Cranes Software International Limited
Cranes Software International Limited (CRANESSOFT.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRANESSOFT.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRANESSOFT.BO | ₹4.48 | -0.67% | 696M | -2.63 | -₹1.74 | N/A |
| TATAELXSI.NS | ₹4,480.00 | -7.80% | 293.7B | 50.53 | ₹93.29 | +1.59% |
| TATAELXSI.BO | ₹4,462.10 | -8.15% | 293.5B | 50.52 | ₹93.27 | +1.59% |
| KFINTECH.NS | ₹989.70 | -1.76% | 174.4B | 50.44 | ₹20.05 | +0.74% |
| KFINTECH.BO | ₹988.95 | -1.78% | 174.2B | 50.39 | ₹20.04 | +0.74% |
| BLACKBUCK.NS | ₹605.45 | +0.66% | 111.1B | 29.25 | ₹20.93 | N/A |
| INTELLECT.BO | ₹692.35 | -1.71% | 97.8B | 27.43 | ₹25.57 | +1.00% |
| INTELLECT.NS | ₹696.90 | -1.04% | 97.8B | 27.42 | ₹25.58 | +1.00% |
| BBOX.NS | ₹518.70 | +0.99% | 88.3B | 41.55 | ₹12.48 | +0.19% |
| BBOX.BO | ₹518.05 | +1.05% | 88.3B | 41.58 | ₹12.46 | +0.19% |
Stock Comparison
CRANESSOFT.BO vs TATAELXSI.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, TATAELXSI.NS has a market cap of 293.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while TATAELXSI.NS trades at ₹4,480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TATAELXSI.NS's P/E ratio is 50.53. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TATAELXSI.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to TATAELXSI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check TATAELXSI.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs TATAELXSI.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, TATAELXSI.BO has a market cap of 293.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while TATAELXSI.BO trades at ₹4,462.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TATAELXSI.BO's P/E ratio is 50.52. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TATAELXSI.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to TATAELXSI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check TATAELXSI.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs KFINTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, KFINTECH.NS has a market cap of 174.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while KFINTECH.NS trades at ₹989.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KFINTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 50.44. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KFINTECH.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to KFINTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check KFINTECH.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs KFINTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, KFINTECH.BO has a market cap of 174.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while KFINTECH.BO trades at ₹988.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KFINTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 50.39. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KFINTECH.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to KFINTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check KFINTECH.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs BLACKBUCK.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, BLACKBUCK.NS has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while BLACKBUCK.NS trades at ₹605.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas BLACKBUCK.NS's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLACKBUCK.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to BLACKBUCK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check BLACKBUCK.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs INTELLECT.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, INTELLECT.BO has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while INTELLECT.BO trades at ₹692.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas INTELLECT.BO's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INTELLECT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to INTELLECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check INTELLECT.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs INTELLECT.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, INTELLECT.NS has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while INTELLECT.NS trades at ₹696.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas INTELLECT.NS's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INTELLECT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to INTELLECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check INTELLECT.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs BBOX.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, BBOX.NS has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while BBOX.NS trades at ₹518.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas BBOX.NS's P/E ratio is 41.55. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BBOX.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to BBOX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check BBOX.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs BBOX.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, BBOX.BO has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while BBOX.BO trades at ₹518.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas BBOX.BO's P/E ratio is 41.58. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BBOX.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to BBOX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check BBOX.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs NEWGEN.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, NEWGEN.BO has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while NEWGEN.BO trades at ₹514.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NEWGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEWGEN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to NEWGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check NEWGEN.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs NEWGEN.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, NEWGEN.NS has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while NEWGEN.NS trades at ₹515.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NEWGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEWGEN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to NEWGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check NEWGEN.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs RATEGAIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, RATEGAIN.BO has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while RATEGAIN.BO trades at ₹509.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RATEGAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RATEGAIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to RATEGAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check RATEGAIN.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs RATEGAIN.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, RATEGAIN.NS has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while RATEGAIN.NS trades at ₹507.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RATEGAIN.NS's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RATEGAIN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to RATEGAIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check RATEGAIN.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs TANLA.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, TANLA.NS has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while TANLA.NS trades at ₹441.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TANLA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TANLA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to TANLA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check TANLA.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs TANLA.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, TANLA.BO has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while TANLA.BO trades at ₹441.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TANLA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TANLA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to TANLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check TANLA.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs MAPMYINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, MAPMYINDIA.BO has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while MAPMYINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,084.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MAPMYINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 46.29. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAPMYINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to MAPMYINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check MAPMYINDIA.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs MAPMYINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, MAPMYINDIA.NS has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while MAPMYINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,086.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MAPMYINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 46.40. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAPMYINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to MAPMYINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check MAPMYINDIA.