Community Redevelopment Inc.
Community Redevelopment Inc. (CRDV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRDV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRDV | $0.00 | +0.00% | 1.5M | -0.44 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| MTSFY | $27.13 | +1.19% | 25.1B | 14.97 | $1.81 | +1.86% |
| MTSFF | $8.94 | +0.06% | 24.8B | 14.89 | $0.60 | +2.37% |
| MITEY | $18.83 | -0.05% | 23.4B | 18.27 | $1.03 | +0.83% |
| MITEF | $18.69 | +0.00% | 23.3B | 18.32 | $1.02 | +1.56% |
| HLDVF | $3.80 | +0.00% | 18.4B | 22.35 | $0.17 | +6.09% |
| HLDCY | $3.49 | +0.00% | 16.9B | 20.50 | $0.17 | +6.61% |
| SPHXF | $0.42 | +0.00% | 12.1B | 13.95 | $0.03 | +2.03% |
| BALDF | $7.40 | +0.00% | 8.3B | 13.45 | $0.55 | N/A |
| PSPSF | $171.20 | +0.00% | 7.9B | 17.67 | $9.69 | +2.66% |
Stock Comparison
CRDV vs MTSFY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MTSFY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MTSFY trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MTSFY's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MTSFY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to MTSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check MTSFY's competition here
CRDV vs MTSFF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MTSFF has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MTSFF trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MTSFF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MTSFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and MTSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTSFF's competition here
CRDV vs MITEY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MITEY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MITEY trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MITEY's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MITEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to MITEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check MITEY's competition here
CRDV vs MITEF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MITEF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MITEF trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MITEF's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MITEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to MITEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check MITEF's competition here
CRDV vs HLDVF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HLDVF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HLDVF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas HLDVF's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HLDVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and HLDVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLDVF's competition here
CRDV vs HLDCY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HLDCY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HLDCY trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas HLDCY's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HLDCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to HLDCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check HLDCY's competition here
CRDV vs SPHXF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SPHXF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SPHXF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SPHXF's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SPHXF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to SPHXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check SPHXF's competition here
CRDV vs BALDF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BALDF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while BALDF trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BALDF's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BALDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to BALDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check BALDF's competition here
CRDV vs PSPSF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PSPSF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while PSPSF trades at $171.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PSPSF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PSPSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and PSPSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSPSF's competition here
CRDV vs DIFTY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DIFTY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while DIFTY trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas DIFTY's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DIFTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to DIFTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check DIFTY's competition here
CRDV vs CPNNF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, CPNNF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while CPNNF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CPNNF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to CPNNF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and CPNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPNNF's competition here
CRDV vs DITTF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DITTF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while DITTF trades at $98.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas DITTF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DITTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and DITTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DITTF's competition here
CRDV vs TTUUF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TTUUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while TTUUF trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas TTUUF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TTUUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and TTUUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTUUF's competition here
CRDV vs TKFOY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TKFOY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while TKFOY trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas TKFOY's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TKFOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to TKFOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check TKFOY's competition here
CRDV vs VESTF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, VESTF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while VESTF trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas VESTF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to VESTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and VESTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VESTF's competition here
CRDV vs AMLLF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, AMLLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while AMLLF trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas AMLLF's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AMLLF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to AMLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check AMLLF's competition here
CRDV vs FSRPF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FSRPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while FSRPF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas FSRPF's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FSRPF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to FSRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check FSRPF's competition here
CRDV vs LLESF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LLESF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while LLESF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas LLESF's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LLESF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to LLESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check LLESF's competition here
CRDV vs HNLGY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HNLGY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HNLGY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas HNLGY's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HNLGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and HNLGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HNLGY's competition here
CRDV vs HUFAF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HUFAF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HUFAF trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas HUFAF's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HUFAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and HUFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUFAF's competition here
CRDV vs LLESY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LLESY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while LLESY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas LLESY's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LLESY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and LLESY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLESY's competition here
CRDV vs UILCF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, UILCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while UILCF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas UILCF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UILCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to UILCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check UILCF's competition here
CRDV vs UILCY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, UILCY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while UILCY trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas UILCY's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to UILCY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to UILCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check UILCY's competition here
CRDV vs HNLGF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HNLGF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HNLGF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas HNLGF's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HNLGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to HNLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check HNLGF's competition here
CRDV vs NDVLY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NDVLY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while NDVLY trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas NDVLY's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NDVLY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and NDVLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDVLY's competition here
CRDV vs NWWDF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NWWDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while NWWDF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas NWWDF's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NWWDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to NWWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check NWWDF's competition here
CRDV vs LCOMF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LCOMF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while LCOMF trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas LCOMF's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LCOMF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to LCOMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check LCOMF's competition here
CRDV vs GEAHF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GEAHF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while GEAHF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas GEAHF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GEAHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and GEAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEAHF's competition here
CRDV vs COYJF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, COYJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while COYJF trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas COYJF's P/E ratio is 200.53. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to COYJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and COYJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COYJF's competition here
