Coca-Cola Co

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 417.49B. In comparison, PRMW.TO has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at $24.97, while PRMW.TO trades at $37.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas PRMW.TO's P/E ratio is 52.68. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PRMW.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is less volatile compared to PRMW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 417.49B. In comparison, LAS-A.TO has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at $24.97, while LAS-A.TO trades at $215.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas LAS-A.TO's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LAS-A.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is less volatile compared to LAS-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 417.49B. In comparison, GURU.TO has a market cap of 57.44M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at $24.97, while GURU.TO trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas GURU.TO's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GURU.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is less volatile compared to GURU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 417.49B. In comparison, WTER.CN has a market cap of 32.63M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at $24.97, while WTER.CN trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas WTER.CN's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to WTER.CN's ROE of -6.88%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is more volatile compared to WTER.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 417.49B. In comparison, JSDA.CN has a market cap of 27.66M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at $24.97, while JSDA.CN trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas JSDA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JSDA.CN's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is less volatile compared to JSDA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 417.49B. In comparison, BEV.CN has a market cap of 10.89M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at $24.97, while BEV.CN trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas BEV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BEV.CN's ROE of +11.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is more volatile compared to BEV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 417.49B. In comparison, FLOW.TO has a market cap of 5.63M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at $24.97, while FLOW.TO trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas FLOW.TO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to FLOW.TO's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is less volatile compared to FLOW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 417.49B. In comparison, NEVI.CN has a market cap of 1.98M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at $24.97, while NEVI.CN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas NEVI.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NEVI.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is more volatile compared to NEVI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.

COLA.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, COLA.NE stands at 417.49B. In comparison, MILK.CN has a market cap of 1.40M. Regarding current trading prices, COLA.NE is priced at $24.97, while MILK.CN trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

COLA.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 27.44, whereas MILK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, COLA.NE's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MILK.CN's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, COLA.NE is more volatile compared to MILK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COLA.NE.