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs EMUDHRA.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, EMUDHRA.BO has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while EMUDHRA.BO trades at ₹439.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas EMUDHRA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.51. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EMUDHRA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to EMUDHRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check EMUDHRA.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs EMUDHRA.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, EMUDHRA.NS has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while EMUDHRA.NS trades at ₹440.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas EMUDHRA.NS's P/E ratio is 37.39. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EMUDHRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to EMUDHRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check EMUDHRA.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs NPST.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, NPST.NS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while NPST.NS trades at ₹1,097.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NPST.NS's P/E ratio is 63.65. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NPST.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to NPST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check NPST.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs NUCLEUS.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, NUCLEUS.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while NUCLEUS.NS trades at ₹791.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NUCLEUS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NUCLEUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to NUCLEUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check NUCLEUS.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs NUCLEUS.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, NUCLEUS.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while NUCLEUS.BO trades at ₹785.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NUCLEUS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NUCLEUS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to NUCLEUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check NUCLEUS.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs INFOBEAN.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, INFOBEAN.BO has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while INFOBEAN.BO trades at ₹841.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas INFOBEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INFOBEAN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to INFOBEAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check INFOBEAN.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs INFOBEAN.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, INFOBEAN.NS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while INFOBEAN.NS trades at ₹839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas INFOBEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INFOBEAN.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to INFOBEAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check INFOBEAN.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs RAMCOSYS.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, RAMCOSYS.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while RAMCOSYS.BO trades at ₹474.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RAMCOSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 85.41. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAMCOSYS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to RAMCOSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check RAMCOSYS.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs RAMCOSYS.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, RAMCOSYS.NS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while RAMCOSYS.NS trades at ₹470.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RAMCOSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 85.43. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAMCOSYS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to RAMCOSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check RAMCOSYS.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs KERNEX.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, KERNEX.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while KERNEX.BO trades at ₹1,082.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KERNEX.BO's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KERNEX.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to KERNEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check KERNEX.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs KERNEX.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, KERNEX.NS has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while KERNEX.NS trades at ₹1,090.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KERNEX.NS's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KERNEX.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to KERNEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check KERNEX.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs MEGASOFT.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, MEGASOFT.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while MEGASOFT.NS trades at ₹183.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MEGASOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MEGASOFT.NS's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to MEGASOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check MEGASOFT.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs GENESYS.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, GENESYS.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while GENESYS.BO trades at ₹300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas GENESYS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GENESYS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to GENESYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check GENESYS.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs GENESYS.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, GENESYS.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while GENESYS.NS trades at ₹301.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas GENESYS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GENESYS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to GENESYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check GENESYS.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs UNIECOM.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, UNIECOM.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while UNIECOM.NS trades at ₹107.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas UNIECOM.NS's P/E ratio is 66.88. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UNIECOM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to UNIECOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check UNIECOM.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs IZMO.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, IZMO.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while IZMO.NS trades at ₹791.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas IZMO.NS's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IZMO.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to IZMO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check IZMO.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs IZMO.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, IZMO.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while IZMO.BO trades at ₹794.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas IZMO.BO's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IZMO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to IZMO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check IZMO.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs KELLTONTEC.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, KELLTONTEC.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while KELLTONTEC.BO trades at ₹19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KELLTONTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KELLTONTEC.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to KELLTONTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check KELLTONTEC.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs KELLTONTEC.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, KELLTONTEC.NS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while KELLTONTEC.NS trades at ₹19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KELLTONTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KELLTONTEC.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to KELLTONTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check KELLTONTEC.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs QUICKHEAL.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, QUICKHEAL.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while QUICKHEAL.BO trades at ₹174.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas QUICKHEAL.BO's P/E ratio is 180.34. