China Railway Group Limited
China Railway Group Limited CRWOF Peers
See (CRWOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWOF | $0.48 | +5.56% | 17.9B | 3.39 | $0.14 | +6.20% |
| FLRAP | $1,763.28 | +4.69% | 251.5B | -735.01 | -$2.40 | N/A |
| ACSAY | $13.38 | +1.93% | 85.2B | 17.84 | $0.75 | N/A |
| BOUYY | $8.71 | +0.69% | 82.7B | 13.61 | $0.64 | +5.20% |
| VCISF | $144.85 | +2.00% | 81.5B | 14.98 | $9.67 | +3.69% |
| VCISY | $35.92 | +0.43% | 80.8B | 14.84 | $2.42 | +3.81% |
| LTOUF | $48.68 | +0.00% | 67B | 38.33 | $1.27 | +0.78% |
| WSPOF | $199.42 | -0.26% | 26B | 49.98 | $3.99 | +0.54% |
| ACSAF | $66.70 | +0.00% | 17B | 17.65 | $3.78 | +3.08% |
| BOUYF | $44.23 | +0.00% | 16.8B | 13.78 | $3.21 | +5.13% |
Stock Comparison
CRWOF vs FLRAP Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, FLRAP has a market cap of 251.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while FLRAP trades at $1,763.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas FLRAP's P/E ratio is -735.01. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLRAP's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to FLRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs ACSAY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, ACSAY has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while ACSAY trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas ACSAY's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACSAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to ACSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs BOUYY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BOUYY has a market cap of 82.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BOUYY trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BOUYY's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOUYY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to BOUYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs VCISF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, VCISF has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while VCISF trades at $144.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas VCISF's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VCISF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and VCISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs VCISY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, VCISY has a market cap of 80.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while VCISY trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas VCISY's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VCISY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to VCISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs LTOUF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, LTOUF has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while LTOUF trades at $48.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas LTOUF's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTOUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to LTOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs WSPOF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, WSPOF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while WSPOF trades at $199.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas WSPOF's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSPOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to WSPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs ACSAF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, ACSAF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while ACSAF trades at $66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas ACSAF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACSAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to ACSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs BOUYF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BOUYF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BOUYF trades at $44.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BOUYF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOUYF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to BOUYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs HOCFF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, HOCFF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while HOCFF trades at $189.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas HOCFF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOCFF's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and HOCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs EFGSY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, EFGSY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while EFGSY trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas EFGSY's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFGSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to EFGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs EFGSF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, EFGSF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while EFGSF trades at $139.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas EFGSF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFGSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and EFGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs KAJMF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, KAJMF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while KAJMF trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas KAJMF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KAJMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to KAJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs SNCAF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, SNCAF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while SNCAF trades at $68.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas SNCAF's P/E ratio is 53.50. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNCAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to SNCAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs KAJMY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, KAJMY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while KAJMY trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas KAJMY's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KAJMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to KAJMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs OBYCF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, OBYCF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while OBYCF trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas OBYCF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBYCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to OBYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs STBBF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, STBBF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while STBBF trades at $92.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas STBBF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STBBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to STBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs TISCY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, TISCY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while TISCY trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas TISCY's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TISCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and TISCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs SKBSY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, SKBSY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while SKBSY trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas SKBSY's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKBSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to SKBSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs ACXIF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, ACXIF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while ACXIF trades at $171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas ACXIF's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACXIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to ACXIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs SKSBF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, SKSBF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while SKSBF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas SKSBF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKSBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and SKSBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs CCOHF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, CCOHF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while CCOHF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas CCOHF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCOHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to CCOHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs AVHNF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, AVHNF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while AVHNF trades at $250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas AVHNF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVHNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and AVHNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs BCKIY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BCKIY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BCKIY trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BCKIY's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCKIY's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to BCKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs BCKIF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BCKIF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BCKIF trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BCKIF's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCKIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to BCKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs SHMUY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, SHMUY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while SHMUY trades at $43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas SHMUY's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHMUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to SHMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs TISCF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, TISCF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while TISCF trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas TISCF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TISCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and TISCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs EKIVF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, EKIVF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while EKIVF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas EKIVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EKIVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to EKIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs AVHNY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, AVHNY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while AVHNY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas AVHNY's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AVHNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to AVHNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs ARCAY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, ARCAY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while ARCAY trades at $50.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas ARCAY's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARCAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to ARCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs RBWNY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, RBWNY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while RBWNY trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas RBWNY's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBWNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and RBWNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs ARCVF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, ARCVF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while ARCVF trades at $46.