Charter Communications Inc

CQD.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQD.DE stands at 0. In comparison, 639.DE has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CQD.DE is priced at €313.35, while 639.DE trades at €549.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 639.DE's P/E ratio is 142.07. In terms of profitability, CQD.DE's ROE is +0.37%, compared to 639.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CQD.DE is less volatile compared to 639.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQD.DE.Check 639.DE's competition here

CQD.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQD.DE stands at 0. In comparison, ERT.DE has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CQD.DE is priced at €313.35, while ERT.DE trades at €134.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERT.DE's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, CQD.DE's ROE is +0.37%, compared to ERT.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CQD.DE is more volatile compared to ERT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQD.DE.Check ERT.DE's competition here

CQD.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQD.DE stands at 0. In comparison, 3LN.DE has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CQD.DE is priced at €313.35, while 3LN.DE trades at €144.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LN.DE's P/E ratio is -475.08. In terms of profitability, CQD.DE's ROE is +0.37%, compared to 3LN.DE's ROE of +11.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CQD.DE is more volatile compared to 3LN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQD.DE.Check 3LN.DE's competition here

CQD.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQD.DE stands at 0. In comparison, RDO.DE has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, CQD.DE is priced at €313.35, while RDO.DE trades at €4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDO.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQD.DE's ROE is +0.37%, compared to RDO.DE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CQD.DE is less volatile compared to RDO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQD.DE.Check RDO.DE's competition here

CQD.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQD.DE stands at 0. In comparison, WBAH.DE has a market cap of 684.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CQD.DE is priced at €313.35, while WBAH.DE trades at €28.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBAH.DE's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, CQD.DE's ROE is +0.37%, compared to WBAH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CQD.DE is more volatile compared to WBAH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQD.DE.Check WBAH.DE's competition here

CQD.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQD.DE stands at 0. In comparison, EMH.DE has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CQD.DE is priced at €313.35, while EMH.DE trades at €3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMH.DE's P/E ratio is -75.50. In terms of profitability, CQD.DE's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EMH.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CQD.DE is less volatile compared to EMH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQD.DE.Check EMH.DE's competition here

CQD.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQD.DE stands at 0. In comparison, AIY.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQD.DE is priced at €313.35, while AIY.DE trades at €89.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIY.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CQD.DE's ROE is +0.37%, compared to AIY.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CQD.DE is more volatile compared to AIY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQD.DE.Check AIY.DE's competition here

CQD.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQD.DE stands at 0. In comparison, EOT.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQD.DE is priced at €313.35, while EOT.DE trades at €18.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EOT.DE's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, CQD.DE's ROE is +0.37%, compared to EOT.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CQD.DE is less volatile compared to EOT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQD.DE.Check EOT.DE's competition here

CQD.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CQD.DE stands at 0. In comparison, DC6.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CQD.DE is priced at €313.35, while DC6.DE trades at €22.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CQD.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC6.DE's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, CQD.DE's ROE is +0.37%, compared to DC6.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CQD.DE is less volatile compared to DC6.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CQD.DE.Check DC6.DE's competition here