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QUICKHEAL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to QUICKHEAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check QUICKHEAL.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs QUICKHEAL.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, QUICKHEAL.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while QUICKHEAL.NS trades at ₹174.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas QUICKHEAL.NS's P/E ratio is 179.75. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to QUICKHEAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check QUICKHEAL.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs INNOVANA.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, INNOVANA.NS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while INNOVANA.NS trades at ₹420.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas INNOVANA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INNOVANA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to INNOVANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check INNOVANA.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs KSOLVES.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, KSOLVES.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while KSOLVES.BO trades at ₹300.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KSOLVES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KSOLVES.BO's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to KSOLVES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check KSOLVES.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs KSOLVES.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, KSOLVES.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while KSOLVES.NS trades at ₹301.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KSOLVES.NS's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KSOLVES.NS's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to KSOLVES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check KSOLVES.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs VEEFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, VEEFIN.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while VEEFIN.BO trades at ₹258.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas VEEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 39.36. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VEEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to VEEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check VEEFIN.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs SUBEXLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, SUBEXLTD.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while SUBEXLTD.NS trades at ₹9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SUBEXLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 494.00. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUBEXLTD.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to SUBEXLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check SUBEXLTD.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs IRIS.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, IRIS.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while IRIS.NS trades at ₹240.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas IRIS.NS's P/E ratio is 61.59. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IRIS.NS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to IRIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check IRIS.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs ABMKNO.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, ABMKNO.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while ABMKNO.BO trades at ₹249.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ABMKNO.BO's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABMKNO.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to ABMKNO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check ABMKNO.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs SOFTTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, SOFTTECH.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while SOFTTECH.NS trades at ₹283.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SOFTTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 312.63. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOFTTECH.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to SOFTTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check SOFTTECH.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs SOFTTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, SOFTTECH.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while SOFTTECH.BO trades at ₹282.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SOFTTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 302.11. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOFTTECH.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to SOFTTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check SOFTTECH.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs XTGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, XTGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while XTGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas XTGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XTGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to XTGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check XTGLOBAL.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs TRACXN.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, TRACXN.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while TRACXN.NS trades at ₹32.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TRACXN.NS's P/E ratio is -27.15. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRACXN.NS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to TRACXN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check TRACXN.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs TRACXN.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, TRACXN.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while TRACXN.BO trades at ₹32.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TRACXN.BO's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRACXN.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to TRACXN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check TRACXN.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs TREJHARA.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, TREJHARA.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while TREJHARA.BO trades at ₹208.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TREJHARA.BO's P/E ratio is 75.49. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TREJHARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to TREJHARA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check TREJHARA.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs DANLAW.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, DANLAW.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while DANLAW.BO trades at ₹616.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas DANLAW.BO's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DANLAW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to DANLAW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check DANLAW.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs TREJHARA.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, TREJHARA.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while TREJHARA.NS trades at ₹193.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TREJHARA.NS's P/E ratio is 72.99. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TREJHARA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to TREJHARA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check TREJHARA.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs AVANCE.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, AVANCE.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while AVANCE.BO trades at ₹1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AVANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 114.00. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVANCE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to AVANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check AVANCE.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs VIAANINDUS.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, VIAANINDUS.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while VIAANINDUS.BO trades at ₹1,940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas VIAANINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is -250.65. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIAANINDUS.BO's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to VIAANINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check VIAANINDUS.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs VIRINCHI.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, VIRINCHI.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while VIRINCHI.NS trades at ₹19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas VIRINCHI.NS's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIRINCHI.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to VIRINCHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check VIRINCHI.