Cronos Group Inc.
Cronos Group Inc. CRON.TO Peers
See (CRON.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
CRON.TO vs CURA.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CURA.CN has a market cap of 4.07B. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CURA.CN trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CURA.CN's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CURA.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to CURA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs BHC.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, BHC.TO has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while BHC.TO trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BHC.TO's P/E ratio is -37.53. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to BHC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs VRNO.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, VRNO.CN has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while VRNO.CN trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas VRNO.CN's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VRNO.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to VRNO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs GTII.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, GTII.CN has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while GTII.CN trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GTII.CN's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GTII.CN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to GTII.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TRUL.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TRUL.CN has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TRUL.CN trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TRUL.CN's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRUL.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to TRUL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CURA.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CURA.TO has a market cap of 867.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CURA.TO trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CURA.TO's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CURA.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to CURA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TER.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TER.CN has a market cap of 804.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TER.CN trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TER.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TER.CN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to TER.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs DHT-UN.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, DHT-UN.TO has a market cap of 696.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while DHT-UN.TO trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DHT-UN.TO's P/E ratio is -154.62. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DHT-UN.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to DHT-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TLRY.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TLRY.TO has a market cap of 595.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TLRY.TO trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TLRY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TLRY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to TLRY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs GUD.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, GUD.TO has a market cap of 567.85M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while GUD.TO trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GUD.TO's P/E ratio is 142.75. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GUD.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to GUD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs DHT-U.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, DHT-U.TO has a market cap of 464.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while DHT-U.TO trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DHT-U.TO's P/E ratio is -137.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DHT-U.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to DHT-U.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs ACB.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, ACB.TO has a market cap of 369.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while ACB.TO trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ACB.TO's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACB.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to ACB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CPH.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CPH.TO has a market cap of 356.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CPH.TO trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CPH.TO's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPH.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to CPH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CL.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CL.CN has a market cap of 337.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CL.CN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CL.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CL.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to CL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs VRNO.NE Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, VRNO.NE has a market cap of 334.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while VRNO.NE trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas VRNO.NE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VRNO.NE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to VRNO.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs WEED.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, WEED.TO has a market cap of 313.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while WEED.TO trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas WEED.TO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WEED.TO's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to WEED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CCHW.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CCHW.CN has a market cap of 228.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CCHW.CN trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CCHW.CN's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCHW.CN's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CCHW.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs OGI.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, OGI.TO has a market cap of 207.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while OGI.TO trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas OGI.TO's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OGI.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to OGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TH.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TH.TO has a market cap of 165.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TH.TO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TH.TO's P/E ratio is -36.10. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TH.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to TH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs HLS.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, HLS.TO has a market cap of 147.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while HLS.TO trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas HLS.TO's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLS.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to HLS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TSND.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TSND.TO has a market cap of 146.50M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TSND.TO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TSND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSND.TO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to TSND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs GRIN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, GRIN.CN has a market cap of 141.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while GRIN.CN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GRIN.CN's P/E ratio is -8.14. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRIN.CN's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to GRIN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs BHSC.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, BHSC.CN has a market cap of 137.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while BHSC.CN trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BHSC.CN's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHSC.CN's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to BHSC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CRDL.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CRDL.TO has a market cap of 132.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CRDL.TO trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CRDL.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRDL.TO's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to CRDL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs XLY.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, XLY.TO has a market cap of 118.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while XLY.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas XLY.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XLY.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to XLY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs PLTH.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, PLTH.CN has a market cap of 113.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while PLTH.CN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLTH.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to PLTH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs JUSH.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, JUSH.CN has a market cap of 102.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while JUSH.CN trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas JUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUSH.CN's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to JUSH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MDP.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MDP.TO has a market cap of 94.19M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MDP.TO trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MDP.TO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MDP.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to MDP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs GDNS.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, GDNS.CN has a market cap of 90.