Cnova N.V.
Cnova N.V. (CNV.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CNV.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNV.PA | €0.09 | +0.00% | 32.2M | -0.35 | -€0.27 | N/A |
| TKWY.AS | €20.22 | +0.00% | 4B | -10.76 | -€1.88 | N/A |
| BLV.PA | €17.20 | +0.00% | 1.7B | -573.33 | -€0.03 | N/A |
| FNAC.PA | €35.25 | +0.00% | 1B | -15.88 | -€2.22 | +2.84% |
| FAST.AS | €22.20 | +0.91% | 432.1M | -14.32 | -€1.55 | N/A |
| TRACT.PA | €3.12 | +0.00% | 217.9M | -2.20 | -€1.42 | N/A |
| BBED.AS | €5.98 | -0.33% | 162.6M | 22.15 | €0.27 | +2.51% |
| ALVU.PA | €14.70 | -2.00% | 141.4M | 17.71 | €0.83 | +2.59% |
| SRP.PA | €0.70 | +0.29% | 80.4M | -4.67 | -€0.15 | N/A |
| CAFO.PA | €7.92 | +0.00% | 72.8M | 4.92 | €1.61 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CNV.PA vs TKWY.AS Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, TKWY.AS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while TKWY.AS trades at €20.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas TKWY.AS's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TKWY.AS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to TKWY.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check TKWY.AS's competition here
CNV.PA vs BLV.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, BLV.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while BLV.PA trades at €17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BLV.PA's P/E ratio is -573.33. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLV.PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to BLV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check BLV.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs FNAC.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, FNAC.PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while FNAC.PA trades at €35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas FNAC.PA's P/E ratio is -15.88. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FNAC.PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to FNAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check FNAC.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs FAST.AS Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, FAST.AS has a market cap of 432.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while FAST.AS trades at €22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas FAST.AS's P/E ratio is -14.32. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FAST.AS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to FAST.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check FAST.AS's competition here
CNV.PA vs TRACT.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, TRACT.PA has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while TRACT.PA trades at €3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas TRACT.PA's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRACT.PA's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to TRACT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check TRACT.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs BBED.AS Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, BBED.AS has a market cap of 162.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while BBED.AS trades at €5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas BBED.AS's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBED.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to BBED.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check BBED.AS's competition here
CNV.PA vs ALVU.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, ALVU.PA has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while ALVU.PA trades at €14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALVU.PA's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALVU.PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to ALVU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check ALVU.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs SRP.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, SRP.PA has a market cap of 80.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while SRP.PA trades at €0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas SRP.PA's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRP.PA's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to SRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check SRP.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs CAFO.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, CAFO.PA has a market cap of 72.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while CAFO.PA trades at €7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas CAFO.PA's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAFO.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to CAFO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check CAFO.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs ALHUN.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, ALHUN.PA has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while ALHUN.PA trades at €7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALHUN.PA's P/E ratio is -36.95. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALHUN.PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to ALHUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check ALHUN.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs ALHRS.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, ALHRS.PA has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while ALHRS.PA trades at €1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALHRS.PA's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALHRS.PA's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to ALHRS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check ALHRS.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs PSAT.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, PSAT.PA has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while PSAT.PA trades at €4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas PSAT.PA's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSAT.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to PSAT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check PSAT.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs ALX.AS Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, ALX.AS has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while ALX.AS trades at €1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALX.AS's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALX.AS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to ALX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check ALX.AS's competition here
CNV.PA vs ALVAP.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, ALVAP.PA has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while ALVAP.PA trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALVAP.PA's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALVAP.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to ALVAP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check ALVAP.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs ALUPG.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, ALUPG.PA has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while ALUPG.PA trades at €1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALUPG.PA's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALUPG.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to ALUPG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check ALUPG.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs ALEMV.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, ALEMV.PA has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while ALEMV.PA trades at €0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALEMV.PA's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALEMV.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to ALEMV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check ALEMV.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs MLBBO.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, MLBBO.PA has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while MLBBO.PA trades at €2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MLBBO.PA's P/E ratio is 244.00. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLBBO.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is less volatile compared to MLBBO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check MLBBO.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs MLCLP.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, MLCLP.PA has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while MLCLP.PA trades at €2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MLCLP.PA's P/E ratio is -81.33. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLCLP.PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to MLCLP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check MLCLP.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs ALVIA.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, ALVIA.PA has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while ALVIA.PA trades at €10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALVIA.PA's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALVIA.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to ALVIA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check ALVIA.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs ALSPT.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, ALSPT.PA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while ALSPT.PA trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALSPT.PA's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALSPT.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to ALSPT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check ALSPT.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs MLTRO.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, MLTRO.PA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while MLTRO.PA trades at €2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas MLTRO.PA's P/E ratio is -49.60. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLTRO.PA's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to MLTRO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check MLTRO.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs ALPHS.PA Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, ALPHS.PA has a market cap of 2K. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while ALPHS.PA trades at €0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas ALPHS.PA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALPHS.PA's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to ALPHS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check ALPHS.PA's competition here
CNV.PA vs GVNV.AS Comparison April 2026
CNV.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CNV.PA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, GVNV.AS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CNV.PA is priced at €0.09, while GVNV.AS trades at €28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CNV.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -0.35, whereas GVNV.AS's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, CNV.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVNV.AS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CNV.PA is more volatile compared to GVNV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CNV.PA.Check GVNV.AS's competition here