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs VIRINCHI.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, VIRINCHI.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while VIRINCHI.BO trades at ₹19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas VIRINCHI.BO's P/E ratio is -12.34. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIRINCHI.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to VIRINCHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check VIRINCHI.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs 7SEASL.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, 7SEASL.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while 7SEASL.BO trades at ₹73.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas 7SEASL.BO's P/E ratio is 82.42. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to 7SEASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to 7SEASL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check 7SEASL.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs CNIRESLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, CNIRESLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while CNIRESLTD.BO trades at ₹10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CNIRESLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -23.89. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNIRESLTD.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to CNIRESLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check CNIRESLTD.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs CURAA.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, CURAA.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while CURAA.NS trades at ₹85.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CURAA.NS's P/E ratio is -365.22. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CURAA.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to CURAA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check CURAA.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs CALSOFT.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, CALSOFT.NS has a market cap of 855.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while CALSOFT.NS trades at ₹13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CALSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 139.80. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CALSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to CALSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check CALSOFT.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs ORCHASP.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, ORCHASP.NS has a market cap of 840.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while ORCHASP.NS trades at ₹2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ORCHASP.NS's P/E ratio is -65.75. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORCHASP.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to ORCHASP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check ORCHASP.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs CALSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, CALSOFT.BO has a market cap of 837.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while CALSOFT.BO trades at ₹13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CALSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 136.80. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CALSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to CALSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check CALSOFT.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs ODYSSEY.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, ODYSSEY.BO has a market cap of 800M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while ODYSSEY.BO trades at ₹51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ODYSSEY.BO's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ODYSSEY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to ODYSSEY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check ODYSSEY.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs SECURKLOUD.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, SECURKLOUD.BO has a market cap of 774.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while SECURKLOUD.BO trades at ₹22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SECURKLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SECURKLOUD.BO's ROE of -8.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to SECURKLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check SECURKLOUD.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs SOFCOM.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, SOFCOM.BO has a market cap of 772.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while SOFCOM.BO trades at ₹29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SOFCOM.BO's P/E ratio is 47.63. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOFCOM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to SOFCOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check SOFCOM.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs AMRAPLIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, AMRAPLIN.BO has a market cap of 759.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while AMRAPLIN.BO trades at ₹14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AMRAPLIN.BO's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMRAPLIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to AMRAPLIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check AMRAPLIN.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs SECURKLOUD.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, SECURKLOUD.NS has a market cap of 745.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while SECURKLOUD.NS trades at ₹22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SECURKLOUD.NS's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SECURKLOUD.NS's ROE of -8.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to SECURKLOUD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check SECURKLOUD.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs VIRTUALS.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, VIRTUALS.BO has a market cap of 691.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while VIRTUALS.BO trades at ₹20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas VIRTUALS.BO's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIRTUALS.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to VIRTUALS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check VIRTUALS.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs SGLRES.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, SGLRES.BO has a market cap of 676.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while SGLRES.BO trades at ₹2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SGLRES.BO's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGLRES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to SGLRES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check SGLRES.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs AEONXDIGI.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, AEONXDIGI.BO has a market cap of 638.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while AEONXDIGI.BO trades at ₹135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AEONXDIGI.BO's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AEONXDIGI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to AEONXDIGI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check AEONXDIGI.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs SAGARSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, SAGARSOFT.BO has a market cap of 564.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while SAGARSOFT.BO trades at ₹89.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SAGARSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 245.14. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAGARSOFT.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to SAGARSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check SAGARSOFT.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs NETLINK.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, NETLINK.BO has a market cap of 491.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while NETLINK.BO trades at ₹191.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas NETLINK.BO's P/E ratio is 473.90. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NETLINK.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to NETLINK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check NETLINK.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs RAMINFO.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, RAMINFO.BO has a market cap of 463.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while RAMINFO.BO trades at ₹54.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas RAMINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAMINFO.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to RAMINFO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check RAMINFO.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs TELECANOR.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, TELECANOR.BO has a market cap of 461.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while TELECANOR.BO trades at ₹42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TELECANOR.BO's P/E ratio is -118.77. