Core One Labs Inc.
Core One Labs Inc. (COOL.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (COOL.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COOL.CN | CA$0.15 | +0.00% | 6.8M | -1.32 | -CA$0.11 | N/A |
| BLU.TO | CA$19.48 | -0.10% | 2.5B | -20.29 | -CA$0.96 | N/A |
| MMED.NE | CA$14.90 | +9.48% | 1.1B | -4.50 | -CA$3.31 | N/A |
| DRUG.CN | CA$58.56 | -2.43% | 414.8M | -42.74 | -CA$1.37 | N/A |
| FRX.TO | CA$12.16 | +1.84% | 334.1M | -19.61 | -CA$0.62 | N/A |
| EPRX.TO | CA$7.20 | -1.77% | 258.8M | -6.05 | -CA$1.19 | N/A |
| CYBN.NE | CA$10.07 | +2.23% | 237.6M | -1.64 | -CA$6.15 | N/A |
| BCT.TO | CA$10.41 | +9.58% | 182.7M | -0.10 | -CA$106.70 | N/A |
| ONC.TO | CA$1.42 | +2.16% | 142.3M | -3.84 | -CA$0.37 | N/A |
| HBP.TO | CA$1.47 | +8.89% | 109M | -1.43 | -CA$1.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
COOL.CN vs BLU.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BLU.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BLU.TO trades at CA$19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas BLU.TO's P/E ratio is -20.29. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to BLU.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to BLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check BLU.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs MMED.NE Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MMED.NE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MMED.NE trades at CA$14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas MMED.NE's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to MMED.NE's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to MMED.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check MMED.NE's competition here
COOL.CN vs DRUG.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, DRUG.CN has a market cap of 414.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while DRUG.CN trades at CA$58.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas DRUG.CN's P/E ratio is -42.74. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to DRUG.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to DRUG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check DRUG.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs FRX.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, FRX.TO has a market cap of 334.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while FRX.TO trades at CA$12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas FRX.TO's P/E ratio is -19.61. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to FRX.TO's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to FRX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check FRX.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs EPRX.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, EPRX.TO has a market cap of 258.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while EPRX.TO trades at CA$7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas EPRX.TO's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to EPRX.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to EPRX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check EPRX.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs CYBN.NE Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CYBN.NE has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CYBN.NE trades at CA$10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas CYBN.NE's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to CYBN.NE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to CYBN.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check CYBN.NE's competition here
COOL.CN vs BCT.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BCT.TO has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BCT.TO trades at CA$10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas BCT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to BCT.TO's ROE of -4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to BCT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check BCT.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs ONC.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ONC.TO has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ONC.TO trades at CA$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas ONC.TO's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to ONC.TO's ROE of -4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to ONC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check ONC.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs HBP.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, HBP.TO has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while HBP.TO trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas HBP.TO's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to HBP.TO's ROE of +13.32%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to HBP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check HBP.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs MSCL.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MSCL.TO has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MSCL.TO trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas MSCL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to MSCL.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to MSCL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check MSCL.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs MDNA.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MDNA.TO has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MDNA.TO trades at CA$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas MDNA.TO's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to MDNA.TO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to MDNA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check MDNA.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs MSET.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MSET.CN has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MSET.CN trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas MSET.CN's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to MSET.CN's ROE of -3.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. COOL.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and MSET.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check MSET.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs ONCO.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ONCO.CN has a market cap of 63.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ONCO.CN trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas ONCO.CN's P/E ratio is -147.00. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to ONCO.CN's ROE of -3.52%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and ONCO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ONCO.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs SVA.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, SVA.TO has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while SVA.TO trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas SVA.TO's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to SVA.TO's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to SVA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check SVA.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs PMN.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, PMN.TO has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PMN.TO trades at CA$6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas PMN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to PMN.TO's ROE of -5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to PMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check PMN.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs IGX.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, IGX.TO has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while IGX.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas IGX.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to IGX.TO's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to IGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check IGX.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs DTC.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, DTC.CN has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while DTC.CN trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas DTC.CN's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to DTC.CN's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to DTC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check DTC.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs GLAB.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, GLAB.CN has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while GLAB.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas GLAB.CN's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to GLAB.CN's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to GLAB.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check GLAB.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs PHRM.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, PHRM.CN has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PHRM.CN trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas PHRM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to PHRM.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to PHRM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check PHRM.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs MBX.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MBX.TO has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MBX.TO trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas MBX.TO's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to MBX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to MBX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check MBX.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs RVX.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, RVX.TO has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while RVX.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas RVX.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to RVX.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and RVX.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RVX.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs AEZS.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, AEZS.TO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while AEZS.TO trades at CA$8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas AEZS.TO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to AEZS.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to AEZS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check AEZS.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs DOSE.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, DOSE.CN has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while DOSE.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas DOSE.CN's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to DOSE.CN's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to DOSE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check DOSE.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs PREV.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, PREV.CN has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while PREV.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas PREV.CN's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to PREV.CN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and PREV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PREV.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs REUN.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, REUN.TO has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while REUN.TO trades at CA$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas REUN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to REUN.TO's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to REUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check REUN.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs TELI.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, TELI.CN has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TELI.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas TELI.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to TELI.CN's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to TELI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check TELI.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs MDMA.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MDMA.CN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MDMA.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas MDMA.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to MDMA.CN's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to MDMA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check MDMA.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs IMV.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, IMV.TO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while IMV.TO trades at CA$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas IMV.TO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to IMV.TO's ROE of -4.95%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to IMV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check IMV.