Churchill Resources Inc.
Churchill Resources Inc. CRICF Peers
See (CRICF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRICF | $0.04 | N/A | 43.2M | -3.63 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.21 | -5.43% | 122.9B | 10.81 | $2.24 | +5.11% |
| RTNTF | $74.31 | N/A | 104.7B | 10.51 | $7.07 | +3.16% |
| RTPPF | $57.12 | -0.98% | 97.1B | 8.08 | $7.07 | +7.04% |
| GLCNF | $3.99 | +2.31% | 47.6B | -30.69 | -$0.13 | +2.92% |
| GLNCY | $7.86 | +0.90% | 47.5B | -30.23 | -$0.26 | +2.73% |
| GMBXF | $5.58 | -0.89% | 43.4B | 11.63 | $0.48 | +4.45% |
| AAUKF | $28.50 | -3.88% | 39.3B | -9.93 | -$2.87 | +2.23% |
| FSUGY | $20.53 | -0.29% | 31.6B | 8.11 | $2.53 | +8.86% |
| NGLOY | $14.53 | N/A | 31B | -10.09 | -$1.44 | +1.89% |
Stock Comparison
CRICF vs BHPLF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while BHPLF trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs RTNTF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while RTNTF trades at $74.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs RTPPF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while RTPPF trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs GLCNF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while GLCNF trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -30.69. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs GLNCY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 47.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while GLNCY trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -30.23. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs GMBXF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while GMBXF trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs AAUKF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while AAUKF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs FSUGY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while FSUGY trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs NGLOY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while NGLOY trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs FSUMF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while FSUMF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs CMCLF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while CMCLF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs TCKRF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while TCKRF trades at $39.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 794.80. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs IPOAF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while IPOAF trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs IVPAF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while IVPAF trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs BOLIF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs JXMNF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs BDNNY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while BDNNY trades at $61.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs SHTLF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while SHTLF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -35.20. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ZNWLF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ZNWLF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ZNWLF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ZNWLF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ZNWLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to ZNWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ABML Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs STMNF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs SMMYY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while SMMYY trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.99. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs LYSDY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while LYSDY trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 146.88. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs LYSCF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while LYSCF trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 146.25. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs PUTKF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs PUTKY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while PUTKY trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs NILSY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs PAEKY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs JMXXF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while JMXXF trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 210.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MLYF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MALRY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MALRY trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs FLMMF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs PILBF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while PILBF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs CHZQ Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MALRF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MALRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs NGXXF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while NGXXF trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.04. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs IPGDF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while IPGDF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs PTNDY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MIMTF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MIMTF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs PTNDF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs IIDDY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while IIDDY trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs NICMF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs AZZVF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs POTRF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, POTRF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while POTRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas POTRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to POTRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to POTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs AFBOF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs DWMNF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs SOUHY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while SOUHY trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.62. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ERMAF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 96.07. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ERMAY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ERMAY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 90.83. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs DETRF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while DETRF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ADTLF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ADTLF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.08. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ADMLF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ADMLF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.20. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs LINRF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while LINRF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -46.80. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs AZRMF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs AUSDF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while AUSDF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ILKAF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ILKAF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ILKAY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ILKAY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs BQSSF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while BQSSF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -62.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs FMCXF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 992.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while FMCXF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -58.82. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MFRVF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 967.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MFRVF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ATUSF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 924.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ATUSF trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs STTSY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs TAOFF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 893.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while TAOFF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs AFMJF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 816.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while AFMJF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs AMVMF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 709.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while AMVMF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -57.89. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ALMTF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 664.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ALMTF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -19.20. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs CTJHF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MJDLF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 559.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MJDLF trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs PXMFF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 554.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while PXMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs VULNF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 537.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while VULNF trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs PKREF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 537.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs TTNNF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs OSTTF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs FGOVF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 469.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while FGOVF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -88.74. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MCRZF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MCHHF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs BIRNF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs NQMIY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MNXMF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 379.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MNXMF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -66.13. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs REEMF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 377M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while REEMF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.35. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs AUMTF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while AUMTF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs CTJHY Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs CGMLF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 349.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while CGMLF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -22.43. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs KMRPF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MLXEF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs FWEDF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while FWEDF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -10.36. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs SVMLF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 306.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while SVMLF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.78. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ERLFF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 306M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ERLFF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.51. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ARAFF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 304.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ARAFF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs SLGGF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs PMETF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while PMETF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -60.48. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs BSSMF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs ERDCF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 264.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while ERDCF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -72.40. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs LRSRF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MGMNF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MGMNF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs LTSRF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 251.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while LTSRF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs STQNF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs NTCPF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 247.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while NTCPF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -32.01. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.
CRICF vs MMILF Comparison
CRICF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRICF stands at 43.2M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRICF is priced at $0.04, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRICF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.63, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, CRICF's ROE is -2.67%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRICF is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRICF.