Control Print Limited
Control Print Limited (CONTROLPR.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CONTROLPR.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Business Equipment & Supplies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTROLPR.NS | ₹650.10 | +1.22% | 10.6B | 10.71 | ₹61.93 | +1.51% |
| DOMS.NS | ₹2,408.60 | +1.41% | 145.4B | 65.51 | ₹36.58 | +0.13% |
| DOMS.BO | ₹2,412.65 | +1.56% | 145.2B | 65.54 | ₹36.51 | +0.13% |
| FLAIR.BO | ₹315.80 | +1.89% | 32.2B | 23.86 | ₹12.81 | +0.66% |
| FLAIR.NS | ₹316.45 | +2.79% | 32.1B | 23.81 | ₹12.81 | +0.66% |
| CONTROLPR.BO | ₹649.00 | +0.65% | 10.6B | 10.71 | ₹61.93 | +1.51% |
| KOKUYOCMLN.BO | ₹85.25 | +4.45% | 8.1B | 30.87 | ₹2.62 | N/A |
| KOKUYOCMLN.NS | ₹85.36 | +4.43% | 8.1B | 30.84 | ₹2.62 | N/A |
| LINC.BO | ₹99.02 | -2.98% | 6B | 17.28 | ₹5.79 | +1.50% |
| LINC.NS | ₹99.06 | -1.28% | 5.9B | 17.23 | ₹5.79 | +1.50% |
Stock Comparison
CONTROLPR.NS vs DOMS.NS Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, DOMS.NS has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while DOMS.NS trades at ₹2,408.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas DOMS.NS's P/E ratio is 65.51. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DOMS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is more volatile compared to DOMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check DOMS.NS's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs DOMS.BO Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, DOMS.BO has a market cap of 145.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while DOMS.BO trades at ₹2,412.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas DOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 65.54. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DOMS.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is more volatile compared to DOMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check DOMS.BO's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs FLAIR.BO Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FLAIR.BO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while FLAIR.BO trades at ₹315.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FLAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLAIR.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is less volatile compared to FLAIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check FLAIR.BO's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs FLAIR.NS Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FLAIR.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while FLAIR.NS trades at ₹316.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas FLAIR.NS's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLAIR.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is more volatile compared to FLAIR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check FLAIR.NS's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs CONTROLPR.BO Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CONTROLPR.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while CONTROLPR.BO trades at ₹649.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CONTROLPR.BO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CONTROLPR.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is less volatile compared to CONTROLPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check CONTROLPR.BO's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs KOKUYOCMLN.BO Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, KOKUYOCMLN.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while KOKUYOCMLN.BO trades at ₹85.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas KOKUYOCMLN.BO's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOKUYOCMLN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is less volatile compared to KOKUYOCMLN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check KOKUYOCMLN.BO's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs KOKUYOCMLN.NS Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, KOKUYOCMLN.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while KOKUYOCMLN.NS trades at ₹85.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas KOKUYOCMLN.NS's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOKUYOCMLN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is less volatile compared to KOKUYOCMLN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check KOKUYOCMLN.NS's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs LINC.BO Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LINC.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while LINC.BO trades at ₹99.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas LINC.BO's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LINC.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is more volatile compared to LINC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check LINC.BO's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs LINC.NS Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LINC.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while LINC.NS trades at ₹99.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas LINC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.23. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LINC.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is more volatile compared to LINC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check LINC.NS's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs SEJAL.BO Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SEJAL.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while SEJAL.BO trades at ₹307.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas SEJAL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SEJAL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is more volatile compared to SEJAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check SEJAL.BO's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs TRANSTEEL.NS Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TRANSTEEL.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while TRANSTEEL.NS trades at ₹149.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas TRANSTEEL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRANSTEEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is more volatile compared to TRANSTEEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check TRANSTEEL.NS's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs NAMAN.NS Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NAMAN.NS has a market cap of 716M. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while NAMAN.NS trades at ₹55.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas NAMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NAMAN.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is less volatile compared to NAMAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check NAMAN.NS's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs OMFURN.NS Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, OMFURN.NS has a market cap of 657M. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while OMFURN.NS trades at ₹63.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas OMFURN.NS's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OMFURN.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is less volatile compared to OMFURN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check OMFURN.NS's competition here
CONTROLPR.NS vs MOHITPPR.BO Comparison April 2026
CONTROLPR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CONTROLPR.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MOHITPPR.BO has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONTROLPR.NS is priced at ₹650.10, while MOHITPPR.BO trades at ₹29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CONTROLPR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas MOHITPPR.BO's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, CONTROLPR.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MOHITPPR.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONTROLPR.NS is less volatile compared to MOHITPPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONTROLPR.NS.Check MOHITPPR.BO's competition here