Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A.
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A. COD.L Peers
See (COD.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COD.L | £94.00 | -2.39% | 46.7B | 16.67 | £5.64 | +2.12% |
| TPK.L | £635.50 | -0.86% | 1.3B | -33.45 | -£0.19 | +2.28% |
| FAN.L | £609.00 | -0.65% | 1.2B | 30.45 | £0.20 | +1.58% |
| GEN.L | £403.00 | +0.25% | 1B | 31.00 | £0.13 | +3.10% |
| TYMN.L | £398.00 | -0.13% | 775.9M | 19.90 | £0.20 | +3.77% |
| JHD.L | £158.00 | N/A | 658.5M | 15.80 | £0.10 | +5.54% |
| NXR.L | £259.00 | +7.02% | 232.6M | 25.90 | £0.10 | +3.98% |
| SRAD.L | £145.00 | N/A | 184.7M | 11.15 | £0.13 | +5.37% |
| ECEL.L | £159.50 | +4.25% | 162.5M | 15.95 | £0.10 | +3.79% |
| EPWN.L | £99.00 | +2.06% | 134.4M | 8.25 | £0.12 | +5.15% |
Stock Comparison
COD.L vs TPK.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, TPK.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while TPK.L trades at £635.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas TPK.L's P/E ratio is -33.45. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPK.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to TPK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs FAN.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, FAN.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while FAN.L trades at £609.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas FAN.L's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FAN.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to FAN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs GEN.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, GEN.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while GEN.L trades at £403.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas GEN.L's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEN.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to GEN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs TYMN.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, TYMN.L has a market cap of 775.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while TYMN.L trades at £398.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas TYMN.L's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TYMN.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to TYMN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs JHD.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, JHD.L has a market cap of 658.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while JHD.L trades at £158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas JHD.L's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JHD.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to JHD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs NXR.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, NXR.L has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while NXR.L trades at £259.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas NXR.L's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NXR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is less volatile compared to NXR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs SRAD.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, SRAD.L has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while SRAD.L trades at £145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas SRAD.L's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRAD.L's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to SRAD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs ECEL.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, ECEL.L has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while ECEL.L trades at £159.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas ECEL.L's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECEL.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to ECEL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs EPWN.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, EPWN.L has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while EPWN.L trades at £99.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas EPWN.L's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPWN.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to EPWN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs ALU.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, ALU.L has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while ALU.L trades at £372.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas ALU.L's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALU.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to ALU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs KGP.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, KGP.L has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while KGP.L trades at £72.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas KGP.L's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGP.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. COD.L has daily volatility of 7.15 and KGP.L has daily volatility of N/A.
COD.L vs NTBR.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, NTBR.L has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while NTBR.L trades at £70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas NTBR.L's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTBR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to NTBR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs TON.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, TON.L has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while TON.L trades at £76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas TON.L's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TON.L's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to TON.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs HSM.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, HSM.L has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while HSM.L trades at £336.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas HSM.L's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSM.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to HSM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs LIFS.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, LIFS.L has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while LIFS.L trades at £6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas LIFS.L's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LIFS.L's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, COD.L is more volatile compared to LIFS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COD.L.
COD.L vs SFE.L Comparison
COD.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COD.L stands at 46.7B. In comparison, SFE.L has a market cap of 444.4K. Regarding current trading prices, COD.L is priced at £94.00, while SFE.L trades at £0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COD.L currently has a P/E ratio of 16.67, whereas SFE.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, COD.L's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFE.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. COD.L has daily volatility of 7.15 and SFE.L has daily volatility of N/A.