF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LTKBF has a market cap of 623M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while LTKBF trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas LTKBF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTKBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to LTKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check LTKBF's competition here
CSPKF vs SEMUF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SEMUF has a market cap of 585.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while SEMUF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas SEMUF's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to SEMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check SEMUF's competition here
CSPKF vs DMCOF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DMCOF has a market cap of 552.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while DMCOF trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas DMCOF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DMCOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to DMCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check DMCOF's competition here
CSPKF vs AGMJF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGMJF has a market cap of 484M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while AGMJF trades at $11.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas AGMJF's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGMJF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to AGMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check AGMJF's competition here
CSPKF vs TSMTF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TSMTF has a market cap of 396.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while TSMTF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas TSMTF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TSMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to TSMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check TSMTF's competition here
CSPKF vs TTBKF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TTBKF has a market cap of 307.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while TTBKF trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas TTBKF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TTBKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to TTBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check TTBKF's competition here
CSPKF vs PSGFF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PSGFF has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while PSGFF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas PSGFF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSGFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to PSGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check PSGFF's competition here
CSPKF vs JMSFF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JMSFF has a market cap of 272.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while JMSFF trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas JMSFF's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JMSFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to JMSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check JMSFF's competition here
CSPKF vs SLOFF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLOFF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while SLOFF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas SLOFF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLOFF's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to SLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check SLOFF's competition here
CSPKF vs CSPKY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CSPKY has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while CSPKY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas CSPKY's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSPKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to CSPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check CSPKY's competition here
CSPKF vs MKOTF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MKOTF has a market cap of 239.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while MKOTF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas MKOTF's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MKOTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to MKOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check MKOTF's competition here
CSPKF vs HSPPF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HSPPF has a market cap of 183.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while HSPPF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas HSPPF's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSPPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to HSPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check HSPPF's competition here
CSPKF vs VKGLF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VKGLF has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while VKGLF trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas VKGLF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VKGLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to VKGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check VKGLF's competition here
CSPKF vs HUPHY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HUPHY has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while HUPHY trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas HUPHY's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUPHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to HUPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check HUPHY's competition here
CSPKF vs BSEAF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BSEAF has a market cap of 91.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while BSEAF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas BSEAF's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSEAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to BSEAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check BSEAF's competition here
CSPKF vs JNSTF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JNSTF has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while JNSTF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas JNSTF's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JNSTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to JNSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check JNSTF's competition here
CSPKF vs AWLNF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AWLNF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while AWLNF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas AWLNF's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AWLNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to AWLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check AWLNF's competition here
CSPKF vs GEOUF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GEOUF has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while GEOUF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas GEOUF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GEOUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to GEOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check GEOUF's competition here
CSPKF vs WSSTF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WSSTF has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while WSSTF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas WSSTF's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WSSTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to WSSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check WSSTF's competition here
CSPKF vs ADCUF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ADCUF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while ADCUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas ADCUF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADCUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to ADCUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check ADCUF's competition here
CSPKF vs ASCJF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ASCJF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while ASCJF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas ASCJF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASCJF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to ASCJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check ASCJF's competition here
CSPKF vs GTMAY Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GTMAY has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while GTMAY trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas GTMAY's P/E ratio is 3.38. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTMAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to GTMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check GTMAY's competition here
CSPKF vs BBLKF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BBLKF has a market cap of 27K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while BBLKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas BBLKF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBLKF's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to BBLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check BBLKF's competition here
CSPKF vs ULTRF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ULTRF has a market cap of 14.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while ULTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas ULTRF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ULTRF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to ULTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check ULTRF's competition here
CSPKF vs SEAOF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SEAOF has a market cap of 6.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while SEAOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas SEAOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to SEAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check SEAOF's competition here
CSPKF vs TEUFF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TEUFF has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while TEUFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas TEUFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to TEUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check TEUFF's competition here
CSPKF vs WLOLQ Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WLOLQ has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while WLOLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas WLOLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WLOLQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to WLOLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check WLOLQ's competition here
CSPKF vs PRGNF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRGNF has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while PRGNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas PRGNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRGNF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to PRGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check PRGNF's competition here
CSPKF vs TEUCF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TEUCF has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while TEUCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas TEUCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEUCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is less volatile compared to TEUCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check TEUCF's competition here
CSPKF vs SEPI Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while SEPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas SEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SEPI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to SEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check SEPI's competition here
CSPKF vs ITKSF Comparison August 2025
CSPKF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSPKF stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ITKSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSPKF is priced at $0.73, while ITKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSPKF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.14, whereas ITKSF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CSPKF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITKSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSPKF is more volatile compared to ITKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSPKF.Check ITKSF's competition here