Community Redevelopment Inc.
Community Redevelopment Inc. CRDV Peers
See (CRDV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
CRDV vs MTSFF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, MTSFF has a market cap of 28.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MTSFF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTSFF's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MTSFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to MTSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs MTSFY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, MTSFY has a market cap of 27.91B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MTSFY trades at $30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTSFY's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MTSFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to MTSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs MITEY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, MITEY has a market cap of 22.42B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MITEY trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MITEY's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MITEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to MITEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs MITEF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, MITEF has a market cap of 22.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MITEF trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MITEF's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MITEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to MITEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs HLDVF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, HLDVF has a market cap of 14.98B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HLDVF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLDVF's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HLDVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to HLDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs HLDCY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, HLDCY has a market cap of 14.86B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HLDCY trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLDCY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HLDCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to HLDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs SPHXF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, SPHXF has a market cap of 13.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SPHXF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SPHXF's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SPHXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to SPHXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs BALDF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, BALDF has a market cap of 8.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while BALDF trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BALDF's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BALDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to BALDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs PSPSF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, PSPSF has a market cap of 8.24B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while PSPSF trades at $179.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PSPSF's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PSPSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to PSPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs CPNNF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, CPNNF has a market cap of 8.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while CPNNF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CPNNF's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CPNNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to CPNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs DIFTY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, DIFTY has a market cap of 7.46B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while DIFTY trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DIFTY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DIFTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to DIFTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs DITTF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, DITTF has a market cap of 6.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while DITTF trades at $102.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DITTF's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DITTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to DITTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs TTUUF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, TTUUF has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while TTUUF trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TTUUF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TTUUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to TTUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs TKFOY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, TKFOY has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while TKFOY trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TKFOY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TKFOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to TKFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs HHC Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, HHC has a market cap of 3.94B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HHC trades at $78.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HHC's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HHC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to HHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs HHH Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, HHH has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HHH trades at $71.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HHH's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HHH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to HHH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs VESTF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, VESTF has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while VESTF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VESTF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VESTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to VESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs AMLLF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, AMLLF has a market cap of 2.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while AMLLF trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMLLF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AMLLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to AMLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs FSRPF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, FSRPF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while FSRPF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FSRPF's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FSRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to FSRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs LLESF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, LLESF has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while LLESF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LLESF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LLESF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to LLESF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs JOE Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, JOE has a market cap of 2.59B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while JOE trades at $44.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JOE's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to JOE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to JOE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs HUFAF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, HUFAF has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HUFAF trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HUFAF's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HUFAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to HUFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs LLESY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, LLESY has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while LLESY trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LLESY's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LLESY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to LLESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs UILCF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, UILCF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while UILCF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UILCF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UILCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to UILCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs HNLGY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, HNLGY has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HNLGY trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HNLGY's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HNLGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to HNLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs UILCY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, UILCY has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while UILCY trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UILCY's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UILCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to UILCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs HNLGF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, HNLGF has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HNLGF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HNLGF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HNLGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to HNLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs NWWDF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, NWWDF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while NWWDF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NWWDF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NWWDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to NWWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs NDVLY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, NDVLY has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while NDVLY trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NDVLY's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NDVLY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to NDVLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs GEAHF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, GEAHF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while GEAHF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GEAHF's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GEAHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to GEAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs LCOMF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, LCOMF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while LCOMF trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LCOMF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LCOMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to LCOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs COYJF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, COYJF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while COYJF trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas COYJF's P/E ratio is 200.53. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to COYJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to COYJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs PTPKF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, PTPKF has a market cap of 1.10B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while PTPKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PTPKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PTPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to PTPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs IRICF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, IRICF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while IRICF trades at $206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IRICF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IRICF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to IRICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs MRCBF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, MRCBF has a market cap of 900.