COPAM - Companhia Portuguesa de Amidos, S.A.

CPA.LS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.LS stands at 0. In comparison, RIN.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.LS is priced at €13.70, while RIN.PA trades at €63.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.32, whereas RIN.PA's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, CPA.LS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RIN.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.LS is less volatile compared to RIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.LS.

CPA.LS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.LS stands at 0. In comparison, SIP.BR has a market cap of 656.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.LS is priced at €13.70, while SIP.BR trades at €63.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.32, whereas SIP.BR's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, CPA.LS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIP.BR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.LS is less volatile compared to SIP.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.LS.

CPA.LS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.LS stands at 0. In comparison, OIZ.IR has a market cap of 397.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.LS is priced at €13.70, while OIZ.IR trades at €3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.32, whereas OIZ.IR's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, CPA.LS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OIZ.IR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.LS is less volatile compared to OIZ.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.LS.

CPA.LS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.LS stands at 0. In comparison, FFARM.AS has a market cap of 353.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.LS is priced at €13.70, while FFARM.AS trades at €4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.32, whereas FFARM.AS's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, CPA.LS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FFARM.AS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.LS is less volatile compared to FFARM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.LS.

CPA.LS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.LS stands at 0. In comparison, MLGDI.PA has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.LS is priced at €13.70, while MLGDI.PA trades at €0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.32, whereas MLGDI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CPA.LS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLGDI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.LS and MLGDI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CPA.LS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.LS stands at 0. In comparison, MLAAH.PA has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.LS is priced at €13.70, while MLAAH.PA trades at €0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.32, whereas MLAAH.PA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, CPA.LS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLAAH.PA's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.LS and MLAAH.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CPA.LS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.LS stands at 0. In comparison, DQ7A.IR has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.LS is priced at €13.70, while DQ7A.IR trades at €18.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.32, whereas DQ7A.IR's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, CPA.LS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DQ7A.IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.LS and DQ7A.IR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

CPA.LS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.LS stands at 0. In comparison, ALKKO.PA has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.LS is priced at €13.70, while ALKKO.PA trades at €0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.32, whereas ALKKO.PA's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, CPA.LS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALKKO.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.LS is less volatile compared to ALKKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.LS.

CPA.LS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.LS stands at 0. In comparison, ALAGR.PA has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.LS is priced at €13.70, while ALAGR.PA trades at €0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.32, whereas ALAGR.PA's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CPA.LS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALAGR.PA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.LS is less volatile compared to ALAGR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.LS.