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs BETR.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BETR.CN has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BETR.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas BETR.CN's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to BETR.CN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and BETR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BETR.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs BLAB.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BLAB.CN has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BLAB.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas BLAB.CN's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to BLAB.CN's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and BLAB.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLAB.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs GLOW.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, GLOW.CN has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while GLOW.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas GLOW.CN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to GLOW.CN's ROE of +296.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to GLOW.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check GLOW.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs TBP.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, TBP.TO has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TBP.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas TBP.TO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to TBP.TO's ROE of -4.68%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and TBP.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBP.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs BIOV.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BIOV.CN has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BIOV.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas BIOV.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to BIOV.CN's ROE of +3.80%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to BIOV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check BIOV.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs MCUR.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MCUR.CN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MCUR.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas MCUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to MCUR.CN's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and MCUR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCUR.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs TRYP.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, TRYP.CN has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TRYP.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas TRYP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to TRYP.CN's ROE of +4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and TRYP.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRYP.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs ASEP.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ASEP.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ASEP.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas ASEP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to ASEP.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and ASEP.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASEP.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs CMND.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CMND.CN has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CMND.CN trades at CA$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas CMND.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to CMND.CN's ROE of +44.20%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and CMND.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMND.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs GTTX.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, GTTX.CN has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while GTTX.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas GTTX.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to GTTX.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and GTTX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTTX.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs APS.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, APS.TO has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while APS.TO trades at CA$1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas APS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to APS.TO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to APS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check APS.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs AWKN.NE Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, AWKN.NE has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while AWKN.NE trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas AWKN.NE's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to AWKN.NE's ROE of -4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and AWKN.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AWKN.NE's competition here
COOL.CN vs MYND.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MYND.CN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MYND.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas MYND.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to MYND.CN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to MYND.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check MYND.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs IPCI.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, IPCI.TO has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while IPCI.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas IPCI.TO's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to IPCI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to IPCI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check IPCI.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs MOOD.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, MOOD.CN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while MOOD.CN trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas MOOD.CN's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to MOOD.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and MOOD.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MOOD.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs APLI.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, APLI.TO has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while APLI.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas APLI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to APLI.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and APLI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APLI.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs AGN.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, AGN.CN has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while AGN.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas AGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to AGN.CN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to AGN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check AGN.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs BRAX.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, BRAX.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while BRAX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas BRAX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to BRAX.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and BRAX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRAX.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs ENBI.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ENBI.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ENBI.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas ENBI.CN's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to ENBI.CN's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and ENBI.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENBI.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs HAVN.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, HAVN.CN has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while HAVN.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas HAVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to HAVN.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and HAVN.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAVN.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs LEXT.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, LEXT.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while LEXT.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas LEXT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to LEXT.CN's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and LEXT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LEXT.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs CHGX.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CHGX.CN has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CHGX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas CHGX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to CHGX.CN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and CHGX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHGX.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs CURE.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, CURE.CN has a market cap of 408K. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while CURE.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas CURE.CN's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to CURE.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and CURE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CURE.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs NIRV.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, NIRV.CN has a market cap of 385.9K. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NIRV.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas NIRV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to NIRV.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to NIRV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check NIRV.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs ABRT.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, ABRT.CN has a market cap of 372.1K. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while ABRT.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas ABRT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to ABRT.CN's ROE of +16.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and ABRT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABRT.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs WBIO.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, WBIO.CN has a market cap of 324.8K. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while WBIO.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas WBIO.CN's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to WBIO.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and WBIO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WBIO.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs NSHS.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, NSHS.CN has a market cap of 308.3K. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NSHS.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas NSHS.CN's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to NSHS.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and NSHS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSHS.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs NOVA.CN Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, NOVA.CN has a market cap of 148.3K. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while NOVA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas NOVA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to NOVA.CN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN and NOVA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOVA.CN's competition here
COOL.CN vs TRIL.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, TRIL.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while TRIL.TO trades at CA$23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas TRIL.TO's P/E ratio is -34.06. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to TRIL.TO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to TRIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check TRIL.TO's competition here
COOL.CN vs IN.TO Comparison August 2025
COOL.CN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COOL.CN stands at 6.8M. In comparison, IN.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COOL.CN is priced at CA$0.15, while IN.TO trades at CA$4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COOL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas IN.TO's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, COOL.CN's ROE is -2.90%, compared to IN.TO's ROE of -175.73%. Regarding short-term risk, COOL.CN is less volatile compared to IN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COOL.CN.Check IN.TO's competition here