Catskill Hudson Bancorp, Inc.
Catskill Hudson Bancorp, Inc. CSKL Peers
See (CSKL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSKL | $40.15 | +0.38% | 28.3M | 18.76 | $2.14 | +0.30% |
| CAIXY | $2.79 | -0.50% | 178.7B | 8.71 | $0.32 | +5.86% |
| BKAYY | $22.75 | -12.50% | 167.3B | 9.06 | $2.51 | +2.24% |
| CIHKY | $33.22 | +2.50% | 162.2B | 8.50 | $3.91 | +4.08% |
| CIHHF | $6.50 | +2.86% | 158.3B | 8.33 | $0.78 | +4.26% |
| AAMAF | $0.09 | +939900.00% | 133.2B | -0.85 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| BNPQF | $92.08 | +3.10% | 104B | 8.63 | $10.67 | +6.08% |
| UNCFF | $66.72 | +2.47% | 103.9B | 9.71 | $6.87 | +3.45% |
| IITSF | $5.72 | +2.23% | 101.7B | 10.04 | $0.57 | +6.49% |
| UNCRY | $32.51 | +0.35% | 101.3B | 9.40 | $3.46 | +2.26% |
Stock Comparison
CSKL vs CAIXY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 178.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CAIXY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BKAYY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BKAYY has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BKAYY trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BKAYY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKAYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BKAYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CIHKY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 162.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CIHKY trades at $33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CIHHF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 158.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CIHHF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs AAMAF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, AAMAF has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while AAMAF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas AAMAF's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AAMAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to AAMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BNPQF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BNPQF trades at $92.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs UNCFF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while UNCFF trades at $66.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs IITSF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while IITSF trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs UNCRY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while UNCRY trades at $32.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs DBSDY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 99.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while DBSDY trades at $139.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BNPQY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BNPQY trades at $43.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs DBSDF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 97.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while DBSDF trades at $34.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SBKFF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SBKFF trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs KBCSY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while KBCSY trades at $48.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CHCJY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CHCJY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs PBCRF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while PBCRF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs MZHOF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while MZHOF trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs PBCRY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while PBCRY trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs AKSJF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs EBKDY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 63.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while EBKDY trades at $41.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs LLOBF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while LLOBF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs PSBKF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CIXPF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CIXPF trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs LLDTF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while LLDTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CHBJF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CHBJF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs OVCHY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while OVCHY trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs OVCHF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while OVCHF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CRARF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CRARF trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CRARY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CRARY trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs NRDBY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while NRDBY trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs NBNKF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while NBNKF trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BHKLY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BHKLY trades at $89.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs UOVEF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while UOVEF trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.27. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs STNDF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BNKHF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BNKHF trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs UOVEY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while UOVEY trades at $54.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SCGLY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SCGLY trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs DNBBF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while DNBBF trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs DNBBY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while DNBBY trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BKRKF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BKRKF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs KBCSF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while KBCSF trades at $99.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SCGLF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SCGLF trades at $54.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CWESF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BKRKY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BKRKY trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CRZBY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CRZBY trades at $31.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CRZBF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CRZBF trades at $30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SVKEF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SVKEF trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs JPSTF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while JPSTF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs JPPTY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs DNKEY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while DNKEY trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs EBKOF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while EBKOF trades at $81.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CEBCF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CEBCF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs JPHLF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while JPHLF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs PPERY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while PPERY trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs MLYNF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SWDBY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SWDBY trades at $26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs JPPHY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while JPPHY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CMAKY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CMAKY trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs PPERF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while PPERF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs MLYBY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while MLYBY trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SWDBF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SWDBF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs DNSKF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs HSNGY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while HSNGY trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs HSNGF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while HSNGF trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs GBOOF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while GBOOF trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs GBOOY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while GBOOY trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs PSZKY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while PSZKY trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BLMIF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BLMIF trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs PSZKF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while PSZKF trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs FCNCB Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while FCNCB trades at $1,625.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CKHGY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CKHGY trades at $98.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 29.65. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CGMBF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SBGOF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SBGOF trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BDORY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BDORY trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BPXXY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BPXXY trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BKHYY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BKHYY trades at $82.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SGBLY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SGBLY trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs RSNHF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, RSNHF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while RSNHF trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas RSNHF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RSNHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to RSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CMTDF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CMTDF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CKHGF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SUTNY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SUTNY trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs MDIBY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while MDIBY trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs CRDIY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, CRDIY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while CRDIY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas CRDIY's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRDIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to CRDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BDOUF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BDOUF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs AIBRF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while AIBRF trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs PBLOF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while PBLOF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs AIBGY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while AIBGY trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BKHPF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BKHPF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs ISNPY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while ISNPY trades at $33.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs GPFOF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while GPFOF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs GPFOY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SKCBY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs TKGBY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while TKGBY trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BKRIY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BKRIY trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BKRIF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BKRIF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs BNCZF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while BNCZF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs OTPBF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs SUGBY Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, SUGBY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while SUGBY trades at $72.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas SUGBY's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUGBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is more volatile compared to SUGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.
CSKL vs MDIBF Comparison
CSKL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSKL stands at 28.3M. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CSKL is priced at $40.15, while MDIBF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSKL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.76, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, CSKL's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSKL is less volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSKL.