Crescent Acquisition Corp.
Crescent Acquisition Corp. CRSAW Peers
See (CRSAW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRSAW | $1.60 | -3.14% | N/A | -1598.20 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| CCIV | $24.25 | +5.90% | 44.39B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| PSACU | $17.08 | +0.35% | 12.00B | -108.79 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| RTPY | $9.91 | -0.30% | 11.62B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LVRAW | $0.04 | N/A | 11.53B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CMLFU | $13.00 | -4.55% | 10.31B | -1444.44 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| PSAC | $13.78 | -0.36% | 9.68B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GRSVU | $11.39 | +3.36% | 6.81B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| APSG | $7.39 | N/A | 6.33B | 36.95 | $0.20 | N/A |
| RTP | $10.03 | -4.48% | 6.30B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRSAW vs CCIV Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, CCIV has a market cap of 44.39B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while CCIV trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas CCIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CCIV's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to CCIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs PSACU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, PSACU has a market cap of 12.00B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while PSACU trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas PSACU's P/E ratio is -108.79. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PSACU's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to PSACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs RTPY Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, RTPY has a market cap of 11.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while RTPY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas RTPY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RTPY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to RTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs LVRAW Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, LVRAW has a market cap of 11.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while LVRAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas LVRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LVRAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to LVRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs CMLFU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, CMLFU has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while CMLFU trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas CMLFU's P/E ratio is -1444.44. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMLFU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to CMLFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs PSAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, PSAC has a market cap of 9.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while PSAC trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas PSAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PSAC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to PSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs GRSVU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, GRSVU has a market cap of 6.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while GRSVU trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas GRSVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRSVU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to GRSVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs APSG Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, APSG has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while APSG trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas APSG's P/E ratio is 36.95. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APSG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to APSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs RTP Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, RTP has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while RTP trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas RTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RTP's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to RTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs DGNR Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, DGNR has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while DGNR trades at $9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas DGNR's P/E ratio is -308.67. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DGNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to DGNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs VTIQ Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, VTIQ has a market cap of 5.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while VTIQ trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas VTIQ's P/E ratio is 91.50. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VTIQ's ROE of +472.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to VTIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs VTIQU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, VTIQU has a market cap of 5.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while VTIQU trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas VTIQU's P/E ratio is 100.60. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VTIQU's ROE of +472.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to VTIQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs VACQ Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, VACQ has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while VACQ trades at $11.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas VACQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VACQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to VACQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SVFC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SVFC has a market cap of 5.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SVFC trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SVFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SVFC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to SVFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs VGAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, VGAC has a market cap of 5.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while VGAC trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas VGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VGAC's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to VGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs CMLT Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, CMLT has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while CMLT trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas CMLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMLT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to CMLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs GHVI Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, GHVI has a market cap of 4.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while GHVI trades at $14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas GHVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GHVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to GHVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs KVSB Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, KVSB has a market cap of 4.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while KVSB trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas KVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KVSB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to KVSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FTOCU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FTOCU has a market cap of 4.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FTOCU trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FTOCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FTOCU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to FTOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs THCBU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, THCBU has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while THCBU trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas THCBU's P/E ratio is -101.87. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to THCBU's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to THCBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs CLII Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, CLII has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while CLII trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas CLII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CLII's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to CLII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs GRNV Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, GRNV has a market cap of 3.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while GRNV trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas GRNV's P/E ratio is -59.68. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GRNV's ROE of -101981.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to GRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FRX Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FRX has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FRX trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FRX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to FRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs HOLUU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, HOLUU has a market cap of 3.65B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while HOLUU trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas HOLUU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HOLUU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to HOLUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SSPK Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SSPK has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SSPK trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SSPK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SSPK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to SSPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FCACU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FCACU has a market cap of 3.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FCACU trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FCACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FCACU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to FCACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs CFVI Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, CFVI has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while CFVI trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas CFVI's P/E ratio is -18.55. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CFVI's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to CFVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs HOL Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, HOL has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while HOL trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas HOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HOL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to HOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs THCB Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, THCB has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while THCB trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas THCB's P/E ratio is -81.30. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to THCB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to THCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SYM Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SYM has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SYM trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SYM's P/E ratio is -345.87. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SYM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to SYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SOAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SOAC has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SOAC trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SOAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SOAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to SOAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FUSE Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FUSE has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FUSE trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FUSE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FUSE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to FUSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs DCRBU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, DCRBU has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while DCRBU trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas DCRBU's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DCRBU's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to DCRBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs IVAN Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, IVAN has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while IVAN trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas IVAN's P/E ratio is -698.18. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IVAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to IVAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs GWAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, GWAC has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while GWAC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas GWAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GWAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to GWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs LCYAU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, LCYAU has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while LCYAU trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas LCYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LCYAU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to LCYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs APXTU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, APXTU has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while APXTU trades at $13.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas APXTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APXTU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to APXTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FWAA Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FWAA has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FWAA trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FWAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FWAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to FWAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs GSAH Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, GSAH has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while GSAH trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas GSAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GSAH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to GSAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs LCY Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, LCY has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while LCY trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas LCY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LCY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to LCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FORE Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FORE has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FORE trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FORE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FORE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to FORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs APXT Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, APXT has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while APXT trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas APXT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APXT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to APXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs RAAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, RAAC has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while RAAC trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas RAAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RAAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to RAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SPNV Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SPNV has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SPNV trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SPNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPNV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to SPNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs DNAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, DNAC has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while DNAC trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas DNAC's P/E ratio is -37.72. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DNAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to DNAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FAII Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FAII has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FAII trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FAII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FAII's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to FAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs DMYI Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, DMYI has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while DMYI trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas DMYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DMYI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to DMYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs LOKB Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, LOKB has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while LOKB trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas LOKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LOKB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to LOKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs STPC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, STPC has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while STPC trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas STPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STPC's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to STPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs MUDS Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, MUDS has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while MUDS trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas MUDS's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MUDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to MUDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs MUDSU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, MUDSU has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while MUDSU trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas MUDSU's P/E ratio is -1125.56. