Coca-Cola Co

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 416.7B. In comparison, PRMW.TO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at CA$24.78, while PRMW.TO trades at CA$37.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.06, whereas PRMW.TO's P/E ratio is 52.68. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PRMW.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is less volatile compared to PRMW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.Check PRMW.TO's competition here

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 416.7B. In comparison, LAS-A.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at CA$24.78, while LAS-A.TO trades at CA$213.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.06, whereas LAS-A.TO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LAS-A.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is less volatile compared to LAS-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.Check LAS-A.TO's competition here

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 416.7B. In comparison, GURU.TO has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at CA$24.78, while GURU.TO trades at CA$1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.06, whereas GURU.TO's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GURU.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is less volatile compared to GURU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.Check GURU.TO's competition here

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 416.7B. In comparison, WTER.CN has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at CA$24.78, while WTER.CN trades at CA$0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.06, whereas WTER.CN's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WTER.CN's ROE of -6.88%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is more volatile compared to WTER.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.Check WTER.CN's competition here

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 416.7B. In comparison, JSDA.CN has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at CA$24.78, while JSDA.CN trades at CA$0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.06, whereas JSDA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JSDA.CN's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is more volatile compared to JSDA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.Check JSDA.CN's competition here

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 416.7B. In comparison, BEV.CN has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at CA$24.78, while BEV.CN trades at CA$0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.06, whereas BEV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BEV.CN's ROE of +10.33%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is more volatile compared to BEV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.Check BEV.CN's competition here

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 416.7B. In comparison, FLOW.TO has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at CA$24.78, while FLOW.TO trades at CA$0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.06, whereas FLOW.TO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FLOW.TO's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is less volatile compared to FLOW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.Check FLOW.TO's competition here

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 416.7B. In comparison, NEVI.CN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at CA$24.78, while NEVI.CN trades at CA$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.06, whereas NEVI.CN's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NEVI.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is more volatile compared to NEVI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.Check NEVI.CN's competition here

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 416.7B. In comparison, MILK.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at CA$24.78, while MILK.CN trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.06, whereas MILK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MILK.CN's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is more volatile compared to MILK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.Check MILK.CN's competition here