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while GDNS.CN trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GDNS.CN's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GDNS.CN's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to GDNS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TGOD.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TGOD.CN has a market cap of 62.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TGOD.CN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TGOD.CN's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGOD.CN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to TGOD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs BNXT.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, BNXT.CN has a market cap of 57.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while BNXT.CN trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BNXT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNXT.CN's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to BNXT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs STEM.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, STEM.CN has a market cap of 53.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while STEM.CN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas STEM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STEM.CN's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to STEM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MRMD.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MRMD.CN has a market cap of 52.48M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MRMD.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MRMD.CN's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRMD.CN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MRMD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs INNO.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, INNO.CN has a market cap of 49.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while INNO.CN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas INNO.CN's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INNO.CN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to INNO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs AYR-A.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, AYR-A.CN has a market cap of 44.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while AYR-A.CN trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas AYR-A.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AYR-A.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to AYR-A.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs HEXO.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, HEXO.TO has a market cap of 38.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while HEXO.TO trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas HEXO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HEXO.TO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to HEXO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CBST.NE Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CBST.NE has a market cap of 37.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CBST.NE trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CBST.NE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBST.NE's ROE of -6.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to CBST.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CHM.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CHM.CN has a market cap of 37.21M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CHM.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CHM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHM.CN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CHM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs LABS.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, LABS.TO has a market cap of 36.32M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while LABS.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas LABS.TO's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LABS.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to LABS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs IAN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, IAN.CN has a market cap of 33.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while IAN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas IAN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IAN.CN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to IAN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs EPIC.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, EPIC.CN has a market cap of 29.43M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while EPIC.CN trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas EPIC.CN's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPIC.CN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to EPIC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs VEXT.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, VEXT.CN has a market cap of 28.47M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while VEXT.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas VEXT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VEXT.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to VEXT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs AVCN.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, AVCN.TO has a market cap of 27.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while AVCN.TO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas AVCN.TO's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVCN.TO's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to AVCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MMEN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MMEN.CN has a market cap of 27.66M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MMEN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MMEN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MMEN.CN's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to MMEN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs GWAY.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, GWAY.CN has a market cap of 24.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while GWAY.CN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GWAY.CN's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GWAY.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to GWAY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CXXI.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CXXI.CN has a market cap of 24.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CXXI.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CXXI.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CXXI.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CXXI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs YOUR.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, YOUR.CN has a market cap of 22.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while YOUR.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas YOUR.CN's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YOUR.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to YOUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs VIN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, VIN.CN has a market cap of 20.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while VIN.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas VIN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIN.CN's ROE of -3.88%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRON.TO has daily volatility of 2.87 and VIN.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRON.TO vs RWB.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, RWB.CN has a market cap of 18.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while RWB.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RWB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RWB.CN's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to RWB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CWEB.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CWEB.TO has a market cap of 18.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CWEB.TO trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CWEB.TO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CWEB.TO's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to CWEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MRV.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MRV.TO has a market cap of 15.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MRV.TO trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MRV.TO's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MRV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs EXM.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, EXM.CN has a market cap of 15.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while EXM.CN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas EXM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXM.CN's ROE of -18.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to EXM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CHAL.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CHAL.CN has a market cap of 14.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CHAL.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CHAL.CN's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHAL.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CHAL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs RIV.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, RIV.CN has a market cap of 13.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while RIV.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RIV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RIV.CN's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to RIV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs RVV.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, RVV.CN has a market cap of 12.56M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while RVV.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RVV.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RVV.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to RVV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs ORI.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, ORI.CN has a market cap of 11.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while ORI.CN trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ORI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORI.CN's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to ORI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs PWR.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, PWR.CN has a market cap of 11.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while PWR.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PWR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PWR.CN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to PWR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CLC.