Constronics Infra Ltd.

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, AEGISLOG.BO has a market cap of 255.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while AEGISLOG.BO trades at ₹696.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas AEGISLOG.BO's P/E ratio is 33.18. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEGISLOG.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to AEGISLOG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check AEGISLOG.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, LLOYDSENT.BO has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while LLOYDSENT.BO trades at ₹53.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas LLOYDSENT.BO's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LLOYDSENT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check LLOYDSENT.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SGMART.NS has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SGMART.NS trades at ₹445.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SGMART.NS's P/E ratio is 51.80. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGMART.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SGMART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SGMART.NS's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, EFCIL.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while EFCIL.BO trades at ₹223.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas EFCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EFCIL.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to EFCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check EFCIL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, VINCOFE.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while VINCOFE.BO trades at ₹150.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas VINCOFE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VINCOFE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to VINCOFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check VINCOFE.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, KHAZANCHI.BO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while KHAZANCHI.BO trades at ₹767.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas KHAZANCHI.BO's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHAZANCHI.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to KHAZANCHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check KHAZANCHI.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, TCC.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while TCC.BO trades at ₹460.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas TCC.BO's P/E ratio is 39.56. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to TCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check TCC.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, CROPSTER.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while CROPSTER.BO trades at ₹11.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas CROPSTER.BO's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CROPSTER.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to CROPSTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check CROPSTER.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, YSL.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while YSL.BO trades at ₹29,001.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas YSL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YSL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to YSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check YSL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, MERCURYEV.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while MERCURYEV.BO trades at ₹33.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas MERCURYEV.BO's P/E ratio is 79.28. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MERCURYEV.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to MERCURYEV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check MERCURYEV.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, VERITAS.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while VERITAS.BO trades at ₹172.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas VERITAS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERITAS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to VERITAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check VERITAS.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, EUROASIA.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while EUROASIA.BO trades at ₹306.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas EUROASIA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EUROASIA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to EUROASIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check EUROASIA.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, BLACKROSE.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while BLACKROSE.BO trades at ₹81.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas BLACKROSE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.71. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BLACKROSE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to BLACKROSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check BLACKROSE.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SWISSMLTRY.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SWISSMLTRY.BO trades at ₹16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SWISSMLTRY.BO's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWISSMLTRY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SWISSMLTRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SWISSMLTRY.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, AERPACE.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while AERPACE.BO trades at ₹24.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas AERPACE.BO's P/E ratio is -38.06. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AERPACE.BO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to AERPACE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check AERPACE.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SRD.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SRD.BO trades at ₹51.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SRD.BO's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SRD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SRD.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, MARBLE.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while MARBLE.BO trades at ₹102.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas MARBLE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MARBLE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to MARBLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check MARBLE.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, WARDWIZFBL.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while WARDWIZFBL.BO trades at ₹8.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas WARDWIZFBL.BO's P/E ratio is -53.25. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WARDWIZFBL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to WARDWIZFBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check WARDWIZFBL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SICAGEN.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SICAGEN.BO trades at ₹53.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SICAGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SICAGEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SICAGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SICAGEN.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, ABANSENT.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while ABANSENT.BO trades at ₹24.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ABANSENT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABANSENT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to ABANSENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check ABANSENT.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, PARSHVA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while PARSHVA.BO trades at ₹157.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas PARSHVA.BO's P/E ratio is 815.00. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PARSHVA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to PARSHVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check PARSHVA.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SAMOR.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SAMOR.BO trades at ₹71.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SAMOR.BO's P/E ratio is 143.75. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAMOR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SAMOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SAMOR.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, METROGLOBL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while METROGLOBL.BO trades at ₹115.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas METROGLOBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to METROGLOBL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to METROGLOBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check METROGLOBL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SEML.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SEML.BO trades at ₹83.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SEML.BO's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEML.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SEML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SEML.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, MAXIMUS.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while MAXIMUS.BO trades at ₹9.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas MAXIMUS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAXIMUS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to MAXIMUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check MAXIMUS.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, CHANDRIMA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while CHANDRIMA.BO trades at ₹6.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas CHANDRIMA.BO's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHANDRIMA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to CHANDRIMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check CHANDRIMA.