Smartt, Inc.
Smartt, Inc. (CRSM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRSM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRSM | $0.25 | +3.99% | 145.8M | 1.00 | $0.25 | N/A |
| SAPGF | $199.88 | +0.00% | 236.8B | 27.44 | $7.41 | +1.30% |
| INVUP | $24.99 | -2.00% | 46.5B | -1666.00 | -$0.02 | +13.01% |
| CNSWF | $1,765.00 | +0.00% | 38.7B | 56.41 | $32.35 | +0.22% |
| DASTY | $20.62 | +0.00% | 26.9B | 19.13 | $1.07 | +1.44% |
| DASTF | $20.41 | -0.02% | 26.9B | 19.13 | $1.07 | +1.44% |
| DIDIY | $4.59 | +0.00% | 22.4B | -231.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| OBIIF | $32.17 | +0.00% | 14B | 31.53 | $1.02 | +1.56% |
| WIGBY | $35.05 | +5.64% | 11.7B | 58.42 | $0.60 | +0.36% |
| SGPYY | $43.45 | +0.00% | 10.6B | 21.75 | $2.03 | +2.48% |
Stock Comparison
CRSM vs SAPGF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 236.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while SAPGF trades at $199.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check SAPGF's competition here
CRSM vs INVUP Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while INVUP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1666.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INVUP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and INVUP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INVUP's competition here
CRSM vs CNSWF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while CNSWF trades at $1,765.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 56.41. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check CNSWF's competition here
CRSM vs DASTY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while DASTY trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check DASTY's competition here
CRSM vs DASTF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while DASTF trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check DASTF's competition here
CRSM vs DIDIY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while DIDIY trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is -231.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check DIDIY's competition here
CRSM vs OBIIF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while OBIIF trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and OBIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OBIIF's competition here
CRSM vs WIGBY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while WIGBY trades at $35.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 58.42. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and WIGBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WIGBY's competition here
CRSM vs SGPYY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while SGPYY trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check SGPYY's competition here
CRSM vs WTCHF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while WTCHF trades at $30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 51.26. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and WTCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WTCHF's competition here
CRSM vs XROLF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while XROLF trades at $57.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 54.53. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and XROLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XROLF's competition here
CRSM vs SGGEF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while SGGEF trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and SGGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGGEF's competition here
CRSM vs NEMKY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while NEMKY trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 38.10. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check NEMKY's competition here
CRSM vs NEMTF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while NEMTF trades at $75.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and NEMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEMTF's competition here
CRSM vs OCLCF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while OCLCF trades at $60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and OCLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCLCF's competition here
CRSM vs ALMFF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check ALMFF's competition here
CRSM vs TMSNY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while TMSNY trades at $82.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check TMSNY's competition here
CRSM vs NCSYF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while NCSYF trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and NCSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCSYF's competition here
CRSM vs THNOF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while THNOF trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 58.67. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and THNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check THNOF's competition here
CRSM vs TMNSF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while TMNSF trades at $82.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and TMNSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMNSF's competition here
CRSM vs FNOXF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and FNOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNOXF's competition here
CRSM vs LIFX Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while LIFX trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 190.92. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and LIFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LIFX's competition here
CRSM vs KGDEY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while KGDEY trades at $148.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -1655.44. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and KGDEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KGDEY's competition here
CRSM vs SMCYY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and SMCYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMCYY's competition here
CRSM vs SICRF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and SICRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SICRF's competition here
CRSM vs IPEU Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while IPEU trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and IPEU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPEU's competition here
CRSM vs ASOZF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while ASOZF trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and ASOZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASOZF's competition here
CRSM vs ASOZY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while ASOZY trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and ASOZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASOZY's competition here
CRSM vs KXSCF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while KXSCF trades at $89.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check KXSCF's competition here
CRSM vs SRBEF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while SRBEF trades at $138.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -151.58. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and SRBEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRBEF's competition here
CRSM vs BCTCF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while BCTCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and BCTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCTCF's competition here
CRSM vs SWONF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while SWONF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -52.94. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWONF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and SWONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWONF's competition here
CRSM vs KHOTF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check KHOTF's competition here
CRSM vs KNNNF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while KNNNF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and KNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KNNNF's competition here
CRSM vs ESKEF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and ESKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ESKEF's competition here
CRSM vs TMOAY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while TMOAY trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -101.67. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and TMOAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMOAY's competition here
CRSM vs VOBIF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while VOBIF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 56.22. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check VOBIF's competition here
CRSM vs MAGTF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and MAGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAGTF's competition here
CRSM vs WEMXF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while WEMXF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and WEMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEMXF's competition here
CRSM vs TMVWF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while TMVWF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and TMVWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMVWF's competition here
CRSM vs ABXXF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while ABXXF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -22.99. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check ABXXF's competition here
CRSM vs LTTHF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and LTTHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTTHF's competition here
CRSM vs ESIGF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check ESIGF's competition here
CRSM vs TMOAF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 901.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while TMOAF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -120.67. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and TMOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMOAF's competition here
CRSM vs TMVWY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 872.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while TMVWY trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and TMVWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMVWY's competition here
CRSM vs FREKF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 829.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while FREKF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FREKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and FREKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FREKF's competition here
CRSM vs BHPA Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check BHPA's competition here
CRSM vs QTGPF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 786.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while QTGPF trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and QTGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTGPF's competition here
CRSM vs PXPHF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 784.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while PXPHF trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and PXPHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXPHF's competition here