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TELECANOR.BO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to TELECANOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check TELECANOR.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs JUPITERIN.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, JUPITERIN.BO has a market cap of 430.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while JUPITERIN.BO trades at ₹42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas JUPITERIN.BO's P/E ratio is -24.12. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JUPITERIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to JUPITERIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check JUPITERIN.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs SAWABUSI.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, SAWABUSI.BO has a market cap of 377.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while SAWABUSI.BO trades at ₹0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas SAWABUSI.BO's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAWABUSI.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to SAWABUSI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check SAWABUSI.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs WESTLEIRES.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, WESTLEIRES.BO has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while WESTLEIRES.BO trades at ₹106.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas WESTLEIRES.BO's P/E ratio is -328.82. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WESTLEIRES.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to WESTLEIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check WESTLEIRES.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs TELESYS.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, TELESYS.BO has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while TELESYS.BO trades at ₹13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas TELESYS.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TELESYS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to TELESYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check TELESYS.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs KASHYAP.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, KASHYAP.BO has a market cap of 253.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while KASHYAP.BO trades at ₹5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas KASHYAP.BO's P/E ratio is -133.00. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KASHYAP.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to KASHYAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check KASHYAP.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs AHASOLAR.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, AHASOLAR.BO has a market cap of 246.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while AHASOLAR.BO trades at ₹78.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AHASOLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AHASOLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to AHASOLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check AHASOLAR.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs ERPSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, ERPSOFT.BO has a market cap of 234M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while ERPSOFT.BO trades at ₹62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas ERPSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 68.72. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ERPSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to ERPSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check ERPSOFT.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs CONTCHM.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, CONTCHM.BO has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while CONTCHM.BO trades at ₹78.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas CONTCHM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CONTCHM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to CONTCHM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check CONTCHM.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs COSYN.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, COSYN.BO has a market cap of 167.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while COSYN.BO trades at ₹22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas COSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 97.26. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to COSYN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to COSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check COSYN.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs IFINSER.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, IFINSER.BO has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while IFINSER.BO trades at ₹15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas IFINSER.BO's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IFINSER.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to IFINSER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check IFINSER.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs OTCO.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, OTCO.BO has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while OTCO.BO trades at ₹7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas OTCO.BO's P/E ratio is -46.81. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OTCO.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to OTCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check OTCO.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs MELSTAR.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, MELSTAR.NS has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while MELSTAR.NS trades at ₹4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MELSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MELSTAR.NS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to MELSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check MELSTAR.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs MAHAVEER.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, MAHAVEER.BO has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while MAHAVEER.BO trades at ₹9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MAHAVEER.BO's P/E ratio is -95.56. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAHAVEER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to MAHAVEER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check MAHAVEER.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs BGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, BGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while BGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas BGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BGLOBAL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to BGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check BGLOBAL.NS's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs VIRGOGLOB.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, VIRGOGLOB.BO has a market cap of 37.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while VIRGOGLOB.BO trades at ₹3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas VIRGOGLOB.BO's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIRGOGLOB.BO's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to VIRGOGLOB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check VIRGOGLOB.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs INTEGHIT.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, INTEGHIT.BO has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while INTEGHIT.BO trades at ₹3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas INTEGHIT.BO's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INTEGHIT.BO's ROE of -6.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to INTEGHIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check INTEGHIT.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs MELSTAR.BO Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, MELSTAR.BO has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while MELSTAR.BO trades at ₹4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas MELSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MELSTAR.BO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is less volatile compared to MELSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check MELSTAR.BO's competition here
CRANESSOFT.BO vs AGCNET.NS Comparison February 2026
CRANESSOFT.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRANESSOFT.BO stands at 696M. In comparison, AGCNET.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRANESSOFT.BO is priced at ₹4.48, while AGCNET.NS trades at ₹906.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRANESSOFT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.63, whereas AGCNET.NS's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGCNET.NS's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRANESSOFT.BO is more volatile compared to AGCNET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRANESSOFT.BO.Check AGCNET.NS's competition here