Crosswood SA
Crosswood SA CROS.PA Peers
See (CROS.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CROS.PA | $11.00 | N/A | 116.96M | 78.57 | $0.14 | +0.91% |
| VGP.BR | $80.50 | -0.74% | 2.20B | 7.65 | $10.52 | +3.50% |
| ATRS.AS | $3.00 | N/A | 1.20B | -18.75 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| ORIA.PA | $171.00 | -2.84% | 412.79M | 13.77 | $12.42 | +4.04% |
| TEXF.BR | $34.00 | +1.19% | 124.66M | 16.75 | $2.03 | +4.78% |
| INCLU.BR | $15.50 | -0.64% | 115.00M | 5.92 | $2.62 | +4.84% |
| SPEL.PA | $9.90 | N/A | 104.39M | 99.00 | $0.10 | N/A |
| MLVIN.PA | $4.60 | N/A | 90.95M | 65.71 | $0.07 | N/A |
| MLPAP.PA | $1.05 | +5.00% | 65.48M | -7.00 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| ARTE.PA | $11.10 | -0.89% | 52.95M | -9.57 | -$1.16 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CROS.PA vs VGP.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, VGP.BR has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while VGP.BR trades at $80.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas VGP.BR's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VGP.BR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to VGP.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs ATRS.AS Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ATRS.AS has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ATRS.AS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ATRS.AS's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATRS.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to ATRS.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs ORIA.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ORIA.PA has a market cap of 412.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ORIA.PA trades at $171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ORIA.PA's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORIA.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and ORIA.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs TEXF.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, TEXF.BR has a market cap of 124.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while TEXF.BR trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas TEXF.BR's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TEXF.BR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to TEXF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs INCLU.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, INCLU.BR has a market cap of 115.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while INCLU.BR trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas INCLU.BR's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INCLU.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to INCLU.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs SPEL.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, SPEL.PA has a market cap of 104.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while SPEL.PA trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas SPEL.PA's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPEL.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and SPEL.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs MLVIN.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, MLVIN.PA has a market cap of 90.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while MLVIN.PA trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas MLVIN.PA's P/E ratio is 65.71. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLVIN.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and MLVIN.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs MLPAP.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, MLPAP.PA has a market cap of 65.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while MLPAP.PA trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas MLPAP.PA's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLPAP.PA's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and MLPAP.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs ARTE.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ARTE.PA has a market cap of 52.95M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ARTE.PA trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ARTE.PA's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARTE.PA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to ARTE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs MLMAQ.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, MLMAQ.PA has a market cap of 48.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while MLMAQ.PA trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas MLMAQ.PA's P/E ratio is 75.45. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLMAQ.PA's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and MLMAQ.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs BEVER.AS Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, BEVER.AS has a market cap of 46.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while BEVER.AS trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas BEVER.AS's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BEVER.AS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and BEVER.AS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs ACCB.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ACCB.BR has a market cap of 39.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ACCB.BR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ACCB.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACCB.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to ACCB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs BEAB.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, BEAB.BR has a market cap of 24.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while BEAB.BR trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas BEAB.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BEAB.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and BEAB.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs MLWRC.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, MLWRC.PA has a market cap of 22.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while MLWRC.PA trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas MLWRC.PA's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLWRC.PA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and MLWRC.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs ALSAS.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ALSAS.PA has a market cap of 20.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ALSAS.PA trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ALSAS.PA's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALSAS.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and ALSAS.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs MLPRI.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, MLPRI.PA has a market cap of 19.93M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while MLPRI.PA trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas MLPRI.PA's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLPRI.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and MLPRI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs MCC.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, MCC.BR has a market cap of 18.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while MCC.BR trades at $496.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas MCC.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCC.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and MCC.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs EBPF.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, EBPF.PA has a market cap of 17.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while EBPF.PA trades at $193.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas EBPF.PA's P/E ratio is 4840.00. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EBPF.PA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and EBPF.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs IMMOU.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, IMMOU.BR has a market cap of 14.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while IMMOU.BR trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas IMMOU.BR's P/E ratio is -133.33. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IMMOU.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and IMMOU.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs DIEG.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, DIEG.BR has a market cap of 14.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while DIEG.BR trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas DIEG.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIEG.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and DIEG.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs FIPP.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, FIPP.PA has a market cap of 13.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while FIPP.PA trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas FIPP.PA's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FIPP.PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and FIPP.