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MUDSU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to MUDSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs TINV Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, TINV has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while TINV trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas TINV's P/E ratio is 30.61. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TINV's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to TINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs CMII Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, CMII has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while CMII trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas CMII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMII's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to CMII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs DWAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, DWAC has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while DWAC trades at $49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas DWAC's P/E ratio is -73.46. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DWAC's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to DWAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs DWACU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, DWACU has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while DWACU trades at $61.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas DWACU's P/E ratio is -451.10. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DWACU's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to DWACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs ATHN Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, ATHN has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while ATHN trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas ATHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ATHN's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to ATHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs GMII Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, GMII has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while GMII trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas GMII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GMII's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to GMII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SVACU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SVACU has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SVACU trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SVACU's P/E ratio is -22.89. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SVACU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to SVACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs MOTV Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, MOTV has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while MOTV trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas MOTV's P/E ratio is 55.86. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MOTV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to MOTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SVAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SVAC has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SVAC trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SVAC's P/E ratio is -32.05. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SVAC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to SVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs CBAH Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, CBAH has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while CBAH trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas CBAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CBAH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to CBAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs GXGXU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, GXGXU has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while GXGXU trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas GXGXU's P/E ratio is -23.73. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GXGXU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to GXGXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs AONE Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, AONE has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while AONE trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas AONE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AONE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to AONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SNPR Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SNPR has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SNPR trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SNPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SNPR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to SNPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SPFR Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SPFR has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SPFR trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SPFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SPFR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to SPFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs DEH Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, DEH has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while DEH trades at $11.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas DEH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DEH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to DEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs ROT Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, ROT has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while ROT trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas ROT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ROT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to ROT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs NGAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, NGAC has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while NGAC trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas NGAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NGAC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to NGAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs GXGX Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, GXGX has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while GXGX trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas GXGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GXGX's ROE of -3.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to GXGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs HECCU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, HECCU has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while HECCU trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas HECCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HECCU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to HECCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs ATMR Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, ATMR has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while ATMR trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas ATMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ATMR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to ATMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SFTW Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SFTW has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SFTW trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SFTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SFTW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to SFTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs ENFA Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, ENFA has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while ENFA trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas ENFA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENFA's ROE of -825.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to ENFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs ENVI Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, ENVI has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while ENVI trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas ENVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to ENVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs DFNS Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, DFNS has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while DFNS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas DFNS's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DFNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to DFNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs ACTD Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, ACTD has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while ACTD trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas ACTD's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ACTD's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to ACTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs VCKA Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, VCKA has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while VCKA trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas VCKA's P/E ratio is 100.11. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VCKA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to VCKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs THMA Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, THMA has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while THMA trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas THMA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to THMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to THMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs LNFA Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, LNFA has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while LNFA trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas LNFA's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LNFA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to LNFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FTIVU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FTIVU has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FTIVU trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FTIVU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FTIVU's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to FTIVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs STWO Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, STWO has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while STWO trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas STWO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to STWO's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to STWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs HYACU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, HYACU has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while HYACU trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas HYACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HYACU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to HYACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FTIV Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FTIV has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FTIV trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FTIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FTIV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to FTIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs AHAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, AHAC has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while AHAC trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas AHAC's P/E ratio is -72.11. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AHAC's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to AHAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs AMHC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, AMHC has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while AMHC trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas AMHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AMHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to AMHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs HERAW Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, HERAW has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while HERAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas HERAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HERAW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to HERAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs HERA Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, HERA has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while HERA trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas HERA's P/E ratio is 46.32. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HERA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to HERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FGNA Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FGNA has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FGNA trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FGNA's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FGNA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to FGNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs DNAA Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, DNAA has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while DNAA trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas DNAA's P/E ratio is -54.53. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DNAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to DNAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs RACA Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, RACA has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while RACA trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas RACA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RACA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to RACA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs TREB Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, TREB has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while TREB trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas TREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TREB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to TREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs PACE Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, PACE has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while PACE trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas PACE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PACE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to PACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs HERAU Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, HERAU has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while HERAU trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas HERAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HERAU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to HERAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs LSAQ Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, LSAQ has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while LSAQ trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas LSAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LSAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to LSAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SRAC Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SRAC has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SRAC trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SRAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SRAC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to SRAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs FTPAW Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, FTPAW has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while FTPAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas FTPAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FTPAW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to FTPAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs SBG Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, SBG has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while SBG trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas SBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SBG's ROE of -3.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to SBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs CVII-WT Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, CVII-WT has a market cap of 977.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while CVII-WT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas CVII-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVII-WT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is more volatile compared to CVII-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.
CRSAW vs CVII-UN Comparison
CRSAW plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRSAW stands at N/A. In comparison, CVII-UN has a market cap of 958.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CRSAW is priced at $1.60, while CVII-UN trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRSAW currently has a P/E ratio of -1598.20, whereas CVII-UN's P/E ratio is 64.65. In terms of profitability, CRSAW's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CVII-UN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRSAW is less volatile compared to CVII-UN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRSAW.