Creatd, Inc.
Creatd, Inc. (CRTDW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRTDW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRTDW | $0.00 | -43.82% | 6K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TCEHY | $66.97 | +0.00% | 603B | 21.09 | $3.17 | +0.86% |
| TCTZF | $66.90 | +0.00% | 600.8B | 20.68 | $3.22 | +0.86% |
| PROSY | $10.35 | +0.00% | 115.8B | 9.02 | $1.15 | +0.29% |
| PROSF | $51.05 | -1.83% | 111.6B | 8.85 | $5.77 | +0.45% |
| BAIDF | $16.70 | +0.00% | 45.3B | 11.84 | $1.41 | N/A |
| NAPRF | $53.38 | -6.09% | 41B | 7.91 | $6.75 | +0.55% |
| KSHTY | $1.75 | +1.74% | 37.4B | 15.91 | $0.11 | +0.54% |
| KUASF | $8.74 | +0.00% | 36.6B | 16.13 | $0.53 | +0.69% |
| YAHOF | $2.60 | +0.00% | 17.8B | 14.44 | $0.18 | +1.77% |
Stock Comparison
CRTDW vs TCEHY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 603B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while TCEHY trades at $66.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check TCEHY's competition here
CRTDW vs TCTZF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 600.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while TCTZF trades at $66.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check TCTZF's competition here
CRTDW vs PROSY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 115.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while PROSY trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check PROSY's competition here
CRTDW vs PROSF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while PROSF trades at $51.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check PROSF's competition here
CRTDW vs BAIDF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while BAIDF trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and BAIDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAIDF's competition here
CRTDW vs NAPRF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while NAPRF trades at $53.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and NAPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NAPRF's competition here
CRTDW vs KSHTY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while KSHTY trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check KSHTY's competition here
CRTDW vs KUASF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while KUASF trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and KUASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUASF's competition here
CRTDW vs YAHOF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while YAHOF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and YAHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YAHOF's competition here
CRTDW vs NHNCF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check NHNCF's competition here
CRTDW vs RPGRF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while RPGRF trades at $124.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 40.54. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and RPGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RPGRF's competition here
CRTDW vs RPGRY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while RPGRY trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check RPGRY's competition here
CRTDW vs ADEVF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and ADEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADEVF's competition here
CRTDW vs ADEVY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and ADEVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADEVY's competition here
CRTDW vs NPSNY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while NPSNY trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check NPSNY's competition here
CRTDW vs CSXXY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while CSXXY trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and CSXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSXXY's competition here
CRTDW vs ATDRY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ATDRY trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check ATDRY's competition here
CRTDW vs ATDRF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ATDRF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check ATDRF's competition here
CRTDW vs SKLTF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while SKLTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is -93.75. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and SKLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKLTF's competition here
CRTDW vs CHLLF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while CHLLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is 238.93. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and CHLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHLLF's competition here
CRTDW vs RTMVF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while RTMVF trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and RTMVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTMVF's competition here
CRTDW vs RTMVY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while RTMVY trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check RTMVY's competition here
CRTDW vs MEIUF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while MEIUF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and MEIUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MEIUF's competition here
CRTDW vs KKKUF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while KKKUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and KKKUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KKKUF's competition here
CRTDW vs DHGAF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check DHGAF's competition here
CRTDW vs HMNTY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while HMNTY trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and HMNTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMNTY's competition here
CRTDW vs PRSNF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 869.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while PRSNF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and PRSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRSNF's competition here
CRTDW vs MLRYY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 524M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and MLRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLRYY's competition here
CRTDW vs XINXF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 509.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to XINXF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and XINXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XINXF's competition here
CRTDW vs ADBMF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and ADBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADBMF's competition here
CRTDW vs WNWSF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 335M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while WNWSF trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and WNWSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WNWSF's competition here
CRTDW vs ZGXNF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ZGXNF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and ZGXNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZGXNF's competition here
CRTDW vs FRRGF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and FRRGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRRGF's competition here
CRTDW vs MECVF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and MECVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MECVF's competition here
CRTDW vs NXCLF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 153.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while NXCLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and NXCLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXCLF's competition here
CRTDW vs UUMMF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and UUMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UUMMF's competition here
CRTDW vs TGRVF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 129.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and TGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGRVF's competition here
CRTDW vs RSTN Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RSTN's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check RSTN's competition here
CRTDW vs ZMDTF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ZMDTF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check ZMDTF's competition here
CRTDW vs CPADF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while CPADF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and CPADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPADF's competition here
CRTDW vs CKPDY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 67.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while CKPDY trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and CKPDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKPDY's competition here
CRTDW vs OPNDF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 60.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while OPNDF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and OPNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPNDF's competition here
CRTDW vs PXSTF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while PXSTF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and PXSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXSTF's competition here
CRTDW vs MSEZ Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while MSEZ trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of -13.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and MSEZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSEZ's competition here
CRTDW vs RDLYF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and RDLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RDLYF's competition here
CRTDW vs NIROF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while NIROF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and NIROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIROF's competition here