CRDV vs PTPKF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PTPKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while PTPKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PTPKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PTPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to PTPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check PTPKF's competition here
CRDV vs IRICF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, IRICF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while IRICF trades at $206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas IRICF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IRICF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and IRICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRICF's competition here
CRDV vs MRCBF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MRCBF has a market cap of 891.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MRCBF trades at $83.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MRCBF's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MRCBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to MRCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check MRCBF's competition here
CRDV vs GZTGF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GZTGF has a market cap of 681.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while GZTGF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas GZTGF's P/E ratio is -23.47. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GZTGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and GZTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GZTGF's competition here
CRDV vs NNXXY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NNXXY has a market cap of 575.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while NNXXY trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas NNXXY's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NNXXY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to NNXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check NNXXY's competition here
CRDV vs GDVTZ Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, GDVTZ has a market cap of 421M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while GDVTZ trades at $385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas GDVTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to GDVTZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and GDVTZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDVTZ's competition here
CRDV vs SHTGF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SHTGF has a market cap of 249.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SHTGF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SHTGF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SHTGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to SHTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check SHTGF's competition here
CRDV vs SIOLF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SIOLF has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SIOLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SIOLF's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SIOLF's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and SIOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIOLF's competition here
CRDV vs SNLKF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SNLKF has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SNLKF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SNLKF's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SNLKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to SNLKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check SNLKF's competition here
CRDV vs DDCCF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, DDCCF has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while DDCCF trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas DDCCF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DDCCF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to DDCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check DDCCF's competition here
CRDV vs SYYNY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SYYNY has a market cap of 171.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SYYNY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SYYNY's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SYYNY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and SYYNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYYNY's competition here
CRDV vs MNPP Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, MNPP has a market cap of 167.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while MNPP trades at $1,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas MNPP's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to MNPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and MNPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNPP's competition here
CRDV vs SIOLY Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SIOLY has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SIOLY trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SIOLY's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SIOLY's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to SIOLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check SIOLY's competition here
CRDV vs LVSDF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LVSDF has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while LVSDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas LVSDF's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LVSDF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to LVSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check LVSDF's competition here
CRDV vs LSIHF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, LSIHF has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while LSIHF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas LSIHF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to LSIHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to LSIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check LSIHF's competition here
CRDV vs HGPI Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HGPI has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HGPI trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas HGPI's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HGPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to HGPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check HGPI's competition here
CRDV vs FCCTP Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FCCTP has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while FCCTP trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas FCCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FCCTP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to FCCTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check FCCTP's competition here
CRDV vs ECDP Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, ECDP has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while ECDP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ECDP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ECDP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to ECDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check ECDP's competition here
CRDV vs TRRE Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TRRE has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while TRRE trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas TRRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TRRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to TRRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check TRRE's competition here
CRDV vs SNNHF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SNNHF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SNNHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SNNHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SNNHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and SNNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNNHF's competition here
CRDV vs HOOB Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, HOOB has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while HOOB trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas HOOB's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to HOOB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to HOOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check HOOB's competition here
CRDV vs IDVV Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, IDVV has a market cap of 616.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while IDVV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas IDVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to IDVV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to IDVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check IDVV's competition here
CRDV vs TDRK Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, TDRK has a market cap of 528.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while TDRK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas TDRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to TDRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to TDRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check TDRK's competition here
CRDV vs NIHK Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, NIHK has a market cap of 455.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while NIHK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas NIHK's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to NIHK's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to NIHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check NIHK's competition here
CRDV vs PCLI Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, PCLI has a market cap of 309.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while PCLI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas PCLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to PCLI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to PCLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check PCLI's competition here
CRDV vs FTPM Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, FTPM has a market cap of 247.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while FTPM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas FTPM's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to FTPM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to FTPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check FTPM's competition here
CRDV vs BRER Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, BRER has a market cap of 164.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while BRER trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BRER's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to BRER's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV is less volatile compared to BRER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRDV.Check BRER's competition here
CRDV vs YRIV Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, YRIV has a market cap of 18K. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while YRIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas YRIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to YRIV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and YRIV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YRIV's competition here
CRDV vs SHIOF Comparison July 2025
CRDV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRDV stands at 1.5M. In comparison, SHIOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRDV is priced at $0.00, while SHIOF trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRDV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas SHIOF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, CRDV's ROE is +0.37%, compared to SHIOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRDV and SHIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHIOF's competition here