AXA SA

CS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CS.PA stands at 92.5B. In comparison, GEN.BR has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CS.PA is priced at €42.50, while GEN.BR trades at €19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas GEN.BR's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, CS.PA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEN.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CS.PA is more volatile compared to GEN.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.PA.

CS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CS.PA stands at 92.5B. In comparison, NN.AS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CS.PA is priced at €42.50, while NN.AS trades at €57.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas NN.AS's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, CS.PA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NN.AS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CS.PA and NN.AS have similar daily volatility (1.27).

CS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CS.PA stands at 92.5B. In comparison, ASRNL.AS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CS.PA is priced at €42.50, while ASRNL.AS trades at €56.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas ASRNL.AS's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, CS.PA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASRNL.AS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CS.PA is less volatile compared to ASRNL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.PA.

CS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CS.PA stands at 92.5B. In comparison, AGS.BR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CS.PA is priced at €42.50, while AGS.BR trades at €56.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AGS.BR's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, CS.PA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGS.BR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CS.PA is more volatile compared to AGS.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.PA.

CS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CS.PA stands at 92.5B. In comparison, AGN.AS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CS.PA is priced at €42.50, while AGN.AS trades at €6.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 13.12, whereas AGN.AS's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, CS.PA's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGN.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CS.PA is more volatile compared to AGN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CS.PA.