Colgate-Palmolive Company

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, PRG.DE has a market cap of 306.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while PRG.DE trades at €131.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas PRG.DE's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to PRG.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to PRG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check PRG.DE's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, LOR.DE has a market cap of 199B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while LOR.DE trades at €374.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas LOR.DE's P/E ratio is 32.51. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to LOR.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to LOR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check LOR.DE's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, UNVB.DE has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while UNVB.DE trades at €51.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas UNVB.DE's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to UNVB.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is more volatile compared to UNVB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check UNVB.DE's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, 3RB.DE has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while 3RB.DE trades at €63.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas 3RB.DE's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to 3RB.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to 3RB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check 3RB.DE's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, KMY.DE has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while KMY.DE trades at €116.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas KMY.DE's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to KMY.DE's ROE of +2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to KMY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check KMY.DE's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, HEN3.DE has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while HEN3.DE trades at €67.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas HEN3.DE's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to HEN3.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to HEN3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check HEN3.DE's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, HEN3.F has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while HEN3.F trades at €67.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas HEN3.F's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to HEN3.F's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to HEN3.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check HEN3.F's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, HEN.DE has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while HEN.DE trades at €61.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas HEN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to HEN.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to HEN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check HEN.DE's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, BEI.DE has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while BEI.DE trades at €97.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas BEI.DE's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to BEI.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to BEI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check BEI.DE's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, CXU.DE has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while CXU.DE trades at €77.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas CXU.DE's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to CXU.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to CXU.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check CXU.DE's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, CO3A.DE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while CO3A.DE trades at €5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas CO3A.DE's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to CO3A.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to CO3A.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check CO3A.DE's competition here

CPA.DE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CPA.DE stands at 58.1B. In comparison, LEI.DE has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPA.DE is priced at €71.20, while LEI.DE trades at €14.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CPA.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 23.41, whereas LEI.DE's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, CPA.DE's ROE is +10.23%, compared to LEI.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPA.DE is less volatile compared to LEI.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPA.DE.Check LEI.DE's competition here