Cypher Metaverse Inc.
Cypher Metaverse Inc. CODE.CN Peers
See (CODE.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CODE.CN | $1.20 | N/A | 4.7M | -1.62 | -$0.74 | N/A |
| GS.NE | $30.25 | +2.65% | 261.5B | 13.94 | $2.17 | +2.72% |
| GLXY.TO | $31.60 | +0.38% | 11B | 41.58 | $0.76 | N/A |
| HUT.TO | $23.27 | +1.84% | 2.4B | -25.57 | -$0.91 | N/A |
| DEFI.NE | $5.04 | +1.41% | 1.6B | 100.80 | $0.05 | N/A |
| CF-PC.TO | $22.65 | +0.80% | 983.3M | 10.49 | $2.16 | +3.61% |
| CF.TO | $9.48 | -1.15% | 972M | -26.33 | -$0.36 | +3.61% |
| BITF.TO | $1.47 | +1.38% | 817.3M | -5.88 | -$0.25 | N/A |
| HODL.CN | $3.70 | -2.12% | 566.7M | 92.50 | $0.04 | N/A |
| PNP.TO | $19.59 | +1.03% | 183.9M | 5.76 | $3.40 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CODE.CN vs GS.NE Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 261.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while GS.NE trades at $30.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs GLXY.TO Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while GLXY.TO trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is 41.58. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs HUT.TO Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while HUT.TO trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is -25.57. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs DEFI.NE Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while DEFI.NE trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is 100.80. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs CF-PC.TO Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 983.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while CF-PC.TO trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and CF-PC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CODE.CN vs CF.TO Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 972M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while CF.TO trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -26.33. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs BITF.TO Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 817.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while BITF.TO trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs HODL.CN Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 566.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while HODL.CN trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is 92.50. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs PNP.TO Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while PNP.TO trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs RICH.CN Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while RICH.CN trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and RICH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CODE.CN vs CXI.TO Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while CXI.TO trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 40.78. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and CXI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CODE.CN vs XAU.TO Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while XAU.TO trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs BIGG.CN Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while BIGG.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs FRNT.V Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while FRNT.V trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to FRNT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs BTC.CN Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while BTC.CN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs HOLD.NE Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while HOLD.NE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and HOLD.NE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CODE.CN vs SIX.CN Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SIX.CN has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while SIX.CN trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SIX.CN's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SIX.CN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and SIX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CODE.CN vs SPIR.CN Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while SPIR.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to SPIR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs ARM.CN Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ARM.CN has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while ARM.CN trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ARM.CN's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ARM.CN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to ARM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.
CODE.CN vs GBC.CN Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while GBC.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and GBC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CODE.CN vs FXC.TO Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FXC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while FXC.TO trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas FXC.TO's P/E ratio is -73.86. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to FXC.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and FXC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
CODE.CN vs DIGI.CN Comparison
CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DIGI.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at $1.20, while DIGI.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DIGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to DIGI.CN's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CODE.CN has daily volatility of 0.00 and DIGI.CN has daily volatility of N/A.