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CLC.CN has a market cap of 11.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CLC.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CLC.CN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLC.CN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CLC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CTX.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CTX.TO has a market cap of 10.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CTX.TO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CTX.TO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTX.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CTX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TRIP.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TRIP.CN has a market cap of 10.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TRIP.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TRIP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRIP.CN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to TRIP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CNFA.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CNFA.CN has a market cap of 9.78M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CNFA.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CNFA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNFA.CN's ROE of -7.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CNFA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs VIVO.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, VIVO.TO has a market cap of 9.27M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while VIVO.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas VIVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIVO.TO's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to VIVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs AVNT.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, AVNT.TO has a market cap of 9.20M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while AVNT.TO trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas AVNT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVNT.TO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to AVNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs AUSA.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, AUSA.CN has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while AUSA.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas AUSA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUSA.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to AUSA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs OILS.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, OILS.CN has a market cap of 9.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while OILS.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas OILS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OILS.CN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to OILS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MVMD.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MVMD.CN has a market cap of 8.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MVMD.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MVMD.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MVMD.CN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MVMD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs AH.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, AH.TO has a market cap of 8.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while AH.TO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas AH.TO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AH.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to AH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs STHZ.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, STHZ.CN has a market cap of 7.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while STHZ.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas STHZ.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STHZ.CN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to STHZ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MOJO.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MOJO.CN has a market cap of 7.46M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MOJO.CN trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MOJO.CN's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOJO.CN's ROE of -11.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MOJO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs SPR.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, SPR.CN has a market cap of 7.29M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while SPR.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SPR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPR.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to SPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CDVA.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CDVA.CN has a market cap of 7.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CDVA.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CDVA.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDVA.CN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CDVA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs SE.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, SE.CN has a market cap of 6.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while SE.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SE.CN's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SE.CN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to SE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs IMCC.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, IMCC.CN has a market cap of 6.79M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while IMCC.CN trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas IMCC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMCC.CN's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to IMCC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CLSH.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CLSH.CN has a market cap of 6.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CLSH.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CLSH.CN's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLSH.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CLSH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs FH.NE Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, FH.NE has a market cap of 6.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while FH.NE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FH.NE's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FH.NE's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to FH.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MYCO.NE Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MYCO.NE has a market cap of 6.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MYCO.NE trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MYCO.NE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MYCO.NE's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to MYCO.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs SNN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, SNN.CN has a market cap of 6.08M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while SNN.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SNN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNN.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to SNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs BBM.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, BBM.CN has a market cap of 5.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while BBM.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BBM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BBM.CN's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to BBM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs WLLW.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, WLLW.TO has a market cap of 5.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while WLLW.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas WLLW.TO's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WLLW.TO's ROE of -21.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to WLLW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs BCBC.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, BCBC.CN has a market cap of 5.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while BCBC.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BCBC.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCBC.CN's ROE of -4.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to BCBC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs AYUR.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, AYUR.CN has a market cap of 4.87M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while AYUR.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas AYUR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AYUR.CN's ROE of -3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to AYUR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CANN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CANN.CN has a market cap of 4.72M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CANN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CANN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CANN.CN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CANN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs BHNG.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, BHNG.CN has a market cap of 4.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while BHNG.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BHNG.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHNG.CN's ROE of +4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to BHNG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs LOBE.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, LOBE.CN has a market cap of 4.58M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while LOBE.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas LOBE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LOBE.CN's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to LOBE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs FFNT.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, FFNT.CN has a market cap of 4.57M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while FFNT.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FFNT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FFNT.CN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to FFNT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs LUFF.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, LUFF.CN has a market cap of 4.02M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while LUFF.