California Resources Corporation
California Resources Corporation (CRCQW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRCQW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRCQW | $17.12 | +5.35% | 1.2B | 2.64 | $6.49 | +3.11% |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | +0.00% | 66.8B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $17.15 | +6.46% | 32.5B | 9.17 | $1.87 | +7.14% |
| PEXNY | $9.76 | +0.00% | 19.4B | 8.13 | $1.20 | +5.42% |
| TRMLF | $44.78 | -1.45% | 17.4B | 18.03 | $2.49 | +4.32% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | +0.00% | 17B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| IPXHY | $14.08 | -0.42% | 16.9B | 5.88 | $2.40 | +3.80% |
| STOSF | $5.10 | +0.00% | 16.5B | 13.42 | $0.38 | +4.60% |
| SSLZY | $5.13 | +0.59% | 16.5B | 13.39 | $0.38 | +1.74% |
| IPXHF | $13.50 | +0.00% | 16.2B | 5.63 | $2.40 | +4.19% |
Stock Comparison
CRCQW vs NSTKF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check NSTKF's competition here
CRCQW vs WOPEF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while WOPEF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check WOPEF's competition here
CRCQW vs PEXNY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PEXNY trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PEXNY's competition here
CRCQW vs TRMLF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while TRMLF trades at $44.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check TRMLF's competition here
CRCQW vs DETNF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DETNF's competition here
CRCQW vs IPXHY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while IPXHY trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check IPXHY's competition here
CRCQW vs STOSF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while STOSF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check STOSF's competition here
CRCQW vs SSLZY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SSLZY trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SSLZY's competition here
CRCQW vs IPXHF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while IPXHF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check IPXHF's competition here
CRCQW vs RGRLF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RGRLF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while RGRLF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas RGRLF's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RGRLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to RGRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check RGRLF's competition here
CRCQW vs AETUF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while AETUF trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check AETUF's competition here
CRCQW vs NOVKY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check NOVKY's competition here
CRCQW vs SPGYF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SPGYF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SPGYF's competition here
CRCQW vs PTRRY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PTRRY trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PTRRY's competition here
CRCQW vs DKDRF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DKDRF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DKDRF's competition here
CRCQW vs MEGEF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while MEGEF trades at $19.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check MEGEF's competition here
CRCQW vs VSOGF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while VSOGF trades at $47.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check VSOGF's competition here
CRCQW vs PREKF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PREKF trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PREKF's competition here
CRCQW vs DELKY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DELKY trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DELKY's competition here
CRCQW vs DLKGF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DLKGF trades at $213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DLKGF's competition here
CRCQW vs PMOIF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PMOIF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PMOIF's competition here
CRCQW vs HBRIY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while HBRIY trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -26.80. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check HBRIY's competition here
CRCQW vs OASPW Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check OASPW's competition here
CRCQW vs PEYUF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PEYUF trades at $14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PEYUF's competition here
CRCQW vs EFVIF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check EFVIF's competition here
CRCQW vs EERGF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while EERGF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check EERGF's competition here
CRCQW vs BTEGF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BTEGF's competition here
CRCQW vs PRMRF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PRMRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PRMRF's competition here
CRCQW vs BEPTF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BEPTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BEPTF's competition here
CRCQW vs ATHOF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ATHOF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ATHOF's competition here
CRCQW vs NUVSF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while NUVSF trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check NUVSF's competition here
CRCQW vs PTGIF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PTGIF's competition here
CRCQW vs BCHEY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BCHEY trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BCHEY's competition here
CRCQW vs IPCFF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while IPCFF trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check IPCFF's competition here
CRCQW vs MEYYY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while MEYYY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check MEYYY's competition here
CRCQW vs JPTXF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while JPTXF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check JPTXF's competition here
CRCQW vs FRHLF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while FRHLF trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check FRHLF's competition here
CRCQW vs AAVVF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while AAVVF trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -62.38. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check AAVVF's competition here
CRCQW vs BIREF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BIREF trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BIREF's competition here
CRCQW vs CDDRF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CDDRF trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CDDRF's competition here
CRCQW vs DTNOF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DTNOF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DTNOF's competition here
CRCQW vs WLLAW Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check WLLAW's competition here
CRCQW vs KELTF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while KELTF trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check KELTF's competition here
CRCQW vs PARXF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PARXF trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PARXF's competition here
CRCQW vs KRNGF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 916.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while KRNGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check KRNGF's competition here
CRCQW vs UNEGF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check UNEGF's competition here
CRCQW vs AOIFF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 878.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while AOIFF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check AOIFF's competition here
CRCQW vs SQZZF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SQZZF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SQZZF's competition here
CRCQW vs CWEGF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CWEGF's competition here
CRCQW vs CRLFF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 853.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CRLFF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CRLFF's competition here
CRCQW vs BWEFF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 774.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BWEFF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BWEFF's competition here