CRTDW vs SABOF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while SABOF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and SABOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SABOF's competition here
CRTDW vs HYPPF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while HYPPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and HYPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYPPF's competition here
CRTDW vs BBUZ Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while BBUZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and BBUZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBUZ's competition here
CRTDW vs APMLF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and APMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APMLF's competition here
CRTDW vs DGTHF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while DGTHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and DGTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DGTHF's competition here
CRTDW vs BBTVF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check BBTVF's competition here
CRTDW vs EGLXF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while EGLXF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check EGLXF's competition here
CRTDW vs QQQFF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while QQQFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and QQQFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QQQFF's competition here
CRTDW vs LTCP Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while LTCP trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and LTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTCP's competition here
CRTDW vs FMHS Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while FMHS trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and FMHS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FMHS's competition here
CRTDW vs GIFX Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while GIFX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check GIFX's competition here
CRTDW vs LBUY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LBUY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check LBUY's competition here
CRTDW vs SEEK Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and SEEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEEK's competition here
CRTDW vs YOOIF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while YOOIF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and YOOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YOOIF's competition here
CRTDW vs NUGL Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while NUGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check NUGL's competition here
CRTDW vs GOGY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check GOGY's competition here
CRTDW vs BMTM Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 892.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while BMTM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and BMTM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMTM's competition here
CRTDW vs MRPT Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 826.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while MRPT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and MRPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MRPT's competition here
CRTDW vs MRNJ Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 762.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check MRNJ's competition here
CRTDW vs SFUNY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 722.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while SFUNY trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and SFUNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFUNY's competition here
CRTDW vs SPFYF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 722.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while SPFYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and SPFYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPFYF's competition here
CRTDW vs ILIM Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 684.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check ILIM's competition here
CRTDW vs OOOOF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 599.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check OOOOF's competition here
CRTDW vs CYAP Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and CYAP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYAP's competition here
CRTDW vs VMSI Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 578.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and VMSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VMSI's competition here
CRTDW vs LHGI Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 576.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and LHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LHGI's competition here
CRTDW vs RBDC Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and RBDC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RBDC's competition here
CRTDW vs LKST Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 243.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while LKST trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and LKST have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LKST's competition here
CRTDW vs KIWB Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and KIWB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KIWB's competition here
CRTDW vs ZONX Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 60.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +28.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and ZONX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZONX's competition here
CRTDW vs OTTV Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and OTTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTTV's competition here
CRTDW vs QTTOY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 42.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while QTTOY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and QTTOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTTOY's competition here
CRTDW vs SLNM Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and SLNM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLNM's competition here
CRTDW vs RWRDP Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 30K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and RWRDP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RWRDP's competition here
CRTDW vs HUTN Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 25.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HUTN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and HUTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUTN's competition here
CRTDW vs DELCF Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 17.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and DELCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DELCF's competition here
CRTDW vs MDAW Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 14.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MDAW's ROE of +7.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and MDAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDAW's competition here
CRTDW vs BTIM Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and BTIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTIM's competition here
CRTDW vs REDFY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and REDFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check REDFY's competition here
CRTDW vs PIKL Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PIKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and PIKL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIKL's competition here
CRTDW vs ISHM Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and ISHM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ISHM's competition here
CRTDW vs SHGY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and SHGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHGY's competition here
CRTDW vs LOCM Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and LOCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LOCM's competition here
CRTDW vs ROII Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and ROII have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ROII's competition here
CRTDW vs LOVLQ Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check LOVLQ's competition here
CRTDW vs ZZLL Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRTDW.Check ZZLL's competition here
CRTDW vs FRFR Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and FRFR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRFR's competition here
CRTDW vs INTH Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and INTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INTH's competition here
CRTDW vs DATI Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while DATI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and DATI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DATI's competition here
CRTDW vs ABBY Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and ABBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABBY's competition here
CRTDW vs RAIO Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RAIO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and RAIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RAIO's competition here
CRTDW vs YITD Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and YITD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YITD's competition here
CRTDW vs CYZN Comparison February 2026
CRTDW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRTDW stands at 6K. In comparison, CYZN has a market cap of 279. Regarding current trading prices, CRTDW is priced at $0.00, while CYZN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRTDW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYZN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRTDW's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CYZN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRTDW and CYZN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYZN's competition here