Capricorn Energy PLC

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 183.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while MEYYY trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check MEYYY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and NSTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSTKF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while WOPEF trades at $18.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check WOPEF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while IPXHY trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check IPXHY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while IPXHF trades at $20.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and IPXHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPXHF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while TRMLF trades at $45.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check TRMLF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while DETNF trades at $26.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DETNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and DETNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DETNF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while SSLZY trades at $5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check SSLZY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PEXNY trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and PEXNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEXNY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while STOSF trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and STOSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STOSF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and NOVKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOVKY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while AETUF trades at $18.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check AETUF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while SPGYF trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check SPGYF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PTRRY trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check PTRRY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while DKDRF trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and DKDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DKDRF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while VSOGF trades at $59.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and VSOGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VSOGF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while DLKGF trades at $325.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and DLKGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLKGF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while DELKY trades at $32.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and DELKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DELKY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while MEGEF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check MEGEF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PREKF trades at $22.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 34.70. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check PREKF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while HBRIY trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -11.78. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check HBRIY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PMOIF trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and PMOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMOIF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while JPTXF trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and JPTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPTXF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PEYUF trades at $18.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check PEYUF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while ATHOF trades at $6.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check ATHOF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while OASPW trades at $55.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and OASPW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OASPW's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PRMRF trades at $18.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check PRMRF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while NUVSF trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check NUVSF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while IPCFF trades at $22.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 90.20. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and IPCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPCFF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and BTEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BTEGF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while EERGF trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EERGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check EERGF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while CDDRF trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check CDDRF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while FRHLF trades at $12.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check FRHLF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while UNEGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and UNEGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNEGF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and PTGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTGIF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while BCHEY trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is -22.54. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and BCHEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCHEY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while BEPTF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is -19.47. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and BEPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEPTF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while DTNOF trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -33.60. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and DTNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTNOF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PARXF trades at $16.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check PARXF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while DALXF trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 49.87. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check DALXF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while BIREF trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check BIREF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while BWEFF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and BWEFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BWEFF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while AAVVF trades at $7.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check AAVVF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while CRLFF trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check CRLFF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while KELTF trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and KELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KELTF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check CRCQW's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check WLLAW's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while AOIFF trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check AOIFF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 927M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while ATUUF trades at $32.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check ATUUF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 890.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while KRNGF trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and KRNGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRNGF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check CWEGF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 864.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while SQZZF trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and SQZZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SQZZF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 810.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while KWTEF trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check KWTEF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 637.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while GUKYF trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 98.00. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and GUKYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUKYF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 601.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while RCKHF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and RCKHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RCKHF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 595.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while FECCF trades at $8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FECCF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check FECCF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and AAGEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAGEF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while ZPTAF trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check ZPTAF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and GFKSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GFKSY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 496M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while SHASF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check SHASF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 473.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while ZNOG trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -41.46. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check ZNOG's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 450.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while OILSF trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check OILSF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while COPJF trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and COPJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COPJF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 418.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while ENQUF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and ENQUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENQUF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and TBNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBNRF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 404.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while EXCE trades at $18.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check EXCE's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check BKBEF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and PEGIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEGIY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and PRYGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRYGF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while KRNGY trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and KRNGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRNGY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while HZNFF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and HZNFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HZNFF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 323.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while CEIEF trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and CEIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CEIEF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while IPOOF trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check IPOOF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PESAF trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and PESAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PESAF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PTALF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check PTALF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 260.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while GASXF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check GASXF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while GEGYY trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and GEGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEGYY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 237.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while GEGYF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and GEGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEGYF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while CRNZF trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and CRNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRNZF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 231.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while EEGUF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and EEGUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EEGUF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, RECAF has a market cap of 230.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while RECAF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas RECAF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RECAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to RECAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check RECAF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, FOLGF has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while FOLGF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas FOLGF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FOLGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to FOLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check FOLGF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while ALVOF trades at $5.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check ALVOF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, JRNGF has a market cap of 199.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while JRNGF trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas JRNGF's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JRNGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to JRNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check JRNGF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check ITEEF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PTOAF has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PTOAF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PTOAF's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTOAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and PTOAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTOAF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, ECAOF has a market cap of 195.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while ECAOF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas ECAOF's P/E ratio is -57.06. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ECAOF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to ECAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check ECAOF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while TUWLF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and TUWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUWLF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, NFTN has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while NFTN trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas NFTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NFTN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and NFTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NFTN's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check PSHIF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and HRCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HRCXF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 176.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while RUBLF trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check RUBLF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PIFYF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check PIFYF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while LNDNF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and LNDNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNDNF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PTRUF trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and PTRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTRUF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while RECWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and RECWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RECWF's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, DTNOY has a market cap of 168.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while DTNOY trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas DTNOY's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DTNOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY and DTNOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DTNOY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while TUWOY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check TUWOY's competition here

CRNCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRNCY stands at 250.1M. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRNCY is priced at $7.17, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRNCY currently has a P/E ratio of -13.28, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, CRNCY's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CRNCY is less volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRNCY.Check PNWRF's competition here