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas LUFF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LUFF.CN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRON.TO has daily volatility of 2.87 and LUFF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRON.TO vs BAMM.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, BAMM.CN has a market cap of 3.69M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while BAMM.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BAMM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BAMM.CN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to BAMM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs RMC.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, RMC.CN has a market cap of 3.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while RMC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RMC.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RMC.CN's ROE of +8.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to RMC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs THC.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, THC.CN has a market cap of 3.28M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while THC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas THC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THC.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to THC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs NBUD.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, NBUD.CN has a market cap of 3.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while NBUD.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas NBUD.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NBUD.CN's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to NBUD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs XBRA.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, XBRA.CN has a market cap of 3.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while XBRA.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas XBRA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XBRA.CN's ROE of -20.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to XBRA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MSVN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MSVN.CN has a market cap of 2.92M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MSVN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MSVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MSVN.CN's ROE of +19.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MSVN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs AREV.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, AREV.CN has a market cap of 2.86M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while AREV.CN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas AREV.CN's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AREV.CN's ROE of +2.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to AREV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs ASP.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, ASP.TO has a market cap of 2.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while ASP.TO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ASP.TO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASP.TO's ROE of +3.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to ASP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CFT.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CFT.CN has a market cap of 2.65M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CFT.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CFT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CFT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CFT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs IPOT.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, IPOT.CN has a market cap of 2.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while IPOT.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas IPOT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPOT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to IPOT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs PBF.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, PBF.CN has a market cap of 2.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while PBF.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PBF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PBF.CN's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to PBF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TGIF.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TGIF.CN has a market cap of 2.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TGIF.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TGIF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGIF.CN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to TGIF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs AION.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, AION.CN has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while AION.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas AION.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AION.CN's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to AION.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs RAMM.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, RAMM.CN has a market cap of 2.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while RAMM.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RAMM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RAMM.CN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to RAMM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs FONE.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, FONE.CN has a market cap of 2.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while FONE.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FONE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FONE.CN's ROE of +8.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to FONE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CHOO.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CHOO.CN has a market cap of 2.33M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CHOO.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CHOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHOO.CN's ROE of +4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CHOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs VENI.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, VENI.CN has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while VENI.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas VENI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VENI.CN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to VENI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CBDN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CBDN.CN has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CBDN.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CBDN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CBDN.CN's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CBDN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs JUVA.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, JUVA.CN has a market cap of 2.11M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while JUVA.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas JUVA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUVA.CN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to JUVA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs POKO.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, POKO.CN has a market cap of 2.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while POKO.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas POKO.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POKO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to POKO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CRCC.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CRCC.CN has a market cap of 1.99M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CRCC.CN trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CRCC.CN's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRCC.CN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CRCC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs FIOR.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, FIOR.CN has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while FIOR.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas FIOR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FIOR.CN's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRON.TO has daily volatility of 2.87 and FIOR.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRON.TO vs WIB.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, WIB.CN has a market cap of 1.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while WIB.CN trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas WIB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WIB.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to WIB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TILT.NE Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TILT.NE has a market cap of 1.96M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TILT.NE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TILT.NE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TILT.NE's ROE of -10.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to TILT.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs XTRX.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, XTRX.CN has a market cap of 1.88M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while XTRX.CN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas XTRX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XTRX.CN's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to XTRX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CPTR.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CPTR.CN has a market cap of 1.84M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CPTR.CN trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CPTR.CN's P/E ratio is 0.09. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CPTR.CN's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CPTR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CHV.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CHV.CN has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CHV.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CHV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHV.CN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to CHV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs DN.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, DN.TO has a market cap of 1.51M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while DN.TO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas DN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DN.TO's ROE of +4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to DN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs ORIG.