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, ISHANCH.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while ISHANCH.BO trades at ₹59.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ISHANCH.BO's P/E ratio is -29.19. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISHANCH.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to ISHANCH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check ISHANCH.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, DHOOTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while DHOOTIN.BO trades at ₹204.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas DHOOTIN.BO's P/E ratio is -75.52. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DHOOTIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to DHOOTIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check DHOOTIN.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, PURVFLEXI.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while PURVFLEXI.NS trades at ₹58.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas PURVFLEXI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PURVFLEXI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to PURVFLEXI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check PURVFLEXI.NS's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, BNL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while BNL.BO trades at ₹118.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas BNL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BNL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to BNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check BNL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SANINFRA.BO trades at ₹6.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 67.60. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SANINFRA.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, OPTIFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while OPTIFIN.BO trades at ₹14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas OPTIFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPTIFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to OPTIFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check OPTIFIN.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, MENAMANI.BO has a market cap of 943.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while MENAMANI.BO trades at ₹9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas MENAMANI.BO's P/E ratio is -235.00. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MENAMANI.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to MENAMANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check MENAMANI.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, MRCAGRO.BO has a market cap of 940.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while MRCAGRO.BO trades at ₹46.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas MRCAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 97.64. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRCAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to MRCAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check MRCAGRO.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, GEL.BO has a market cap of 887.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while GEL.BO trades at ₹288.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas GEL.BO's P/E ratio is 993.10. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to GEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check GEL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, INDXTRA.BO has a market cap of 863.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while INDXTRA.BO trades at ₹6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas INDXTRA.BO's P/E ratio is -38.94. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDXTRA.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to INDXTRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check INDXTRA.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, RAFL.BO has a market cap of 774.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while RAFL.BO trades at ₹65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas RAFL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to RAFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check RAFL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, KTIL.BO has a market cap of 731.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while KTIL.BO trades at ₹66.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas KTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KTIL.BO's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to KTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check KTIL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, HRYNSHP.BO has a market cap of 691M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while HRYNSHP.BO trades at ₹111.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas HRYNSHP.BO's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HRYNSHP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to HRYNSHP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check HRYNSHP.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, MYSORPETRO.BO has a market cap of 639.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while MYSORPETRO.BO trades at ₹95.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas MYSORPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -18.26. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MYSORPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to MYSORPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check MYSORPETRO.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, MISHKA.BO has a market cap of 586.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while MISHKA.BO trades at ₹40.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas MISHKA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.86. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MISHKA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to MISHKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check MISHKA.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, NVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 568.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while NVENTURES.BO trades at ₹127.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas NVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 234.23. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to NVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check NVENTURES.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, IFL.BO has a market cap of 560.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while IFL.BO trades at ₹0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas IFL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to IFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check IFL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, RONI.BO has a market cap of 544.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while RONI.BO trades at ₹46.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas RONI.BO's P/E ratio is 68.70. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RONI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to RONI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check RONI.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, PALCO.BO has a market cap of 467M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while PALCO.BO trades at ₹118.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas PALCO.BO's P/E ratio is -29.11. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PALCO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to PALCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check PALCO.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SSTL.BO has a market cap of 459.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SSTL.BO trades at ₹18.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SSTL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSTL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SSTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SSTL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, TAVERNIER.BO has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while TAVERNIER.BO trades at ₹94.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas TAVERNIER.BO's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TAVERNIER.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to TAVERNIER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check TAVERNIER.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, VEL.BO has a market cap of 404M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while VEL.BO trades at ₹46.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas VEL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEL.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to VEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check VEL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, AAPLUSTRAD.BO has a market cap of 347.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while AAPLUSTRAD.BO trades at ₹1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas AAPLUSTRAD.BO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAPLUSTRAD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to AAPLUSTRAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check AAPLUSTRAD.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, ACEMEN.BO has a market cap of 328.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while ACEMEN.BO trades at ₹100.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ACEMEN.BO's P/E ratio is 5172.50. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACEMEN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to ACEMEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check ACEMEN.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, CCAL.BO has a market cap of 307.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while CCAL.BO trades at ₹18.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas CCAL.BO's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCAL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to CCAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check CCAL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, YASHINNO.BO has a market cap of 296.