CRSM vs SLVFF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check SLVFF's competition here
CRSM vs BTRCF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 681.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while BTRCF trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and BTRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTRCF's competition here
CRSM vs EGHSF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 681.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while EGHSF trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to EGHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check EGHSF's competition here
CRSM vs IRLTF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is -110.01. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to IRLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check IRLTF's competition here
CRSM vs XMMRF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check XMMRF's competition here
CRSM vs GBGPF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 617.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while GBGPF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and GBGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBGPF's competition here
CRSM vs CHNVF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while CHNVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check CHNVF's competition here
CRSM vs NPACF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while NPACF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and NPACF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPACF's competition here
CRSM vs RWWI Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, RWWI has a market cap of 547.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while RWWI trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas RWWI's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWWI's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to RWWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check RWWI's competition here
CRSM vs PSSWF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 503.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while PSSWF trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check PSSWF's competition here
CRSM vs NPACY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 493M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while NPACY trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check NPACY's competition here
CRSM vs TSVNF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and TSVNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSVNF's competition here
CRSM vs NSWEF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and NSWEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSWEF's competition here
CRSM vs BRDLF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and BRDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRDLF's competition here
CRSM vs BVSFF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 448.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while BVSFF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check BVSFF's competition here
CRSM vs IQGLF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check IQGLF's competition here
CRSM vs BLKLF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 399.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while BLKLF trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -67.14. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and BLKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLKLF's competition here
CRSM vs JAPPF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while JAPPF trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 21.32. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and JAPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JAPPF's competition here
CRSM vs RPGHF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and RPGHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RPGHF's competition here
CRSM vs RTME Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and RTME have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTME's competition here
CRSM vs ELMFF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and ELMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMFF's competition here
CRSM vs NXLLF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 334.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while NXLLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and NXLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXLLF's competition here
CRSM vs RLLMF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 332.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while RLLMF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and RLLMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLLMF's competition here
CRSM vs IVUFF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and IVUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IVUFF's competition here
CRSM vs CIGMF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and CIGMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIGMF's competition here
CRSM vs LCHTF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while LCHTF trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and LCHTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LCHTF's competition here
CRSM vs EXMXF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and EXMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXMXF's competition here
CRSM vs TZROP Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TZROP has a market cap of 259.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while TZROP trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas TZROP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZROP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to TZROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check TZROP's competition here
CRSM vs PSHPF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while PSHPF trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to PSHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check PSHPF's competition here
CRSM vs TCYSF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 256.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while TCYSF trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 66.54. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and TCYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCYSF's competition here
CRSM vs SMTEF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 252.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while SMTEF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -11.68. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and SMTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMTEF's competition here
CRSM vs DOTDF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while DOTDF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and DOTDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DOTDF's competition here
CRSM vs IARGF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 236.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while IARGF trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and IARGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IARGF's competition here
CRSM vs CMDXF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 234.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while CMDXF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check CMDXF's competition here
CRSM vs BAINF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 230.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while BAINF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check BAINF's competition here
CRSM vs EXSPF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while EXSPF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and EXSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXSPF's competition here
CRSM vs DAHLF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and DAHLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DAHLF's competition here
CRSM vs PLDIF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while PLDIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and PLDIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PLDIF's competition here
CRSM vs FXSRF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and FXSRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FXSRF's competition here
CRSM vs FBSFF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while FBSFF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and FBSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FBSFF's competition here
CRSM vs MCAP Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while MCAP trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check MCAP's competition here
CRSM vs TCIIF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while TCIIF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and TCIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCIIF's competition here
CRSM vs LOQPF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while LOQPF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check LOQPF's competition here
CRSM vs NEOJF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while NEOJF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and NEOJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEOJF's competition here
CRSM vs CBSZF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check CBSZF's competition here
CRSM vs WONDF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 151.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while WONDF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check WONDF's competition here
CRSM vs WECMF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and WECMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WECMF's competition here
CRSM vs DLEXY Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, DLEXY has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while DLEXY trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas DLEXY's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DLEXY's ROE of +8.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM and DLEXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLEXY's competition here
CRSM vs URLOF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, URLOF has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while URLOF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas URLOF's P/E ratio is 144.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to URLOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to URLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check URLOF's competition here
CRSM vs VCTTF Comparison February 2026
CRSM plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSM stands at 145.8M. In comparison, VCTTF has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSM is priced at $0.25, while VCTTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSM currently has a P/E ratio of 1.00, whereas VCTTF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CRSM's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCTTF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSM is less volatile compared to VCTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSM.Check VCTTF's competition here