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MRCBF trades at $83.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MRCBF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MRCBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to MRCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs GZTGF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, GZTGF has a market cap of 597.83M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while GZTGF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GZTGF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GZTGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to GZTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs NNXXY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, NNXXY has a market cap of 574.35M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while NNXXY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NNXXY's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NNXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to NNXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs GDVTZ Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, GDVTZ has a market cap of 546.70M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while GDVTZ trades at $500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDVTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GDVTZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to GDVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs SIOLF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, SIOLF has a market cap of 364.81M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SIOLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SIOLF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SIOLF's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to SIOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs SIOLY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, SIOLY has a market cap of 239.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SIOLY trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SIOLY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SIOLY's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to SIOLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs SHTGF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, SHTGF has a market cap of 234.77M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SHTGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHTGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SHTGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to SHTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs SYYNY Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, SYYNY has a market cap of 200.73M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SYYNY trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SYYNY's P/E ratio is 2.47. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SYYNY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to SYYNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs MNPP Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, MNPP has a market cap of 181.18M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MNPP trades at $2,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNPP's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MNPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to MNPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs DDCCF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, DDCCF has a market cap of 179.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while DDCCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DDCCF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DDCCF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to DDCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs STRS Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, STRS has a market cap of 156.53M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while STRS trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STRS's P/E ratio is 80.79. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to STRS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to STRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs CHCI Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, CHCI has a market cap of 112.17M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while CHCI trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHCI's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CHCI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to CHCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs SNLKF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, SNLKF has a market cap of 103.90M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SNLKF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SNLKF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SNLKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to SNLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs LVSDF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, LVSDF has a market cap of 72.67M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while LVSDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LVSDF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LVSDF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to LVSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs HGPI Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, HGPI has a market cap of 29.22M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HGPI trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HGPI's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HGPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to HGPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs ECDP Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, ECDP has a market cap of 19.91M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while ECDP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ECDP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ECDP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to ECDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs HOOB Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, HOOB has a market cap of 7.61M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HOOB trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOOB's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HOOB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to HOOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs TRRE Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, TRRE has a market cap of 7.54M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while TRRE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TRRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to TRRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs TPHS Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, TPHS has a market cap of 2.98M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while TPHS trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TPHS's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TPHS's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to TPHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs SNNHF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, SNNHF has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SNNHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SNNHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SNNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to SNNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs IDVV Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, IDVV has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while IDVV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IDVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IDVV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to IDVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs VINO Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, VINO has a market cap of 1.24M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while VINO trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VINO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VINO's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to VINO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs LSIHF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, LSIHF has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while LSIHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LSIHF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LSIHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to LSIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs NIHK Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, NIHK has a market cap of 527049.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while NIHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NIHK's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NIHK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to NIHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs TDRK Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, TDRK has a market cap of 520231.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while TDRK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TDRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TDRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to TDRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs FTPM Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, FTPM has a market cap of 247564.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while FTPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FTPM's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FTPM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to FTPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs PCLI Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, PCLI has a market cap of 226386.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while PCLI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PCLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PCLI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to PCLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs BRER Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, BRER has a market cap of 164310.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while BRER trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRER's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BRER's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to BRER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs YRIV Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, YRIV has a market cap of 17953.00. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while YRIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YRIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to YRIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to YRIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs SHIOF Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, SHIOF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SHIOF trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHIOF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SHIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to SHIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
CRDV vs FCCTP Comparison
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 34107.00. In comparison, FCCTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while FCCTP trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FCCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FCCTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is more volatile compared to FCCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTSFF | $10.25 | -0.53% | 28.42B | 20.49 | $0.50 | +2.01% |
| MTSFY | $30.07 | -2.31% | 27.91B | 19.91 | $1.51 | +1.68% |
| MITEY | $17.57 | -1.73% | 22.42B | 16.27 | $1.08 | +0.47% |
| MITEF | $17.85 | -0.56% | 22.24B | 16.53 | $1.08 | +0.01% |
| HLDVF | $3.10 | +20.90% | 14.98B | 18.21 | $0.17 | +7.45% |
| HLDCY | $3.07 | +6.60% | 14.86B | 18.06 | $0.17 | +7.49% |
| SPHXF | $0.46 | -20.29% | 13.28B | 15.33 | $0.03 | N/A |
| BALDF | $6.93 | +18.23% | 8.24B | 23.89 | $0.29 | N/A |
| PSPSF | $179.55 | N/A | 8.24B | 18.08 | $9.93 | +2.52% |
| CPNNF | $1.80 | N/A | 8.08B | 16.36 | $0.11 | +3.54% |