California Resources Corporation

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 183.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while MEYYY trades at $7.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check MEYYY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check NSTKF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while WOPEF trades at $18.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check WOPEF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while IPXHY trades at $23.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check IPXHY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while IPXHF trades at $20.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check IPXHF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while TRMLF trades at $45.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check TRMLF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DETNF trades at $26.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DETNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DETNF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SSLZY trades at $5.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SSLZY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PEXNY trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PEXNY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while STOSF trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check STOSF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check NOVKY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while AETUF trades at $18.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check AETUF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SPGYF trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SPGYF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PTRRY trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PTRRY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DKDRF trades at $7.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DKDRF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while VSOGF trades at $59.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check VSOGF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DLKGF trades at $325.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DLKGF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DELKY trades at $32.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DELKY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while MEGEF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check MEGEF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PREKF trades at $22.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 34.70. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PREKF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while HBRIY trades at $3.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -11.78. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check HBRIY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PMOIF trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PMOIF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while JPTXF trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check JPTXF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PEYUF trades at $18.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PEYUF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ATHOF trades at $6.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ATHOF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while OASPW trades at $55.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check OASPW's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PRMRF trades at $18.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PRMRF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while NUVSF trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check NUVSF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while IPCFF trades at $22.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 90.20. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check IPCFF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BTEGF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while EERGF trades at $12.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EERGF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check EERGF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CDDRF trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CDDRF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while FRHLF trades at $12.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check FRHLF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while UNEGF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNEGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check UNEGF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PTGIF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BCHEY trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is -22.54. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BCHEY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BEPTF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is -19.47. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BEPTF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DTNOF trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -33.60. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DTNOF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PARXF trades at $16.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PARXF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DALXF trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 49.87. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DALXF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BIREF trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BIREF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BWEFF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BWEFF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while AAVVF trades at $7.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAVVF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check AAVVF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CRLFF trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CRLFF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while KELTF trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check KELTF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check WLLAW's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while AOIFF trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AOIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check AOIFF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 927M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ATUUF trades at $32.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATUUF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ATUUF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 890.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while KRNGF trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check KRNGF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CWEGF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 864.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SQZZF trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SQZZF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SQZZF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 810.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while KWTEF trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check KWTEF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 637.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while GUKYF trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 98.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GUKYF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check GUKYF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 601.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while RCKHF trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is -8.64. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RCKHF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check RCKHF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 595.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while FECCF trades at $8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FECCF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check FECCF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check AAGEF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ZPTAF trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ZPTAF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check GFKSY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 496M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while SHASF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check SHASF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 473.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ZNOG trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -41.46. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ZNOG's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 450.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while OILSF trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check OILSF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while COPJF trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check COPJF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 418.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ENQUF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENQUF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ENQUF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check TBNRF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 404.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while EXCE trades at $18.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check EXCE's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check BKBEF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 372M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PEGIY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PRYGF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while KRNGY trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check KRNGY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 325.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while HZNFF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check HZNFF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 323.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CEIEF trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CEIEF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while IPOOF trades at $11.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPOOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check IPOOF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 281.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PESAF trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PESAF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PTALF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PTALF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 260.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while GASXF trades at $0.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GASXF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check GASXF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRNCY has a market cap of 250.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CRNCY trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CRNCY's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRNCY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to CRNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CRNCY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while GEGYY trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check GEGYY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 237.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while GEGYF trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check GEGYF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 233.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while CRNZF trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check CRNZF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 231.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while EEGUF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -18.57. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check EEGUF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RECAF has a market cap of 230.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while RECAF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas RECAF's P/E ratio is 2.57. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RECAF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to RECAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check RECAF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FOLGF has a market cap of 221.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while FOLGF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas FOLGF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOLGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to FOLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check FOLGF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ALVOF trades at $5.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ALVOF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JRNGF has a market cap of 199.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while JRNGF trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas JRNGF's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JRNGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to JRNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check JRNGF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ITEEF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTOAF has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PTOAF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PTOAF's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTOAF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PTOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PTOAF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ECAOF has a market cap of 195.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while ECAOF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas ECAOF's P/E ratio is -57.06. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECAOF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to ECAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check ECAOF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while TUWLF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TUWLF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check TUWLF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NFTN has a market cap of 190.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while NFTN trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas NFTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NFTN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to NFTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check NFTN's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PSHIF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check HRCXF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 176.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while RUBLF trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check RUBLF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PIFYF trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PIFYF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while LNDNF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check LNDNF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PTRUF trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 129.00. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PTRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PTRUF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while RECWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check RECWF's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DTNOY has a market cap of 168.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while DTNOY trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas DTNOY's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DTNOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to DTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check DTNOY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 168.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while TUWOY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TUWOY's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check TUWOY's competition here

CRCQW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CRCQW stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRCQW is priced at $17.12, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CRCQW currently has a P/E ratio of 2.64, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, CRCQW's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, CRCQW is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRCQW.Check PNWRF's competition here