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, ORIG.CN has a market cap of 1.41M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while ORIG.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ORIG.CN's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORIG.CN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRON.TO has daily volatility of 2.87 and ORIG.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRON.TO vs REZN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, REZN.CN has a market cap of 1.40M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while REZN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas REZN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REZN.CN's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to REZN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CVGR.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CVGR.CN has a market cap of 1.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CVGR.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CVGR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CVGR.CN's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CVGR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TEQ.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TEQ.CN has a market cap of 1.38M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TEQ.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TEQ.CN's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEQ.CN's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to TEQ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs NLV.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, NLV.CN has a market cap of 1.34M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while NLV.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas NLV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NLV.CN's ROE of +148.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to NLV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs ORCD.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, ORCD.CN has a market cap of 1.31M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while ORCD.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ORCD.CN's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORCD.CN's ROE of -4.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to ORCD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TCAN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TCAN.CN has a market cap of 1.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TCAN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TCAN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TCAN.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to TCAN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs PULL.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, PULL.CN has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while PULL.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PULL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PULL.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to PULL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs SLNG.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, SLNG.CN has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while SLNG.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SLNG.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLNG.CN's ROE of +4.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to SLNG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CRFT.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CRFT.CN has a market cap of 1.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CRFT.CN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CRFT.CN's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRFT.CN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CRFT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs OVAT.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, OVAT.CN has a market cap of 1.14M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while OVAT.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas OVAT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OVAT.CN's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to OVAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs PHRX.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, PHRX.CN has a market cap of 1.07M. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while PHRX.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PHRX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PHRX.CN's ROE of +8.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to PHRX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs STPH.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, STPH.CN has a market cap of 970722.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while STPH.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas STPH.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STPH.CN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to STPH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MGW.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MGW.CN has a market cap of 969810.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MGW.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MGW.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGW.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MGW.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs J.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, J.CN has a market cap of 899698.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while J.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas J.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to J.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to J.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs GNOM.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, GNOM.CN has a market cap of 854108.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while GNOM.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GNOM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GNOM.CN's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRON.TO has daily volatility of 2.87 and GNOM.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRON.TO vs GSL.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, GSL.CN has a market cap of 847528.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while GSL.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GSL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSL.CN's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to GSL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs IONC.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, IONC.CN has a market cap of 727580.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while IONC.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas IONC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IONC.CN's ROE of -3.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to IONC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MPXI.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MPXI.CN has a market cap of 721615.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MPXI.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MPXI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPXI.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MPXI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs IBH.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, IBH.CN has a market cap of 711360.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while IBH.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas IBH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IBH.CN's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to IBH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MJ.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MJ.CN has a market cap of 702818.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MJ.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MJ.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MJ.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MJ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs VIBE.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, VIBE.CN has a market cap of 593835.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while VIBE.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas VIBE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIBE.CN's ROE of -18.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to VIBE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs AGRA.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, AGRA.CN has a market cap of 590267.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while AGRA.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas AGRA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGRA.CN's ROE of -174.91%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to AGRA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CNTR.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CNTR.CN has a market cap of 578985.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CNTR.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CNTR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNTR.CN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CNTR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs LRDS.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, LRDS.CN has a market cap of 577620.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while LRDS.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas LRDS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LRDS.CN's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to LRDS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs BIO.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, BIO.CN has a market cap of 562085.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while BIO.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas BIO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BIO.CN's ROE of -10.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to BIO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs CIG.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, CIG.CN has a market cap of 551550.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while CIG.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas CIG.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CIG.CN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to CIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs OMND.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, OMND.CN has a market cap of 548940.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while OMND.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas OMND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OMND.CN's ROE of +8.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to OMND.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs ASIA.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, ASIA.CN has a market cap of 543706.