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas ARCVF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARCVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to ARCVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs PUODY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, PUODY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while PUODY trades at $226.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas PUODY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PUODY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and PUODY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs IMPJY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, IMPJY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while IMPJY trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas IMPJY's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMPJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and IMPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs SHMUF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, SHMUF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while SHMUF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas SHMUF's P/E ratio is 581.60. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHMUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to SHMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs ABGOF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, ABGOF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while ABGOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas ABGOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABGOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to ABGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs AGOAF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, AGOAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while AGOAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas AGOAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGOAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and AGOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs PYOIF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, PYOIF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while PYOIF trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas PYOIF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYOIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to PYOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs NWSGY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, NWSGY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while NWSGY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas NWSGY's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWSGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and NWSGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs MLLUY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, MLLUY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while MLLUY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas MLLUY's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLLUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and MLLUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs BFLBF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BFLBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BFLBF trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BFLBF's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BFLBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to BFLBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs BAFBF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BAFBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BAFBF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BAFBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAFBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to BAFBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs BFLBY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BFLBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BFLBY trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BFLBY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BFLBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and BFLBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs NWSZF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, NWSZF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while NWSZF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas NWSZF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWSZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to NWSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs SENGF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, SENGF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while SENGF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas SENGF's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SENGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to SENGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs PYYIF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, PYYIF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while PYYIF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas PYYIF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PYYIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and PYYIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs OPMXF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, OPMXF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while OPMXF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas OPMXF's P/E ratio is 44.42. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPMXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and OPMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs BAFYY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BAFYY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BAFYY trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BAFYY's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAFYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to BAFYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs SYRVF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, SYRVF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while SYRVF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas SYRVF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SYRVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to SYRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs PTJSY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, PTJSY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while PTJSY trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas PTJSY's P/E ratio is 3.73. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTJSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to PTJSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs JGCCF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, JGCCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while JGCCF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas JGCCF's P/E ratio is -40.48. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JGCCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to JGCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs AFXXF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, AFXXF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while AFXXF trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas AFXXF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFXXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to AFXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs GKTRF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, GKTRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while GKTRF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas GKTRF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GKTRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to GKTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs JGCCY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, JGCCY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while JGCCY trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas JGCCY's P/E ratio is -795.50. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JGCCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to JGCCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs PTJSF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, PTJSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while PTJSF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas PTJSF's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTJSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to PTJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs SKBNF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, SKBNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while SKBNF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas SKBNF's P/E ratio is -15.48. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKBNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to SKBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs PNOCF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, PNOCF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while PNOCF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas PNOCF's P/E ratio is 50.91. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNOCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and PNOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs AGRUF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, AGRUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while AGRUF trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas AGRUF's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGRUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and AGRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs TNISY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, TNISY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while TNISY trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas TNISY's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNISY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to TNISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs TNISF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, TNISF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while TNISF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas TNISF's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNISF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and TNISF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs KBAGF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, KBAGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while KBAGF trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas KBAGF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KBAGF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to KBAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs KLRGF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, KLRGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while KLRGF trades at $19.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas KLRGF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLRGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to KLRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs HAZAF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, HAZAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while HAZAF trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas HAZAF's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HAZAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to HAZAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs BIRDF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BIRDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BIRDF trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BIRDF's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIRDF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and BIRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs BADFF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BADFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BADFF trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BADFF's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BADFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to BADFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs KIERF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, KIERF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while KIERF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas KIERF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KIERF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and KIERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs CKOCF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, CKOCF has a market cap of 946.