CRCQW vs DALXF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 681.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DALXF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 42.60. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DALXF's competition here
CRCQW vs KWTEF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 677.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while KWTEF trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check KWTEF's competition here
CRCQW vs AAGEF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check AAGEF's competition here
CRCQW vs RCKHF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 557.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while RCKHF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check RCKHF's competition here
CRCQW vs ZPTAF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 517.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ZPTAF trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -17.40. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ZPTAF's competition here
CRCQW vs GFKSY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check GFKSY's competition here
CRCQW vs GUKYF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 481.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while GUKYF trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 74.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check GUKYF's competition here
CRCQW vs KRNGY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 472.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while KRNGY trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check KRNGY's competition here
CRCQW vs SHASF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 470M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SHASF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SHASF's competition here
CRCQW vs PTALF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 469.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PTALF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PTALF's competition here
CRCQW vs COPJF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while COPJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check COPJF's competition here
CRCQW vs TBNRF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check TBNRF's competition here
CRCQW vs PTHRF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PTHRF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -32.70. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PTHRF's competition here
CRCQW vs ATUUF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 388.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ATUUF trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -42.79. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ATUUF's competition here
CRCQW vs BKBEF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BKBEF's competition here
CRCQW vs PRYGF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PRYGF's competition here
CRCQW vs PEGIY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PEGIY's competition here
CRCQW vs ENQUF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ENQUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ENQUF's competition here
CRCQW vs OILSF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 323.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while OILSF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check OILSF's competition here
CRCQW vs CEIEF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 321.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CEIEF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -30.12. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CEIEF's competition here
CRCQW vs FECCF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while FECCF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check FECCF's competition here
CRCQW vs TUWLF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 305M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while TUWLF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check TUWLF's competition here
CRCQW vs EXCE Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 260.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while EXCE trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check EXCE's competition here
CRCQW vs PESAF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PESAF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PESAF's competition here
CRCQW vs TUWOY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while TUWOY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check TUWOY's competition here
CRCQW vs GEGYF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 251.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while GEGYF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check GEGYF's competition here
CRCQW vs ZNOG Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 219.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ZNOG trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ZNOG's competition here
CRCQW vs HZNFF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check HZNFF's competition here
CRCQW vs IPOOF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while IPOOF trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check IPOOF's competition here
CRCQW vs ITEEF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ITEEF's competition here
CRCQW vs CRNZF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CRNZF's competition here
CRCQW vs PIFYF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 193.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PIFYF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PIFYF's competition here
CRCQW vs PSHIF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PSHIF's competition here
CRCQW vs GASXF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while GASXF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check GASXF's competition here
CRCQW vs EEGUF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 184.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while EEGUF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check EEGUF's competition here
CRCQW vs HRCXF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check HRCXF's competition here
CRCQW vs SEUSF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 181.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SEUSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -15.98. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SEUSF's competition here
CRCQW vs RECWF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check RECWF's competition here
CRCQW vs ALVOF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 158.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ALVOF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ALVOF's competition here
CRCQW vs GEGYY Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while GEGYY trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check GEGYY's competition here
CRCQW vs SVNNF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SVNNF has a market cap of 156.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SVNNF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SVNNF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to SVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SVNNF's competition here
CRCQW vs PNWRF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PNWRF's competition here
CRCQW vs KGEIF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check KGEIF's competition here
CRCQW vs LNDNF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while LNDNF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check LNDNF's competition here
CRCQW vs PTRUF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 139.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PTRUF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 107.29. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PTRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PTRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PTRUF's competition here
CRCQW vs RUBLF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while RUBLF trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check RUBLF's competition here
CRCQW vs SLGYF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to SLGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SLGYF's competition here
CRCQW vs HMENF Comparison July 2025
CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HMENF has a market cap of 134.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while HMENF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas HMENF's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HMENF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to HMENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check HMENF's competition here