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while YASHINNO.BO trades at ₹45.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas YASHINNO.BO's P/E ratio is 4398.00. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YASHINNO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to YASHINNO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check YASHINNO.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SANBLUE.BO has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SANBLUE.BO trades at ₹40.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SANBLUE.BO's P/E ratio is 82.12. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SANBLUE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SANBLUE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SANBLUE.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, OPCHAINS.BO has a market cap of 212.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while OPCHAINS.BO trades at ₹31.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas OPCHAINS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPCHAINS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to OPCHAINS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check OPCHAINS.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, TTIL.BO has a market cap of 208M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while TTIL.BO trades at ₹8.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas TTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TTIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to TTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check TTIL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, PRADHIN.BO has a market cap of 203M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while PRADHIN.BO trades at ₹0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas PRADHIN.BO's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRADHIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to PRADHIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check PRADHIN.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SRUSTEELS.BO has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SRUSTEELS.BO trades at ₹3.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SRUSTEELS.BO's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRUSTEELS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SRUSTEELS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SRUSTEELS.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, TAIIND.BO has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while TAIIND.BO trades at ₹29.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas TAIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 383.25. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TAIIND.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to TAIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check TAIIND.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, RAWEDGE.BO has a market cap of 181M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while RAWEDGE.BO trades at ₹17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas RAWEDGE.BO's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAWEDGE.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to RAWEDGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check RAWEDGE.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, NEERAJ.BO has a market cap of 178.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while NEERAJ.BO trades at ₹16.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas NEERAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 147.73. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEERAJ.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to NEERAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check NEERAJ.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, PANTH.BO has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while PANTH.BO trades at ₹7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas PANTH.BO's P/E ratio is 1.52. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PANTH.BO's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to PANTH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check PANTH.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, NIVAKA.BO has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while NIVAKA.BO trades at ₹1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas NIVAKA.BO's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIVAKA.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to NIVAKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check NIVAKA.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, RAMAPETRO.BO has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while RAMAPETRO.BO trades at ₹14.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas RAMAPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAMAPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to RAMAPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check RAMAPETRO.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SAENTER.BO has a market cap of 146.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SAENTER.BO trades at ₹35.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SAENTER.BO's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAENTER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SAENTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SAENTER.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, FRONTCORP.BO has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while FRONTCORP.BO trades at ₹30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas FRONTCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -17.79. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRONTCORP.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to FRONTCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check FRONTCORP.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, MULLER.BO has a market cap of 140.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while MULLER.BO trades at ₹225.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas MULLER.BO's P/E ratio is 178.57. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MULLER.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to MULLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check MULLER.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, REETECH.BO has a market cap of 139.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while REETECH.BO trades at ₹33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas REETECH.BO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REETECH.BO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to REETECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check REETECH.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, GANONPRO.BO has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while GANONPRO.BO trades at ₹15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas GANONPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 56.46. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GANONPRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to GANONPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check GANONPRO.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, ALCHCORP.BO has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while ALCHCORP.BO trades at ₹27.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ALCHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALCHCORP.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to ALCHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check ALCHCORP.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SIBARAUT.BO has a market cap of 127.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SIBARAUT.BO trades at ₹7.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SIBARAUT.BO's P/E ratio is -24.09. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIBARAUT.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SIBARAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SIBARAUT.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, COMPUPN.BO has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while COMPUPN.BO trades at ₹4.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas COMPUPN.BO's P/E ratio is -69.17. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMPUPN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to COMPUPN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check COMPUPN.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, PMTELELIN.BO has a market cap of 117.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while PMTELELIN.BO trades at ₹11.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas PMTELELIN.BO's P/E ratio is -193.67. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMTELELIN.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to PMTELELIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check PMTELELIN.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, PANKAJPIYUS.BO has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while PANKAJPIYUS.BO trades at ₹284.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas PANKAJPIYUS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PANKAJPIYUS.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to PANKAJPIYUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check PANKAJPIYUS.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, AIHL.BO has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while AIHL.BO trades at ₹47.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas AIHL.BO's P/E ratio is 191.96. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIHL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to AIHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check AIHL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, 7NR.BO has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while 7NR.BO trades at ₹3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas 7NR.BO's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 7NR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to 7NR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check 7NR.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, ELEFLOR.BO has a market cap of 99.