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while CKOCF trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas CKOCF's P/E ratio is -20.81. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKOCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and CKOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs MOPHY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, MOPHY has a market cap of 934M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while MOPHY trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas MOPHY's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOPHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and MOPHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs ELLKY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, ELLKY has a market cap of 924.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while ELLKY trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas ELLKY's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELLKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to ELLKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs AEGXF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, AEGXF has a market cap of 921.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while AEGXF trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas AEGXF's P/E ratio is -13.80. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEGXF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to AEGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs YITYY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, YITYY has a market cap of 622.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while YITYY trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas YITYY's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YITYY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to YITYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs RNWHF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, RNWHF has a market cap of 585.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while RNWHF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas RNWHF's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNWHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and RNWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs TKFHY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, TKFHY has a market cap of 559M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while TKFHY trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas TKFHY's P/E ratio is -15.95. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TKFHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to TKFHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs ELLKF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, ELLKF has a market cap of 555.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while ELLKF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas ELLKF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to ELLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs CHYCY Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, CHYCY has a market cap of 505.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while CHYCY trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas CHYCY's P/E ratio is 2.71. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHYCY's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to CHYCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs SLAAF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, SLAAF has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while SLAAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas SLAAF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLAAF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to SLAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs CHYCF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, CHYCF has a market cap of 479.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while CHYCF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas CHYCF's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHYCF's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and CHYCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs OBSJF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, OBSJF has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while OBSJF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas OBSJF's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBSJF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to OBSJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs ELWSF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, ELWSF has a market cap of 442.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while ELWSF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas ELWSF's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ELWSF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to ELWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs YRCCF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, YRCCF has a market cap of 399.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while YRCCF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas YRCCF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YRCCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to YRCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs CSGQF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, CSGQF has a market cap of 375.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while CSGQF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas CSGQF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSGQF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to CSGQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs LYOPF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, LYOPF has a market cap of 284.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while LYOPF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas LYOPF's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LYOPF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to LYOPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs BRAGF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BRAGF has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BRAGF trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BRAGF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and BRAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs HUKEF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, HUKEF has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while HUKEF trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas HUKEF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to HUKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs DBMG Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, DBMG has a market cap of 165.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while DBMG trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas DBMG's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBMG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to DBMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs BRANF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BRANF has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BRANF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BRANF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRANF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and BRANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs BILBF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, BILBF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while BILBF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas BILBF's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BILBF's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and BILBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs KNNKF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, KNNKF has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while KNNKF trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas KNNKF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNNKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and KNNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs APEUF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, APEUF has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while APEUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas APEUF's P/E ratio is 62.34. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APEUF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to APEUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs MURSF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, MURSF has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while MURSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas MURSF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MURSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and MURSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs MRCR Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, MRCR has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while MRCR trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas MRCR's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRCR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to MRCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs LOUIF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, LOUIF has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while LOUIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas LOUIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and LOUIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs GRHI Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, GRHI has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while GRHI trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas GRHI's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRHI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and GRHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs COLDF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, COLDF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while COLDF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas COLDF's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COLDF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to COLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs CIPI Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, CIPI has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while CIPI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas CIPI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIPI's ROE of +8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to CIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs ETWLF Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, ETWLF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while ETWLF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas ETWLF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETWLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and ETWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs SODE Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, SODE has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while SODE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas SODE's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SODE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF and SODE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CRWOF vs PMDP Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, PMDP has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while PMDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas PMDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMDP's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to PMDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.
CRWOF vs RELT Comparison
CRWOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRWOF stands at 17.9B. In comparison, RELT has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRWOF is priced at $0.48, while RELT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRWOF currently has a P/E ratio of 3.39, whereas RELT's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, CRWOF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RELT's ROE of +19.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRWOF is less volatile compared to RELT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRWOF.