Cypher Metaverse Inc.

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GS.NE has a market cap of 305.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while GS.NE trades at CA$34.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GS.NE's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to GS.NE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to GS.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check GS.NE's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GLXY.TO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while GLXY.TO trades at CA$37.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GLXY.TO's P/E ratio is 48.80. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to GLXY.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to GLXY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check GLXY.TO's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HUT.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while HUT.TO trades at CA$27.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HUT.TO's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to HUT.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to HUT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check HUT.TO's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DEFI.NE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while DEFI.NE trades at CA$3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DEFI.NE's P/E ratio is 72.80. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to DEFI.NE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to DEFI.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check DEFI.NE's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CF-PC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while CF-PC.TO trades at CA$23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CF-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CF-PC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to CF-PC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check CF-PC.TO's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CF.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while CF.TO trades at CA$10.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CF.TO's P/E ratio is -34.97. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CF.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to CF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check CF.TO's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BITF.TO has a market cap of 903.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while BITF.TO trades at CA$1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BITF.TO's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to BITF.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to BITF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check BITF.TO's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HODL.CN has a market cap of 200.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while HODL.CN trades at CA$1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HODL.CN's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to HODL.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to HODL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check HODL.CN's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PNP.TO has a market cap of 147.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while PNP.TO trades at CA$15.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas PNP.TO's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to PNP.TO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to PNP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check PNP.TO's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RICH.CN has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while RICH.CN trades at CA$2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas RICH.CN's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to RICH.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and RICH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RICH.CN's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CXI.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while CXI.TO trades at CA$19.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas CXI.TO's P/E ratio is 42.45. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to CXI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to CXI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check CXI.TO's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XAU.TO has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while XAU.TO trades at CA$8.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas XAU.TO's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to XAU.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to XAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check XAU.TO's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BIGG.CN has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while BIGG.CN trades at CA$0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BIGG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to BIGG.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to BIGG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check BIGG.CN's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SIX.CN has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while SIX.CN trades at CA$0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SIX.CN's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SIX.CN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and SIX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIX.CN's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FRNT.V has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while FRNT.V trades at CA$0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas FRNT.V's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to FRNT.V's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and FRNT.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRNT.V's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HOLD.NE has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while HOLD.NE trades at CA$0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas HOLD.NE's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to HOLD.NE's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to HOLD.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check HOLD.NE's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DIGI.CN has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while DIGI.CN trades at CA$0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas DIGI.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to DIGI.CN's ROE of -4.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to DIGI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check DIGI.CN's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BTC.CN has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while BTC.CN trades at CA$0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas BTC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to BTC.CN's ROE of -8.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to BTC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check BTC.CN's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SPIR.CN has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while SPIR.CN trades at CA$0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas SPIR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to SPIR.CN's ROE of +10.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN is less volatile compared to SPIR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CODE.CN.Check SPIR.CN's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ARM.CN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while ARM.CN trades at CA$0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas ARM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to ARM.CN's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and ARM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARM.CN's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GBC.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while GBC.CN trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas GBC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to GBC.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and GBC.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBC.CN's competition here

CODE.CN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, CODE.CN stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FXC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CODE.CN is priced at CA$1.20, while FXC.TO trades at CA$5.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

CODE.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.62, whereas FXC.TO's P/E ratio is -73.86. In terms of profitability, CODE.CN's ROE is -1.24%, compared to FXC.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CODE.CN and FXC.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FXC.TO's competition here