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while ASIA.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ASIA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASIA.CN's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to ASIA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs HMPS.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, HMPS.CN has a market cap of 541293.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while HMPS.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas HMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HMPS.CN's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to HMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MCCN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MCCN.CN has a market cap of 528610.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MCCN.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MCCN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCCN.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MCCN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs PLCN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, PLCN.CN has a market cap of 520478.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while PLCN.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PLCN.CN's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLCN.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to PLCN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs YOOM.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, YOOM.CN has a market cap of 504300.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while YOOM.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas YOOM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YOOM.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to YOOM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MLCL.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MLCL.CN has a market cap of 488910.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MLCL.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MLCL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MLCL.CN's ROE of +2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MLCL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs GHG.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, GHG.CN has a market cap of 485830.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while GHG.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GHG.CN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GHG.CN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to GHG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs LVT.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, LVT.CN has a market cap of 454652.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while LVT.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas LVT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LVT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to LVT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs LOWL.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, LOWL.CN has a market cap of 272246.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while LOWL.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas LOWL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LOWL.CN's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to LOWL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs PKB.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, PKB.CN has a market cap of 249943.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while PKB.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PKB.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PKB.CN's ROE of +7.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to PKB.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs XCX.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, XCX.CN has a market cap of 236180.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while XCX.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas XCX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XCX.CN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to XCX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs GAIA.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, GAIA.CN has a market cap of 230034.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while GAIA.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas GAIA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GAIA.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to GAIA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs HALO.NE Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, HALO.NE has a market cap of 206196.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while HALO.NE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas HALO.NE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HALO.NE's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to HALO.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs PILL.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, PILL.CN has a market cap of 194546.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while PILL.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PILL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PILL.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to PILL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs MJRX.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, MJRX.CN has a market cap of 93921.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while MJRX.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas MJRX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MJRX.CN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to MJRX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs HUGE.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, HUGE.CN has a market cap of 88576.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while HUGE.CN trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas HUGE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUGE.CN's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to HUGE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs SILO.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, SILO.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while SILO.CN trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas SILO.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SILO.CN's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRON.TO has daily volatility of 2.87 and SILO.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRON.TO vs VLNS.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, VLNS.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while VLNS.TO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas VLNS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLNS.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to VLNS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs LUV.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, LUV.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while LUV.CN trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas LUV.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LUV.CN's ROE of -7.87%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRON.TO has daily volatility of 2.87 and LUV.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRON.TO vs EASY.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, EASY.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while EASY.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas EASY.CN's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EASY.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to EASY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs TGOD.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, TGOD.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while TGOD.TO trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas TGOD.TO's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGOD.TO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to TGOD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs ICAN.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, ICAN.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while ICAN.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas ICAN.CN's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICAN.CN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRON.TO has daily volatility of 2.87 and ICAN.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
CRON.TO vs NEPT.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, NEPT.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while NEPT.TO trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas NEPT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEPT.TO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to NEPT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs IDVR.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, IDVR.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while IDVR.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas IDVR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IDVR.CN's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to IDVR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs RIV.TO Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, RIV.TO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while RIV.TO trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas RIV.TO's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RIV.TO's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is less volatile compared to RIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
CRON.TO vs PLNT.CN Comparison
CRON.TO plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRON.TO stands at 1.06B. In comparison, PLNT.CN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRON.TO is priced at $2.76, while PLNT.CN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRON.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.40, whereas PLNT.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRON.TO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLNT.CN's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CRON.TO is more volatile compared to PLNT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRON.TO.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CURA.CN | $5.22 | +9.21% | 4.07B | -6.07 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| BHC.TO | $6.38 | -2.74% | 2.36B | -37.53 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| VRNO.CN | $6.32 | +6.76% | 2.17B | -5.40 | -$1.17 | N/A |
| GTII.CN | $7.71 | -4.93% | 1.87B | 18.80 | $0.41 | N/A |
| TRUL.CN | $6.06 | -2.57% | 1.16B | -5.56 | -$1.09 | N/A |
| CRON.TO | $2.76 | -0.72% | 1.06B | 18.40 | $0.15 | N/A |
| CURA.TO | $1.14 | -5.79% | 867.54M | -2.65 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| TER.CN | $2.38 | -0.42% | 804.79M | -1.33 | -$1.79 | N/A |
| DHT-UN.TO | $12.37 | +2.66% | 696.57M | -154.62 | -$0.08 | +7.82% |
| TLRY.TO | $0.59 | -3.28% | 595.42M | -0.39 | -$1.52 | N/A |