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while ELEFLOR.BO trades at ₹4.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ELEFLOR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELEFLOR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to ELEFLOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check ELEFLOR.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, KONNDOR.BO has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while KONNDOR.BO trades at ₹17.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas KONNDOR.BO's P/E ratio is -287.00. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KONNDOR.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to KONNDOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check KONNDOR.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, DEVINE.BO has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while DEVINE.BO trades at ₹9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas DEVINE.BO's P/E ratio is 331.67. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DEVINE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to DEVINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check DEVINE.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, FRASER.BO has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while FRASER.BO trades at ₹10.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas FRASER.BO's P/E ratio is -9.71. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRASER.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to FRASER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check FRASER.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, PARKERAC.BO has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while PARKERAC.BO trades at ₹16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas PARKERAC.BO's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PARKERAC.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to PARKERAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check PARKERAC.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, AMANAYA.BO has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while AMANAYA.BO trades at ₹20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas AMANAYA.BO's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMANAYA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to AMANAYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check AMANAYA.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, ROJL.BO has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while ROJL.BO trades at ₹1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ROJL.BO's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROJL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to ROJL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check ROJL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, FLORACORP.BO has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while FLORACORP.BO trades at ₹7.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas FLORACORP.BO's P/E ratio is -45.83. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLORACORP.BO's ROE of -5.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to FLORACORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check FLORACORP.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, TRIVENIENT.BO has a market cap of 68.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while TRIVENIENT.BO trades at ₹1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas TRIVENIENT.BO's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRIVENIENT.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to TRIVENIENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check TRIVENIENT.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SAICOM.BO has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SAICOM.BO trades at ₹0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SAICOM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAICOM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SAICOM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SAICOM.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, ENTRINT.BO has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while ENTRINT.BO trades at ₹21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ENTRINT.BO's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENTRINT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to ENTRINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check ENTRINT.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, AMITINT.BO has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while AMITINT.BO trades at ₹3.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas AMITINT.BO's P/E ratio is 36.22. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMITINT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to AMITINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check AMITINT.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, PADMAIND.BO has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while PADMAIND.BO trades at ₹9.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas PADMAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 77.62. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PADMAIND.BO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to PADMAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check PADMAIND.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, UTLINDS.BO has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while UTLINDS.BO trades at ₹1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas UTLINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 88.50. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UTLINDS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to UTLINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check UTLINDS.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, NAKSH.BO has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while NAKSH.BO trades at ₹5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas NAKSH.BO's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAKSH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to NAKSH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check NAKSH.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, WWALUM.BO has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while WWALUM.BO trades at ₹16.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas WWALUM.BO's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WWALUM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to WWALUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check WWALUM.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, DITCO.BO has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while DITCO.BO trades at ₹15.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas DITCO.BO's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DITCO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to DITCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check DITCO.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, ASHAI.BO has a market cap of 50.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while ASHAI.BO trades at ₹10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ASHAI.BO's P/E ratio is 68.75. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASHAI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to ASHAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check ASHAI.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, PATRON.BO has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while PATRON.BO trades at ₹2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas PATRON.BO's P/E ratio is 53.25. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PATRON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to PATRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check PATRON.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, VOLLF.BO has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while VOLLF.BO trades at ₹11.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas VOLLF.BO's P/E ratio is -12.15. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOLLF.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to VOLLF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check VOLLF.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SIMPLXPAP.BO has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SIMPLXPAP.BO trades at ₹1,448.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SIMPLXPAP.BO's P/E ratio is -32.99. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIMPLXPAP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to SIMPLXPAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check SIMPLXPAP.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, WOMENNET.BO has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while WOMENNET.BO trades at ₹7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas WOMENNET.BO's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOMENNET.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to WOMENNET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check WOMENNET.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, TSPIRITUAL.BO has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while TSPIRITUAL.BO trades at ₹1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas TSPIRITUAL.BO's P/E ratio is -17.89. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSPIRITUAL.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CONSTRONIC.BO is more volatile compared to TSPIRITUAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CONSTRONIC.BO.Check TSPIRITUAL.BO's competition here

CONSTRONIC.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CONSTRONIC.BO stands at 626.5M. In comparison, SURANATP.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CONSTRONIC.BO is priced at ₹50.98, while SURANATP.BO trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CONSTRONIC.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SURANATP.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CONSTRONIC.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SURANATP.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CONSTRONIC.BO has daily volatility of 15.63 and SURANATP.BO has daily volatility of N/A.Check SURANATP.BO's competition here