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs MLVIE.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, MLVIE.PA has a market cap of 13.10M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while MLVIE.PA trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas MLVIE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLVIE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to MLVIE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs EFI.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, EFI.PA has a market cap of 12.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while EFI.PA trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas EFI.PA's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFI.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and EFI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs BERR.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, BERR.PA has a market cap of 12.63M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while BERR.PA trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas BERR.PA's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BERR.PA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to BERR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs ZEN.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ZEN.BR has a market cap of 12.52M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ZEN.BR trades at $202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ZEN.BR's P/E ratio is 1262.50. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZEN.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and ZEN.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs SNG.LS Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, SNG.LS has a market cap of 12.00M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while SNG.LS trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas SNG.LS's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNG.LS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and SNG.LS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs TAYN.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, TAYN.PA has a market cap of 11.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while TAYN.PA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas TAYN.PA's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAYN.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and TAYN.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs ALEUA.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ALEUA.PA has a market cap of 9.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ALEUA.PA trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ALEUA.PA's P/E ratio is 0.76. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALEUA.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to ALEUA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs COUR.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, COUR.PA has a market cap of 8.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while COUR.PA trades at $116.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas COUR.PA's P/E ratio is -24.32. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COUR.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and COUR.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs ALREA.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ALREA.PA has a market cap of 5.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ALREA.PA trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ALREA.PA's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALREA.PA's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to ALREA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs ALNOR.LS Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ALNOR.LS has a market cap of 5.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ALNOR.LS trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ALNOR.LS's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALNOR.LS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to ALNOR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs SOFT.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, SOFT.BR has a market cap of 4.09M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while SOFT.BR trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas SOFT.BR's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOFT.BR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and SOFT.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs BAS.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, BAS.BR has a market cap of 3.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while BAS.BR trades at $27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas BAS.BR's P/E ratio is -19.58. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BAS.BR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to BAS.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs MLNEU.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, MLNEU.BR has a market cap of 2.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while MLNEU.BR trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas MLNEU.BR's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLNEU.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and MLNEU.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs CARP.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, CARP.PA has a market cap of 2.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while CARP.PA trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas CARP.PA's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CARP.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to CARP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs EURS.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, EURS.PA has a market cap of 1.49M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while EURS.PA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas EURS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EURS.PA's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and EURS.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs ANT.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ANT.BR has a market cap of 1.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ANT.BR trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ANT.BR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANT.BR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and ANT.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs MLALV.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, MLALV.PA has a market cap of 894132.00. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while MLALV.PA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas MLALV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLALV.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and MLALV.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs MLFTI.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, MLFTI.PA has a market cap of 760310.00. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while MLFTI.PA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas MLFTI.PA's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLFTI.PA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and MLFTI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs CFI.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, CFI.PA has a market cap of 426837.00. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while CFI.PA trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas CFI.PA's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFI.PA's ROE of -7.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and CFI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs DISL.BR Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, DISL.BR has a market cap of 250000.00. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while DISL.BR trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas DISL.BR's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DISL.BR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to DISL.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.
CROS.PA vs ALIMO.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ALIMO.PA has a market cap of 193578.00. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ALIMO.PA trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ALIMO.PA's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALIMO.PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA and ALIMO.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CROS.PA vs ALADO.PA Comparison
CROS.PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CROS.PA stands at 116.96M. In comparison, ALADO.PA has a market cap of 94437.00. Regarding current trading prices, CROS.PA is priced at $11.00, while ALADO.PA trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CROS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 78.57, whereas ALADO.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CROS.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALADO.PA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CROS.PA is less volatile compared to ALADO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CROS.PA.